SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.68 issue3Evaluation of the milling efficiency increase of AISI 52100 steel using niobium carbide addition through high energy ball millingThree-dimensional reconstruction of compacted graphite in vermicular cast iron by manual serial sectioning author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Rem: Revista Escola de Minas

Print version ISSN 0370-4467On-line version ISSN 1807-0353

Rem: Rev. Esc. Minas vol.68 no.3 Ouro Preto July/Sept. 2015

https://doi.org/10.1590/0370-44672014680027 

Metallurgy and materials

The influence of tundish heating and purging on inclusion formation

Jayme Alves de Souza Junior 1  

Estéfano Aparecido Vieira 2  

Felipe Fardin Grillo 3  

Jose Roberto de Oliveira 4  

1Technical Assistance Engineer- ArcelorMittal Tubarão, Serra - Espírito Santo - Brazil. jayme.souza@arcelormittal.com.br

2Professor, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Metalúrgica e de Materiais - PROPEMM, Instituto Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória - Espírito Santo - Brazil. estefanovieira@ifes.edu.br

3PhD student, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Politechnic School, University of São Paulo. São Paulo - São Paulo - Brazil. felipefarding@usp.br

4Professor, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Metalúrgica e de Materiais - PROPEMM, Instituto Federal do Espírito Santo, Vitória - Espírito Santo - Brazil. jroberto@ifes.edu.br


ABSTRACT

Steel with high cleanliness requirements require an accurate control of the non-metallic inclusions, such as its quantity, morphology, chemical composition and size distribution. The continuous casting tundish has a fundamental role in steel cleanliness, avoiding its reoxidation by air and ladle slag that retain inclusions, as well as aiding the removal of those same inclusions along the continuous casting (Sahai, 2008). To perform the study, IF steel samples were collected in RH at the start, in the middle and at the end of the continuous casting of the tundish's first heat in three different conditions of tundish processing, alternating between heating and purging. These samples had their inclusions characterized by MEV/EDS using the ASCAT (Automated Steel Cleanliness Analysis Tool) technology. The results showed that more than 90% of the oxide inclusions generated in that type of steel are Al2O3 and AlTi. It was also observed that there is an increase of steel inclusions originating from RH in the tundish and that area fraction and average inclusionary density decreases along the continuous casting in two of the processing conditions.

Key words: Inclusions; tundish; ASCAT and purging

1. Introduction

The requirements for steel mechanical properties and chemical composition are in constant transformation with the growing demands for quality; at the same time, the cost, energy and environmental effect in production have also become items of great concern. Hence, steel properties such as mechanical resistance, malleability, durability and resistance to corrosion have improved over the years to meet such needs. This was achieved partly by producing the so-called "clean steel", or steels of high cleanliness in relation to the presence of non-metallic inclusions deteriorate most of the mentioned properties Zang and Thomas, (2002) and Choudhary, (2011).

An experiment was developed on an industrial scale at ArcelorMittal Tubarão Steel Company, using the actual productive process of Continuous Casting, where the focus was on the evolution and generation of inclusions in the Continuous Casting tundish. The experiment result supplies a quantitative and qualitative description of inclusions generated in the tundish's first heating, and under defined and controlled conditions of heating and previous purging of that same tundish .

The present work aims to evaluate the cleanliness of an ultra low carbon IF (Interticial Free) steel produced in Continuous Casting, through the analysis of Al2O3 and AlTi inclusions generated in three different tundish processing conditions: a) with heating and purging of inert gas b) with heating and no purging and c) with no heating and with purging. Steel samples were collected in RH and at the start, in the middle and end of the tundish's first heating of the casting. These samples had their inclusions characterized by SEM/EDS using ASCAT (Automated Steel Cleanliness Analysis Tool) technology.

2. Materials and methods

Three different types of Ultra Lower Carbon steel - IF processing were studied in the continuous casting tundish:

a) Tundish with Hot Start and with preliminary Purging (AP);

b) Tundish with Hot Start and No preliminary Purging (ASP) and

c) Tundish with Cold Start and with preliminary Purging (FP). Figure 1 corresponds to the schematic drawing of the Ultra Lower Carbon steel processing runs in the tundish sequence, showing the sample collection points for the steel cleanliness study of the first heat of the tundish.

Figure 1 Sample collection in the pot and tundish 

The following information summarizes the stages that were followed for the development of this work.

'Lollipop' type samples of Ultra Low Carbon steel were collected in the tundish sequence's first heat of the Continuous Casting in the three different processing conditions described below, equally in the RH ladle as in the Tundish;.

The samples were sent to the ArcelorMittal research center in Chicago-USA for inclusion characterization via sweeping electronic microscope SEM / EDS using ASCAT technology (RJ Lee Group, 2005);

From the data, the steel cleanliness results were analyzed in the RH and tundish (Al2O3 and AlTi inclusions) individually for each processing condition as well as by comparative analysis among the different processes.

Experiment samples were removed in three different heats for each type of processing in the tundish, as shown in Table 1, being that in each situation, a ladle sample after RH treatment and three samples of the same heating were removed during its casting in the tundish, making a sub-total of 12 samples for each experiment, and a total of 36 final samples. The sampling stages are:

Table 1 Samples collected in the study. 

Sampling condition Heat 1 Heat 2 Heat 3
Tundish with heating and purging (AP)
Collected in RH ladle AP1 AP2 AP3
Collected after 50t casted into tundish AP50.1 AP50.2 AP50.3
Collected after 150t casted into tundish AP150.1 AP150.2 AP150.3
Collected after 250t casted into tundish AP250.1 AP250.2 AP250.3
Tundish with heating and no purging(ASP)
Collected in RH ladle ASP1 ASP2 ASP3
Collected after 50t casted into tundish ASP50.1 ASP50.2 ASP50.3
Collected after 150t casted into tundish ASP150.1 ASP150.2 ASP150.3
Collected after 250t casted into tundish ASP250.1 ASP250.2 ASP250.3
Tundish with no heating and purging (FP)
Collected in RH ladle FP1 FP2 FP3
Collected after 50t casted into tundish FP50.1 FP50.2 FP50.3
Collected after 150t casted into tundish FP150.1 FP150.2 FP150.3
Collected after 250t casted into tundish FP250.1 FP250.2 FP250.3
Total of samples 36

i) one sample in the ladle after treatment in RH and liberation for Casting. This sample aims to characterize the inclusion that is getting into the continuous casting.

ii) Three samples in the first heat of the tundish during its casting from the ladle mentioned in item i. The first sample will be removed after having drained 50t from the ladle, practically after filling the tundish up, the second one after having drained 150t from the ladle, practically a half of the ladle and the third sample leaving 50t for the end of the ladle. It is important to note that the experiment is only focused on the tundish's first heating, as it is the one with the biggest influences from the preliminary procedures of tundish heating and pre-purging.

For a reproductive guarantee of the different trial process heats, some basic operational variables of the continuous casting process were maintained in constant range: casting temperature, casting speed, covering powder quantity, heat casting time and ladle opening without use of oxygen.

Of the inclusion indicators supplied by ASCAT, two figure among the more used and representative for cleanliness measurement in this work. The first is inclusion Area Fraction (Area occupied by an inclusion class in µm2 / total analyzed Area in mm2) and the second is Inclusion Density (numeric amount of certain class of inclusions / total analyzed Area). The occupied Area Fraction notably stands out in cleanliness evaluation for considering not only the quantity, but the inclusion sizes, representing the density of impurities in the steel. Although the number of large inclusions is much smaller than those of minor inclusions, its volumetric fraction can be larger, and a simple inclusion of great size found in the material can cause relevant defects. Also inclusion size distribution was evaluated.

3. Results and discussions

Firstly, it was checked and confirmed that all the assisted runs met the process variables described in the previous chapter; there was no need to discard any sample.

The Figure 2 shows the average Area Fraction of several oxide classes observed in the samples collected in RH and in the three distinct conditions in the Continuous Casting processing.

Figure 2 Area fraction average of inclusions found by ASCAT in the different studied process 

The two majority inclusion groups presented in the samples and the focus of this work were Al2O3 and AlTi inclusions; Al2O3 inclusions occupied proportionally seven times more area than AlTi inclusions. MATSUURA et al (2007) shows that the generation of less AlTi is due to the fact that the titanium, used as element stabilizer, is only added to the steel at the end of RH treatment and in small amounts, while alumina is generated from the intentional aluminum oxidation for steel deoxidation.

The average result of 4 sample groups collected in three different run for each type of tundish processing is shown as follows.

Comparative Evaluation of Al2O3 and AlTi Inclusions in the Three Processing Types

The Figure 3 presents the average Area Fraction and average inclusionary Density of Al2O3 and AlTi Inclusions together in the three studied processes.

Figure 3 Area fraction and density average of Al2O3 e AlTi inclusions in the three different studied process 

It is seen that the smallest occupied Area Fraction by AlTi inclusions in the three cases, which on average are 6 times smaller than the occupied Area fraction for Al2O3 inclusions, as already shown in the Figure 2. as well as the total Area Fraction, the inclusionary Density total plotted in the secondary axis of the same graph show similar evolution in the three processes, with the increase of RH inclusion totals (samples AP, ASP and FP) for the Tundish (AP50, ASP50 and FP50 samples). According to Tanaka et al. (1993) that behavior is explained due to the first steel portion that enters in the tundish being totally unprotected, entering in contact with the air and forming new Al2O3 exogen inclusions and worsening the steel cleanliness.

Inclusionary reduction of the two cleanliness indicators is also observed in the graph during the casting in the three evaluated processes, in other words, the tundish's initial samples (AP50, ASP50 and FP50 samples) until the last ones (AP250, ASP250 and FP250 samples). This reduction along the casting is expected and according to Sahai and Emi (2008) due to the tundish's steel renewal coming from the ladle and greater cleanliness, and as a secondary cause the tundish's own capacity to remove inclusions by flotation as the steel passes through it towards the mold.

The analysis of Figure 4 together with Table 2 shows the following tendencies in relation to the three studied processes:

Figure 4 Size distribution average of Al2O3 e AlTi inclusions in the three different studied process 

Table 2 Area fraction and density average of Al2O3 e AlTi inclusions in the three different studied process. 

Sample Area Fraction (Al2O3) Area Fraction (AlTi) Total Area Fraction Std Deviation total AF Delta each step % Delta into Tundih % Total Density (nº/mm2) Std Deviation Total Density Delta each step % Delta into Tundih %
AP 32 12 44 16     14 4    
AP50 250 23 273 107 523   26 7 81  
AP150 208 24 231 40 -15   20 10 -24  
AP250 191 18 208 60 -10 -24 15 7 -22 -41
ASP 43 10 53 16     11 2    
ASP50 184 29 214 57 304   35 14 232  
ASP150 202 39 241 62 13   51 26 46  
ASP250 183 32 214 61 -11 0 34 14 -33 -2
FP 67 6 73 32     11 3    
FP50 228 26 254 22 247   33 2 200  
FP150 174 26 200 25 -21   28 2 -17  
FP250 165 23 189 27 -6 -26 25 15 -11 -26

a) RH inclusionary evolution for the Tundish: The three processes present Al2O3 and AlTi inclusion pick-up in the tundish expressed by the occupied total Area Fraction, the largest percentage pick-up (523%) being in the heats with Heating and Purging (AP), followed by the heats with Heating and No Purging (ASP) with 304%. The best result was observed in the heats with Tundish for Cold and Purging (FP) that had an inclusionary pick-up in the Area Fraction of 247%. Considering the Total inclusionary Density, the process with Heating and No Purging (ASP) leaves its previous second position and becomes the greater inclusion evolution with a 232% increase in RH Density for the Tundish. This behavior would be the most expected, as this tundish type does not have the previous Purging, which favors oxidation, as shown by Tanaka et al (1993), Zang and Thomas (2003) and Yanyan et al (2013).

The largest pick-up in the tundish with Heating and Purging (AP) was not expected, because according to the Jen-Hsin et al (2003) experiment, due to its high temperature, in the warm tundish, the oxygen present is 20.9% smaller than a cooling tundish. The tundish's greatest temperature, besides reducing the air volume inside the refractory container, according to the Miki et al (1999) experiment, promotes different behavior from the steel flow inside the tundish, with a rising tendency to buoyancy and greater circulation, thus favoring steel cleanliness. An explanation for this might be the abnormal pick-up of one of the group heats, either for a non- registered purging defect or some air flow between ladle and tundish.

b) Inclusions behavior during Casting: As expected, the process with Heating and No Purging (ASP) presented the worst reduction result for inclusion Area Fraction during the casting, given the lack of purging, greatly adding to the tundish's initial inclusions, as already shown. The other two processes, Heating with Purging (AP) and Cooling with Purging (FP) presented similar performances, with a 24% and 26% reduction respectively in the inclusionary total, showing that the initial purging of the last two processes might have made the difference, as discussed previously. That improvement inclusionary tendency along the heats is explained by Sahai e Emi (2008) mainly by the renewal in the tundish of a cleaner steel coming from the pot, as well as the tundish's own capacity to remove inclusions through its synthetic slag.

c) Size of the Inclusions: The average general distribution of the inclusion size in RH and in the Tundish follows the great majority of inclusions (47%~86%) concentrating on the smallest range between 1µm to 2.5µm, followed by 12%~37% of the inclusions in the range between 2.5µm to 5µm, 2%~16% in the range between 5µm to 10µm and 0~5% between 10µm to 20µm, with no inclusion above 20 µm. The distribution of inclusion size in the tundish is quite favorable to steel cleanliness. According to T. Emi (2005), there are very few occurrences of inclusions above 10µm and none above 20µm.

The high standard deviation values for both, total area fraction and total density, shows how inclusion measure are sensitive to operational variables, sampling and analysis practice. Results in the ladle show more stability with a lower standard deviation, probably due a more stable homogenization condition of the ladle process. Meanwhile in the tundish, the results are more impacted by the unstable conditions of the tundish fluxes, especially during its first heat filling.

4. Conclusions

Al2O3 and AlTi inclusions are the two majority inclusion groups presented in an IF aluminum killed steel, both representing 90% of total inclusions;

Al2O3 inclusions occupies proportionally seven times more area than AlTi inclusions, and its volumetric size distribution is as follows: 85% <=10µm, 15% between 10µm~20µm and 0% > 20µm. This size distribution was not affected by the different studied processes;

All three processes presented inclusion pick-up from RH to the Tundish and as expected, tundish purging showed to be the most more efficient than that with no preliminary Purging process, especially during a tundish sequence;

The heating process showed a similar tendency evolution when compared to the cold tundish, for both, RH-Tundish pick-up and inclusion reduction along the tundish sequence;

Finally it is concluded that previous purging of the tundish has an important role in minimizing RH inclusion pick-up for Continuous Casting, proving to be more important than heating the tundish. The tundish with no purging had the worst result and the cooling tundish with purging had the best general performance.

5. Acknowledgements

Thanks to ArcelorMittal Tubarão for the support, that recognized a great technical training opportunity, and to friends Phd. Henrique Silva Furtado and Msc Paulo Andre Lucas P. for the technical discussions on the studied theme.

6. References

JEN-HSIN, C., CHING-CHIH, C., CHUN-YEN, Y., CHING-CHAO, Y., Tundish metallurgical practices for "Slab production in Bokaro steel"., Metal, 2003. [ Links ]

MATSUURA, H., WANG, C., WEN, G., SRIDHAR, S. The transient stages of inclusions evolution during Al and/or Ti additions to Molten iron. ISIJ Internacional, v. 47, n. 9, p. 1265-1274, 2007. [ Links ]

SASAI, K., MIZUKAMI, Y. Reoxidation behavior of molten steel in tundish. ISIJ International, v. 40, n. 1, p. 40-47, 2000. [ Links ]

RJ Lee Group, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, RJ Fruehan Consulting, Aspex LLC Development of the Automated Steel Cleanliness Analysis Tool ASCAT, RJ Lee Group 350 Hochberg Rd Monroeville, PA 15146, September 24, 1999 through September 23,2005. [ Links ]

CHOUDHARY, S. K. Influence of modified casting practice on steel cleanliness. ISIJ Internationalv. 51, p. 557-565, 2011. [ Links ]

EMI, T. Improving steelmaking and steel properties, fundamentals of metallurgy, Ed. In: SEETHARAMAN, S. (Ed.). UK: Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, Inst. of Mater., Minerals & Mining, 503-554, 2005. [ Links ]

YANYAN, B., ANDREY, V. K., PÄR, G. J. Evolution of Different Inclusions during ladle treatment and continuous casting of Stainless steel. ISIJ International, v. 53, p. 2099-2109, 2013. [ Links ]

MIKI, Y., THOMAS, B. G. Modeling of inclusion removal In: Tundish, A. Metallurgical Transactions B, v. 30, p. 639-654, 1999. [ Links ]

SAHAI, Y., EMI, T. Tundish technology for clean steel production. World Scientific, Singapore, p. 1-15, 2008. [ Links ]

ZHANG, L., THOMAS, B. G. Evaluation and control of steel cleanliness - review. In: STEELMAKING CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 85. ISS-AIME. Warrendale, PA, p. 431-452, 2002. [ Links ]

ZHANG, L., THOMAS, B. G. Inclusions in continuous casting of steel. In: NATIONAL STEELMAKING SYMPOSIUM, 24. Morelia, Mich, México, p. 138-183, 2003. [ Links ]

Received: February 12, 2014; Accepted: June 03, 2015

Creative Commons License This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.