SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 suppl.1Effect of liver ischemic preconditioning in cirrhotic rats submitted to hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injuryProliferative effect of the aqueous extract of Hyptis pectinata on liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in rats author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

  • English (pdf)
  • Article in xml format
  • How to cite this article
  • SciELO Analytics
  • Curriculum ScienTI
  • Automatic translation

Indicators

Related links

Share


Acta Cirurgica Brasileira

Print version ISSN 0102-8650On-line version ISSN 1678-2674

Acta Cir. Bras. vol.21  suppl.1 São Paulo  2006

https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-86502006000700007 

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

 

The effect of laser on remanescent liver tissue after 90% hepatectomy in rats1

 

Efeito do laser no tecido hepático após hepatectomia a 90% em ratos

 

 

Alexandre Ferreira OliveiraI; Tiago Castro e SilvaII; Ajith Kumar SankarankuttyIII; Eduardo Garcia PachecoIV; Juliana FerreiraV; Vanderlei Salvador BagnatoVI; Sergio ZucolotoVII; Orlando de Castro e SilvaVIII

IFellow PhD degree of the Departament of Surgery and Anatomy, (FMRP-USP), Brazil
IIGraduate Student at the (IFSC-USP), São Paulo, Brazil
IIIPhD Professor of Division of Gastroenterology of the Department of Surgery and Anatomy, (FMRP-USP), Brazil
IVFellow PhD degree of the Liver Transplant Program of the Division of Gastroenterology of the Department of Surgery and Anatomy, (FMRP-USP), Brazil
VFellow PhD degree of the Department of Pathology, (FMRP-USP), Brazil
VIFull Professor, (IFSC-USP), São Paulo, Brazil
VIIFull Professor of the Department of Pathology, (FMRP-USP), Brazil
VIIIFull Professor, Head of Division of Gastroenterology of Department of Surgery and Anatomy, Coordinator of the Liver Transplant Program, (FMRP-USP), Brazil

Correspondence

 

 


ABSTRATC

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of laser beam on remanescent liver after partial hepatectomy 90%.
METHODS: Wistar rats, (N= 42), were divided into six groups with seven specimens each. The partial hepatectomy (HP) was performed in all animals through exeresis of approximately 90% of the liver parenchyma. The animals from groups HP and Laser application, HPL24, HPL48 and HPL72 undertook laser irradiation carried out through application (dose of 22.5 J/cm2) in five different sites in the remanescent liver. The rats were then sacrificed 24, 48 and 72hours after HP procedure, for the liver regeneration analysis,using the Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen (PCNA),and for dosage of serum aminotransferases.
RESULTS: Were demonstrated an increase of the serum levels of alanine aminotransferase for the group of 24 hours and a decrease for the group of 72 hours exposed to laser. The index of marked cells had a considerable more improvement for the group of 72 hours exposed in laser compared to other groups.
CONCLUSION: Laser did not cause hepatic injuries additional to the partial hepatectomy and perhaps led to a benefit by stimulating the proliferative activity.

Key words: Liver Regeneration. Acute Liver Failure. Laser. Partial Hepatectomy.


RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Avaliar o efeito da luz laser em remanescentes hepáticos após hepatectomia a 90%.
MÉTODOS: Aplicou-se luz laser com comprimento de onda de 660 nm e potência de 30 mw, por 30 segundos, na dose de 22,5 J/cm2 em cada um deles, repetidos em cinco pontos do fígado remanescente, após realizada a hepatectomia a 90%. Os animais foram sacrificados para análise do fígado, contagem de hepatócitos em proliferação (Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen -PCNA), e coleta de sangue para dosagem serica das aminotransferases, após 24, 48 e 72 horas.
RESULTADO: O índice de células marcadas teve significativo aumento no grupo de 72 horas irradiados com laser.
CONCLUSÃO: A análise dos resultados demonstrou que o laser não causou lesões hepáticas adicionais à hepatectomia parcial e estimulou a atividade proliferativa hepatocelular.

Descritores: Regeneração Hepática. Insuficiência Hepática Aguda. Laser. Hepatectomia parcial.


 

 

Introduction

Acute liver failure (ALF) is a less common condition that afflicts previously healthy people through the development of severe liver dysfunction related to the fast change of the neurological function1. Several causes may be recognized as ALF etiological factors, however viral hepatitis is the most common one all over the world, mainly fulminate the virus B hepatitis. Virus and drugs (halothane, acetaminophen isoniazide) are responsible for about 80% of the cases. Other causes seem to be related to the region, as for example the intoxication by acetaminophen, which is the most common cause in countries such as England, the United States and Denmark, and practically non-existent in others such as France and India1. Experimental models are aimed at studying about liver regeneration (LR), but partial hepatectomy described by Higgins and Anderson2 is one of the best published studies. This model outlines the surgical removal of the left lateral and middle lobes of the liver of rats, consisting of approximately 67 to 70% of the total liver mass of these animals. Right lateral and tailed (posterior lobes) remain intact, which correspond to approximately 24% and 9% of the total liver mass. Well-standardized 70% hepatectomy allowed the increase of the resection level to 90%, but with high death rates. Gaub and Iversen were able to make possible the subtotal hepatectomy technique at 90% by means of post surgical support, thus permitting the use of the model in IHA and RH studies2,3,4. During the regenerative process there is a proliferation of all liver cells, though most of the studies focus on the hepatocytes, for these constitute around 90% of the liver mass and 60% of the whole cell number4. After partial hepatectomy there is the activation of 70 or more genes, which is the first step of event cascade that guides the DNA synthesis. Hepatocytes leave the rest state of the cellular cycle (G0), go through the G1 phase and start the DNA synthesis or S phase (10 to 14 hours after the hepatectomy) with the occurrence of the first peak at the 24th hours and the second peak between the 36th and 48th hour4,5,6. LASER is an acronym in English that stands for, light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation. As to its action on the liver parenchyma we suppose that the LASER light carries the conformational changes in the structure of the hepatocyte_cytochrome so that there would be an increase in ATP production, expressing an augmentation in the liver energetic metabolism of hepatectomized rats7,8,9. This paper has the objective to analyze the photo-bio-stimulating effect of the LASER light on the regeneration of the remanescent liver tissue after hepatectomy 90%.

 

Methods

Forty-two male, Rattus norvegicus, lineage Wistar rats, apparently healthy, with body weight between 240 and 300 grams, from the Animal Colony of Ribeirão Preto Faculty of Medicine – University of São Paulo - (FMRP-USP), were used and kept under controlled conditions. Wistar rats, (N= 42), were divided into six groups with seven specimens each. The hepatectomy was carried out through exeresis of approximately 90% of the liver parenchyma2,3. Before the synthesis of the abdominal wall, the animals from groups HPL24, HPL48 and HPL72 undertook laser irradiation carried out through application (dose of 22.5 J/cm2 ) in five different sites for 30 seconds in each one of them in the remanescent liver. The equipment for the laser light transmission used was that of low potency BDP 660 (MM Optics Ltda., São Carlos – SP) of continuous emission classified as IIIb, which has as active medium the semiconductor, wavelength of 660 nm (visible / red), adjusted with potency of 30mW. The animals were sacrificed at 24, 48 and 72 hours after the first surgical intervention according to what is described in the experiment outline. After anesthesia, the abdominal wall was widely open and collected 2 ml of blood through low cava vein punction for biochemical dosages of the aminotransfereases. Small liver fragment was collected for analysis of the liver regeneration.

Serum aminotransferases

Blood samples (4ml) were placed in a container without previous anticoagulant treatment. Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase activities in serum (AST and ALT, respectively) were determined by conventional procedures using a commercial spectrophotometer (Model E2250-CELM)10

Liver regeneration analysis

Liver regeneration was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) using monoclonal primary anti-PCNA antibody (PC-10; DAKO A/S, Glostrup, Denmark) on formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded liver tissues. Sections were cut at 4 µm, mounted on poly-L-lysine-coated glass slides, deparaffinized, rehydrated in an increasing alcohol series, placed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and treated with 2% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 15 min to block endogenous peroxidase activity8. Nonspecific protein binding was blocked by pre-incubation with 5% normal horse serum diluted in PBS for 30 min. This was followed by incubation with PC-10 monoclonal primary antibody, diluted 1:40 in PBS for 120 min at 25ºC. The sections were then incubated for 35 min with a biotinylated horse antimouse immunoglobulin. The reaction product was detected with an avidin-biotin-peroxidase complex and diaminobenzidine was used as a chromogen substrate. Positive and negative controls were used to assess and control the staining procedure. Sections were examined blindly at high power (400X), and 20 fields were chosen at random. Nuclear labeling indices for PCNA (positive nuclei/total number of counted nuclei) were determined by evaluation of at least 1,000 hepatocyte nuclei8. In order to accomplish the overall comparison among the several studied groups we used the non-parametric test of Kruskal-Wallis. The significance level considered was 0.05. For comparison between the two sacrificed groups within 24 hours (with and without LASER irradiation), 48 hours (with and without LASER irradiation) and 72 hours (with and without LASER irradiation), we made use the non-parametric U test of Mann-Whitney. The significance level considered in these tests was 0.05.

 

Results

In relation to ALT, significant statistical differences were found among the 24-hour groups and the 72-hour groups. In the 24-hour groups there was an increase in the ALT serum levels in the LASER-irradiated group. However, in the 72-hour groups there was a reduction in the alt serum levels in the LASER-irradiated groups (table 1). In relation to AST there were no significant statistical differences among the different studied groups. As to indexes of marked cells, we found significant statistical differences among the 72-hour groups. For these groups there was an increase in the marked cells index in the LASER-irradiated group. In the remainder of the groups, there were no significant differences.

 

 

Discussion

Liver regeneration has been studied in several aspects and the most puzzling question is how the regenerative process is triggered, because contrary to the cells that constitute renovating tissues, the hepatocytes are at rest in the G0 phase of the cellular cycle5,6,9. Experiments with growing factor infusion (HGF, alpha-TGF and EGF) in the portal circulation of normal rats reveal that only 10% of hepatocytes turn to synthesize DNA, but if the same infusion is preceded by hepatectomy 30%, the administration of colegenase via portal or even hepatotoxic drugs, the proliferative response becomes very intense, showing that the hepatocytes must be first habilitated before the regenerative activity5,6. Studies reveal that the capacitation of the hepatocytes constitute a reversible process and is not sufficient to induce DNA replication, and that the main regulatory step for cellular replication might not be the capacitation period, but mainly the hepatocyte progression until the DNA synthesis6. The activity of several mitogenic cells was compared in different levels of hepatectomy (30, 70 and 90%) and it was seen through the detection of nuclear antigen Ki-67 that the larger the resection the greater the mitotic activity of the remanescent parenchyma11. After partial hepatectomy, the liver remanescent (LR) undergoes a metabolic overcharge (MO) that is more intense according to the resection level. This MO occurs because the LR needs undergo hemodynamic adaptation (parenchyma reduction and maintenance of the portal and arterial blood flow), need to keep the liver metabolism intact and still regenerates8. Application of low potency laser light on rat liver, with focus on the biochemical parameters related to regeneration, as well as the analysis of histological indicators of mitosis was demonstrated that the mitotic index rises to 15% in hepatectomies without laser application for 50% when followed by illumination8. The same group showed that the argon-laser application with 590 nm wavelength and 50 mw/cm2 power on the liver remanescent of rats subjected to hepatectomy 70% and 90%7,8 present elevation of state three of mitochondrial breathing, as well as an increase of the mitosis number in the first 24 hours. Studies have shown that low potency laser (LPL) significantly increased both the bloodstream flow in the ungueal bed and the mesenteric capillary flow12­ .With the promising findings we decided to study the cellular proliferation level in rats subjected to hepatectomy 90% that represents an experimental model of acute liver insufficiency (ALI) and to check the results through PCNA and evaluate also the biochemical and enzymatic patterns. Biochemical and enzymatic tests are important in the evaluation process of IHA and liver regeneration because they are useful for the diagnosis, prognosis and monitoring of the therapeutic response10,11,12,13. Aminotransferases ALT and AST are enzymes whose synthesis takes place in the liver, kidney, heart muscle, pancreas, skeleton muscle and brain. Both are intracellular enzymes, but AST is mainly located in the cytoplasm and is present in a smaller concentration in the mitochondrias. A ALT is exclusively located in the cytoplasm. Aminotransferases are usually present in low concentration serum, and their absolute values and/or ratio ALT/AST may serve as indicators for hepatic-cellular integrity. Therefore, ALT elevation is an indicator of more specific liver damage.8,9,11 Hepatectomy 90% had a course with elevated levels of AST and ALT in the first 24 hours that was followed by subsequent decline in the 48- and 72-hour groups, and as to the laser application there was a significant elevation of ALT in the 24 HPL group when compared to 24 HP group and a significant reduction of this in the 72 HPL when compared to the 72 HP, which shows that the laser in the first moment increases the metabolic overcharge preparing the liver parenchyma for a marked regeneration that will take place later and improve the liver regeneration prognosis. A few immunohistochemical methods have been used to assess the LASER action on the liver tissue in the phase of cellular proliferation9,14,15 .The present study showed that in the 72 HPL group when compared to the 72 HP group, the number of marked cells was significantly greater, and this shows that laser prepares the LR for a more intense regeneration as the SM becomes more attenuated. Laser may bring important advances concerning the stimulation of liver regeneration in IHA helping in the metabolic recovery of LR and in its proliferation. Therefore, in the experimental conditions of the current paper it was verified that laser had significantly stimulated the liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy 90% in the 72-hour group without inducing further hepatic-cellular damage to that induced by hepatectomy per si.

 

References

1. Williams R, Riordan SM. Schiff's diseases of the liver. 9th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2003.        [ Links ]

2. Higgins GM, Anderson RM. Experimental pathology of the liver. Restoration of the liver of the white rat following partial surgical removal. Arch Pathol. 1931;12:186-202.        [ Links ]

3. Gaub J, Iversen J. Rat liver regeneration after 90% partial hepatectomy. Hepatology. 1984;4:902-4.        [ Links ]

4. Alison MR. Regulation of hepatic growth. Physil Rev. 1986;66:499-541.        [ Links ]

5. Michalopoulos GK, De Frances MC. Liver Regeneration: molecular mechanism of growth control. FASEB J. 1990; 4:176-87.        [ Links ]

6. Fausto, F. Liver regeneration. J Hepatol. 32: 19-31, 2000.        [ Links ]

7. Brasil IRC. Efeito da luz Laser sobre o remanescente hepático de ratos submetido a hepatectomia 90%. [Tese - Doutorado]. Universidade de São Paulo - Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto; 2002.        [ Links ]

8. Castro e Silva Jr O, Zucoloto S, Bagnato VS. Laser enhanced effect in hepatic regeneration after hepatectomy in rats. Laser Surg Med. 2001;28:1-5.        [ Links ]

9. Ozawa K. Liver Surgery Approached Through the Mitochondria. Tokyo: Medical Tribune Inc.; 1992.        [ Links ]

10. Reichling JJ, Kaplan MM. Clinical use of serum enzymes in liver disease. Dig Dis Sci. 1988;33:1601-14.        [ Links ]

11. Sakaguchi K, Takeuchi E, Suzuki M, Oda K, Nagino M, Nimura Y, Yoshida S. ADN polymerases and Ki-67 nuclear antigen are induced in correlation with the resected mass o rat liver up to 90%. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2000; 385:135-42.        [ Links ]

12. Miro L. Estudio capilaroscópico de la acción de un laser AsGa sobre la microcirculación. Investig Clin Laser. 1984; 12:9-14.        [ Links ]

13. Jalan R, Sen S, Stoiner C, Kapjor D, Aur A. Extracorporeal liver support with molecular adsorbents recirculating system in patients with severe acute alcoholic hepatitis. J Hepatol. 2003;38:24-31.        [ Links ]

14. Ohmori S. Clinical characteristics and prognostic indicators of drug-induced fulminant hepatic failure. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2003; 50:1531-4.        [ Links ]

15. Assy N, Gong Y, Zhang M, Pettigrew NM, Pashniak D, Minuk GY. Use of proliferating cell nuclear antigen as a marker of liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in rats. J Lab Clin Med. 1998;131:251-6.        [ Links ]

 

 

Correspondence:
Orlando de Castro e Silva Jr.
Rua Campos Salles, 809/9º andar
14015-110 Ribeirão Preto - SP Brazil
orlando@fmrp.usp.br

Conflict of interest: none
Financial source: FAPESP, CNPq and CAPES

 

 

1 Study performed in the Liver Transplantation Unit of the Division of Gastroenterology of the Department of Surgery and Anatomy of Ribeirão Preto Faculty of Medicine (FMRP-USP), and in the in the Physics Institute of São Carlos (IFSC-USP) –University of São Paulo - Brazil.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License