Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Occurrence of Physoclypeus farinosus Hendel (Diptera: Lauxaniidae) in flowerheads of Asteraceae (Asterales)

Ocorrência de Physoclypeus farinosus Hendel (Diptera: Lauxaniidae) em capítulos de Asteraceae (Asterales)

Abstracts

The occurrence of Physoclypeus farinosus Hendel in flowerheads of Asteraceae from different Brazilian localities is presented. The use of this resource by this fly is discussed.

Neotropical Region; floral resource; insect-plant interaction; Compositae


É apresentada a ocorrência de Physoclypeus farinosus Hendel em capítulos de Asteraceae de várias localidades brasileiras. Discute-se brevemente o uso desse recurso por essa mosca.

Região Neotropical; recurso floral; interação inseto-planta; Compositae


SCIENTIFIC NOTE

Occurrence of Physoclypeus farinosus Hendel (Diptera: Lauxaniidae) in flowerheads of Asteraceae (Asterales)

Ocorrência de Physoclypeus farinosus Hendel (Diptera: Lauxaniidae) em capítulos de Asteraceae (Asterales)

Vera C. SilvaI; Ramon L. MelloII

IDepto. Ciências Biológicas, Faculdade de Ciências e Letras de Assis - UNESP, Av. Dom Antonio, 2100 19.806-900, Assis, SP, vcsilva@assis.unesp.br

IIMuseu de Zoologia da Univ. de São Paulo. Av. Nazaré 481, 04263-000, São Paulo, SP, ramonluciano@usp.br

ABSTRACT

The occurrence of Physoclypeus farinosus Hendel in flowerheads of Asteraceae from different Brazilian localities is presented. The use of this resource by this fly is discussed.

Key words: Neotropical Region, floral resource, insect-plant interaction, Compositae

RESUMO

É apresentada a ocorrência de Physoclypeus farinosus Hendel em capítulos de Asteraceae de várias localidades brasileiras. Discute-se brevemente o uso desse recurso por essa mosca.

Palavras-chave: Região Neotropical, recurso floral, interação inseto-planta, Compositae

The family Lauxaniidae, one of the largest families of schizophoran Diptera, is composed of 149 genera and nearly 1550 species worldwide, except Antarctica (Kim 1994). In the Neotropics they comprise 62 genera, with a described fauna of nearly 400 species (Silva 1993, Gaimari & Silva in press). The family exhibits a variety of morphological patterns; adults are small, rarely exceeding 6 mm in length, with various patterns of marks and colors (Shewell 1987).

The lauxaniids are known to be mainly saprophagous in their larval stage, found in fallen leaves, decaying grasses, under bark of trunks in decomposition, and in nests of birds and mammals. Nevertheless, the majority of that data was obtained from non-Neotropical regions and focus on less than 1.5% of the known lauxaniid species (Miller 1977a, b; Miller & Foote 1975, 1976). Few species of lauxaniids have been reported as phytophagous found in roots, stems and leaves of clover (Marchal 1897, Oettingen 1934), in ovary galls of violets (Viola sp.) (Kaltenbach 1874), and in phylloclades of Opuntia spp. cacti (Hering 1951). Needham (1948) cited Spilochroa ornata Johnson as a lauxaniid species in flowerheads of Bidens pilosa (Asteraceae); currently this fly species is included in the Heleomyzidae (Thompson 2000).

Oldroyd (1964, apud Miller 1977b) suggested that their larval alimentary content consist of decomposed plant matter, including rotten trunk material, mold of leaves and peat soil. Within the family there has been some degree of saprophytic specialization, including the habit of forming mines between the epidermal layers of fallen leaves. Hering (1951) considers that although those larvae technically build mines, their behavior represents specialization of saprophagy rather than a phytophagous existence. Miller & Foote (1976) indicated a possibility that the larvae, in that case, are feeding on the microorganisms such as fungi, yeast and bacteria of the parenchyma in decay. According to Miller & Foote (1976), another line of specialization includes the utilization of material in decomposition found in nests, mainly of birds. Due to the great amount of data indicating a saprophagous existence for lauxaniid larvae, any data concerning phytophagy, according to Miller (1977b), must be cautiously considered. In some cases, it is probable that the larvae are feeding in plant tissue already attacked by fungi.

Miller (1977b) summarized the few available data for the Neotropical region, citing the larval microhabitat for species in two genera (Allominettia latelimbata (Macquart) – orange fruit in decomposition; Poecilominettia sp. – in a South American cuckoo nest).

Kevan & Baker (1983), for California, and Gonçalves-Alvim & Macedo (1998), for Minas Gerais, Brazil, reported that adult lauxaniids are frequently seen visiting flowers, although their activities are not specified. They could be feeding on nectar or pollen, or visiting for copulation or oviposition. Kato et al. (1995) observed specimens of a species of Homoneura Wulp feeding on nectar of the male strobile of Gnetum cuspidatum (Gnetaceae); the larvae feed within fallen leaves, while the adults may be attracted by the odor emitted by the strobiles that may be similar to some fungal odors.

The Asteraceae is the largest plant family on Earth, with around 23,000 species, being notably more abundant in open environments and/or non-forest. It is characterized by having its flowers being reduced and organized in the form of a flowerhead (Bremer 1994). Those flowerheads supply food in a sheltered feeding site to a rich and various fauna of endophagous insects (Lewinsohn 1991). In the South and Southeast of Brazil there are three dipteran families among the main endophages: Agromyzidae, Cecidomyiidae and Tephritidae (Lewinsohn 1991, Prado et al. 2002, Almeida et al. 2006).

Hendel (1907) described the genus Physoclypeus designating the type species as Chlorops flavus Wiedemann. The genus currently is composed of seven species, distributed from the United States of America to Argentina (Silva 1993). Presently, there are no published data on their biology. Among the species, Physoclypeus farinosus Hendel was originally described from material from Bolivia; nowadays the species is known from some localities in Brazil and Argentina (Mello & Silva, unpubl. data).

The studied material in this work proceeds from collections made in 50 areas in five Brazilian states (Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná, Santa Catarina and Rio Grande do Sul). More detailed data on the collecting sites is given in Almeida et al. (2004). At those sites, Asteraceae flowerheads were collected and taken to the laboratory, kept in plastic jars covered with net cloth until the adult emergence was complete. Specimens of Lauxaniidae in Asteraceae inflorescences were obtained in thirteen sites, listed in the next paragraph. Another set of lauxaniids, collected in flowerheads of Asteraceae by Gonçalves-Alvim & Macedo (1998), was also analyzed in this study. Those two sets of specimens were sent to the first author for identification. Several specimens had not totally emerged and could not have the sex determined. After identification, the material was deposited in the collection of the Museu de Zoologia da USP/SP (MZUP).

All the 180 specimens received for analysis were identified as Physoclypeus farinosus Hendel. Table 1 has the list of Asteraceae species from which P. farinosus has been reared. They were recorded from several cities of five states as follows: Minas Gerais: Diamantina, Grão Mogol, Ibitipoca, Itatiaia, Joaquim Felício, Ouro Branco, Passa Quatro, S. J. Chapada, Santana do Riacho, Serra da Canastra (Parque Nacional); Rio de Janeiro: Visconde de Mauá; São Paulo: Campos do Jordão; Santa Catarina: Bom Jardim da Serra, Lages, Matos Costa, Santa Cecília, São Joaquim, Urupema; Rio Grande do Sul: Cambará do Sul, Gravataí, Guaíba.

The data obtained represents the first occurrence of lauxaniids reared from flowerheads of Asteraceae. Since lauxaniids have been considered saprophagous and data from phytophagy must be cautiously considered according to Miller (1977b), more studies are needed to make clear if the larvae of P. farinosus were eating or not the vegetal tissues of the flowerheads. Lauxaniids were obtained from collections throughout the year, in different months (February; April; May; June; July; September; October; December), in different weather conditions. This would give a clue that they could not be eating just microorganisms, although we could not affirm that they are phytophagous.

The specimens of P. farinosus were all collected from 56 different plant species, belonging to 35 genera from eight tribes of Asteraceae (Table 1). Insects may use non-related plants that share key attributes such as chemical substances, or preferences for microhabitat or geographic distribution (Prado & Lewinsohn 2004), but data from McCall & Primack’s studies (1992) indicate that the relationship between insects and flowers are non specific and vary among the communities, such that the shape of flower, temperature, light and season of the year were the variables that most influenced insect visitation rates. The data found in the present study indicate that, at least for the identified taxon, does not exist specialization, according to McCall & Primack’s (1992) criteria. In a different study on Diptera-Asteraceae interactions in the Cerrado region in the city of Assis, São Paulo State, flowerhead collections for a period of one year did not yield any lauxaniids (T. Yamada, personal communication).

It is believed that when P. farinosus females oviposit into the flowerheads, they are looking for appropriated places for larval development, with abundant food, which, in some cases, could be fungal hyphae in the flowerheads during decomposition. Data from these collections (e.g., variable relative humidity), do not correlate with possible presence of fungi.

An interesting fact was that only one species of lauxaniid was collected, despite the extensive sampling area and the fact that the family is highly diverse in the Neotropical region. The data also expands the known distribution for the species.

Overall, the results reinforce the need for further studies of the biology of Lauxaniidae in the Neotropical region.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Dr. Paulo I. Prado for proofreading the manuscript and for sending material from the project entitled "Diversity of Species and Interactions in Phytophagous Plants and Insects", in the BIOTA/FAPESP Program, collected by the Laboratório de Interações Insetos-Plantas/UNICAMP. We are also grateful to Dr. Geraldo W. Fernandes (UFMG, Belo Horizonte/MG), for sending the specimens of Lauxaniidae studied by Gonçalves-Alvim & Macedo (1998). Two anonymous reviewers greatly improved the final version of the manuscript. We also thank FUNDUNESP (Proc. 44/2006 PROINTER-PROPe) for financial support.

Received 14/IX/06. Accepted 13/IX/07.

  • Almeida, A.M., C.R. Fonseca, P.I. Prado, M. Almeida-Neto, S. Diniz, U. Kubota, M.R. Braun, R.L.G. Raimundo, L.A. Anjos, T.G. Mendonça, S.M. Futada & T.M. Lewinsohn. 2006. Assemblages of endophagous insects on Asteraceae in São Paulo cerrados. Neotrop. Entomol. 35: 458-468.
  • Almeida, A.M., P.I. Prado & T.M. Lewinsohn. 2004. Geographical distribution of Eupatorieae (Asteraceae) in South-eastern and South Brazilian Mountain ranges. Plant Ecol. 174: 163-181.
  • Bremer, K. 1994. Asteraceae: Cladistics and classification. Portland, Timber Press, 752p.
  • Gaimari, S.D. & V.C. Silva (in press). Lauxaniidae. In B. Brown (ed.), Manual of Central American Diptera. Ottawa , National Research Council Press.
  • Gonçalves-Alvim, S. de J. & C.F. Macedo. 1998. Insetos visitantes de capítulos de Heterocondylus alatus (Asteraceae) no Parque Nacional da Serra da Canastra, MG. Braz. J. Ecol. 1998: 102-107.
  • Hendel, F. 1907. Neue und interessante Dipteren aus dem kaiserl. Museum in Wien (Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis der acalyptraten Musciden). Wien. Entomol. Ztg. 26: 223-245.
  • Hering, E. 1951. Biology of the leaf miners. Netherlands, N. V. Drukkerij Hooiberg. 420p.
  • Kaltenbach, J.H. 1874. Die Pflanzenfeinde aus der Klasse der Insekten. Stuttgart, 848p.
  • Kato, M., T. Inoue & T. Nagamitsu. 1995. Pollination biology of Gnetum (Gnetales) in a lowland mixed dipterocarp Forest in Sarawak. Amer. J. Bot. 82: 862-868.
  • Kevan, P.G. & H. G. Baker. 1983. Insects as flower visitors and pollinators. Ann. Rev. Entom. 28: 407-453.
  • Kim, S.P. 1994. Australian lauxaniid flies: Revision of the Australian species of Homoneura van der Wulp, Trypetisoma Malloch, and allied genera (Diptera: Lauxaniidae). Victoria, Australia, CSIRO. 445p. (Monographs on invertebrate taxonomy, vol. 1)
  • Lewinsohn, T.M. 1991. Insects in flower heads of Asteraceae in Southeast Brazil: A tropical case study on species richness, p.525-560. In P.W. Price, T.M. Lewinsohn, G.W. Fernandes & W.W. Benson (eds.), Plant-animal interactions: Evolutionary ecology in Tropical and Temperate regions. New York, Wiley/Interscience, 639p.
  • Marchal, P. 1897. Note sur la biologie de Lauxania aenea Fall., Diptère nuisible au Trèfle. Bull. Soc. Ent. France 1897: 216-217.
  • McCall, C. & R.B. Primack. 1992. Influence of flower characteristics, weather, time of day, and season on insect visitation rates in 3 plant-communities. Am. J. Bot. 79: 434-442.
  • Miller, R.M. 1977a. Ecology of Lauxaniidae (Diptera: Acalyptratae), I. Old and new rearing records with biological notes and discussion. Ann. Natal Mus. 23: 215-238.
  • Miller, R.M. 1977b. Taxonomy and biology of the Nearctic species of Homoneura (Diptera: Lauxaniidae). I. Subgenera Mallochomyza and Tarsohomoneura Iowa State J. Res. 52: 147-176.
  • Miller, R.M. 1977c. Taxonomy and biology of the Nearctic species of Homoneura (Diptera: Lauxaniidae). II. Subgenus Homoneura Iowa State J. Res. 52: 177-252.
  • Miller, R.M. & B.A. Foote. 1975. Biology and immature stages of eight species of Lauxaniidae (Diptera). I. Biological observations. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 77: 308-328.
  • Miller, R.M. & B.A. Foote. 1976. Biology and immature stages of eight species of Lauxaniidae (Diptera). II. Descriptions of immature stages and discussion of larval feeding habits and morphology. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 78: 16-37.
  • Needham, J.G. 1948. Ecological notes on the insect population of the flowerheads of Bidens pilosa Ecol. Monogr. 18: 431-446.
  • Oettingen, H. von. 1934. Zwei neue Schädlinge an Futterpflanzen. Nach. bl. Dtsch. Pfl. sch. dienst. 14: 65-66.
  • Prado, P.I. & T.M. Lewinsohn. 2004. Compartments in insect-plant associations and their consequences for community structure. J. Anim. Ecol. 73: 1168-1178.
  • Prado, P.I., T.M. Lewinsohn, A.M. Almeida, A.L. Norrbom, B.D. Buys, A.C.C. Macedo & M.B. Lopes. 2002. The fauna of Tephritidae (Diptera) from capitula of Asteraceae in Brazil. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 104: 1007-1028.
  • Shewell, G.E. 1987. Lauxaniidae, p.951-964. In J.F. McAlpine (ed.), Manual of Nearctic Diptera. Ottawa, Research Branch, Agriculture Canada, v. 2 (Monograph nş. 28), 658p.
  • Silva, V.C. 1993. Revisão dos gêneros neotropicais de Lauxaniidae com ênfase nos gêneros com antena longa (Diptera, Schizophora). Tese de Doutorado. Instituto de Biociências, Universidade de São Paulo. São Paulo, 225p.
  • Thompson, F.C. (ed.). 2000. Biosystematic database of world Diptera. http://www.sel.barc.usda.gov/names [accessed 15.xii.2006]

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    17 Mar 2008
  • Date of issue
    Feb 2008

History

  • Received
    14 Sept 2006
  • Accepted
    13 Sept 2007
Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil Sociedade Entomológica do Brasil, R. Harry Prochet, 55, 86047-040 Londrina PR Brasil, Tel.: (55 43) 3342 3987 - Londrina - PR - Brazil
E-mail: editor@seb.org.br