SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.42 issue3Three year seroepidemiological study of varicella-zoster virus in São Paulo, BrazilThiamphenicol in the treatment of chancroid. A study of 1,128 cases author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de São Paulo

On-line version ISSN 1678-9946

Rev. Inst. Med. trop. S. Paulo vol.42 n.3 São Paulo May/June 2000

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652000000300003 

CONGENITAL CYTOMEGALOVIRUS INFECTION IN A NEONATAL INTENSIVE CARE UNIT IN BRAZIL EVALUATED BY PCR AND ASSOCIATION WITH PERINATAL ASPECTS

 

Daniel Vítor V. SANTOS(1), Maria Margarida R. SOUZA(1), Sérgio Henrique L. GONÇALVES(1), Ana Cristina S. COTTA(1), Lorenza A. O. MELO(2), Gláucia M. Q. ANDRADE(2) & Geraldo BRASILEIRO-FILHO(1)

 

 


SUMMARY

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is the most common congenital infection, affecting 0.4% to 2.3% newborns. Most of them are asymptomatic at birth, but later 10% develop handicaps, mainly neurological disturbances. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of CMV shed in urine of newborns from a neonatal intensive care unit using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and correlate positive cases to some perinatal aspects. Urine samples obtained at first week of life were processed according to a PCR protocol. Perinatal data were collected retrospectively from medical records. Twenty of the 292 cases (6.8%) were CMV-DNA positive. There was no statistical difference between newborns with and without CMV congenital infection concerning birth weight (p=0.11), gestational age (p=0.11), Apgar scores in the first and fifth minutes of life (p=0.99 and 0.16), mother's age (p=0.67) and gestational history. Moreover, CMV congenital infection was neither related to gender (p=0.55) nor to low weight (<2,500g) at birth (p=0.13). This high prevalence of CMV congenital infection (6.8%) could be due to the high sensitivity of PCR technique, the low socioeconomic level of studied population or the severe clinical status of these newborns.

KEYWORDS: Cytomegalovirus; Congenital infection; Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU); PCR


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV), a ubiquitous microrganism, is responsible for the most common and widespread congenital infection all over the world, affecting 0.4% to 2.3% of all newborns5,20. In selected populations such as those infants from neonatal intensive care units (NICU), figures are even larger13. Transplacental transmission of CMV may occur either due to maternal primary infection (especially in low prevalence populations) or to recurrent infections (reactivation or reinfection) during pregnancy9,21. Previous studies8,12,19,21,23 have pointed out that age, race, sexual activity, marital status, parity, socioeconomic background and contact with potential sources of CMV (eg. children in day care centers) are risk factors for delivering a congenitally infected newborn.

Fortunately, most of the infected children do not present signs of the disease at birth or soon thereafter, but up to 10% may have a severe symptomatic course or even long-term sequelae ranging from discrete learning disabilities to frank hearing loss or other ocular and neurological handicaps1,5,15,20,21. The importance of promptly diagnosing CMV infection resides in both the perspectives of intervening therapeutically to minimize morbidity, mortality and sequelae and of determining risk factors for future abnormalities5,20.

Classically, the gold standard diagnostic technique for congenital CMV infection has been viral isolation in urine, although usually only serology is available in daily practice, with its obvious limitations3,10. Alternative approaches have emerged, of which the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is especially promising for its high sensitivity, specificity and relative simplicity2,3,6,7,24,25.

In Brazil, studies have shown that prevalence of IgG antibodies to CMV in pregnant women range from 66.5% to 92% depending on the applied technique (enzyme linked immune assay or complement-fixing reaction, usually higher in the later)11 and on the social background of the studied population (low or middle socioeconomical level, higher in the former)14,22. Concerning congenital CMV infection assessed by viral isolation, its prevalence rates have been found to range from 0.46% and 0.92% in low and middle socioeconomical level populations respectively14. Recently, there has also been a report on the use of the PCR versus viral isolation in congenital and perinatal CMV infection25, but prevalence studies in neonatal intensive care units applying this technique are still lacking in Brazil.

Our study aimed at using this novel technique so as to determine the prevalence of congenital CMV infection in a selected population of infants in a NICU unit from a university hospital and to relate it to some perinatal findings.

 

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1995 to 1998, we studied 292 newborns from Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (HC-UFMG) selected at random, all of them from the NICU. Urine sample from each newborn was collected in the first week of life and stored in a freezer until processed.

PCR was performed using two pairs of primers that anneal to well-conserved immediate early (IE) and late (LA) transcripted regions of CMV genome leading to amplification of 393 and 139 bp fragments, respectively (Table 1).

 

 

From two milliliters of urine collected, 1mL was used for stock and 1mL for DNA extraction. The latter consisted of centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 15 minutes followed by discharge of the supernatant and suspension of the pellet (urine sediment) in 200mL of PCR buffer (2.5mL KCl 2M, 1mL Tris-HCl 1M pH 8, 250mL MgCl2 1M, 10mg gelatin, 450mL NP40, 450mL Tween 20 and H2O q.s.p. 100 mL). Six microliters of proteinase K solution (20mg/mL) were then added and incubated at 52 ºC for two hours. Finally, the enzyme was inactivated by boiling at 100 ºC for seven minutes. Reaction mixture consisted of 3mL of the former DNA suspension, 2.5mL of 10X PCR buffer (15mM MgCl2, 500 mM KCl, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH=8), 6 pmol of each of the four deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 0.75 IU of Taq DNA polymerase, 20 pmol of each primer and deionized water to get a final volume of 25mL. DNA amplification was performed in a MJ Research MiniCyclerTM (initial five-minute-denaturation at 94 ºC, two-minute-annealing and extension at     72 ºC followed by 34 cycles of thirty-second-denaturation at 94 ºC and two-minute-annealing and extension at 72 ºC, at the end of the programme, a seven-minute-final-extension at 72 ºC). All amplification reactions contained a positive (one microliter of extracted CMV DNA from positive urine) and negative (3mL of deionized water) controls. Products were submitted to electrophoresis and analyzed in silver-stained 6% polyacrilamide gels16.

Congenital CMV infection was defined as amplification of CMV DNA by either or both IE and LA primers in urine collected in the first week of life. All positive cases were confirmed in a second test.

Data on the newborns and their mothers were collected retrospectively from livebirth declaration forms ("Declaração de Nascidos Vivos" ¾ DNV), "Centro Latinoamericano de Perinatalogia" (CLAP-OPS/OMS) perinatal clinical history forms and medical records. Unfortunately, not all data were accessible for all patients due to incomplete and/or inadequate filling of the available records. Variables were considered suitable for statistical analysis when they were missing in less than 5% of the patients.

Statistical analysis were performed in Epi Info Software4 using Chi-square or Fisher (comparison of frequencies), ANOVA (comparison of means) and Kruskal-Wallis (comparison of medians) tests, depending on the data profile and distribution. P value was considered statistically significant when <0.05.

 

RESULTS

During the study interval, 292 newborns had urine samples analyzed: 179 males (61.3%) and 113 females (38.7%). Mean gestational age, weight, stature and cephalic perimeter at birth were respectively 35.3±2.8 weeks (median: 35 weeks), 2,226±751g (median: 2,100g), 44.4±4.1cm (median: 44.5cm) and 32.1±3.5cm (median: 32cm). Apgar scores at one and five minutes showed respective mean values of 6.5±2.5 (median: 8) and 8.4±1.2 (median: 9). Mean hospital stay was 22.0±23.8 days (median: 14 days). Mothers had a mean age of 26.9±6.9 years (median: 26 years), most of them were married or had a stable union (73.2%) and had only elementary education (72.4%). Their gestational history showed a mean of 1.4 deliveries (median: 1 delivery) and 0.3 miscarriage (median: no miscarriage).

Among the 292 newborns, 20 (6.8%) showed CMV-DNA in urine during their first week of life, indicating congenital infection (Table 2). In ten newborns, only LA primers yielded DNA amplification; in seven both LA and IE did so and in the remaining three newborns, only target DNA for IE primers was amplified.

 

 

Data loss did not differ when analyzing the frequency of CMV-DNA positive and negative subjects among those whose variables where available and those whose variables were missing.

Variables with less than 5% loss were analyzed (Table 2). Comparing non-infected versus CMV infected newborns, mean weight did not differ (2,245±748g versus 1,967±763g; p=0.11), so as gestational age medians (35 weeks versus 35 weeks; p=0.11). One and five-minute-Apgar scores showed similar medians in the two groups (p=0.99 and p=0.16) (Table 2). Low birth weight (<2500g) and normal birth weight (³2500g) were not statistically related to CMV congenital infection (p=0.13). There were also no gender differences concerning CMV infection (p=0.55) (Table 2).

Mother's age was slightly higher in CMV infected newborns (medians: 28.5 versus 26 years), although not statistically significant (p=0.67). A similar situation was observed when comparing both groups concerning parity (p=0.25) and number of miscarriages (p=0.51) (Table 2).

 

DISCUSSION

In Brazil, studies applying polymerase chain reaction in the diagnosis of CMV congenital infection are still scarce25, especially those dealing with prevalence in a significant number of newborns and specifically in a neonatal intensive care unit. In this regard, we are adding important data to the knowledge of this subject. Moreover, we tried to correlate CMV congenital infection with some features linked to the infants and their mothers. In this analysis, it is essential to bear in mind that since previous maternal serological status was not available, we could be assessing not only factors influencing transplacental infection but also maternal infection12.

Despite the high prevalence of congenital CMV infection in our investigation (6.8%), values up to 10% have been described when studying infants from NICU elsewhere using the PCR13. The low socioeconomical level of the studied population and, mainly, the clinical status of the newborns (from a NICU) possibly influenced the high prevalence rate of congenital CMV infection now described as compared with that of the general population.

It is established that in populations with unfavourable socioeconomical conditions congenital CMV infection is more prevalent14,21. Besides, the expected number of infected newborns among those in worse clinical conditions is higher than in the general population, once the deleterious effects determined by the virus begin in the fetus. Finally the high sensitivity of the applied technique may have contributed towards a higher detection of congenital infection13,25. However, if from one side PCR improves sensitivity, from the other one must be aware of the risk of false positive results, essentially through contamination. So we tried to attenuate this risk performing DNA extraction, amplification and electophoresis phases in separated rooms, using positive and negative controls and making a second corfirmatory PCR test in all positive cases in the first reaction.

It is known that some variables are related to a higher or lower risk of delivering a CMV congenitally infected newborn8,12,19,21,23. In this studied population, we could not detect any difference between the group with and without congenital CMV infection concerning the analyzed maternal data (Table 2). Congenital CMV infection is a established cause of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). However, in our sample, birth weight was not different between infected and non-infected newborns (1,967±763g versus 2,245±748g; p=0.11). This finding may possibly be related to the profile of the newborns, since most of them, coming from the NICU, were affected by fetal or maternal diseases that cause IUGR. An analogous interpretation can be made concerning gestational age in these patients (medians: 35 versus 35 weeks; p=0.11), once there were other prevalent causes of prematurity in this population. Apgar scores did also not differ between the two groups, as other maternal aspects like age and gestational history.

Infected infants are being followed periodically by the infectologist staff of HC-UFMG. In the first visit, CMV serology, a skull x-ray and/or a transfontanel ultrasound and a fundoscopic examination are performed. The infant is then followed clinically in intervals of three months until two years old, when an audiometry test is performed. After that, the child is examined anually so as to evaluate his/her development.

In our experience, PCR technique showed to be useful and effective in the early diagnosis of congenital CMV infection.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

To Professor Eugênio Marcos Andrade Goulart, for his statistical support and reviewing of the manuscript.

 

 

RESUMO

Infecção congênita pelo citomegalovírus em unidade neonatal de alto risco de um hospital universitário no Brasil: prevalência avaliada pela PCR e associação com alguns aspectos perinatais

A citomegalovirose é das infecções congênitas mais prevalentes, acometendo de 0,4% a 2,3% dos nascidos vivos. A maioria dos recém-nascidos (RN) infectados é assintomática, mas até 10% desenvolvem seqüelas variadas, principalmente neurossensoriais. Objetivamos determinar a prevalência do CMV na urina de RN através da PCR, correlacionando-a a alguns achados perinatais. Analisamos amostras de urina colhidas na 1ª semana de vida de 292 RN do HC-UFMG, todos internados na unidade neonatal de alto risco. DNA viral foi amplificado segundo protocolo de PCR. Os dados perinatais foram colhidos retrospectivamente de registros médicos. Na população estudada, 20 dos 292 casos (6,8%) mostraram positividade para o DNA-CMV. Não houve diferença estatisticamente significante entre os RN com e os sem infecção congênita pelo CMV quanto a peso ao nascer (p=0,11), idade gestacional (p=0,11), índice de Apgar no 1º e 5º minutos (p=0,99 e 0,16), idade da mãe (p=0,67) e história gestacional materna. Também não se observou associação da infecção congênita pelo CMV com baixo peso ao nascer (p=0,13) ou sexo do RN (p=0,55). A alta prevalência da infecção congênita neste estudo (6,8%) pode ser devida à elevada sensibilidade da PCR, ao baixo nível sócio-econômico da população estudada ou às características clínicas mais graves desses RN.

 

 

REFERENCES

1. BOPPANA, S.B.; PASS, R.F.; BRITT, W.J.; STAGNO, S. & ALFORD, C.A. - Symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection: neonatal morbidity and mortality. Pediat. infect. Dis. J., 11: 93-99, 1992.         [ Links ]

2. BORG, K.L.; NORDBO, A.S.; WINGE, P. & DALEN, A. - Detection of cytomegalovirus using "boosted" nested PCR. Molec. cell. Probes, 9: 251-257, 1995.         [ Links ]

3. CHOU, S. - Newer methods for diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infection. Rev. infect. Dis., 12 (suppl. 7): S727-S736, 1990.

4. DEAN, A.G.; DEAN, J.A.; COULOMBIER, D. et al. ¾ Epi Info, Version 6: a Word processing, database and statistics program for Epidemiology on microcomputers. Atlanta, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1994.         [ Links ]

5. DEMMLER, G.J. ¾ Summary of a workshop on surveillance for congenital cytomegalovirus disease. Rev. infect. Dis., 13: 315-329, 1991.         [ Links ]

6. DEMMLER, G.J.; BUFFONE, G.J.; SCHIMBOR, C.M. & MAY, R.A. ¾ Detection of cytomegalovirus in urine from newborns by using polymerase chain reaction DNA amplification. J. infect. Dis., 158: 1177-1184, 1988.         [ Links ]

7. EHRNST, A. ¾ The clinical relevance of different laboratory tests in CMV diagnosis. Scand. J. infect. Dis., 100 (suppl.): 64-71, 1996.         [ Links ]

8. FOWLER, K.B. & PASS, R.F. ¾ Sexually transmitted diseases in mothers of neonates with congenital cytomegalovirus infection. J. infect. Dis., 164: 259-264, 1991.         [ Links ]

9. GRUNDY, J.E. ¾ Virologic and pathogenetic aspects of cytomegalovirus infection. Rev. infect. Dis., 12 (suppl. 7): S711-S719, 1990.         [ Links ]

10. LANDINI, M.P. ¾ New aproaches and perspectives in cytomegalovirus diagnosis. Progr. med. Virol., 40: 74-81, 1993.         [ Links ]

11. MAGALHÃES-NETO, J.M.; NOGUEIRA, F.E.; SILVA, J.F. et al. - Prevalência de anticorpos para citomegalovírus em gestantes em Salvador ¾ Bahia. Folha méd., 106: 55-57, 1993.         [ Links ]

12. MURPH, J.R.; SOUZA, I.E.; DAWSON, J.D et al. ¾ Epidemiology of congenital cytomegalovirus infection: maternal risk factors and molecular analysis of cytomegalovirus strains. Amer. J. Epidem., 147: 940-947, 1998.         [ Links ]

13. ODA, K.; OKI, S.; TSUMURA, N. et al. ¾ Detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in urine from newborns in NICU using a polymerase chain reaction. Kurume med. J., 42: 39-44, 1995.         [ Links ]

14. PANNUTI, C.S.; VILAS-BOAS, L.S.; ANGELO, M.J.O.; CARVALHO, R.P.S. & SEGRE, C.M. ¾ Congenital cytomegalovirus infection. Occurrence in two socioeconomically distinct populations of a developing country. Rev. Inst. Med. trop. S. Paulo, 27: 105-107, 1985.         [ Links ]

15. PASS, R.F.; STAGNO, S.; MYERS, G.J. & ALFORD, C.A. ¾ Outcome of symptomatic congenital cytomegalovirus infection: results of long-term longitudinal follow-up. Pediatrics, 66: 758-762, 1980.         [ Links ]

16. SANTOS, F.R.; PENA, S.D.J. & EPPLEN, J.T. ¾ Genetic and population study of a Y-linked tetranucleotide repeat DNA polymorphism with a simple non-isotopic technique. Hum. Genet., 90: 655-656, 1993.         [ Links ]

17. SHIBATA, D. ¾ Detection of human cytomegalovirus. In: INNIS, M.A.; GELFAND, D.H.; SNINSKYEDS, J.J. et al., ed. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego, Academic Press, 1990. p 368-371.         [ Links ]

18. SHIBATA, D.; MARTIN, W.J. & APPLEMAN, M.D. - Detection of cytomegalovirus DNA in peripheral blood of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus. J. infect. Dis., 158: 1185-1192, 1988.         [ Links ]

19. SOHN, Y.M.; OH, M.K.; BARCAREK, K.B.; CLOUD, G.A. & PASS, R.F. ¾ Cytomegalovirus infection in sexually active adolescents. J. infect. Dis., 163: 460-463, 1991.         [ Links ]

20. STAGNO, S. - Cytomegalovirus. In: REMINGTON, J.S. & KLEIN, J.O., ed. Infectious diseases of the fetus and the newborn infant. 4. ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 1995.         [ Links ]

21. STAGNO, S.; PASS, R.F.; CLOUD, G.A. et al. ¾ Primary cytomegalovirus infection: incidence, transmission to the fetus, and clinical outcome. J. Amer. med. Ass., 256: 1904-1908, 1986.         [ Links ]

22. SUASSUNA, J.H.R.; LEITE, L.L. & VILLELA, L.H.C. ¾ Prevalence of cytomegalovirus infection in different patient groups of a urban university in Brazil. Rev. Soc. bras. Med. trop., 28: 105-108, 1995.         [ Links ]

23. TOOKEY, P.A.; ADES, A.E. & PECKHAM, C.S. ¾ Cytomegalovirus prevalence in pregnant women: the influence of parity. Arch. Dis. Childh., 67: 779-783, 1992.         [ Links ]

24. XU, W.; SUNDQVIST, A.; BRYTTING, M. & LINDE, A. ¾ Diagnosis of cytomegalovirus infections using polymerase chain reaction, virus isolation and serology. Scand. J. infect. Dis., 25: 311-316, 1993.         [ Links ]

25. YAMAMOTO, A.Y.; AQUINO, V.H.; FIGUEIREDO, L.T.M. & MUSSI-PINHATA, M.M. ¾ Diagnosis of congenital and perinatal cytomegalovirus infection by using the polymerase chain reaction. Rev. Soc. bras. Med. trop., 31: 19-26, 1998.         [ Links ]

 

Received: 27 October 1999
Accepted: 20 January 2000

 

Financial support: FAPEMIG
(1) Departamento de Anatomia Patológica e Medicina Legal da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil
(2) Departamento de Pediatria da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil

Correspondence to: Geraldo Brasileiro Filho, Departamento de Anatomia Patológica e Medicina Legal, Faculdade de Medicina da UFMG, Av. Alfredo Balena 190, 30130-100 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil; E-mail: gbrasil@medicina.ufmg.br

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License