ABSTRACT
Objective To describe and review the role of nutritionists in three Brazilian Food Security facilities: popular-restaurants, food banks, and community kitchens.
Methods This study comprises a review of the scientific literature combined with an assessment of regulations and technical documents addressing the role of nutritionists in Food Security facilities.
Results A total of 29 studies were included in the sample after screening for the inclusion and exclusion criteria: 12 addressed popular-restaurants, 11 food banks, and 6 o community kitchens. The studies indicated that there was an insufficient number of nutritionists in the facilities when compared to the requirements set forth in to-day’s regulations, which ought to be reviewed and updated taking into account the current context. Furthermore, it was difficult to obtain accurate data on the number of nutritionists working in these facilities in Brazil.
Conclusion In order to enhance the role of nutritionists in food and nutritional security, actions are required at all levels, including improving professional training, expanding job openings in the public food and nutrition programs, monitoring and inspection by legal councils and raising awareness and mobilizing the professional category to value and acknowledge the actual need of nutritionists and their duties in the food and nutritional security teams.
Keywords
Food security; Human right to adequate food; Nutritional sciences; Nutritionists
RESUMO
Objetivo Descrever e analisar a atuação do nutricionista em três equipamentos de segurança alimentar e nutricional brasileiros: restaurantes populares, bancos de alimentos e cozinhas comunitárias.
Métodos Trata-se de revisão de literatura científica associada à análise de normativas e documentos técnicos que dispõem sobre a atuação do nutricionista em equipamentos de segurança alimentar e nutricional.
Resultados Foram incluídos na amostra 29 estudos. Destes, 12 são sobre restaurantes populares, 11 sobre bancos de alimentos e 6 sobre cozinhas comunitárias. Os estudos apontaram um número insuficiente de nutricionistas nos equipamentos, quando comparado às normativas vigentes, as quais carecem de revisão e atualização frente ao contexto atual. Ainda, deparou-se com dificuldade na obtenção de dados precisos sobre o número de nutricionistas atuantes nestes equipamentos no Brasil.
Conclusão Para fortalecer a atuação do nutricionista na segurança alimentar e nutricional, são necessárias ações em todos os níveis, incluindo a melhoria da formação profissional, a ampliação de vagas em políticas e programas públicos de alimentação e nutrição, o monitoramento e fiscalização por parte dos conselhos de direito e; a sensibilização e mobilização da categoria profissional para a valorização e o reconhecimento da necessidade e obrigatoriedade do nutricionista nos equipamentos de segurança alimentar e nutricional.
Palavras-chave
Direito humano à alimentação adequada; Nutrição em saúde pública; Nutricionistas; Segurança alimentar e nutricional
INTRODUCTION
In Brazil, in 2021-2022, 41.3% of the households were identified as having food security and 15.5% as having severe food insecurity (FI), that is, 33 million Brazilians were facing hunger [1]. On the other hand, the results of the 2023 Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua (PNAD, Continuous National Household Sample Survey), indicated that 72.4% of the Brazilian households were in a situation of food security, and 4.1% were in a condition of severe FI [2]. This reduction in the rates of severe FI can be attributed to a set of economic, social and structural factors, such as, for example, an increase in family income and education; improvement in basic sanitation conditions; growth of employment rates and/or insertion in the labor market; improvement in the food dietary quality; access to health services and drinking water; among others [3]. However, as pointed out by the Rede Brasileira de Pesquisa em Soberania e Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional (REDE PENSSAN, Brazilian Research Network on Food and Nutrition Sovereignty and Security), the reinstallation of the Conselho Nacional de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional (CONSEA, National Council on Food Security and Nutrition) in 2023, played a crucial role in this process. However, despite the improvement in the aforementioned indices, 27.6% of the Brazilian households still experienced FI in 2023, whether mild, moderate or severe. Therefore, it is assumed that strategies are required to ensure the fostering of the population food and nutrition security (FNS), at all levels of the food supply chain and access in this country [4].
In this connection, besides CONSEA, the role of the Sistema Nacional de Segurança Alimentar (SISAN, National Food Security System) and its components is highlighted, with emphasis on the food and nutritional security equipment (EqSAN), which aim to contribute to the fight against hunger, aiming at ensuring healthy, culturally appropriate and safe food to achieve the fostering of human dignity [5,6]. However, it is important to highlight the incipience of the process of decentralization and adherence to SISAN at the municipal level, as opposed to adherence at the state level, a fact that limits the scope and impact of the system nationally [7].
Despite the aforementioned challenges, the SISAN infrastructure involves the operationalization of EqSAN, requiring support, financing and institutionalization of different intersectoral, coordinated and complementary programs and actions, addressing all aspects of the food system, with a view at promoting the human right to adequate food (HRAF) [6]. According to the regulations, EqSAN include: Popular-Restaurants, Food Banks, Community Kitchens and other facilities such as street markets, public markets food outlets, food supply centers, public grocery stores, organic and agroecological markets, support units for the distribution of family farming products and, more recently, solidarity kitchens [8,9]. Among the many actors involved in the operationalization of EqSAN, nutritionists deserve special mention, due to the nature of the actions developed in such settings. According to Resolution No. 600/2018 of the Conselho Federal de Nutrição (FNC, Federal Nutrition Council) [10], the professional’s performance in these facilities is provided for in the segment – Política Nacional de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional (PNSAN, National Policy for Food and Nutrition Security), in the subsegment – SISAN: Food Banks (public, private and foundations), Popular-Restaurants, Community Kitchens and other food security facilities. Furthermore, according to the sole paragraph of Law No. 8,234, of September 17, 1991 [11], “the participation of nutritionists in multidisciplinary teams, created by public or private entities and intended to plan, coordinate, supervise, implement, execute and evaluate policies, programs, courses at different levels, research or events of any nature, directly or indirectly related to food and nutrition, as well as to prepare and review legislation and codes specific to this area is mandatory”.
Taking as reference the three EqSAN listed in Resolution No. 600/2018/CFN [10], the following information is reported on the institutional page of the Ministério do Desenvolvimento e Assistência Social, Família e Combate à Fome (MDS, Ministry of Development and Social Assistance, Family and Fight against Hunger): “regarding the minimum team of the Community Kitchen, Popular-Restaurant / Food Bank, considering that the management and maintenance of the facilities are carried out by the municipality or the state personnel, the composition of the team is their responsibility. We point out that, according to the CFN Resolution, “a nutritionists’ presence is mandatory” [12-14].
Based on the above, this article aims to reflect and offer proposals on the work of professionals in three EqSAN: Popular-Restaurants (PR), Food Banks (FB) and Community Kitchens (CK). The choice of these facilities is justified by their greater connection with government spheres and by their financing and management standards that follow already established bureaucratic and institutional processes. In addition, these facilities aim to ensure the direct access of the FI population to food, whether through adequate meals or with the supply of fresh food, and they can and should act in an articulated manner with each other. Finally, the facilities chosen are the EqSAN with the oldest official registrations, such as, for example, the PR.
METHOD
This is a review of the scientific literature [15,16] associated with the analysis of regulations and technical documents [17] on the performance of nutritionists in three Brazilian EqSAN: PR, FB and CK.
The exploratory bibliographic search on the three EqSAN objects of this article was carried out in the following electronic databases: Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO.org), PubMed® (MEDLINE), Brazilian Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (BDTD); Catalog of Theses and Dissertations of the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES); LILACS - Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences; and Google Scholar. With the exception of the PubMed® (MEDLINE) database, the following search strategies were used in the other databases: (“popular-restaurants” AND “nutritionist”); (“food banks” AND “nutritionist”) and (“community kitchens” AND “nutritionist”). In PubMed® (MEDLINE) the search strategies were: (“popular-restaurants” AND “nutritionist”); (“food banks” AND “nutritionist”) and (“community kitchens” AND “nutritionist”). Searches were initially conducted in July 2024 and updated until January 2025.
The following inclusion criteria were adopted: scientific articles, theses, dissertations and course completion papers that presented quantitative and/or qualitative data on the presence and/or performance of nutritionists in EqSAN. There was no year restriction thus allowing the identification of these studies trajectory from the incorporation of the facilities into the national public FNS agenda until 2024.
The exclusion criteria covered duplicates, books, book chapters and papers presented at events/congresses. In the Google Scholar, due to the specificities of this platform, the selection was limited to the first five pages, excluding duplicates and citations. There are reports of use of the first five [18], the first ten [19], the first 14 [20] and the first 20 pages [21], among others. In general, Google Scholar is used as a complementary database, restricting the search to a predefined limit [18-21].
After the selection, the articles underwent exploratory and selective reading, followed by interpretative analysis to identify the presence or absence of nutritionists in the EqSAN, the number of such professionals in the facility and considerations about their performance. Figure 01 presents the flowchart of the bibliographic search.
Flowchart of the bibliographic review on Popular-Restaurants, Food Banks and Community Kitchens.
The FNC was inquired for data on the number of nutritionists working in the EqSAN, and the MDS was requested information on the number of facilities. In addition, official websites were searched, especially those of the SDM and FNC, focusing on regulations and standards. Data from the Food and Nutrition Security Survey (MapaSAN 2022), coordinated by the SDM, covering 1,845 municipalities that responded to the SISAN management questionnaires; FNS actions and public FNS facilities [22] were also considered.
The three EqSAN assessed aim to combat hunger, ensure FNS and promote the HRAF, operating with their own specificities (Chart 2). Thus, the results will be presented separately for each EqSAN, starting with its historical characterization, followed by the analysis of the nutritionists’ performance.
Studies on Brazilian popular-restaurants and the presence and/or performance of nutritionists in those establishments. Brazil, 2024.
Nutritionists’ role in popular-restaurants
Popular-Restaurants are facilities that were created in the 1940s [23-25]; their purpose is to ensure a proper space for meals, as well as food and nutrition education (FNE) actions, the promotion of food sovereignty and dialogue with other FNS actions [25-28]. In 2004, they were included in the Zero Hunger Program [25] and, currently (2024), they are managed by the MDS as a federal agency.
The MDS defines Popular-Restaurants as facilities intended for municipalities with more than 100,000 inhabitants that have a high number of people living in poverty or misery. Access to PRs must be universal, with priority given to specific population groups in situations of food and nutritional insecurity and/or social vulnerability [12].
According to the data provided by the federal coordination of the program with the MDS, in November 2023, there were 478 Popular-Restaurants in Brazil. Out of these, 128 (26.8%) were funded by the MDS and 350 (74.3%) received funding from local governments, private institutions or civil society [29].
According to the MapaSAN 2022 data, 248 PRs in this country were reported among the municipalities that took part in the survey. The Northeast region had the largest number of PRs (34.8%), followed by the Southeast (33.9%), South (18.5%), North (11%) and Central-West reported the lowest number of such facilities, totaling 1.8% [22]. The average cost to prepare a meal served at lunchtime in 2022, ranged between R$ 8.57 to a maximum R$ 35.00. The average price charged for a meal at lunchtime at the PRs was R $1.95; an average of 1,117 people was served daily [22].
The PRs operational characteristics (objective, methodology, audience and minimum functional requirement) are summarized in Chart 1.
Description of Popular-Restaurants, Food Banks and Community Kitchens’ main characteristics. Brazil, 2024.
It is worth noting that, in connection with the data requested from the CFN regarding the presence of nutritionists in the three investigated facilities, there is no mapping or system for recording the number of professionals working in EqSAN in the country. However, the FNC presents minimum numerical reference parameters for nutritionists’ work for the subsegment – SISAN [10]. For PR and CK, the FNC parameters include two variables: the number and quantity of meals served (lunch and/or dinner). Based on this information, the number of professionals required and the workload are stipulated. For example, PR or CK that offer between 100 and 500 meals at lunchtime or at dinnertime should have a nutritionist with a weekly workload ranging from 15h to 20h. For the food outlets that serve up to 1,000 meals/lunch, 2 nutritionists (30h/week) are recommended; between 1,001 and 1,500 meals/lunch: 3 nutritionists (30h/week); between 1,501 and 2,000 meals/lunch: 4 nutritionists (30h/week); above 2,500 meals/lunch: 4 nutritionists + 1 for every 1,000 meals/day. These numbers will be higher if the facility produces two kinds of meals per day, for example, lunch and dinner, or lunch and breakfast. For FB (public, private and foundational set ups), the recommendation is one nutritionist with a workload of 30 hours per week in each establishment [10].
The literature review on Popular-Restaurants and the work of nutritionists in Brazil yielded 12 papers, published from 2009 to 2024, as shown in Chart 2.
Of the 12 studies in the sample, only two, published in 2009 and 2023, reported numerical data on the presence of nutritionists in Popular-Restaurants [28,38]. The oldest study is a dissertation that evaluated 10 PRs located in the State of Rio de Janeiro. At the time, the study identified, on average, three nutritionists per PR [28]. Despite such number of professionals on the staff, according to the FNC recommendations, the ideal would be at least 4 nutritionists per PR taking into account the 2,530 meals/day/lunch produced on average [10].
The 2023 study is a doctoral thesis whose investigation purpose was the Popular-Restaurants existing throughout the country [38]. The study included a sample of 87 PRs set up in Brazilian capitals; it identified that 98.8% of the facilities had nutritionists in charge (RN). Considering the 87 facilities that responded informing about the number of nutritionists on their staff, the sum of these professionals totaled 114 nutritionists. In other words, there was an average of 1.3 professionals per PR in the country. In this same study, it was reported that each PR served an average of 1,213 meals per day, only at lunchtime. Therefore, based on the provisions of the FNC, an average of 3 nutritionists would be required per Popular-Restaurant in those facilities that served only lunch and 4 professionals for those that served more than one meal. In other words, the number of professionals was far below what was necessary and/or established [10].
The other studies informed on the role of nutritionists, suggesting the need for the professional’s appreciation and effective presence in the PR. The authors highlighted that the presence of nutritionists in the food production units is essential for the production of quality and safe food in terms of hygiene, in order to ensure the safety and health of the consumer [33-36]. Furthermore, they enhanced the relevance of the professional’s role in the performance of FNE actions in the equipment, in the promotion of health associated with food safety and the assurance of the right to citizenship and food [36] and in the encouragement and rescue of food culture [39].
The article by Zimmermann et al. [40] highlights the implementation of FNS policies and programs in the capitals Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais) and Curitiba (Paraná), due to the pioneering role in the creation of food supply policies in the mid-1980s and due to the continuity and diversity of the actions developed. The authors emphasized that the success of such municipalities involve, among other management actions, the hiring of professionals, particularly nutritionists to expand the capacity for action and regulation of food policies.
Nutritionists’ role in food banks
Food banks emerged in Brazil at a later date than the Popular-Restaurants and the food bank experiences in North America and Europe, which began in the 1960s and 1980s, respectively [41]. The first Brazilian Food Bank was set up as an initiative of the civil society in São Paulo in 1994 [42], and soon after it became the Mesa São Paulo program, run by the Serviço Social do Comércio (SESC). Within the scope of SESC, this program gained national scale and deploys currently more than 100 units in operation [43].
At the state government level, the Banco Municipal de Alimentos de Santo André, São Paulo, was one of the pioneering experiences, created in 2000 [41]. In the same year, a group of companies, unions, entities and service groups came together and created a Food Bank in Rio Grande do Sul. In 2007, with the aim of expanding the food bank activities and drive its benefits to other locations, the Rio Grande do Sul Food Bank Network was created. Later, in 2010, with the participation of all active FBs, the Brazilian Food Bank Network was inaugurated [44]. It is worth noting that the FB model for combating food loss and waste and providing the HRAF was also incorporated as a target of the FNS public policies from 2003 onwards, in the Zero Hunger Strategy, integrating the axis of actions that articulate access to food [45].
According to the database provided by CGESAN/MDS, there were 325 FBs in Brazil in November 2023. Out of these, 94 (28.9%) were financed by the MDS and 231 (71.1%) received funding from local governments, private institutions or civil society [29].
It is worth noting that Brazil Federal Union, through SESAN/MDS, supports the implementation of food banks in the States, the Federal District and in the municipalities, as well as in Supply Centers, in partnership with state or municipal governments, through financing initiatives for the preparation of basic architectural and engineering projects, execution of works and installations, and acquisition of equipment, permanent materials and new consumables, with a view to making food supply viable and combating losses and waste in urban and metropolitan agrifood systems [46,47].
As defined by the Brazilian Network of Food Banks, established on September 17, 2020, by Decree No. 10,490, food banks are “physical and/or logistical structures that offer the service of collecting and/or receiving and distributing free food items from donations from the private and/or public sectors and that are directed to public or private institutions characterized as providers of social assistance, civil protection and defense services, educational and justice units, health establishments and other food and nutrition units” [48].
Tenuta et al. [49] enhances that food banks are facilities or infrastructure with three basic objectives: I) combat food loss and waste; II) ensure food and nutrition security and III) provide food and nutrition education. The same authors, who assessed 217 Brazilian food banks operating in 2019 and 2020, identified four management modalities namely: (a) food banks of federated entities (in the survey, there were only units under the management of municipal governments); (b) food banks of Supply Centers; (c) food banks of civil society organizations; and (d) food banks of autonomous social services (the survey showed that there were only units under the management of the Serviço Social do Comércio, belonging to Rede Mesa Brasil). Furthermore, those authors observed that the units were spread throughout Brazil, with a greater concentration in the Southeast region (65.63%), followed by the Northeast (28.57%) and then the South region (19.61%) [49]
Regarding the services provided by the food banks, Tenuta et al. [49] found that 41.5% (n=90) of the facilities had families in situations of social risk as their main beneficiaries, while 36.9% (n=80) mainly served children, by delivering food donations to childcare institutions. These two beneficiary profiles were the most significant in the four food banks management modalities. Considering that food banks can receive a wide range of products, the aforementioned study investigated the kind of food most frequently delivered in the facilities; it was found that 85.2% (n=185) included “fruits and vegetables (natural, chilled or frozen, dried and dehydrated – without the addition of other ingredients)” as the most common type of food included in the operational stocks [49].
The food banks operational characteristics (objective, methodology, target audience and minimum functional requirement) are summarized in Chart 1.
The literature review on FB and the work of nutritionists in Brazil yielded a sample of eleven studies, published from 2014 to 2024. Chart 3 presents a summary of these studies according to the parameters investigated.
Three of the eleven studies listed in Chart 3 were evaluations of food banks in Minas Gerais [50,43,55]; there was another study that was a national survey and characterization of food banks operating in Brazil [42].
Studies on Brazilian food banks and the presence and/or performance of nutritionists in the facility. Brazil, 2024.
All those studies investigated if a nutritionist worked at the facility. The findings of Tenuta [42,43] demonstrate that a significant portion of the food banks operating in the country did not comply with the FNC recommendation of one nutritionist working per unit. The aforementioned national survey indicated that 57% of the facilities had a nutritionist to provide technical guidance [42].
The other three studies evaluated food banks in Minas Gerais; however only Tenuta, [43], when evaluating public food banks, assessed whether there were one or more professionals working in the unit, without evidencing the parameter for such definition. Furthermore, the author highlighted that 66.67% of nutritionists had temporary employment relationships, via contracts or held commissioned positions. It is understood that, for the operationalization process to be carried out effectively, such employment relationships ought to be permanent and not subject to management changes. Costa et al. [50] found a similar scenario, corroborating the concern regarding the fragility of the nutritionists’ employment relationship and their high turnover. According to the authors, the employment fragility of those who work in food banks constitutes a crucial point for evaluating the continuity and stability of this policy [50].
The other seven studies mentioned make relevant references to the presence of nutritionists working in food banks, discussing their skills and abilities as activities specific to their profession [51-54, 56-58].
We suggest that future studies focus in more detail the characteristics and limits of the nutritionists’ work in food banks. It is essential to highlight the relevance of this professional’s activity in such facilities, given their particular modus operandi when collecting food that does not meet commercial standards and when serving people in situations of social, economic and health vulnerability. Therefore, it is imperative to have a technical manager capable of assessing the health quality of donations, in addition to carrying out educational actions aimed at the consumption of adequate and quality food.
Nutritionists’ role in community kitchens
In Brazil, the Community Kitchens (CK) gained federal scope when they were included in the Zero Hunger Program in 2000. The CK were designed to be a facility that seeks to ensure adequate nutrition for people in situations of social vulnerability, providing them with balanced, quality meals produced with safe processes. The CK were set up in a cooperation between the Union and the municipalities, and it was the municipality’s responsibility to offer the service, delimit the vulnerable area in which the facility would be installed, as well as to hire the technical team, maintain the program and provide the meals [59].
According to the program regulations, the CK must primarily benefit low-income formal and informal workers, the unemployed, students, older adults, single mothers and people at social risk in urban peripheral areas. In addition, the CK must carry out activities of productive social inclusion, enhancing collective action and community identity and FNE actions [13].
According to the data provided by CGESAN/MDS, in November 2023, 425 CK operated in Brazil. Out of these, 304 (71.5%) were funded by the MDS and 121 (28.5%) received funding from local governments, private institutions or civil society [29].
According to data from MapaSAN 2022 [22], CK operated in 166 municipalities, corresponding to 8.8% of the municipalities that provided data on EqSAN. The distribution rate of municipalities with CK indicated a concentration in the Northeast region (37.8%), followed by the South (28.0%) and Southeast (23.8%) regions [22]. However, the survey did not capture, whether or not there was a nutritionist working in the facility [22]. The average cost to prepare a meal for lunch was in the range of R$ 5.08to a maximum of R$ 30.00. In turn, the average amount charged for a meal served for lunch in the month prior to the survey was R$ 0.62, ranging from R$0.00 to R$ 13.00, indicating a significant variation among the different kitchens. However, the average amount of R$ 0.62 indicated that most CK charged a low amount per meal or offered it free of charge [22]. The CK served an average of 208 people at lunch. Furthermore, 74% of the respondents indicated that there was a workflow or partnership established between the kitchen and the service provided to users in the direct or indirect social assistance network [22].
The operational characteristics (objective, methodology, target audience and minimum functional requirement) of community kitchens are summarized in Chart 1.
The literature review on CK and on the nutritionists’ activities in Brazil yielded a sample of six studies, published from 2012 to 2023 (Chart 4).
Studies on Brazilian community kitchens and the presence and/or performance of nutritionists in the facility. Brazil, 2024.
The studies found a number of nutritionists per facility lower than that standardized by the FNC [10] and the MDS [13]. The studies by Nascimento and Quintão [60] and Rabelo and Ruckert [62] indicated an average of 1 nutritionist for every 3 CK. The study by Perin [63] showed an even lower average, that is, 1 nutritionist for every 5 CK. In the study by Severo and Oliveira [65], the CK were not monitored by nutritionists. And finally, in the national study by Sarti et al. [61], only 28% of the CK investigated reported a nutritionist in charge. The authors of the studies highlighted and promoted the importance of nutritionists in CK, mainly associating the professional with the quality of the diet and improvement of health, with the adequacy of regulations and good practices. And, in an isolated but no less important way, they enhanced the nutritionists’ role in the articulation of EqSAN with civil society to act as an intermediary between the latter and the state via the FNS council [60-62,64].
It is worth mentioning that a study was found, published in 2009 and not included in the bibliographic databases investigated, which reviewed a sample of community kitchens nationwide and considered the number of nutritionists in charge of the unit at that time. This study included a sample of 111 community kitchens, of which only 25% had a nutritionist on the staff [66].
In general, we observed that in the studies on CK, the discussion about the presence of nutritionists attending the facility, was less notable when compared to the studies with popular-restaurants and food banks.
FINAL CONSIDERATIONS
The difficulty in obtaining accurate data on the number of nutritionists in EqSAN highlights the need for greater organization and appreciation of FNS actions in Brazil. Despite searches in regulatory documents, scientific articles and databases, including requests to the FNC and CGESAN/MDS, we were not able to locate exact information. Hence, it is suggested that an official database and/or an annual national monitoring system be developed for EqSAN, covering the number of professionals working in those facilities, similar to the National School Feeding Program (PNAE).
In addition, the standardization of EqSAN needs to be updated via government ordinance or decree. Studies indicate that the current legislation [8, 23–25, 38] is outdated, which weakens the attendance of nutritionists in those facilities. Current regulations [12–14], in addition to being obsolete, do not require a mandatory attendance of this professional in the food facilities compromising their recognition in SISAN.
We emphasize that the dismantling of the National Food and Nutrition Policy in recent years has had an impact that still reverberates in EqSAN, but that it has been recuperating vigor since 2023. In this process, actions to promote food and nutrition are necessary at all management and execution levels. Here, we highlight some strategies that can contribute to the process of food and nutrition actions effectiveness, as well as helping the food facilities, namely: i) the need for better training of nutritionists to work in the area of food and nutrition; ii) increasing the number of vacancies for nutritionists in public food and nutrition endeavors and programs; iii) monitoring and inspection by legal councils, such as nutrition councils and food and nutrition councils; and iv) raising awareness and mobilizing the professional category to value and recognize the need and obligation of nutritionists in EqSAN.
Although the FNC establishes recommendations on the number of nutritionists and their duties in those facilities, it is essential to reflect on the expected profile of this professional. FNC Resolution No. 600/2018 [10], with the exception of work in food banks, suggests that community kitchens and popular-restaurants should have duties similar to those of the Food and Nutrition Units. However, these spaces are not restricted in providing meals: these are sites that ensure rights and provide care to populations which are in social, food, and nutritional vulnerability. Thus, the work of the nutritionist must consider not only food production, but also the promotion of adequate and healthy eating, the creation of bonds with beneficiaries, and the understanding of the social context of users and collaborators, who often also face food and nutritional insecurity.
As the main limitation of the study, we highlight the fact that the systematic search for scientific articles in Google Scholar was limited to page 5. On the other hand, we emphasize the breadth and scope of the five other databases included in the review. However, as researchers studying the subject, we chose to maintain this basis in order to illustrate how incipient the national scientific literature in the area still is. The fragile findings corroborate the reflections generated by the few reference studies on the subject. It is hoped, in this way, that the issues raised here can stimulate the look and consequent increase in the science behind these food outlets that have the role and potential to alleviate hunger and social inequalities in Brazil.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors are grateful to the Federal Nutrition Council for the dialogue established and to the General Coordination of Food and Nutrition Security Facilities, the Department for the Promotion of Adequate and Healthy Food, the National Secretariat for Food and Nutrition Security, the Ministry of Development and Social Assistance, Family and Fight against Hunger for providing the requested data.
-
How to cite this article:
Oliveira JTC, Tenuta N, Gabriel CG, Vasconcelos FAG. Food and Nutritional Safety Facilities and nutritionists’ actions: elements for reflection. Rev Nutr. 2025;38:e240130. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202538e240130en
References
- 1 Penssan R. II Inquérito Nacional sobre Insegurança Alimentar no Contexto da Pandemia da COVID-19 no Brasil (II VIGISAN): relatório final. Rede Brasileira de Pesquisa em Soberania e Segurança Alimentar-PENSSAN. São Paulo: Fundação Friedrich Ebert: Rede PENSSAN; 2022.
-
2 Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua (PNAD Contínua). Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 17]. Available from: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/trabalho/17270-pnad-continua.html
» https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/trabalho/17270-pnad-continua.html - 3 Sobrinho FM, Silva YC, Abreu MNS, Pereira SCL, Dias Júnior CS. Fatores determinantes da insegurança alimentar e nutricional: estudo realizado em Restaurantes Populares de Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brasil. Ciên Saúde Colet. 2014;19:1601-11.
-
4 Rede Brasileira de Pesquisa. Nota pública: dados do IBGE sobre a insegurança alimentar no Brasil. Basília: Rede Brasileira de Pesquisa; 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 17]. Available from: https://pesquisassan.net.br/nota-publica-dados-do-ibge-sobre-a-inseguranca-alimentar-no-brasil/
» https://pesquisassan.net.br/nota-publica-dados-do-ibge-sobre-a-inseguranca-alimentar-no-brasil/ -
5 Presidência da República (Brasil). Decreto nº 7.272, de 25 de agosto de 2010. Regulamenta a Lei no 11.346, de 15 de setembro de 2006, que cria o Sistema Nacional de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional-SISAN com vistas a assegurar o direito humano à alimentação adequada, institui a Política Nacional de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional-PNSAN, estabelece os parâmetros para a elaboração do Plano Nacional de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional, e dá outras providências. Brasília: Diário Oficial da União; 2010 [cited 2024 Jul 28]. Available from: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2010/decreto/d7272.htm
» http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2007-2010/2010/decreto/d7272.htm -
6 Fagundes A, Ribeiro RCL, Brito, ERB, Recine E, Rocha C. Public infrastructure for food and nutrition security in Brazil: fufilling the constitutional commitment to the human right to adequate food. Food Sec. 2022;14:897-905. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01272-1
» https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-022-01272-1 - 7 Vasconcellos ABPDA, Moura LBAD. Segurança alimentar e nutricional: uma análise da situação da descentralização de sua política pública nacional. Cad Saude Publica. 2018;34:e00206816.
- 8 Oliveira JTC. Avaliação dos restaurantes populares no âmbito da segurança alimentar e nutricional [dissertação]. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; 2018.
-
9 Presidência da República (Brasil). Lei no 14.628, de 20 de julho de 2023. Institui o Programa de Aquisição de Alimentos (PAA) e o Programa Cozinha Solidária; altera as Leis nos 12.512, de 14 de outubro de 2011, e 14.133, de 1o de abril de 2021 (Lei de Licitações e Contratos Administrativos); e revoga dispositivos das Leis nos 11.718, de 20 de junho de 2008, 11.775, de 17 de setembro de 2008, 12.512, de 14 de outubro de 2011, e 14.284, de 29 de dezembro de 2021. Brasília: Diário Oficial da União; 2023 [cited 2024 Ju. 18]. Avaiable fron: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2023-2026/2023/Lei/L14628.htm
» https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2023-2026/2023/Lei/L14628.htm -
10 Conselho Federal de Nutricionistas. Resolução nº 600/2018, de 25 de fevereiro de 2018. Dispõe sobre a definição das áreas de atuação do nutricionista e suas atribuições, indica parâmetros numéricos mínimos de referência, por área de atuação, para a efetividade dos serviços prestados à sociedade e dá outras providências. Brasília: Diário Oficial da União; 2018 [cited 2024 Jul 28]. Available from: https://www.cfn.org.br/wp-content/uploads/resolucoes/resolucoes_old/Res_600_2018.htm
» https://www.cfn.org.br/wp-content/uploads/resolucoes/resolucoes_old/Res_600_2018.htm -
11 Presidência da República (Brasil). Lei nº 8.234, de 17 de setembro de 1991. Regulamenta a profissão de nutricionista e determina outras providências. Brasília: Diário Oficial da União; 1991 [cited 2024 Jul 28]. Available from: https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/1989_1994/l8234.htm
» https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/1989_1994/l8234.htm -
12 Ministério do Desenvolvimento e Assistência Social, Família e Combate à Fome (Brasil). Ações e Programas. Equipamentos de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional. Bancos de Alimentos. Brasília: MDS; 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/mds/pt-br/acoes-e-programas/equipamentos-de-seguranca-alimentar-e-nutricional/banco-de-alimentos
» https://www.gov.br/mds/pt-br/acoes-e-programas/equipamentos-de-seguranca-alimentar-e-nutricional/banco-de-alimentos -
13 Ministério do Desenvolvimento e Assistência Social, Família e Combate à Fome (Brasil). Ações e Programas. Equipamentos de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional. Cozinha Comunitária. Brasília: MDS; 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/mds/pt-br/acoes-e-programas/equipamentos-de-seguranca-alimentar-e-nutricional/cozinha-comunitaria#:~:text=O%20que%20s%C3%A3o%20Cozinhas%20Comunit%C3%A1rias,e%20financiados%20com%20recursos%20p%C3%BAblicos
» https://www.gov.br/mds/pt-br/acoes-e-programas/equipamentos-de-seguranca-alimentar-e-nutricional/cozinha-comunitaria#:~:text=O%20que%20s%C3%A3o%20Cozinhas%20Comunit%C3%A1rias,e%20financiados%20com%20recursos%20p%C3%BAblicos -
14 Ministério do Desenvolvimento e Assistência Social, Família e Combate à Fome (Brasil). Ações e Programas. Equipamentos de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional. Restaurante Popular Brasília: MDS; 2024 [cited 2024 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/mds/pt-br/acoes-e-programas/equipamentos-de-seguranca-alimentar-e-nutricional/restaurante-popular
» https://www.gov.br/mds/pt-br/acoes-e-programas/equipamentos-de-seguranca-alimentar-e-nutricional/restaurante-popular -
15 Galvão MBC, Ricarte ILM. Revisão sistemática da literatura: conceituação, produção e publicação. Logeion. 2019;6(1):57-73. doi: https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2019v6n1.p57-73
» https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2019v6n1.p57-73 -
16 Bispo MS. Um olhar crítico sobre a prática de revisão de literatura. Rev Adm Contemp. 2023;27(6):e230264. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2023230264.por
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2023230264.por -
17 Dalglish SL, Khalid H, McMahon SA. Document analysis in health policy research: the READ approach. Health Policy Plan. 2021;35(10),1424-31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa064
» https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czaa064 -
18 Ratusniak C, Panassolo JB. O fracasso escolar em alunas: esforçadas, dedicadas, caprichosas. E inteligentes?. Rev Psicol Pesq. 2024;18(1):1-32. doi: https://doi.org/10.34019/1982-1247.2024.v1.36218
» https://doi.org/10.34019/1982-1247.2024.v1.36218 -
19 Stroher JN, Henckes SBR, Gewehr D, Strohschoen AAG. Estratégias pedagógicas inovadoras compreendidas como metodologias ativas. Rev Thema. 2018;15(2):734-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.15536/thema.15.2018.734-747.891
» https://doi.org/10.15536/thema.15.2018.734-747.891 -
20 Vieira-Santos J, Del Prette ZAP. Del Prette A. Habilidades sociais educativas: revisão sistemática da produção brasileira. Av. Psicol. Latinoam. 2018;36(1),45-63. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.5069
» https://doi.org/10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/apl/a.5069 -
21 Silva IP. Em busca de significados para a expressão “ideologia de gênero”. Educ Rev. 2018;34:e190810. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-4698190810
» https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-4698190810 -
22 Ministério do Desenvolvimento e Assistência Social, Família e Combate à Fome (Brasil). Monitoramento da Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional (MapaSAN 2022): Análise descritiva. Brasília: MDS; 2022 [cited 2024 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.gov.br/mds/pt-br/caisan/monitoramento-da-san/MapaSAN_2022__Anlise_Descritiva_verso_final.pdf
» https://www.gov.br/mds/pt-br/caisan/monitoramento-da-san/MapaSAN_2022__Anlise_Descritiva_verso_final.pdf -
23 Oliveira JTC, Gabriel CG, Machado ML, Reos MF, Soar C, Venske DKR. Government-subsidized restaurants as promoters of the realization of the human right to adequate food: proposal of an evaluation model. Rev Nutr. 2019;32:e18193. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865201932e180193
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865201932e180193 -
24 Oliveira JTC, Gabriel CG, Vasconcelos FAG, Machado ML, Soar C, Fagundes A. Government-subsidized restaurants in Brazil: an evaluation within the framework of food and nutrition security. Rev Nutr. 2020;33:e20085. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202033e200085
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202033e200085 -
25 Oliveira JTC, Gabriel CG, Machado ML, Martins MC, Bricarello LP, Vasconcelos FAG. Popular Restaurants as strategies to fight hunger and to promote Food and Nutrition Security: an integrative review of scientific publications in the period 2011-2021. Rev Nutr. 2023;36:e220067. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202336e220067
» https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-9865202336e220067 -
26 Ministério de Desenvolvimento Social e Agrário (Brasil). Manual de instruções, diretrizes e procedimentos operacionais para contratação e execução de programas e ações da Secretaria Nacional de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional. Brasília: MDSA; 2016 [cited 2024 Jul 23]. Available from: https://www.mds.gov.br/webarquivos/publicacao/seguranca_alimentar/diretrizes_programaticas_CAIXAMDS.pdf
» https://www.mds.gov.br/webarquivos/publicacao/seguranca_alimentar/diretrizes_programaticas_CAIXAMDS.pdf -
27 Faustino L, Cervenka C. Desperdício e insegurança alimentar durante a pandemia de COVID-19: análise de um restaurante popular na cidade de São Paulo-SP. Res Soc Dev. 2022;11(13):e594111335910. doi: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i13.35910
» https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i13.35910 - 28 Oliveira AGDM. Condições higiênico-sanitárias na produção de refeições em restaurantes públicos populares localizados no estado do Rio de Janeiro [dissertação]. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; 2009.
- 29 Ministério do Desenvolvimento e Assistência Social, Família e Combate à Fome (Brasil). Coordenação-geral de equipamentos de segurança alimentar nutricional. Dados sobre bancos de alimentos. Brasília: Coordenação-Geral de Equipamentos de Segurança Alimentar Nutricional; 2023.
- 30 Ginani, VC. Avaliação da qualidade nutricional, sensorial e cultural de cardápios populares [tese]. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília; 2011.
- 31 Portella E, Basso C, Medina VB. Perfil do usuário do Restaurante Popular da cidade de Santa Maria-RS. Discip. Sci. 2013;14(1):101-7.
- 32 Villas Bôas GFM. Alimentos regionais: avaliação das mudanças da oferta no programa de restaurantes populares brasileiros [dissertação]. Brasília: Universidade de Brasília; 2013.
- 33 Silva DMS. Evidências de desafios e propostas na gestão da qualidade em restaurantes [monografia]. Brasília: Nutrição da Universidade de Brasília; 2014.
-
34 Volpini-Rapina LF, Costa-Singh T. Comparação de boas práticas em estabelecimentos com e sem nutricionista. Nutrição Brasil. 2016;15(4):198-205. doi: https://doi.org/10.33233/nb.v15i4.449
» https://doi.org/10.33233/nb.v15i4.449 - 35 Calazans DLM, Pequeno NPF, Pereira LCA, Freitas JF. Equipamentos públicos para promoção da alimentação adequada e saudável: um estudo nos restaurantes populares do Rio Grande do Norte. Rasbran. 2018;9(2):32-42.
- 36 Calazans DLM, Pequeno NPF, Freitas JF, Oliveira VTL, Araújo FR. O que tem para o almoço? – Apoio às ações de educação alimentar e nutricional e de controle social em programas de acesso à alimentos. Rev Ext Soc. 2019;10(1):12-23.
- 37 Sousa HSV, Oliveira MRM. Atuação do nutricionista nas ações de educação alimentar e nutricional nos equipamentos públicos do município de Lauro de Freitas, Bahia. Segur Aliment Nutr. 2022;29:e022012.
- 38 Oliveira JTC. Restaurantes Populares e Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional nas capitais brasileiras: estudo de avaliação e de associação com características contextuais. [tese]. Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina; 2023.
- 39 Oliveira CHRS, Coelho ACP, Oliveira BCG, Salvador ILS, Silva SM, Reis GA. Projeto voluntário de rastreio de hipertensão, diabetes e obesidade em um restaurante popular em uma cidade de Minas Gerais. Rev Eletrônica Acervo Saúde. 2024;24(2):e15135.
-
40 Zimmermann SA, Grisa C, Aranha A. Políticas alimentares e as capacidades estatais em capitais metropolitanas brasileiras. Confins. 2024;63. doi: https://doi.org/10.4000/11wvr
» https://doi.org/10.4000/11wvr - 41 Belik W. Políticas de seguridad alimentaria para las áreas urbanas. Politicas de Seguridad Alimentaria y Nutrición em America Latina. São Paulo: Hucitec; 2004.
- 42 Amaral, NTK. Bancos de Alimentos Brasileiros: contribuições para a segurança alimentar e nutricional, redução de perdas e desperdícios de alimentos e educação alimentar e nutricional [tese]. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; 2023.
- 43 Tenuta, NO. Análise tridimensional da situação dos bancos de alimentos de Minas Gerais, Brasil [dissertação]. Diamantina: Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri; 2014.
-
44 Rede de Bancos de Alimentos do Rio Grande do Sul [Internet]. Porto Alegre: Federação das Indústrias do Rio Grande do Sul; 2014 [cited 2024 jul 18]. Available from: http://www.redebancodealimentos.org.br/Inicial
» http://www.redebancodealimentos.org.br/Inicial -
45 Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome (Brasil). Manual de Implantação do Banco de Alimentos. Brasília: MDS; 2006 [cited 2024 Jul 18]. Available from: http://www.mds.gov.br/backup/programas/seguranca-alimentar-e-nutricional-san/banco-de-alimentos/MANUAL%20DE%20IMPLANTAcaO%20DO%20BANCO%20DE%20ALIMENTOS.doc
» http://www.mds.gov.br/backup/programas/seguranca-alimentar-e-nutricional-san/banco-de-alimentos/MANUAL%20DE%20IMPLANTAcaO%20DO%20BANCO%20DE%20ALIMENTOS.doc - 46 Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome (Brasil). Edital MDS/SESAN No 05/2012. Seleção Pública de Propostas para Apoio à Implantação ou Modernização de Bancos de Alimentos em Centrais de Abastecimento. Brasília: MDS; 2012.
- 47 Ministério do Desenvolvimento Social e Combate à Fome (Brasil). Edital MDS/SESAN No 02/2011. Seleção Pública de Propostas para Apoio à Implantação ou Modernização de Bancos de Alimentos. Brasília: MDS; 2011.
- 48 Presidência da República (Brasil). Decreto no 10.490, de 17 de setembro de 2020. Institui a Rede Brasileira de Bancos de Alimentos e o Comitê Gestor da Rede Brasileira de Bancos de Alimentos. Brasília: Diário Oficial da União; 2020.
- 49 Tenuta N, Barros T, Teixeira RA, Paes-Sousa R. Brazilian Food Banks: overview and perspectives. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(23):12598.
-
50 Costa, LA, et al. Capacidade de resposta de Bancos de Alimentos na captação, distribuição e redução de desperdício de alimentos. RBSP. 2014;38(1):30-48. doi: https://doi.org/10.22278/2318-2660.2014.v38.n1.a716
» https://doi.org/10.22278/2318-2660.2014.v38.n1.a716 - 51 Galisa, MS. Reflexão bioética sobre a contribuição do programa de banco de alimentos no direito humano à alimentação adequada e no meio ambiente [tese]. São Paulo: Centro Universitário São Camilo; 2014.
-
52 Paula NF, Assis L, Ribeiro CSG, Bezerra I. Manual de boas práticas para bancos de alimentos: a perspectiva de uma nova construção. DEMETRA. 2017;12(2):361-83, doi: https://doi.org/10.12957/demetra.2017.22877
» https://doi.org/10.12957/demetra.2017.22877 - 53 Silva KCC. Processos educativos nos bancos de alimentos: perspectivas e desafios com base em uma experiência [monografia]. João Pessoa: Universidade Federal da Paraíba; 2018.
-
54 Benavides, DAD. Proposta do método Archer de modelo de valor para a formação de um centro de assessoria em gastronomia nutricional e saudável, no Banco de Alimentos de Bogotá DC [monografia]. Bogotá: Pontifícia Universidad Javariana; 2021 [cited 2025 Jan 23]. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10554/54035
» http://hdl.handle.net/10554/54035 - 55 Barros, TP. Avaliação do Grau de Implantação de bancos de alimentos públicos de Minas Gerais [dissertação]. Diamantina: Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri; 2022.
-
56 Garcia ACN, Fonseca HS, Jardim MZ, Cordeiro NG, Lisboa SCP, Amaral JHC, et al. Condição domiciliar de (In)Segurança Alimentar dos trabalhadores dos bancos de alimentos. Segur Aliment Nutr. 2022;29: e022022. doi: https://doi.org/10.20396/san.v29i00.8657904
» https://doi.org/10.20396/san.v29i00.8657904 -
57 Manzanero-Rodriguez R, Hurtado-Moreno O, Perez-Jimenez J. Caracterización de las donaciones de alimentos solicitadas por entidades de apoyo social en la comunidad de Madrid: una valoración preliminar. Rev Esp Nutr Hum Diet. 2023;27(1):84-92. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.27.1.1827.
» https://doi.org/10.14306/renhyd.27.1.1827 -
58 Tenuta N, Alves Teixeira R, Paes-Sousa R. A lógica da intervenção e os indicadores de monitoramento e avaliação de Bancos de Alimentos brasileiros. Nau Soc. 2024;14(26):1279. doi: https://doi.org/10.9771/ns.v14i26.51056
» https://doi.org/10.9771/ns.v14i26.51056 - 59 Garajau NI, Afonso MLM. Articulação intersetorial como estratégia de gestão na Política de Segurança Alimentar e Nutricional no Brasil: análise do Programa Cozinha Comunitária. Segur Aliment Nutr. 2016;23:1065-79.
- 60 Nascimento JC, Quintão DF. Avaliação das condições de ambiência em três cozinhas comunitárias do município de Leopoldina (MG). Rev Cient FAMINAS. 2012;8(1):11-23.
-
61 Sarti FM, Marchioni DML, Bandoni DH, Figueiredo ICR, Brasil BG. Análise custo-efetividade aplicada a políticas públicas de segurança alimentar e nutricional no Brasil: uma avaliação do Programa Cozinhas Comunitárias. Rev Gest Políticas Públicas. 2013;3(2):368-86. doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2237-1095.v3p368-386
» https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2237-1095.v3p368-386 - 62 Rabelo MM, Ruckert IN. A construção da política de segurança alimentar e nutricional: o caso de Porto Alegre. Indic Econ FEE. 2014;41(3):85-100.
- 63 Perin G. Segurança alimentar e políticas públicas: uma análise da implementação das cozinhas comunitárias em Porto Alegre/RS [dissertação]. Porto Alegre: Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; 2017.
-
64 Vasconcelos CVS, Silva Lima MR, Souza Vasconcelos LT. Com as mãos na terra: estratégias de promoção em nutrição agroecológica. Arq Ciênc Saúde Unipar. 2022;26(1):89-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.25110/arqsaude.v26i1.2022.7987
» https://doi.org/10.25110/arqsaude.v26i1.2022.7987 - 65 Severo VMA. Cozinhas comunitárias e o coletivo multiplicidade no combate à fome: desafios e proposições de melhorias [monografia]. Porto Alegra: Pontíficia Universidade Católica do Sul; 2023.
- 66 Bandoni DH, Marchioni DML, Brasil BG, Figueiredto IC, Sarti FM. O programa de incentivo à instalação de cozinhas comunitárias: avaliação de uma política pública brasileira. Nutrire Rev Soc Bras Aliment Nutr. 2010;35(1):15-27.
Edited by
-
Editor
Maria Angélica Tavares de Medeiros


Note: CK: Community Kitchens; FB: Food Banks; PR: Popular-Restaurants.