Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Evaluation of a cotton germplasm collection against Fusarium wilt race 3 isolates from Egypt

Abstract

Pathogenic variation of 30 isolates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum (FOV) race 3 was evaluated on seedlings of the highly susceptible cotton cultivar 'Giza 74' in greenhouse assays. FOV isolates were clustered based upon their virulence patterns. The clusters of FOV isolates were not related to their geographic origins. Fifty-five experimental cotton genotypes were evaluated under greenhouse conditions for resistance to Fusarium wilt, in autoclaved clay loam soil infested with a mixture of equal parts (w/w) of 30 isolates of FOV race 3 at a rate of 10 g/kg of soil. Eleven genotypes were rated as highly susceptible (survival frequency from zero to 24.7%) and 21 genotypes were rated as highly resistance (survival frequency of 79.6 to 100%). The remaining genotypes displayed variable levels of partial resistance. Since no wilt nursery has been established in Egypt, greenhouse tests will continue to be the only reliable method for screening cotton breeding materials for FOV resistance. The current absence of Fusarium wilt in commercial cotton fields in Egypt demonstrates the reliability of the adopted screening procedures in discriminating cotton genotypes for resistance to Fusarium wilt.

Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum; Gossypium barbadense; Gossypium spp.; germplasm screening


Evaluation of a cotton germplasm collection against Fusarium wilt race 3 isolates from Egypt

Kamel A. Abd-Elsalam; Moawad R. Omar; Abdelmogny Asran-Amal; Mahmoud T. Mansour; Aly Abd El-Hady Aly

Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt

Author for correspondence Author for correspondence: Kamel Abd-Elsalam, e-mail: abd-elsalam.k.a@post.com

ABSTRACT

Pathogenic variation of 30 isolates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum (FOV) race 3 was evaluated on seedlings of the highly susceptible cotton cultivar 'Giza 74' in greenhouse assays. FOV isolates were clustered based upon their virulence patterns. The clusters of FOV isolates were not related to their geographic origins. Fifty-five experimental cotton genotypes were evaluated under greenhouse conditions for resistance to Fusarium wilt, in autoclaved clay loam soil infested with a mixture of equal parts (w/w) of 30 isolates of FOV race 3 at a rate of 10 g/kg of soil. Eleven genotypes were rated as highly susceptible (survival frequency from zero to 24.7%) and 21 genotypes were rated as highly resistance (survival frequency of 79.6 to 100%). The remaining genotypes displayed variable levels of partial resistance. Since no wilt nursery has been established in Egypt, greenhouse tests will continue to be the only reliable method for screening cotton breeding materials for FOV resistance. The current absence of Fusarium wilt in commercial cotton fields in Egypt demonstrates the reliability of the adopted screening procedures in discriminating cotton genotypes for resistance to Fusarium wilt.

Key words: Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum, Gossypium barbadense, Gossypium spp., germplasm screening.

INTRODUCTION

Fusarium wilt is a destructive disease of cotton (Gossypium spp.) in many countries of the world including Australia, USA, Egypt, Tanzania, and China (Feng et al., 2000). The disease is caused by the soil inhabiting fungus Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum (G.F. Atk.) W.C. Snyder & H.N. Hansen (FOV) (teleomorph: Neocosmospora vasinfecta), which causes vascular wilt in susceptible cotton (Watkins, 1981; Chen et al., 1985; Hillocks, 1992; Davis et al., 1996) and okra cultivars (Aguiar et al., 2013). Fusarium wilt of cotton was first observed by Atkinson (1892) in USA. The first report of this disease outside the USA was done in Egypt, where it was rapidly disseminated after the release of the susceptible cultivar 'Sakal' during the 1920s (Fahmy, 1927).

Currently, up to eight races of FOV are recognized worldwide with most of them being geographically isolated (Abd-Elsalam et al., 2004; Abo et al., 2005). The determination of FOV races depends upon the analysis of their virulence profile in a set of differential cotton lines/ species and up to five non-cotton hosts (Davis et al., 1996). In Egypt, the occurrence of FOV race 3 has been documented in the Nile Valley, where it remains one of the most damaging pathogens on G. barbadense cultivars (Watkins, 1981; Abd-Elsalam et al., 2004). To date, race 3 is the only one found in Egypt. This race was also reported attacking G. barbadense in the former Soviet Union (Watkins, 1981).

Techniques for screening cotton germplasm resistance to FOV need to be rigorous because even plants with mild foliar symptoms can be colonized by the pathogen and do exhibit stem discoloration (Davis et al., 2006). The root-cut dip method of inoculation is useful for screening wilt resistance in cotton and has been widely employed (Kim et al., 2005). However, this method may occasionally damage the plants and result in severe wilt even in resistant genotypes (Hillocks, 1992). Other inoculation methods, such as the stem puncture, have been also employed, but they give less discriminating wilt reactions (Ibrahim & Nirenberg, 1993; 2000)

FOV was responsible for serious yield losses in commercial Egyptian cotton (G. barbadense) in the late 1950s. Since then, an extensive cotton-breeding program was initiated to develop cultivars highly resistant to the disease. In this program, breeding materials supplied by cotton breeders (Cotton Research Institute) have been screened for Fusarium-wilt resistance under greenhouse conditions using soil infested with FOV isolates. This test has been conducted for the past 50 years at the Cotton and Fiber Crop Diseases Research Section (Plant Pathology Research Institute), Agricultural Research Center, Giza, Egypt. This breeding program has been so successful in developing highly resistant commercial cultivars that the disease no longer occurs at epidemic levels in the major cotton-producing areas of the country. However, Fusarium wilt remains a potential threat to cotton K.A. Abd-Elsalam et al. production because FOV isolates are well established in Egypt as indicated by the severe disease symptoms whenever susceptible cultivars are used (Abd-Elsalam et al., 2009; Aly et al., 2000). In addition, either new races (other than race 3) or new biotypes within the race 3 may arise after continuous growing of resistant cotton cultivars over the years.

In this context, the objective of the present work was to provide information on the variability of FOV race 3 isolates as well as about the efficiency of the methodology currently used in Egypt to screen cotton germplasm for Fusarium wilt resistance.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

FOV isolates and their geographic origins

A random collection of single-spore Fusarium isolates was chosen from the fungal culture collection of the Fiber Crop Diseases Section (Plant Pathology Research Institute). Isolates were originally recovered from symptomatic greenhouse-grown seedlings of the highly susceptible cultivar 'Giza 74' after cultivation in naturally infested soil samples collected from different locations in Egypt. Fusarium isolates were identified at the species level as F. oxysporum according to Booth (1971). Pathogenicity of F. oxysporum isolates was evaluated on the highly susceptible cultivar 'Giza 74'. The isolates able to induce typical Fusarium wilt symptoms in 'Giza 74' were classified as FOV (Aly et al., 2000).

A random sample of 30 FOV isolates was chosen for further studies. Most of Lower Egypt (LE) isolates were obtained from east Delta governorates (Sharqiya, Daqahliya and Damietta). These represented 41.2% of LE isolates, while south Delta (Qulyubiya) isolates represented the lowest percentage (5.9%). Isolates from north Delta (Kafer El-Sheikh), west Delta (Beheira), and middle Delta (Gharbiya and Minufiya) represented 17.6, 11.8 and 23.5% of the LE isolates, respectively (Table 1). The majority of Upper Egypt (UE) isolates (46.2%) come from south UE (Assiut and Sohag). Isolates of north (Beni suef and Fayoum) and middle (Minya) areas were represented by 38.5 and 15.4%, respectively of the UE isolates (Table 1). Therefore, the two groups of FOV isolates covered most of the cotton-growing regions in Egypt.

Assessment of the pathogenic variation of FOV isolates on 'Giza 74' seedlings

Autoclaved clay loamsoilwasinfested with inoculums of each isolate at a rate of 10 g/kg of soil. Substrate for growth of each isolate was prepared in 500 mL glass bottles. Each bottle contained 50 g of sorghum and 40 mL of tap water. Contents of bottles were autoclaved for 30 minutes. Inoculum (mycelium and conidiospores) was obtained from one-week-old culture on potato dextrose agar (PDA), was aseptically introduced into the bottle and allowed to colonize sorghum for three weeks. Fungus-sorghum mixture was used to infest soil. Infested soil was dispensed in 15 cm diameter clay pots and each pot was planted with 20 seeds of the 'Giza 74' (Aly, 1988). Pots were distributed on greenhouse benches. The greenhouse was equipped with a heating system assuring that the minimum temperature in the greenhouse was maintained at 28ºC. However, due to the lack of a cooling system, the maximum temperature was out of control, fluctuating from 30 to 35ºC depending on the prevailing temperature during the day (the test was conducted in January and February). The pathogenicity test was repeated once with essentially the same results. Dead as well as surviving seedlings (with external symptoms) were counted daily. In the surviving seedlings, discrete areas of vein discoloration in the cotyledonary leaves usually began at the margin, turned yellow or brown, and eventually the entire leaf wilted. Seedlings that remained apparently healthy six weeks after planting were cut diagonally across the root and stem to examine the internal symptoms. If discoloration of xylem vessels was observed, they were considered infected. If seedlings were free of such a discoloration, they were considered healthy. Thus, seedlings of 'Giza 74' were placed in four distinct classes: (1) resistant (healthy) if they were free of any external or internal symptoms; (2) slightly susceptible if the surviving seedlings showed discoloration of xylem vessels; (3) susceptible if the surviving seedlings showed vein discoloration in the cotyledonary leaves, and (4) highly susceptible if the seedlings died. Symptoms on 'Giza 74 'seedlings are shown in Figure 1.


Screening of cotton genotypes for Fusarium wilt resistance under greenhouse conditions

The genotypes evaluated in this assay were part of the Cotton Screening Program for Fusarium wilt resistance. The test, which included 55 experimental breeding materials (Table 2), was conducted in Cotton and Fiber Crop Diseases Research section, Plant Pathology Research Institute, Agric. Res. Cent., Egypt. The inoculum used in the test was a mixture of equal parts (w/w) of 30 isolates of FOV race 3. Autoclaved clay loam soil was infested with the mixture of isolates isolate at rate of 10 g/kg of soil. The infested soil was dispensed in 15 cm diameter clay pots and 20 seeds per each pot were planted (three pots for each genotype). The test was repeated once with almost the same results. Seedlings of each genotype were evaluated based on the previously mentioned four grade scale (resistant, slightly susceptible, susceptible, and highly susceptible).

Statistical analyses

The experimental design of greenhouse tests of FOV isolates and cotton genotypes was randomized complete block with three replications. Data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's multiple range test was used to compare isolate and genotype means. ANOVA was performed with MSTAT-C statistical package. Isolates were clustered by the average linked technique (unweighted pair-group method) and the results were expressed as a phenogram. Cluster analysis was performed with the software package SPSS 6.0.

RESULTS

Pathogenic variation of FOV isolates

A distinctive characteristic of LE isolates was their inability to induce vascular discoloration when compared with UE isolates (Tables 3 and 4). On the other hand, the percentage of LE isolates which induced cotyledonary yellowing and seedling death was greater than those of UE. There were no significant differences between FOV isolates from LE and UE regarding rate of plant survival, vascular discoloration, and dead seedlings. However, LE isolates caused significantly more cotyledonary yellowing than UE isolates (Tables 4 and 5). Symptoms used for evaluating pathogenicity of FOV isolates were better correlated in the case of LE isolates (Table 6). Isolates of FOV were clustered based on their virulence patterns on seedlings of 'Giza 74' (Figure 2). The observed clustering of the isolates was not related to their geographical origins.


Screening of cotton genotypes for Fusarium wilt resistance

Plant survival rate was used as a criterion to evaluate the reaction of the tested genotypes to Fusarium wilt. The tested genotypes showed a wide range of reactions to Fusarium wilt with survival rates ranging from 0 to 100% (Table 7). Genotypes #07, #13, #16, #17, #25, #39, #41, #43, #46, and #55 were classified as highly susceptible with survival rates ranging from 0 to 24.7%. Seedlings within each of these genotypes showed variable symptom expression due to the fact that many of these genotypes were not pure lines. On the other hand, genotypes #05, #19, #21, #24, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35, #36, #37, #38, #40, #45, #50, #51, #52, #53, and #54 were classified as highly resistant with plant survival rate ranging from 79.6 to 100%. The grade scale including the slightly susceptible, susceptible and highly susceptible categories, enabled us to differentiate within the susceptible group the genotypes that were statistically indistinguishable in terms of plant survival rate. For example, 5.56% of the tested seedlings of the genotype #5 were placed in the susceptible category (dead seedlings), while 5.56% of the tested seedlings of the genotype #19 were placed in the slightly susceptible category (displaying only vascular discoloration). This comparison implies that genotype #19 has superior levels of resistance to Fusarium wilt when compared to genotype #5 because it did not include any dead seedlings. Another example is the comparison between genotypes #36 and #37, which indicates the superiority of the first. The other genotypes showed variable levels of resistance/susceptibility between the two extremes of highly susceptible and highly resistant genotypes.

Among the significant correlations, those which included vascular discoloration showed the lowest r values. The correlation between vascular discoloration and dead seedlings was non significant (Table 8).

DISCUSSION

Advances in breeding cotton for resistance to FOV have been difficult because of the complex interaction of the host, pathogen, and soil environment. Host resistance offers the best opportunity to protect the cotton industry from virulent populations of FOV that may be introduced and from new virulent strains of FOV that may arise within cotton production areas.

Pathogenic variation within FOV isolates, as we have demonstrated herein, is well documented in the literature (Mohamed, 1958; Fahim et al., 1973; Osman, 1996; Abd-Elsalam et al., 2009). In the present study, genotypes were screened against 30 FOV isolates from almost all cotton growing areas in Egypt. The use of such a large number of isolates is a strategy to maximize the probability that resistant genotypes identified under greenhouse conditions will maintain their resistance levels under field conditions in distinct geographic locations. On the contrary, if genotypes were screened against a limited number of isolates, they may not perform as expected due to potential presence of isolates differing in their virulence profile from those used in the greenhouse tests.

A distinctive characteristic of Fusarium wilt is the olive brown discoloration of the root and stem xylem. However, there is no consensus regarding the diagnostic importance of this vascular discoloration for evaluation of the host germplasm reaction to Fusarium wilt. For example, Armstrong & Armstrong (1978) stated that vascular discoloration is a questionable standard for judging susceptibility to wilt in seedling tests. Zink et al. (1983) found no clear relationship between the severity of external symptoms in surviving muskmelon seedlings and the extent and degree of internal vascular discolorations. On the other hand, Salgado et al. (1994) used vascular discolorations as a criterion for judging susceptibility of tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius Gray) seedlings to Fusarium wilt. Osman (1996) found a highly significant correlation (r= 0.98, p<0.01) between external wilt symptoms and vascular discoloration of cotton seedlings (cultivar 'Giza 74').

In the present study, we used more rigorous criteria for disease rating. According to these criteria, the seedlings were considered slightly susceptible if they showed internal discolorations even though they were free of external symptoms. Thus, the seedlings were considered resistant only if they were completely free of any internal and external symptoms. In our study, cotton genotypes were screened under very favorable conditions for FOV development. The soil was sterile, temperature was optimal most of the time, and the inoculum density was relatively high. Under these conditions, it is unlikely that any susceptible genotypes would have escaped from infection. However, one should keep in mind that evaluation in the greenhouse precludes identifying genotypes that may possess useful levels of field resistance to wilt. The soil infestation method, which we used for seedling inoculation, had several advantages. Assays are simple, did not damage the seedlings, and provided discriminating and reproducible disease reactions.

Since no cotton wilt nurseries have been established in Egypt, greenhouse tests will continue to be the only reliable method for screening cotton breeding materials for Fusarium wilt resistance. The current absence of Fusarium wilt in commercial cotton fields using cultivars derived from our breeding program demonstrates the reliability of these screening procedures, which we have adopted in testing cotton genotypes for Fusarium wilt resistance. In addition, the present work provides new and useful sources of resistance that might be employed in breeding programs aiming to develop cotton cultivars with resistance to FOV race 3 isolates.

REFERENCES

Abd-Elsalam KA, Omar MR, Migheli Q, Nirenberg HI (2004) Genetic characterization of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum isolates by random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Journal of Plant Disease and Protection 111:534-544.

Abd-Elsalam KA, Omar R, Asran-Amal A, Aly AA (2009) Differential interaction between cotton genotypes and isolates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum. Archive of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 42:464-473.

Abo K, Klein KK, Edel-Hermann V, Gautheron N, Traore D, Steinberg C (2005) High genetic diversity among strains of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum from cotton in Ivory Coast. Phytopathology 95:1391-1396.

Aguiar FM, Michereff SJ, Boiteux LS, Reis A (2013) Search for sources of resistance to Fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum) in okra germplasm. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 13:33-40.

Aly AA, Eisa H, Mansour, MTM, Zayed SME, Omar MR (2000) Resistance to Fusarium wilt disease in families of some commercial cotton cultivars. In: 19th Conference of the Egyptian Phytopathological Society, Proceedings... Giza Egypt. Egyptian Phytopathological Society. pp. 113-121.

Aly AA (1988) Incidence of Fusarium wilt of flaxes influenced by biotic and abiotic factors. PhD Thesis, South Dakota State University. Brookings SD, USA.

Armstrong GM, Armstrong JK (1978) Formae speciales and races of Fusarium oxysporum causing wilts of the Cucurbitaceae. Phytopathology 68:19-28.

Atkinson GF (1892) Some diseases of cotton. 3. Frenching. Bulletin Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station 41:19-29.

Booth C (1971) The genus Fusarium. Kew UK. Commonwealth Mycological Institute.

Chen Q, Ji X, Sun W (1985) Identification of races of cotton wilt Fusarium in China. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 6:1-6.

Davis RD, Moore NY, Kochman JK (1996) Characterization of a population of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum causing wilt of cotton in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47:1143-1156.

Davis RM, Colyer PD, Rothrock CS, Kochman JK (2006) Fusarium wilt of cotton: Population diversity and implications for management. Plant Disease 90:692-703.

Fahmy T (1927) The Fusarium wilt disease of cotton and its control. Phytopathology 17:749-767.

Feng J, Wen S, Leiyan S, Ma, C, Feng J, Sun WJ, Shi CLY (2000) RAPD analysis of physiologic races of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum in China. Mycosystema 19:45-50.

Grinstein A, Fishler G, Katan J, Hakoen D (1983) Dispersal of the Fusarium wilt pathogen in furrow irrigated cotton in Israel. Plant Disease 67:742-743.

Hao JJ, Yang ME, Davis RM (2009) Effect of soil inoculum density of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum race 4 on disease development in cotton. Plant Disease 93:1324-1328.

Hillocks RJ (1992) Fusarium wilt. In: Hillocks RJ (Ed.) Cotton diseases. Melksham UK. Redwood Press Ltd. pp. 127-160.

Holmes EA, Bennett RS, Spurgeon DW, Colyer PD, Davis RM (2009) New genotypes of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum from the southeastern United States. Plant Disease 93:1298-1304.

Ibrahim G, Nirenberg HI (1993) Response of some Sudanese cotton cultivars to race 1 and 5 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum. Journal of Plant Disease and Protection 100:645651.

Ibrahim G, Nirenberg HI (2000) Recent studies on Fusarium vascular wilt of cotton at the Federal Biological Center for Agricultural and Forestry (BBA). Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft 377:87-88.

Kim Y, Hutmacher RB, Davis RM (2005) Characterization of California isolates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum. Plant Disease 89:366-372.

Mohamed HA (1963) Inheritance of resistance to fusarium wilt in some Egyptian cottons. Empire Cotton Growing Review 40:292-295. Salgado MO, Schwartz F, Pastor-Corrales MA (1994) Resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. phaseoli in tepary beans (Phaseolus acutifolius). Plant Disease 78:357-360.

Watkins GM (1981) Compendium of cotton diseases. St. Paul MN, USA. APS Press.

Submitted: 10 November 2012

Revisions requested: 6 April 2013

Accepted: 10 August 2013

TPP 2012-0125

Section Editor: Adalberto C. Café Filho

  • Abd-Elsalam KA, Omar MR, Migheli Q, Nirenberg HI (2004) Genetic characterization of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum isolates by random amplification of polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP). Journal of Plant Disease and Protection 111:534-544.
  • Abd-Elsalam KA, Omar R, Asran-Amal A, Aly AA (2009) Differential interaction between cotton genotypes and isolates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum Archive of Phytopathology and Plant Protection 42:464-473.
  • Abo K, Klein KK, Edel-Hermann V, Gautheron N, Traore D, Steinberg C (2005) High genetic diversity among strains of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum from cotton in Ivory Coast. Phytopathology 95:1391-1396.
  • Aguiar FM, Michereff SJ, Boiteux LS, Reis A (2013) Search for sources of resistance to Fusarium wilt (Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum) in okra germplasm. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 13:33-40.
  • Aly AA, Eisa H, Mansour, MTM, Zayed SME, Omar MR (2000) Resistance to Fusarium wilt disease in families of some commercial cotton cultivars. In: 19th Conference of the Egyptian Phytopathological Society, Proceedings... Giza Egypt. Egyptian Phytopathological Society. pp. 113-121.
  • Aly AA (1988) Incidence of Fusarium wilt of flaxes influenced by biotic and abiotic factors. PhD Thesis, South Dakota State University. Brookings SD, USA.
  • Armstrong GM, Armstrong JK (1978) Formae speciales and races of Fusarium oxysporum causing wilts of the Cucurbitaceae. Phytopathology 68:19-28.
  • Atkinson GF (1892) Some diseases of cotton. 3. Frenching. Bulletin Alabama Agricultural Experiment Station 41:19-29.
  • Booth C (1971) The genus Fusarium Kew UK. Commonwealth Mycological Institute.
  • Chen Q, Ji X, Sun W (1985) Identification of races of cotton wilt Fusarium in China. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 6:1-6.
  • Davis RD, Moore NY, Kochman JK (1996) Characterization of a population of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum causing wilt of cotton in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 47:1143-1156.
  • Davis RM, Colyer PD, Rothrock CS, Kochman JK (2006) Fusarium wilt of cotton: Population diversity and implications for management. Plant Disease 90:692-703.
  • Fahmy T (1927) The Fusarium wilt disease of cotton and its control. Phytopathology 17:749-767.
  • Feng J, Wen S, Leiyan S, Ma, C, Feng J, Sun WJ, Shi CLY (2000) RAPD analysis of physiologic races of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum in China. Mycosystema 19:45-50.
  • Grinstein A, Fishler G, Katan J, Hakoen D (1983) Dispersal of the Fusarium wilt pathogen in furrow irrigated cotton in Israel. Plant Disease 67:742-743.
  • Hao JJ, Yang ME, Davis RM (2009) Effect of soil inoculum density of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum race 4 on disease development in cotton. Plant Disease 93:1324-1328.
  • Hillocks RJ (1992) Fusarium wilt. In: Hillocks RJ (Ed.) Cotton diseases. Melksham UK. Redwood Press Ltd. pp. 127-160.
  • Holmes EA, Bennett RS, Spurgeon DW, Colyer PD, Davis RM (2009) New genotypes of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum from the southeastern United States. Plant Disease 93:1298-1304.
  • Ibrahim G, Nirenberg HI (1993) Response of some Sudanese cotton cultivars to race 1 and 5 of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum Journal of Plant Disease and Protection 100:645651.
  • Ibrahim G, Nirenberg HI (2000) Recent studies on Fusarium vascular wilt of cotton at the Federal Biological Center for Agricultural and Forestry (BBA). Mitteilungen aus der Biologischen Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft 377:87-88.
  • Kim Y, Hutmacher RB, Davis RM (2005) Characterization of California isolates of Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum. Plant Disease 89:366-372.
  • Mohamed HA (1963) Inheritance of resistance to fusarium wilt in some Egyptian cottons. Empire Cotton Growing Review 40:292-295.
  • Salgado MO, Schwartz F, Pastor-Corrales MA (1994) Resistance to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. phaseoli in tepary beans (Phaseolus acutifolius). Plant Disease 78:357-360.
  • Watkins GM (1981) Compendium of cotton diseases. St. Paul MN, USA. APS Press.
  • Author for correspondence:

    Kamel Abd-Elsalam,
    e-mail:
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      31 Jan 2014
    • Date of issue
      Feb 2014
    Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia Sociedade Brasileira de Fitopatologia, SGAS 902 Edifício Athenas - Bl. B, Salas 102/103, 70390-020 Brasília - DF Brasil, Tel: (55 61) 3225-2421 - Brasília - DF - Brazil
    E-mail: sbfito@sbfito.com.br