Abstract
Objective This study aims to explore the effects of miR-223-3p and miR-155-5p on epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) and migration in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).
Methodology EMT markers (E-cadherin, N-cadherin, P120 catenin (P120ctn), and vimentin) expression was determined by qRT-PCR and western blot analysis in SCC-9 cells which overexpress miR-155-5p and/or not express miR-223-3p. Scratch assays and Transwell migration assays were conducted to evaluate cell migration ability.
Results When miR-223-3p was inhibited in OSCC cells, P120ctn and E-cadherin mRNA levels were dramatically downregulated (P<0.05), while N-cadherin levels were significantly upregulated, and the migration ability of OSCC cells increased. The overexpression of miR-155-5p in OSCC cells upregulated miR-223-3p significantly (34-fold) compared to the control group. It also led to significant downregulation of the mRNA of P120ctn and E-cadherin and significant upregulation of the mRNA of N-cadherin and Vimentin (P<0.05). Meanwhile, the migratory ability of OSCC cells significantly increased. When miR-155-5p was overexpressed while miR-223-3p was inhibited, the highest expression of E-cadherin and P120ctn mRNA and the lowest expression of N-cadherin(P<0.05) was observed. Simultaneously, tumor cell migration was significantly facilitated.
Conclusion miR-223-3p inhibits the migration of OSCC cells, while miR-155-5p can elevate the miR-223-3p mRNA expression. The simultaneous miR-155-5p overexpression and miR-223-3p inhibition can activate pEMT, increasing OSCC migration in vitro. This provides a novel approach and potential target for the effective treatment of OSCC.
miR-223-3p; miR-155-5p; Migration; Oral squamous cell carcinoma; EMT
Introduction
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) poses a significant public health concern, representing 80% of oral and maxillofacial cancers, with an approximate 50% 5-year survival rate.1 Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), a crucial developmental process2 plays a significant role in the metastasis of various cancers, including those of the lung, breast, ovary, liver, stomach, and colon.3 It refers to the biological process through which epithelial cells transform into cells with a mesenchymal phenotype. In OSCC, EMT’s effect on tumor recurrence and metastasis is a significant prognostic factor.4,5
During EMT, there is a downregulation of epithelial markers, such as E-cadherin (E-cad), α-catenin, and β-catenin, and an upregulation of mesenchymal markers including N-cadherin (N-cad) and vimentin (Vim).6 This process leads to aggressive characteristics in epithelial cells, such as reduced cell adhesion, loss of tight junctions, altered cell polarity, and increased mobility. However, many studies have shown that cancer cells can stably acquire one or more partial EMT (pEMT) phenotypes displaying tumor-migration potential, and that they can exhibit a mixture of epithelial and mesenchymal characteristics at the molecular and/or morphological level.7,8,9
E-cad plays a crucial role in maintaining cell-cell junctions10 and its downregulation is a hallmark of EMT.11 Meanwhile, it has been well-documented that P120 catenin (P120ctn) interacts with E-cad, regulating its stability and expression.12,13,14Moreover, reduced P120ctn expression is associated with downregulated E-cad, promoting OSCC invasion and migration.15 Additionally, N-cad promotes tumor cell invasion and metastasis by indirectly affecting the synthesis and transcription of E-cad.16 Accumulating evidence has revealed that in OSCC with lymph node metastasis, N-cad expression is increased, while E-cad expression is reduced, suggesting a cadherin transformation from E-cad to N-cad in these tissues.17,18 Furthermore, Vim is upregulated in various epithelial tumors, including OSCC, and is associated with tumor invasion and poor prognosis.19,20 In addition, in OSCC, Vim expression is elevated in poorly differentiated and lymph node metastatic tumors, indicating the acquisition of an EMT phenotype.16,17,18,21
Intriguingly, recent evidence has uncovered that the human genome dedicates a relatively small proportion of its transcribed RNA to protein coding, while the majority consists of non-coding RNAs, such as microRNAs (miRNAs), small interfering RNAs, and long non-coding RNAs.22 Despite their low abundance, endogenous miRNAs regulate 30% of genes in the human genome by binding to the target mRNA’s 3’ untranslated region (3’-UTR), leading to translation inhibition or degradation,23 playing critical roles in tumor formation,24 occurrence, and development.25
Recent studies attached importance to the role of miR-223-3p and miR-155-5p in various cancers. The overexpression of miR-223-3p promotes colon cancer progression through the downregulation of P120ctn and E-cad, and the upregulation of Vim, leading to increased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.26,27 Conversely, overexpressing miR-233-3p in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells suppressed cell proliferation and migration.28 The role of miR-223-3p in OSCC via EMT markers such as P120ctn, E-cad, N-cad, and Vim remains to be confirmed. Moreover, miR-155-5p, highly expressed in various tumors,29,30 including OSCC, is associated with metastasis, poor prognosis, and EMT progression.31,32 Given their inclusion in the same miRNA subnetwork across 2532 solid cancers,33 both miR-155-5p and miR-223-3p may contribute to tumor pathogenesis.
The experiments described here provide a theoretical basis for OSCC-targeted therapy by exploring the correlation between miR-223-3p and miR-155-5p and EMT markers and their mechanism in the migration of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells.
Methodology
Cell culture and transfection
Human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell strain SCC-9 was purchased from Shanghai Fuheng Biotechnology Co., Ltd. SCC-9 cells were maintained in DMEM/F-12 [HAM]1:1 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum and 0.4 μg/ml hydrocortisone at 37°C in humidified air with 5% CO2.
SCC-9 cells were divided into 4 groups based on the nucleotide transfected: negative control group (NC), miR-223-3p inhibitor (miR-223-3p(-)), miR-223-3p inhibitor/miR-155-5p mimics group (miR-223-3p(-)/miR-155-5p(+), and miR-155-5p mimics group (miR-155-5p(+)). Transfection was conducted using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Extraction of microRNA and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)
The total RNA and miRNAs were isolated using the miRcute miRNA Isolation Kit (DP501, Tiagen, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration and purity of the extracted mRNA and miRNAs were determined using a NanoDrop One ultra-microphotometer (ThermoFisher, USA). The complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized using a SuperScript™ IV First-Strand Synthesis System (for microRNAs, #18091050, ThermoFisher Scientific) or a NovoScript®Plus All-in-one 1st Strand cDNA Synthesis SuperMix (for RNAs, E047-01B, Novoprotein) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The resulting cDNAs were amplified on an A600 Super Gradient Thermo Cycler (LongGene, Hangzhou, China). The relative expression levels of miR-223-3p, E-cad, N-cad, P120ctn, and Vim, were calculated using the 2-Ctmethod. U6 and GAPDH served as the internal references for microRNAs and RNAs, respectively. All primers used in this study (Figure 1) were synthesized by Borui Biotechnology Col, Ltd (Xiamen, China).
Western blot analysis
SCC-9 cells were harvested and solubilized using RIPA lysis buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors (P1045, Beyotime, 1:50 dilution) and EDTA (1:50 dilution), followed by centrifugation (4°C, 10,000 rpm, 5 minutes). The cleared cell lysate was collected and protein concentration was determined using a Bradford protein concentration determination kit (P0006, Beyotime).34 An equal amount of total cell lysate was separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. Subsequently, the membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C (Figure 2). Then, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature. The enhanced chemiluminescence reagent was used to develop the membranes, and images were captured using a ChemiDoc imaging system (BioRad, USA) and the gray scale of the bands were analyzed with ImageJ 1.45 s software (National Institutes of Health, USA) to reflect the relative protein expression levels.
Cell migration assays
For scratch assays, SCC-9 cells under the indicated conditions were cultured in six-well plates until confluent. Scratches were then made using a 10 μL pipette tip. After the detached cells were washed off, the adherent cells were photographed under a microscope at the beginning (0 h) and the end (18 h) of the experiment, capturing images from five random fields. Wound closure was reflected by the closure rate (0 h scratch width – 18 h scratch width)/0 h scratch width × 100%.
For the transwell migration assay, 100 μL of serum-free medium containing 1.5×105 SCC-9 cells under the indicated conditions were loaded into each insert of the upper chamber. Then, the upper chamber was placed into 12-well plates containing 200 μL of normal culture medium. After 18 hours, un-migrated cells were removed with a cotton swab and the migrated cells were washed with PBS and stained with 0.1% crystal violet (10 min, at room temperature). Subsequently, the migrated cells were photographed and counted in six random fields of each well.
Statistical analysis
All results were analyzed using the SPSS software (version 23.0, IBM). The data are expressed as means ± standard deviation (means ± SD), and all graphs presenting means ± SD represent data from at least 3 independent experiments. Pairwise comparisons were made using the t-test, and one-way ANOVA was performed for multiple comparisons, while LSD-t test was used for pairwise comparisons between groups. The two-sided test level was α=0.05, and P<0.05 indicated that the difference was statistically significant.
Results
Effects of miR-155-5p on miR-223-3p expression in OSCC
SCC-9 cells were transfected with miR-223-3p inhibitor and miR-155-5p mimic, either separately or together. miR-223-3p and miR-155-5p expression was subsequently determined in the cells using RT-PCR analysis. We found that miR-223-3p expression was significantly elevated when the miR-155-5p mimic was transfected, and it decreased to 70% with miR-223-3p inhibition transfection. Remarkably, the suppressive effects of the miR-223-3p inhibitor were neutralized by miR-155-5p overexpression, as reflected by the 34-fold increase in miR-223-3p expression upon miR-155-5p mimic transfection. Meanwhile, miR-155-5p overexpression dramatically increased (184-fold) miR-223-3p (P<0.05) production. Together, these findings suggest a regulatory role of miR-155-5p on miR-223-3p expression in OSCC.
Regulation of EMT markers by miR-223-3p inhibitor and miR-155-5p mimic in OSCC cells
miR-223-3p is known to exert an inhibitory effect on EMT in nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells.28 Thus, we examined whether this regulatory effect could be detected in OSCC. In SCC-9 cells, inhibiting miR-223-3p led to significant decreases in the expressions of E-cad and P120ctn, along with a significant increase in Vim and N-cad, compared to the control group (Figure 3A, P<0.05). Our data demonstrated that overexpression of miR-155-5p resulted in miR-223-3p upregulation. By qRT-PCR analysis, following the overexpression of miR-155-5p, the expression of E-cad and P120ctn, which were initially suppressed by the inhibition of miR-223-3p, exhibited an increase (P<0.05). However, miR-223-3p(-)/miR-155-5p(+) showed the highest expression of E-cad and P120ctn mRNA and the lowest expression of N-cad (P<0.05). To further validate our findings, we performed western blot analysis to assess the protein levels of the EMT markers. Surprisingly, despite a significant difference observed at the transcriptional level, the variations of the EMT markers at the protein level were marginal (P>0.05, Figure 3B and 3C).
Effects of miR-223-3p and miR-155-5p on the expression of EMT markers in OSCC cells. (A) Results of RT-PCR showing the relative expression levels of EMT markers in SCC-9 cells under indicated conditions. (B) Representative images of western blot analysis showing the expression levels of EMT markers in SCC-9 cells under the indicated conditions. (C) Results of western blotting showing the relative expression levels of EMT markers in SCC-9 cells under the indicated conditions
Effects of transfection of miR-223-3p inhibitor and miR-155-5p mimic respectively or simultaneously on SCC-9 cell migration
We further investigated the impact of miR-223-3p and miR-155-5p on OSCC cells. Considering their influence on EMT markers, we reasoned that miR-223-3p and miR-155-5p might regulate the mobility of OSCC cells. To test this hypothesis, cell migration assays were conducted using SCC-9 cells transfected with or without altered miR-223-3p and/or miR-155-5p. Scratch assays revealed that inhibiting miR-223-3p facilitated wound closure compared to the control group (20.00% vs. 9.75%, P<0.01). In addition, overexpressing miR-155-5p also promoted cell mobility as reflected by enhanced wound closure compared to the control group (19.50% vs. 9.75%, P<0.05). Cells in the miR-223-3p(-)/miR-155-5p(+) showed the highest migratory capability (28.75% vs. 16.7%, P<0.05) (Figure 4A).
Both miR-223-3p and miR-155-5p are involved in SCC-9 cell migration. Representative images of (A) scratch assay and (B) transwell migration assay demonstrating the migration of SCC-9 cells under the indicated conditions
Meanwhile, transwell migration assays revealed comparable results. We observed more migrated SCC-9 cells from miR-223-3p(-) group and miR-155-5p(+) group compared to the negative control group (P<0.001). Remarkably, the cells exhibited the highest migratory capacity when miR-155-5p mimic and miR-223-3p inhibitor were co-transfected (P<0.0001) (Figure 4B).
Discussion
OSCC accounts for 95% of head and neck tumors, with over 300,000 cases annually,35 making it a major public health concern.1 MicroRNAs play a regulatory role in diseases, including OSCC,36by regulating protein-coding genes. miR-223-3p is downregulated in OSCC tissues,37 and is involved in tumor proliferation and migration by targeting FBXW7.38 These data strongly suggest that miR-223-3p is a multifunctional regulatory miRNA involved in the pathogenesis of OSCC in humans.
In our study, inhibiting miR-223-3p promoted EMT and cell mobility in OSCC cells, as evidenced by decreased epithelial markers (E-cad and P120ctn) and increased mesenchymal markers (Vim and N-cad). This aligns with previous studies showing lower miR-223-3p expression in OSCC patients.37 Upregulation of miR-223-3p in OSCC cells inhibits cell functions, such as proliferation, migration, and survival, by targeting SHOX237or NLRP3,39 leading to the inhibition of OSCC invasion. Separate studies in gingival cancer also found that miR-223 inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis.40 miR-223-3p had a diametrically opposite effect on EMT marker expression in colon cancer, probably because in colon cancer dual luciferase reporter assays showed that miR-223-3p directly targeted P120ctn and downregulated P120ctn expression,41 whereas in SCC-9 miR-223-3p may also target other genes, resulting in upregulation of P120ctn.
Similarly, in our study, overexpression of miR-155-5p decreased E-cad and P120ctn while increasing N-cad and Vim, consistent with promotion of EMT and an invasive OSCC phenotype. This finding is consistent with that of Wu et al., showing that miR-155-5p enhances OSCC invasion and metastasis through EMT regulation.42 Given the parallels between miR-223-3p inhibition and miR-155-5p overexpression, we speculate that these four EMT markers are co-regulated downstream targets in SCC-9 cells.
Notably, miR-155-5p positively regulated miR-223-3p, with a 184-fold increase in the miR-155-5p(+) group and 35-fold increase in the miR-223-3p(-)/miR-155-5p(+) group. This reveals an interacting miRNA network that cooperatively regulates EMT and the invasive phenotype. Indeed, prior studies found miRNA-miRNA interactions influence tumor growth and metastasis by regulating the expression of miRNA and mRNA.43,44,45
Surprisingly, despite this upregulation of the tumor suppressive miR-223-3p, migration was not further suppressed by miR-155-5p overexpression. Instead, significant migration was still observed, indicating that miR-155-5p’s dominant pro-invasive effect overwhelms miR-223-3p’s anti-migration influence. This reveals miR-155-5p likely has a greater functional influence on cell migration, even though it positively regulates miR-223-3p expression. miR-155-5p appeared to have a greater influence on tumor cell migration.
Moreover, cells in the miR-223-3p(-)/miR-155-5p(+) showed the highest migratory capability with the highest mRNA expression level of E-cad and p120ctn and the lowest N-cad expression.46 EMT often associates with an almost complete loss of membranous localization of E-cad, i.e., a “cadherin switch” from E-cad(epithelial marker) to N-cad(mesenchymal marker).47 Recent findings suggest that EMT and MET are not all-or-none responses, i.e., switching between purely epithelial and purely mesenchymal phenotypes48 but rather multi-state processes called “partial EMT,” which can lead to collective migration. The upregulated expression of E-cad supports a special, “tether-mediated” mode of collective migration, that enhances both stromal infiltration capacity and the efficient formation of metastases.49 The lowest expression of N-cad46 may be attributed to that it is a late EMT marker expressed only after full EMT.
The discrepancy between mRNA and protein expression of EMT markers in SSC-9 cells, especially when miR-223-3p inhibitor and miR-155-5p mimic were co-transfected, indicates a need for further research to better understand the communication between these two miRNAs in OSCC.
The current study has some limitations. While providing valuable insights, the current study suggests the need for further investigation. Though we focused the discussion on one or two lead possibilities based on prior literature, there may be multiple mechanisms underlying the observed phenotypes. Follow-up analyses are warranted to explore alternative explanations. Additionally, as only the SCC-9 cell line was employed here, examining other oral cancer cell models would strengthen confidence in the findings and account for potential cell-specific effects. Expanding the experimental approaches could yield deeper mechanistic clarity while reinforcing the key conclusions made.
In summary, our investigation revealed the functional roles and influencing factors of miR-223-3p and miR-155-5p in OSCC. We established that miR-223-3p acts as a negative regulator in the development of OSCC and is closely related to EMT. The simultaneous miR-155-5p overexpression and miR-223-3p inhibition can activate pEMT increasing OSCC migration. Currently, few studies have examined the crosstalk between miR-223-3p and miR-155-5p, warranting further investigation to elucidate the primary regulatory mechanism of miR-155-5p on miR-223-3p. Such insights may pave the way for novel targeted therapies for OSCC.
References
- 1 - Cui Z, Liu Z. [The expression of c-met and cox-2 protein in the tissues of oral leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma]. J Prac Stomatol. 2019;35(6):839-42. Chinese
-
2 - Debaugnies M, Rodriguez-Acebes S, Blondeau J, Blondeau J, Parent MA, Zocco M. RHOJ controls EMT-associated resistance to chemotherapy. Nature. 2023;616(7955):168-75. doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05838-7
» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-05838-7 -
3 - Huang Y, Hong W, Wei X. The molecular mechanisms and therapeutic strategies of EMT in tumor progression and metastasis. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15(1):129-55. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01347-8
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s13045-022-01347-8 -
4 - Weisse J, Rosemann J, Muller L, Kappler M, Eckert AW, Glaß M, et al. Identification of lymphocyte cell-specific protein-tyrosine kinase (LCK) as a driver for invasion and migration of oral cancer by tumor heterogeneity exploitation. Mol Cancer. 2021;20(1):88-110. doi: 10.1186/s12943-021-01384-w
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-021-01384-w -
5 - Casili G, Scuderi SA, Lanza M, Filippone A, Mannino D, Giuffrida R, et al. Therapeutic potential of BAY-117082, a ´s elective NLRP3 inflammasome inhibitor, on metastatic evolution in human Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma (OSCC). Cancers (Basel). 2023;15(10):2796-810. doi: 10.3390/cancers15102796
» https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15102796 -
6 - Ozel M, Baskol M, Akalin H, Baskol G. Suberoylanilide Hydroxamic Acid (SAHA) reduces fibrosis markers and deactivates human stellate cells via the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT). Cell Biochem Biophys. 2021;79(2):349-57. doi: 10.1007/s12013-021-00974-1
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s12013-021-00974-1 -
7 - Bierie B, Pierce SE, Kroeger C, Stover DG, Pattabiraman DR, Thiru P, et al. Integrin-ß4 identifies cancer stem cell-enriched populations of partially mesenchymal carcinoma cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(12):E2337-46. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1618298114
» https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618298114 -
8 - Burger GA, Danen EH, Beltman JB. Deciphering epithelial-mesenchymal transition regulatory networks in cancer through computational approaches. Front Oncol .2017;7:162-75. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00162
» https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2017.00162 -
9 - Li H, Courtois ET, Sengupta D, Tan Y, Chen KH, Goh JJ, et al. Reference component analysis of single-cell transcriptomes elucidates cellular heterogeneity in human colorectal tumors. Nat Genet. 2017;49(5):708-18. doi: 10.1038/ng.3818
» https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.3818 -
10 - Cabrera AJ, Gumbiner BM, Kwon YV. Remodeling of E-cadherin subcellular localization during cell dissemination. Mol Biol Cell. 2023;34(5):ar46. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E23-03-0087
» https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E23-03-0087 -
11 - Wang W, Jin J, Zhou Z, Wang Y, Min K, Zuo X, et al. Snail inhibits metastasis via regulation of E-cadherin and is associated with prognosis in colorectal cancer. Oncol Lett. 2023;25(6):271-80. doi: 10.3892/ol.2023.13857
» https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.13857 -
12 - Xie J, Zhou J, Xia J, Zeng Y, Huang G, Zeng W, et al. Phospholipase C delta 1 inhibits WNT/beta-catenin and EGFR-FAK-ERK signaling and is disrupted by promoter CpG methylation in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Epigenetics. 2023;15(1):30-44. doi: 10.1186/s13148-023-01448-2
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-023-01448-2 -
13 - Hu Y, Zhu S, Xu R, Zeng Y, Huang G, Zeng W, et al. Delta-catenin attenuates medulloblastoma cell invasion by targeting EMT pathway. Front Genet. 2022;13:867872. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.867872
» https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2022.867872 -
14 - Chen Z, Dong M, Deng F. [The expression of PKC, P120ctn and E-cad in oral squamous carcinoma]. J Pract Stomatol. 2014;61-5. Chinese. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3733.2014.01.015
» https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-3733.2014.01.015 -
15 - Chen Z, Ji Q, Zheng X. Effect of P120ctn silence and overexpression on cell migration and invasion of oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Sci Res. 2016;1141-5. Chinese. doi: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2016.11.007
» https://doi.org/10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2016.11.007 -
16 - Hakim SG, Taubitz C, Hoppe S, Steller D, Rades D, Ribbat-Idel J, et al. Prognostic impact of the loss of E-cadherin and de novo expression of N-cadherin at the invasive front of primary and recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1151879-1151893. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1151879
» https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1151879 -
17 - Gravdal K, Halvorsen OJ, Haukaas SA, Akslen LA. A switch from E-cadherin to N-cadherin expression indicates epithelial to mesenchymal transition and is of strong and independent importance for the progress of prostate cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13(23):7003-11. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1263
» https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1263 -
18 - Miao Y, Li AL, Wang L, Fan CF, Zhang XP, Xu HT, et al. Overexpression of NEDD9 is associated with altered expression of E-Cadherin, beta-Catenin and N-Cadherin and predictive of poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer. Pathol Oncol Res. 2013;19(2):281-6. doi:10.1007/s12253-012-9580-2
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-012-9580-2 -
19 - Jang HR, Shin SB, Kim CH, Won JY, Xu R, Kim DE, et al. PLK1/vimentin signaling facilitates immune escape by recruiting Smad2/3 to PD-L1 promoter in metastatic lung adenocarcinoma. Cell Death Differ. 2021;28(9):2745-64. doi: 10.1038/s41418-021-00781-4
» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41418-021-00781-4 -
20 - Fei X, Wang S, Meng Y, Shi L, Lei S, Dongxia Q, et al. [Expression of SOX2 in OSCC and its correlation with EMT]. J Oral Sci Res. 2017;33(11):1209-12. Chinese. doi: 10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2017.11.019
» https://doi.org/10.13701/j.cnki.kqyxyj.2017.11.019 -
21 - Ruyu C, Rui H, Shanghua W, Xiang D, Dandan D, Zhenzhong F, et al. Expression and clinical significance of YAP, E-cadherin and Vimentin in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Acta Univ Med Anhui. 2018;53(12):1964-7. Chinese. doi: 10.19405/j.cnki.issn1000-1492.2018.12.032
» https://doi.org/10.19405/j.cnki.issn1000-1492.2018.12.032 - 22 - Ahmad A. Non-coding RNAs: a tale of junk turning into treasure. Noncoding RNA Res. 2017;1(1):1-2. doi:10.1016/j.ncrna.2016.12.001
-
23 - Goodall GJ, Wickramasinghe VO. RNA in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2021;21(1):22-36. doi: 10.1038/s41568-020-00306-0
» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-020-00306-0 - 24 - Wang L, Liu Y, Gao Q, Hu R. Hsa_circ_0005085 may suppress cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma growth and metastasis through targeting the miR-186-5p/LAMC1 axis. Skin Res Technol. 2023;29(6):e13321. doi:10.1111/srt.13321
- 25 - Acunzo M, Romano G, Wernicke D, Croce CM. MicroRNA and cancer-a brief overview. Adv Biol Regul. 2015;57:1-9. doi:10.1016/j.jbior.2014.09.013
-
26 - Liu L, Zhang C, Li X, Sun W, Qin S, Qin L, et al. miR-223 promotes colon cancer by directly targeting p120 catenin. Oncotarget. 2017;8(38):63764-79. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19541
» https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19541 -
27 - Zhang J, Luo X, Li H, Yue X, Deng L, Cui Y, et al. MicroRNA-223 functions as an oncogene in human colorectal cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 2014;32(1):115-20. doi:10.3892/or.2014.3173
» https://doi.org/10.3892/or.2014.3173 -
28 - Gao L, Xiong X. MiR-223 inhibits the proliferation, invasion and EMT of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells by targeting SSRP1. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2018;11(9):4374-84. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.59876
» https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.59876 -
29 - Sun X, Guan G, Dai Y, Zhao P, Liu L, Wang Q, et al. microRNA-155-5p initiates childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia by regulating the IRF4/CDK6/CBL axis. Lab Invest. 2022;102(4):411-21. doi: 10.1038/s41374-021-00638-x
» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41374-021-00638-x -
30 - Al-Moghrabi N, Al-Showimi M, Al-Yousef N, AlOtai L. MicroRNA-155-5p, reduced by curcumin-re-expressed hypermethylated BRCA1, is a molecular biomarker for cancer risk in BRCA1-methylation Carriers. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(10):9021-36. doi: 10.3390/ijms24109021
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24109021 -
31 - Mehterov N, Sacconi A, Pulito C, Vladimirov B, Haralanov G, Pazardjikliev D, et al. A novel panel of clinically relevant miRNAs signature accurately differentiates oral cancer from normal mucosa. Front Oncol. 2022;12:1072579. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1072579
» https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.1072579 -
32 - Kim H, Yang JM, Ahn SH, Jeong WJ, Chung JH, Paik JH. Potential oncogenic role and prognostic implication of MicroRNA-155-5p in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2018;38(9):5193-200. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.12842
» https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12842 -
33 - Volinia S, Galasso M, Costinean S, Tagliavini L, Gamberoni G, Drusco A, et al. Reprogramming of miRNA networks in cancer and leukemia. Genome Res. 2010;20(5):589-99. doi: 10.1101/gr.098046.109
» https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.098046.109 -
34 - Wang S. [Study on the mechanism of p120ctn promoting acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs in non-small cell lung cancer [dissertation]. Taiwan: China Medical University; 2020. Chinese. doi: 10.27652/d.cnki.gzyku.2020.000065.
» https://doi.org/10.27652/d.cnki.gzyku.2020.000065 -
35 - Miranda-Filho A, Bray F. Global patterns and trends in cancers of the lip, tongue and mouth. Oral Oncol. 2020;102:104551. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104551
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104551 -
36 - Patel A, Patel P, Mandlik D, Patel K, Malaviya P, Johar K, et al. A novel 3-miRNA network regulates tumour progression in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Biomark Res. 2023;11(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s40364-023-00505-5
» https://doi.org/10.1186/s40364-023-00505-5 -
37 - Sun C, Liu XH, Sun YR. MiR-223-3p inhibits proliferation and metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma by targeting SHOX2. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2019;23(16):6927-34. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201908_18732
» https://doi.org/10.26355/eurrev_201908_18732 -
38 - Jiang L, Lv L, Liu X, Jiang X, Yin Q, Hao Y, et al. MiR-223 promotes oral squamous cell carcinoma proliferation and migration by regulating FBXW7. Cancer Biomark. 2019;24(3):325-34. doi: 10.3233/CBM-181877
» https://doi.org/10.3233/CBM-181877 - 39 - Zhu Z, Yang L, Wang Q, Qu XW, Xiong J. [The role of miR-223-3p in the proliferation, migration and invasion of oral squamous cell carcinoma cells]. J Clin Stomatol. 2021;37(10):587-91. Chinese.
-
40 - Tachibana H, Sho R, Takeda Y, Zhang X, Yoshida Y, Narimatsu H, et al. Circulating miR-223 in oral cancer: its potential as a novel diagnostic biomarker and therapeutic target. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159693
» https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0159693 -
41 - Liu L, Zhang C, Li X, Sun W, Qin S, Qin L, et al. miR-223 promotes colon cancer by directly targeting p120 catenin. Oncotarget. 2017;8(38):63764-79. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19541
» https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.19541 -
42 - Wu M, Duan Q, Liu X, Zhang P, Fu Y, Zhang Z, et al. MiR-155-5p promotes oral cancer progression by targeting chromatin remodeling gene ARID2. Biomed Pharmacother. 2020;122:109696. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109696
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109696 -
43 - Borzi C, Calzolari L, Centonze G, Milione M, Sozzi G, Fortunato O. mir-660-p53-mir-486 network: a new key regulatory pathway in lung tumorigenesis. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(1):222-33. doi: 10.3390/ijms18010222
» https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18010222 -
44 - Wang D, Sun X, Wei Y, Liang H, Yuan M, Jin F, et al. Nuclear miR-122 directly regulates the biogenesis of cell survival oncomiR miR-21 at the posttranscriptional level. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(4):2012-29. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1254
» https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1254 -
45 - Matkovich SJ, Hu Y, Dorn GW 2nd. Regulation of cardiac microRNAs by cardiac microRNAs. Circ Res. 2013;113(1):62-71. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300975
» https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300975 -
46 - Haerinck J, Berx G. Partial EMT takes the lead in cancer metastasis. Dev Cell. 2021;56(23):3174-6. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2021.11.012
» https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2021.11.012 -
47 - Andriani F, Bertolini G, Facchinetti F, Baldoli E, Moro M, Casalini P, et al. Conversion to stem-cell state in response to microenvironmental cues is regulated by balance between epithelial mesenchymal features in lung cancer cells. Mol Oncol. 2015;10(2):253-71. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261
» https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261 -
48 - Nieto MA. Epithelial plasticity: a common themein embryonic and cancer cells. Science. 2013;342:1234850-74. doi:10.1126/science.1234850
» https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234850 -
49 - Elisha Y, Kalchenko V, Kuznetsov Y, Geiger B. Dual role of E-cadherin in the regulation of invasive collective migration of mammary carcinoma cells. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4986-500. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22940-3
» https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22940-3
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.








