## Services on Demand

## Journal

## Article

## Indicators

- Cited by SciELO
- Access statistics

## Related links

- Cited by Google
- Similars in SciELO
- Similars in Google
- uBio

## Share

## Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz

##
*Print version* ISSN 0074-0276

### Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz vol.106 no.6 Rio de Janeiro Sept. 2011

#### https://doi.org/10.1590/S0074-02762011000600017

**SHORT COMMUNICATIONS**

**Potential impact of a presumed increase in the biting activity of dengue-virus-infected Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) females on virus transmission dynamics**

**Paula Mendes Luz ^{I, +}; Tamara Nunes Lima-Camara^{II}; Rafaela Vieira Bruno^{II}; Márcia Gonçalves de Castro^{III}; Marcos Henrique Ferreira Sorgine^{IV, V}; Ricardo Lourenço-de-Oliveira^{III}; Alexandre Afrânio Peixoto^{II, V}**

^{I}Laboratório de Pesquisa Clínica em DST & AIDS, Instituto de Pesquisa Clínica Evandro Chagas

^{II}Laboratório de Biologia Molecular de Insetos, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz

^{III}Laboratório de Transmissores de Hematozoários, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz-Fiocruz, Av. Brasil 4365, 21045-900 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

^{IV}Programa de Biologia Molecular e Biotecnologia, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

^{V}Instituto Nacional de Ciência e Tecnologia em Entomologia Molecular, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil

**ABSTRACT**

Recently, we showed that infection with dengue virus increases the locomotor activity of Aedes aegypti females. We speculate that the observed increased locomotor activity could potentially increase the chances of finding a suitable host and, as a consequence, the relative biting rate of infected mosquitoes. We used a mathematical model to investigate the impact of the increased locomotor activity by assuming that this activity translated into an increased biting rate for infected mosquitoes. The results show that the increased biting rate resulted in dengue outbreaks with greater numbers of primary and secondary infections and with more severe biennial epidemics.

**Key words:** *Aedes aegypti* - locomotor activity - dengue transmission

Dengue fever is one of the most important mosquito-borne viral diseases in the world and is endemic in approximately 112 countries. It has been estimated that almost 100 million cases of dengue fever and half a million cases of dengue haemorrhagic fever occur worldwide (Gurugama et al. 2010). The main dengue vector, *Aedes aegypti* (Diptera: Culicidae), is a widely distributed species, occurring in many countries in the world. This mosquito is diurnal, very anthropophilic, endophilic and highly abundant in the urban districts and slums of many countries (Braks et al. 2003, Lima-Camara et al. 2006).

The behaviour of insect vectors can be affected by infection with viruses and other parasites (e.g., Grimstad et al. 1980, Rowland & Lindsay 1986) and by symbionts (e.g., Evans et al. 2009, Moreira et al. 2009). There is evidence that the dengue virus can alter the behaviour of *Ae. aegypti*. For example, dengue-infected mosquitoes have been shown to take longer to feed than uninfected mosquitoes (Platt et al. 1997).

Recently, we reported that *Ae. aegypti* females that were experimentally infected with dengue virus showed an increase of up to ~50% in their locomotor activity compared to uninfected controls (Lima-Camara et al. 2011). Although it is yet unknown whether this behavioural change has any effect on the biting activity in the wild, we speculate that the higher levels of locomotor activity observed in dengue-virus-infected *Ae. aegypti* females could potentially increase their chance of finding a suitable host and, as a consequence, their relative biting rate.

In the current study, we used a simplified version of a previously developed model (Luz et al. 2009, 2011) to examine the potential impact of this increased activity level of dengue-virus-infected mosquitoes on dengue transmission dynamics. A complete description of this model is beyond the scope of this short communication and can be found in the above-mentioned references. Briefly, the model describes the vector-human transmission cycle of dengue by incorporating both mosquito and human dynamics (Fig. 1). The model's system of differential equations and the parameters are detailed in the Supplementary data.

For the mosquito population dynamics, six compartments are defined. The first three mosquito life stages, egg, larva and pupa are denoted by *E*, *L* and *P*, respectively. The adult life stage is composed of two compartments: young mosquitoes (*Y*) (1-5 days of age, which do not yet lay eggs) and old mosquitoes (> 5 days of age, which lay eggs). To simulate dengue transmission, the old adult life stage is further subdivided into uninfected adults (*O*) and dengue-virus-infected adults (*O _{I}*).

The transition rates between life stages are given by *t _{ij}* (where

*i*is the current life stage and

*j*is the next life stage). Seasonality is built into the transition rates between model compartments. Weather data from Rio de Janeiro were used to parameterise the temporal pattern of the transition rates, which were mathematically defined as sinusoidal functions (Luz et al. 2009). The transition rate from egg to larva (

*t*) follows the pattern for precipitation because eggs hatch in response to water. The transition rates from larva to pupa (

_{EL}*t*) and pupa to young adult (

_{LP}*t*) are functions of temperature because temperature accelerates

_{Pay}*Ae. aegypti*'s development rate (Scott et al. 2000b). The transition rate from young adult to old adult (

*t*) is assumed to be constant.

_{YO}The death rate of each mosquito compartment (*d _{i}*) (where

*i = E, L, P, Y, O, O*) is the background mortality from natural sources. Field studies have shown that the larval development of

_{I}*Ae. aegypti*is density dependent (Southwood et al. 1972, Barrera et al. 2006) and this dependence is built into the function of the background death rate of the larvae (

*d*). Recently, cohort studies of mosquito populations showed that adult death is age dependent (Styer et al. 2007a). Thus, for the adult life stage, the death rates vary by age group. The rate of production of viable eggs per adult is given by

_{L}*b*(Styer et al. 2007b).

*O* acquire infection (entering compartment *O _{I}*) at a rate that depends on the force of infection (λ

*) and the duration of the extrinsic incubation period (τ). We defined λ*

_{M}*as a function of (i) the biting rate (*

_{M}*c*), (ii) the proportion of infected humans [with either primary (

*I*) or secondary (

_{1}*I*) infections] and their respective probabilities of infecting a mosquito (β

_{2}*and β*

_{1}*) and (iii) the susceptibility of mosquitoes (σ*

_{2}*). Thus, λ*

_{M}*= [cσ*

_{M}*(β*

_{M}*+ β*

_{ 1}I_{1}*)]/*

_{2}I_{2}*H*, where

*H*is the total number of humans.

For the human population dynamics, seven compartments are defined. We incorporated the demographic dynamics of the human population from the city of Rio de Janeiro into the mathematical model. Newborns (*R _{m}*) have maternally acquired immunity that wanes at rate

*@@α*. Susceptible humans (

*S*) acquire primary infection at the λ

_{1}*rate λ*

_{M}*, which depends on (i)*

_{1}*c*, (ii)

*O*and their infectivity (β

_{I}*) (iii) the density of adult mosquitoes (*

_{M}*O*) to

_{T}*H*and (iv) the susceptibility of humans to primary infection (σ

*). Thus, λ*

_{1}_{1}= [

*c*σ

*(β*

_{1}*]/*

_{ M}O_{I}*H*.

The risk of death for individuals presenting with dengue haemorrhagic fever is given by ν* _{1}*. Nonetheless, the majority of

*I*recover at rate γ into a cross-immunity compartment (

_{1}*R*). Cross-immunity wanes at a rate δ, resulting in susceptibility to secondary infection (

_{1}*S*) at a rate λ

_{2}*. This force of secondary infection depends on (i)*

_{2}*c*, (ii)

*O*and β

_{I}*, (iii)*

_{M}*O*and H and (iv) the susceptibility of humans to secondary infection (σ

_{T}*). Thus, λ*

_{2}_{2 }= [

*c*σ

*(β*

_{2}*)]/*

_{ M}O_{I}*H*. The majority of humans with

*I*re-cover at rate γ into a resistant compartment (

_{2}*R*). Those presenting with dengue haemorrhagic fever die with probability ν

_{2}*(which is greater than ν*

_{2}*because secondary infections are more severe) (Gubler 1998, Guzman & Kouri 2002). Similar to previous analyses (Bartley et al. 2002), we modelled humans as only being susceptible to two dengue infections. Despite this simplification, we incorporated the force of infection for all four serotypes by defining full susceptibility to primary infection and 75% susceptibility to secondary infection resulting from immunity to the primary serotype.*

_{1}For the present analysis, we assumed that the increased locomotor activity of dengue-virus-infected mosquitoes improves their likelihood of finding a suitable host and, as a consequence, enhances their biting rate, represented by parameter *c* described above. We simulated dengue transmission dynamics assuming a baseline value for the biting rate and assuming an increased biting rate for infected mosquitoes. The impact of the increased biting rate of infected mosquitoes was evaluated in the number of primary and secondary infections predicted by the model.

Fig. 2 shows the simulation results. The increase in the activity was assumed to manifest as a percent increase of the biting rate of infected mosquitoes relative to uninfected mosquitoes. Based on our previous experimental findings (Lima-Camara et al. 2011), we explored different degrees of the relative increase in the biting rate of dengue-infected mosquitoes ranging from no increase to a 50% increase in increments of 10%. When no difference was assumed between the biting rates of uninfected and infected mosquitoes (baseline assumption, black), the model predicted annual dengue epidemics of a relatively constant size (i.e., with a relatively constant number of primary and secondary infections per year for 10 years). Overall, when assuming that the biting rate was increased, an increase in the number of infections was observed. For example, when assuming a 50% increase in the biting rate of dengue-infected mosquitoes, the percent increases in the number of primary and secondary infections were 3.8% and 6.5%, respectively, for the 10-year period shown in Fig. 2. In addition, the impact of the increased biting rate of infected mosquitoes on the transmission dynamics of dengue was profound, causing more severe biennial epidemics (colours in Fig. 2).

Transmission dynamics models aim to represent, using mathematical equations, the essential components of biological processes and how these components relate to each other. The simplest model, the SIR model, represents the dynamics of a directly transmitted disease by dividing up the host population on the basis of whether they are susceptible, infectious or recovered/immune. The most important parameter of the SIR model is the rate at which susceptible hosts become infected, usually called the force of infection or the instantaneous incidence rate of infection. For vector-borne diseases such as dengue, this rate depends on parameters such as vector density, vector survival, the extrinsic incubation period of the virus and the biting rate (Nishiura 2006). In our model, these parameters are incorporated into the forces of infection acting on humans and mosquitoes. Uninfected mosquitoes acquire the infection at a rate given by the force of infection (λ* _{M}*) (Fig. 1). λ

*is a function of the biting rate (*

_{M}*c*) which is the average number of bites per mosquito per day. Similarly, acting on susceptible humans are the forces of primary and secondary infection (λ

*and λ*

_{1}*) which also depend on the biting rate of the mosquitoes (Fig. 1). In fact, the biting rate is the only parameter entering the formula of all three forces of infection and is thus expected to greatly impact the transmission dynamics.*

_{2}In our analysis, we found that the increased biting rate modified the dengue transmission dynamics simulated by the model. The absolute number of infections was greater, and most strikingly, the annual pattern of epidemics changed, with more severe biennial epidemics being observed. This pattern of biennial epidemics more closely resembles the observed multi-annual cycle of dengue epidemics in endemic countries, including the pattern observed in Brazil (Nogueira et al. 2007, Nogueira & Eppinghaus 2011). In agreement, other studies have shown the importance of the parameters related to the vector-host interaction, including the biting rate, in determining the seasonal and multi-annual cycle of dengue (Hay et al. 2000, Bartley et al. 2002). A more severe biennial epidemic implies that the virus, during the epidemic, is circulating among a greater proportion of the population, thus causing the number of secondary infections to increase. Indeed, the relative increase in the number of secondary infections was always greater than the relative increase in the number of primary infections. This finding is of clinical relevance because secondary infections have a greater likelihood of resulting in dengue haemorrhagic fever (Guzman & Kouri 2002).

**REFERENCES**

Anonymous 2008. [Accessed: 06 June 2008]. The 2006 revision, world population prospects, population division, United Nations. Available from: esa.un.org/unpp/. [ Links ]

Barrera R, Amador M, Clark GG 2006. Ecological factors influencing *Aedes aegypti* (Diptera: Culicidae) productivity in artificial containers in Salinas, Puerto Rico. *J Med Entomol 43*: 484-492. [ Links ]

Bartley LM, Donnelly CA, Garnett GP 2002. The seasonal pattern of dengue in endemic areas: mathematical models of mechanisms. *Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 96*: 387-397. [ Links ]

Braks MA, Honorio NA, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R, Juliano AS, Lounibos LP 2003. Convergent habitat segregation of *Aedes aegypti* and *Aedes albopictus* (Diptera: Culicidae) in southeastern Brazil and Florida. *J Med Entomol 40*: 785-794. [ Links ]

Braks MAH, Juliano SA, Lounibos LP 2006. Superior reproductive success on human blood without sugar is not limited to highly anthropophilic mosquito species. *Med Vet Entomol 20*: 53-59. [ Links ]

Crovello TJ, Hacker CS 1972. Evolutionary strategies in life table characteristics among feral and urban strains of *Aedes aegypti*. *Evolution 26*: 185-196. [ Links ]

Evans O, Caragata EP, McMeniman CJ, Woolfit M, Green DC, Williams CR, Franklin CE, O'Neill SL, McGraw EA 2009. Increased locomotor activity and metabolism of *Aedes aegypti* infected with a life-shortening strain of *Wolbachia pipientis*. *J Exp Biol 212*: 1436-1441. [ Links ]

Focks DA, Daniels E, Haile DG, Keesling JE 1995. A simulation-model of the epidemiology of urban dengue fever - literature analysis, model development, preliminary validation and samples of simulation results. *Am J Trop Med Hyg 53*: 489-506. [ Links ]

Grimstad PR, Ross QE, Craig GB Jr. 1980. *Aedes triseriatus* (Diptera: Culicidae) and La Crosse virus. II. Modification of mosquito feeding behavior by virus infection. *J Med Entomol 17*: 1-7. [ Links ]

Gubler DJ 1998. Dengue and dengue hemorrhagic fever. *Clin Microbiol Rev 11*: 480-496. [ Links ]

Gurugama P, Garg P, Perera J, Wijewickrama A, Seneviratne SL 2010. Dengue viral infections. *Indian J Dermatol 55*: 68-78. [ Links ]

Guzman MG, Kouri G 2002. Dengue: an update. *Lancet Infec Dis 2*: 33-42. [ Links ]

Hay SI, Myers MF, Burke DS, Vaughn DW, Endy T, Ananda N, Shanks GD, Snow R W Rogers DJ 2000. Etiology of interepidemic periods of mosquito-borne disease. *Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 97*: 9335-9339. [ Links ]

Lima-Camara TN, Bruno R, Luz PM, Castro MG, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R, Sorgine MHF 2011. Dengue infection increases the locomotor activity of *Aedes aegypti* females. *PLoS ONE 6*: e17690. [ Links ]

Lima-Camara TN, Honorio NA, Lourenço-de-Oliveira R 2006. Frequência e distribuição espacial de *Aedes aegypti* e *Aedes albopictus* (Diptera: Culicidae) no Rio de Janeiro, Brasil. *Cad Saude Publica 22*: 2079-2084. [ Links ]

Luz PM, Codeco CT, Medlock J, Struchiner CJ, Valle D, Galvani AP 2009. Impact of insecticide interventions on the abundance and resistance profile of *Aedes aegypti*. *Epidemiol Infect 137*: 1203-1215. [ Links ]

Luz PM, Vanni T, Medlock J, Paltiel AD, Galvani AP 2011. Dengue vector control strategies in an urban setting: an economic modelling assessment. *Lancet 377*: 1673-1680. [ Links ]

MATLAB 2007. MATLAB^{®} version 7.5.0.342 R2007b, T. MathWorks, Natick, MA. [ Links ]

Moreira LA, Iturbe-Ormaetxe I, Jeffery JA, Lu G, Pyke AT, Hedges LM, Rocha BC, Hall-Mendelin S, Day A, Riegler M, Hugo LE, Johnson KN, Kay BH, McGraw EA, van den Hurk AF, Ryan PA, O'Neill SL 2009. A *Wolbachia symbiont* in *Aedes aegypti* limits infection with dengue, Chikungunya, and *Plasmodium*. *Cell 139*: 1268-1278. [ Links ]

Nagao Y, Koelle K 2008. Decreases in dengue transmission may act to increase the incidence of dengue hemorrhagic fever. *Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105*: 2238-2243. [ Links ]

Nishiura H 2006. Mathematical and statistical analyses of the spread of dengue. *Dengue Bull 30*: 51-67. [ Links ]

Nogueira RM, Araujo JMG, Schatzmayr HG 2007. Dengue viruses in Brazil, 1986-2006. *Rev Panam Salud Publica 22*: 358-363. [ Links ]

Nogueira RM, Eppinghaus AL 2011. Dengue virus type 4 arrives in the state of Rio de Janeiro: a challenge for epidemiological surveillance and control. *Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz 106*: 255-256. [ Links ]

Platt KB, Linthicum KJ, Myint KS, Innis BL, Lerdthusnee K, Vaughn DW 1997. Impact of dengue virus infection on feeding behavior of *Aedes aegypti*. *Am J Trop Med Hyg 57*: 119-125. [ Links ]

Rowland MW, Lindsay SW 1986. The circadian flight activity of *Aedes aegypti* parasitized with the filarial nematode *Brugia pahangi*. *Physiol Entomol 11*: 325-334. [ Links ]

Scott TW, Amerasinghe PH, Morrison AC, Lorenz LH, Clark GG, Strickman D, Kittayapong P, Edman JD 2000a. Longitudinal studies of *Aedes aegypti* (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand and Puerto Rico: blood feeding frequency. *J Med Entomol 37*: 89-101. [ Links ]

Scott TW, Morrison AC, Lorenz LH, Clark GG, Strickman D, Kittayapong P, Zhou H, Edman JD 2000b. Longitudinal studies of *Aedes aegypti* (Diptera: Culicidae) in Thailand and Puerto Rico: population dynamics. *J Med Entomol 37*: 77-88. [ Links ]

Southwood TR, Murdie G, Yasuno M, Tonn RJ, Reader PM 1972. Studies on the life budget of *Aedes aegypti* in Wat Samphaya, Bangkok, Thailand. *Bull WHO 46*: 211-226. [ Links ]

Styer LM, Carey JR, Wang JL, Scott TW 2007a. Mosquitoes do senesce: departure from the paradigm of constant mortality. *Am J Trop Med Hyg 76*: 111-117. [ Links ]

Styer LM, Minnick SL, Sun AK, Scott TW 2007b. Mortality and reproductive dynamics of *Aedes aegypti* (Diptera: Culicidae) fed human blood. *Vec Borne Zoonotic Dis 7*: 86-98. [ Links ]

Watts DM, Burke DS, Harrison BA, Whitmire RE, Nisalak A 1987. Effect of temperature on the vector efficiency of *Aedes aegypti* for dengue 2 virus. *Am J Trop Med Hyg 36*: 143-152. [ Links ]

Received 23 March 2011

Accepted 2 August 2011

Financial support: HHMI, CNPq, FAPERJ, CAPES, FIOCRUZ

+ Corresponding author: paula.luz@ipec.fiocruz.br

The system of differential equations describing the vector-human transmission cycle of dengue is given below. Parameters are given in the Table. The system was numerically integrated in continuous time in MATLAB^{®} (MATLAB 2007) using a fourth-fifth order Runge-Kutta solver ("ode45"). The initial conditions corresponding to first day of the year, derived by running the model to equilibrium, were: 1 billion mosquitoes: 98.75% eggs, 0.41% larva, 0.07% pupa, 0.18% young adults and 0.59% old adults; 5 million humans: 0.71% R_{m}, 2.60% S_{1}, 0.02% I1, 0.66% R_{1}, 2.44% S_{2}, 0.00% I_{2}, 93.57% R_{2}. Model's files are available from the authors upon request.

*dE*/*dt* = *bO*_{T} - *t*_{EL}(*t*)*E* - *d*_{E}*E *

*dL*/

*dt*=

*t*

_{EL}(

*t*)

*E*-

*t*

_{LP}(

*t*)

*L*-

*d*

_{L}(

*L*)

*L*

*dP*/

*dt*=

*t*

_{LP}(

*t*)

*L*-

*t*

_{PY}(

*t*)

*P*-

*d*

_{P}

*P*

*dY*/

*dt*=

*t*

_{PY}(

*t*)

*P*-

*t*

_{YO}

*Y*-

*d*

_{Y}

*Y*

*dO*/

*dt*=

*t*

_{YO}

*Y*-

*d*

_{O}

*O*-

*λ*

_{M}

*τ*

*O*

*dO*

_{1}/

*dt*=

*λ*

_{M}

*τ*

*O*-

*d*

_{O}

*O*

_{1 }

*dR*

_{m}/

*dt*=

*BH*-

*α*

*R*

_{m}-

*d*

_{H}

*R*

_{m }

*dS*

_{1}/

*dt*=

*α*

*R*

_{m}-

*λ*

_{1}

*S*

_{1}-

*d*

_{H}

*S*

_{1 }

*dI*

_{1}/

*dt*=

*λ*

_{1}

*S*

_{1}-

*γ*

*I*

_{1}-

*d*

_{H}

*I*

_{1 }

*dR*

_{1}/

*dt*=

*γ*

*I*

_{1}(1 -

*ν*

_{1}) -

*δ*

*R*

_{1}-

*d*

_{H}

*R*

_{1 }

*dS*

_{2}/

*dt*=

*δ*

*R*

_{1}-

*λ*

_{2}

*S*

_{2}-

*d*

_{H}

*S*

_{2 }

*dI*

_{2}/

*dt*=

*λ*

_{2}

*S*

_{2}-

*γ*

*I*

_{2}-

*d*

_{H}

*I*

_{2 }

*dR*

_{2}/

*dt*=

*γ*(1 -

*ν*

_{2})

*I*

_{2}-

*δ*

*R*

_{2}-

*d*

_{H}

*R*

_{2}