Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection

Sulfato de magnésio para neuroproteção fetal

EDITORIAL

Magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection

Sulfato de magnésio para neuroproteção fetal

Fabricio da Silva CostaI; Laudelino LopesII; Shaun BrenneckeIII

IConsultant Obstetrician and Clinical Senior Lecturer, Department of Perinatal Medicine, Royal Women's Hospital and Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne - Melbourne, Australia

IIProfessor and Head, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London (ON), Canada

IIIProfessor, Department of Perinatal Medicine, Royal Women's Hospital; Head, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia

Correspondência Correspondência: Fabricio da Silva Costa Royal Women's Hospital Pregnancy Research Centre 7 th floor, 20 Flemington Road, Parkville 3052 Melbourne, Australia

Introduction

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a group of disorders characterised by motor and/or postural dysfunction of a non-progressive nature commonly associated with cognitive impairment1. The prevalence of CP is 2/1,000 live births1, with principal obstetric risk factors being preterm birth (particularly less than 34 weeks) and very low birth weight (less than 1,500g)2. Approximately 42% of all cases of CP are associated with preterm birth (Australian Cerebral Palsy Register Group)3 with the rate of disorders amongst neonatal survivors born at less than 28 weeks gestation up to 30 times higher compared with infants born at term1.

CP has a severe impact for the health care system. In Australia, for example, the cost of CP to the Australian community is around US$3.8 billion per annum3. The Centers of Disease Control and Prevention estimates the lifetime costs - including direct medical (physician visits, hospital stays, medication, assistive devices, long-term care), direct nonmedical (home and automobile modifications, special education), and indirect (productivity loses) - for all people born with CP in 2000 to be $11.5 billion. The estimated lifetime cost of CP is US$1 million per case4.

To date, there have been limited antenatal strategies to prevent this devastating outcome, but encouraging results from meta-analysis5-7 using several large and well-designed trials8-12 confirm that administration of magnesium sulphate (MgSO4) improves the neurodevelopmental future of preterm infants.

The importance of preterm birth

The Canadian preterm birth rate overall reached 8.2% of live births in 2004, with births at <32 weeks representing 1.2% of live births in Canada2.

The rate of preterm birth is increasing in many countries, with recently reported rates of 12.8% in the United States (National Center for Health Statistics 2009), over 8% in Australia (AIHW 2009) and over 7% in New Zealand (New Zealand Health Information Service 2006), with corresponding increases in the number of babies at risk of death or an adverse neurological outcome3. Information published by the Ministry of Health in Brazil showed that preterm birth rate is stable in the last few years with mean of 6.6%, with some metropolis reaching 9%13.

The survival of infants born preterm has improved with interventions such as antenatal corticosteroids and surfactant. However, survival has been associated with substantial risk of medical and neurodevelopmental impairment14.

Clinically, the most frequent adverse neurological outcomes associated with preterm birth are CP and cognitive impairment14. More than 50% of very preterm babies suffer from learning or motor disabilities or school difficulties, compared with about 20% of normal birthweight controls15.

Magnesium sulphate for neuroprotection

Magnesium sulphate is widely available and commonly used worldwide in obstetric practice for eclampsia prophylaxis and treatment. Magnesium sulphate is no longer recommended for tocolysis because it is ineffective16.

In the 1990s, observational studies suggested an association between prenatal exposure to MgSO4 and less frequent subsequent neurologic morbidities17. Subsequently, several large randomized prospective clinical trials have been performed to evaluate the utility of MgSO4 for fetal and neonatal neuroprotection. Table 1 presents a summary of these studies. The five trials examining the impact of magnesium sulphate on CP have been the subject of a Cochrane review16 and three meta-analyses in 20095-7.

Although the effectiveness of MgSO4 for prevention and treatment of maternal eclampsia is well proven, there remains a lack of understanding of how it may act as a neuroprotective agent. Magnesium acts in many intracellular processes, and its actions include cerebral vasodilatation, reduction in inflammatory cytokines and/or oxygen free radicals, and/or inhibition of calcium influx into cells14. Theoretically, MgSO4 might be neuroprotective due to effects on cellular metabolism, cell death or injury or blood flow to the brain.

The Cochrane and three other systematic reviews have all come to similar conclusions and so the summary of the Cochrane review is presented:

• antenatal MgSO4 had no overall significant effect on mortality (fetal, neonatal and later) (RR=1.04; 95%CI=0.92-1.17). This was an important negative finding since concerns were raised from one of the earlier trials that the reduction in CP may have been achieved at the expense of increased death rates in the MgSO4 group. The finding was unaltered when confined to those where MgSO4 was given specifically for neuroprotective intent;

• MgSO4 significantly reduced the risk of CP (RR=0.68; 95%CI=0.54-0.87) and this remained significant when only the four trials in which magnesium with neuroprotective intent were considered (RR=0.71; 95%CI=0.55-0.91). A similar magnitude of risk reduction was seen for moderate to severe CP (RR=0.64; 95%CI=0.44-0.92) and substantial gross motor dysfunction (RR=0.61; 95%CI=0.44-0.85);

• there were no significant differences observed for the major maternal outcomes of death (RR=1.25; 95%CI=0.51-3.07), cardiac arrest (RR=0.34; 95%CI=0.04-3.26) or respiratory arrest (RR=1.02; 95%CI=0.06-16.25). Significantly more women ceased therapy in the magnesium group (RR=3.26; 95%CI=2.46-3.51). Regarding secondary maternal outcomes, magnesium therapy was associated with significantly more hypotension (RR=1.51; 95%CI=1.09-2.09) and tachycardia (RR=1.53, 95%CI=1.03-2.29). There were no differences seen in rates of maternal respiratory depression, postpartum haemorrhage or caesarean delivery;

• the "number needed to treat" (NNT) will rise in parallel with increasing gestational age, given the reducing incidence of CP with advancing gestation. In these trials, the absolute risk of CP was 3.7% among those treated and 5.4% in those receiving the placebo. This relative risk reduction (31%) translates an absolute risk reduction of 1.7% and therefore the number of women needed to treat to benefit one baby was 63. Among those infants delivered at less than 28 weeks gestation, where the background incidence of CP is much higher, the NNT was only 29. It should be noted that both of these NNTs compare favourably with the approximately 70 women with preeclampsia who need to be treated to prevent one eclamptic fit18.

Magnesium sulphate produces flushing, sweating, and a sensation of warmth by its peripheral vasodilator effects when infused intravenously. Other reported maternal side effects, related to dosage and speed of infusion, include nausea, vomiting, headache, palpitations and, rarely, pulmonary oedema. Administration of MgSO4 to concentrations above the recommended therapeutic range can lead to respiratory depression, respiratory arrest, cardiac arrest and death.

In the neonate, hypermagnesaemia can lead to hyporeflexia, poor sucking, and, rarely, respiratory depression needing mechanical ventilation.

In the Conde-Agudelo and Romero5 meta-analysis, MgSO4 given with neuroprotective intent was not associated with a difference in Caesarean section (822 [42.9%] in the magnesium arm versus 834 [42.8%] for placebo; RR=1.0; 95%CI=0.9 to 1.1; 3 trials, 3,867 women) or severe postpartum hemorrhage (28 [3.4%] in the magnesium arm versus 26 [3.2%] for placebo; RR=1.1; 95%CI=0.6 to 1.8; 2 trials, 1,626 women). None of the trials reported length of labour or augmentation of labour.

International guidelines

Australian National Clinical Practice Guidelines were published in March 2010 by the Antenatal Magnesium Sulphate for Neuroprotection Guideline Development Panel. They recommended antenatal MgSO4 for fetal neuroprotection (excellent evidence) in the same dosage as recommended in these guidelines. However, magnesium was recommended only at <30 weeks gestation (good evidence)3. Also in March 2010, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists issued a committee opinion on MgSO4 for fetal neuroprotection. It stated that "the available evidence suggests that magnesium sulphate given before anticipated early preterm birth reduces the risk of cerebral palsy in surviving infants". No official opinion was given on a gestational age cut-off, but it was recommended that physicians develop specific guidelines around the issues of inclusion criteria, dosage, concurrent tocolysis, and monitoring in accordance with one of the larger trials19.

In May 2011, the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada issued their committee opinion recommending that antenatal MgSO4 administration should be considered for fetal neuroprotection when women present at <31+6 weeks with imminent preterm birth, defined as a high likelihood of birth with or without preterm labour rupture of membranes, and/or planned preterm birth for fetal or maternal indications in the same dosage as recommended in these guidelines14.

Clinical recommendations (adapted from The Antenatal Magnesium Sulphate for Neuroprotection Guideline Development Panel3)

A summary of clinical recommendations is presented in Table 2.

Dose and timing

Using a 10 mL vial of MgSO4 prepare 4 g (i.e. 8 mL) of MgSO4 50% in a 10 mL syringe, configure the pump to accept the 10 mL syringe and set the pump to 32 mL an hour for 15 minutes as loading dose. For maintenance rate once the loading dose has been completed, using a 50 mL vial of MgSO4 prepare 50 mL of MgSO4 50% in a 50 mL syringe, re-configure the pump to accept the 50 mL syringe and set the pump to administer the maintenance rate of 1 g/hour (2 mL/hour) or as ordered. Continue regimen until birth or for 24 hours, whichever comes first.

If birth before 30 weeks is planned or expected to occur sooner than 4 hours (e.g. scheduled caesarean or late presentation to hospital), administer MgSO4 to women at risk of preterm birth, as there is still advantage likely from administration within this time. In situations where urgent delivery is necessary because of actual or imminent maternal or fetal compromise (e.g. severe fetal distress or antepartum haemorrhage), then birth should not be delayed to administer MgSO4.

In the event that birth does not occur after giving MgSO4 for neuroprotection of the infant, and preterm birth (less than 30 weeks gestation) appears imminent again (planned or definitely expected within 24 hours), a repeat dose of MgSO4 may be considered at the discretion of the attending health professional.

Location of administration of antenatal magnesium sulphate

The location of administration of antenatal MgSO4 intravenously to women should be determined by each individual maternity facility. During administration of MgSO4intravenously, women should be regularly assessed as detailed in individual obstetric unit protocols. Resuscitation and ventilatory support should be immediately available, if needed, during administration of MgSO4. If hypotension or respiratory depression occur prompt medical review is recommended. This may include cessation of MgSO4. A minimum assessment should include checking pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate and patellar reflexes before loading dose, 10 minutes after loading dose infusion has started and at the end of the loading dose infusion (20-30 minutes). The infusion should be stopped if respiratory rate decreases more than 4 breaths per minute below baseline, or it is less than 12 breaths per minute; or diastolic blood pressure decreases more than 15 mmHg below baseline level. While the maintenance infusion is running, observe any adverse effects. The minimum assessments should include checking pulse, blood pressure, respiratory rate, patellar reflexes and urine output 4-hourly. Stop infusion if respiratory rate is less than 12 breaths per minute; if patellar reflexes are absent, if hypotension occurs or if urine output is less than 100 mL over 4 hours.

Toxicity and potential interactions

Magnesium toxicity is unlikely with the regimen recommended in these guidelines and serum magnesium concentrations do not need to be routinely measured. In women with renal compromise, serum magnesium monitoring is recommended. Calcium gluconate (1 g -10 mL of 10% solution - slowly via intravenous route over 10 minutes) can be given if there is clinical concern over respiratory depression. There is a potential theoretical interaction between MgSO4 and nifedipine of hypotension and neuromuscular blockade effects, although this is seldom reported in clinical practice. Regular monitoring of the mother is recommended as detailed in individual obstetric unit protocols. If hypotension occurs, nifedipine and MgSO4 administration should cease and the woman should be promptly reviewed by a medical practitioner.

Implementation implications (adapted from The Antenatal Magnesium Sulphate for Neuroprotection Guideline Development Panel3)

Changes in usual care

While intravenous MgSO4 administration is standard care and in common use to prevent and treat eclampsia, as yet, fewer obstetric units around the world are using antenatal MgSO4 for fetal, infant, and child neuroprotection.

Resource implications

Although MgSO4 is an inexpensive drug, setting up, maintaining and monitoring MgSO4 infusions will incur additional staff time. There will also be training needs, but these should be minimal as all units will have experience with MgSO4 infusions to treat or prevent eclampsia. Less than 1.2% of all births occur at before 30 weeks gestation. Up to 10% of these babies will have been exposed in utero to MgSO4 as procedure for prevention and treatment of eclampsia.

Changes in the way care is currently organised

It is acknowledged that while all tertiary obstetric units dealing with babies likely to be born at or before 30 weeks will already have established protocols and systems that will enable them to administer MgSO4 intravenously to women at risk of preterm birth less than 30 weeks gestation, appropriate staffing structures may not be always in place to enable the safe administration of MgSO4. The ideal setting for babies to be born before 30 weeks is a tertiary specialist unit. Given that the clinical indication for MgSO4 is planned or definitely expected preterm birth before 30 weeks, then its use will generally be within tertiary obstetric units. Women threatening to give birth before 30 weeks in other settings, and fulfilling all other guideline criteria, may be eligible to receive MgSO4 after consultation of their clinical carers with their local tertiary obstetric network, depending on the service capability and staffing of the non-tertiary unit.

Barriers to implementation

Barriers to implementation will include finding the extra time and staff required to administer MgSO4 to more women. However, as MgSO4 infusions, in the recommended regimens, are already widely practised for treatment of severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia at these gestational ages, training needs should be minimal as all units will have experience. Monitoring women during and after they have received antenatal infusions of MgSO4 is usually recommended and every obstetric unit should determine their own protocols for monitoring outcomes. As toxicity is uncommon in the recommended regimen in these guidelines, routine monitoring of serum MgSO4 concentrations may not be required in all cases.

What's next?

Despite the strength of the data presented for MgSO4 in fetal neuroprotection, there remain significant gaps in our knowledge and future research priorities have been identified. Some clinicians remain sceptical regarding the validity of the findings -given the heterogeneity of the trials and the lack of statistical significance for their a priori primary outcome (death or disability) and point to the need for further confirmatory data.

Further randomised trials are needed, comparing antenatal MgSO4 with placebo when given to women at risk of preterm birth at 30 weeks gestation or more, that assess mortality, CP and combined death and CP.

Further randomised controlled trials are required specifically comparing3:

• different speeds of administering the loading dose of MgSO4 to establish if slower loading reduces maternal adverse effects;

• optimal timing of the antenatal administration of MgSO4 prior to preterm birth;

• loading dose versus loading dose plus maintenance;

• different loading doses (4 g versus 6 g);

• use of repeat doses of MgSO4;

• treatment of the very preterm infant with MgSO4 after birth.

Conclusion

Cerebral palsy is permanent, can result in severe sequelae for the infant, and can significantly affect the family and society as a whole. The NNT to prevent one case of CP appears justifiable and comparable with that for eclampsia prevention. Given the relative safety of MgSO4 for the mother, the lack of evident risk regarding infant mortality, and the familiarity of most obstetricians with its use, MgSO4 should be considered for neuroprotection in the setting of preterm birth in countries such as Brazil.

Recebido 20/06/2011

Aceito com modificações 30/07/2011

  • 1. Stanley FJ, Watson L. Trends in perinatal mortality and cerebral palsy in Western Australia, 1967 to 1985. BMJ. 1992;304(6843):1658-63.
  • 2. Himpens E, Van den Broeck C, Oostra A, Calders P, Vanhaesebrouck P. Prevalence, type, distribution, and severity of cerebral palsy in relation to gestational age: a meta-analytic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(5):334-40.
  • 3
    The Antenatal Magnesium Sulphate for Neuroprotection Guideline Development Panel [Internet]. Antenatal magnesium sulphate prior to preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus, infant and child: national clinical practice guidelines. Adelaide: The University of Adelaide; 2010 [cited 2011 Apr 8]. Available from: http://www.adelaide.edu.au/arch/MagnesiumSulphate2010.pdf
  • 4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Economic costs associated with mental retardation, cerebral palsy, hearing loss, and vision impairment-United States, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004;53(3):57-9.
  • 5. Conde-Agudelo A, Romero R. Antenatal magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy in preterm infants less than 34 weeks' gestation: a systematic review and metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009;200(6):595-609.
  • 6. Costantine MM, Weiner SJ; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Effects of antenatal exposure to magnesium sulfate on neuroprotection and mortality in preterm infants: a meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(2 Pt 1):354-64.
  • 7. Doyle LW, Crowther CA, Middleton P, Marret S. Antenatal magnesium sulfate and neurologic outcome in preterm infants: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;113(6):1327-33.
  • 8. Mittendorf R, Dambrosia J, Pryde PG, Lee KS, Gianopoulos JG, Besinger RE, et al. Association between the use of magnesium sulfate in preterm labor and adverse health outcomes in infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(6):1111-8.
  • 9. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Doyle LW, Haslam RR; Australasian Collaborative Trial of Magnesium Sulphate (ACTOMgSO4) Collaborative group. Effect of magnesium sulphate given for neuroprotection before preterm birth: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2003;290(20):2669-76.
  • 10. Marret S, Marpeau L, Zupan-Simunek V, Eurin D, Lévêque C, Hellot MF, et al. Magnesium sulphate given before very-preterm birth to protect infant brain: the randomised controlled PREMAG trial*. BJOG. 2007;114(3):310-8.
  • 11. Rouse DJ, Hirtz DG, Thom E, Varner MW, Spong CY, Mercer BM, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(9):895-905.
  • 12. Magpie Trial Follow-up Study Collaborative Group. The Magpie Trial: a randomised trial comparing magnesium sulphate with placebo for pre-eclampsia. Outcome for children at 18 months. BJOG. 2007;114(3):289-99.
  • 13. Federação Brasileira das Associações de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia. Manual de orientação perinatologia [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: FEBRASGO; 2010 [citado 2011 Abr 8]. Disponível em: http://www.febrasgo.com.br/?op=paginas&tipo=pagina&secao=8&pagina=159
  • 14. Magee L, Sawchuck D, Synnes A, von Dadelszen P. SOGC Clinical Practice Guideline. Magnesium sulphate for fetal neuroprotection. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011;33(5):516-29.
  • 15. Anderson P, Doyle LW; Victorian Infant Collaborative Study Group. Neurobehavioral outcomes of school-age children born extremely low birth weight or very preterm in the 1990s. JAMA. 2003;289(24):3264-72.
  • 16. Doyle LW, Crowther CA, Middleton P, Marret S, Rouse D. Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD004661.
  • 17. Nelson KB, Grether JK. Can magnesium sulfate reduce the risk of cerebral palsy in very low birthweight infants? Pediatrics. 1995;95(2):263-9.
  • 18. Sibai BM. Diagnosis, prevention, and management of eclampsia. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;105(2):402-10.
  • 19. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice; Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Committee Opinion No. 455: Magnesium sulfate before anticipated preterm birth for neuroprotection. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(3):669-71.
  • Correspondência:

    Fabricio da Silva Costa
    Royal Women's Hospital
    Pregnancy Research Centre
    7
    th floor, 20 Flemington Road, Parkville 3052
    Melbourne, Australia
  • Publication Dates

    • Publication in this collection
      19 Aug 2011
    • Date of issue
      June 2011
    Federação Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia Av. Brigadeiro Luís Antônio, 3421, sala 903 - Jardim Paulista, 01401-001 São Paulo SP - Brasil, Tel. (55 11) 5573-4919 - Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brazil
    E-mail: editorial.office@febrasgo.org.br