SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.11 issue3Multivariate analysis of the factors associated with the risk of pneumonia in intensive care unitsNosocomial bloodstream infections: organisms, risk factors and resistant phenotypes in the Brazilian University Hospital author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand




Related links


Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases

Print version ISSN 1413-8670On-line version ISSN 1678-4391

Braz J Infect Dis vol.11 no.3 Salvador June 2007 



Heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin and teicoplanin among Staphylococcus spp. isolated from bacteremia



Ana Paula Ferreira NunesI; Ricardo Pinto SchuenckII; Carla Callegário Reis BastosIV; Mônica Maria F. MagnaniniIII; Jacinta B. LongIV; Natália Lopes Pontes IorioII; Kátia Regina Netto dos SantosII

IDepartment of Pathology of Federal University of Espírito Santo, Vitória, ES
IIInstitute of Microbiology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
IIICenter of Studies in Public Health, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
IVNaval Hospital Marcílio Dias; Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil

Address for correspondence




This study evaluated the BHIA screening method with 4 or 6 mg/mL of vancomycin to detect glycopeptides heteroresistant staphylococci strains isolated from bacteremia. A total of 213 staphylococci strains were isolated from 106 patients between October/2001 and November/2002 in a tertiary hospital in Rio de Janeiro city. Fifty-seven (53.8%) patients presented Staphylococcus aureus, while coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) were isolated from 49 (46.2%). Resistance rates for oxacillin of 26.3% and 81.6% were found for the staphylococci isolates, respectively. Thirteen CNS isolated from nine (8.5%) patients grew on agar screening with 4 mg/mL of vancomycin and showed heterogeneous profiles of resistance for vancomycin and teicoplanin by the population analysis profile method. Only 30.8% of them grew at the concentration 6 mg/mL. Bacterial infection and use of antimicrobial therapy were common among these patients. Alert about the emergence of oxacillin-resistant staphylococci presenting heteroresistance to glycopeptides is important in order to achieve judicious use of antimicrobials. Vancomycin agar screening test could help to confirm the presence of these isolates in hospitals.

Key-Words: Staphylococci, vancomycin and teicoplanin heteroresistance, population analysis profile, vancomycin agar screen.



Antimicrobial therapy used in infections by multiresistant staphylococci has been limited since the resistance to oxacillin is associated with resistance to all b-lactams agents and, with frequency, to the other drugs. Thus, the vancomycin comes being widely used as last resource in the treatment of these infections [1].

Resistance to glycopeptides in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CNS) comes already being shown since the end of the years 80 [2,3]. However, the interest on the acquisition of resistance to glycopeptides increased only after the isolation of Staphylococcus aureus strains presenting intermediate resistance to vancomycin (VISA strains) worldwide [4,5]. Studies with VISA isolates from several countries indicated that these strains present resistance to low levels of vancomycin (minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC] of 8 mg/mL) that is not associated with the presence of van genes responsible for resistance to glycopeptides in enterococci [1,5,6].

Studies of population analysis profile (PAP) have shown phenotypes of heterogeneous susceptibility to glycopeptides in clinical strains of S. aureus [7] and CNS [8]. These strains present susceptibility to vancomycin (MIC < 4 mg/mL) or teicoplanin (MIC < 8 mg/mL) when tested by the conventional methods [9,10]. However, they possess subpopulations capable to grow in higher concentrations of vancomycin and/ or teicoplanin [6,8,11,12]. The disk diffusion test is not able to detect these types of strains, while the methods based on the determination of MICs have shown good accuracy to detect VISA or CNS strains with intermediate resistance to vancomycin (MIC = 8 mg/mL) or resistance to teicoplanin (MIC > 32 mg/mL). However, these methods fail in the detection of glycopeptides heteroresistant strains [13,14]. In this case PAP is considered a standard detection method [11]. However, its use in laboratorial routine is not advisable since it is a hard method. Thus, the BHIA (brain heart infusion agar) with 4 mg/mL [11] or 6 mg/mL [15] of vancomycin have been recommended to routines use. Nevertheless, studies that show the usefulness of the agar screening with vancomycin to detect heteroresistant staphylococci are scarce.

Staphylococci are considered important agents of hospital bacteremia [16] and glycopeptides have often been used in both rational and empirical therapy [1]. The clinical significance of heteroresistance to glycopeptides in Staphylococcus spp. is not completely established, but it has been considered that the presence of these strains could be associated with failure in the treatment [6,12,17,18]. In a previous study [19] we confirmed that the vancomycin heteroresistance in CNS is similar to the one described in S. aureus and is associated with an increase in cell wall thickness probably contributing to make difficult the therapy. Here, we evaluated the accuracy of the BHIA screening method with 4 or 6 mg/mL of vancomycin to detect staphylococci strains with heteroresistance to glycopeptides isolated from patients with bacteremia in a tertiary hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.


Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains

Two hundred and thirteen staphylococci strains isolated from blood cultures of 106 patients between October/2001 and November/2002 at the Marcílio Dias Naval Hospital (MDNH), a tertiary hospital with 500 beds, were analyzed. The professional of the Commission of Hospital Infection Control as clinical considered all the bacteremias evaluated significant [20]. Staphylococcus identification and determination of the antimicrobial susceptibility profiles were performed by the Microscan WalkAway automated system (Dade Behring).

Oxacillin, Vancomycin and Teicoplanin Susceptibility Testing

Susceptibility to oxacillin, vancomycin and teicoplanin was initially evaluated by the Microscan WalAway system for 106 staphylococci strains (one isolate for each patient). Resistance to oxacillin (Sigma Chemical Company, St Louis, USA) was confirmed by the agar screening method containing 6 mg/mL of the drug for S. aureus [15] and 4 mg/mL for CNS isolates [21] and by the PCR method to detection of the mecA gene, according to Ferreira and coworkers [21]. Vancomycin (Sigma) and teicoplanin (provided by Marion Marrel Dow, Research Institute Cincinnati, Ohio, USA) MICs were obtained by the agar dilution method in Müeller-Hinton agar (MHA, Difco) in accordance with the CLSI [10]. Concentrations of 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 mg/mL were used for vancomycin, while for teicoplanin the concentrations ranged from 1 to 256 mg/mL. Vancomycin and teicoplanin resistances, including intermediate resistance were defined as MIC > 8 mg/mL and > 16 mg/mL, respectively [15].

Vancomycin Agar Screen Method

All the 213 staphylococci strains isolated from blood cultures (1 to 3 strains for each patient) were cultured on BHIA screening plates with 4 mg/mL of vancomycin to detection of heteroresistant strains [11]. The isolates were inoculated with swab, using an inoculum from a bacterial suspension in saline that was adjusted at 0.5 McFarland turbidity (~108 CFU/mL). The plates were maintained at 35°C for 24 and 48 h. BHIA screening with 6 mg/mL of vancomycin recommended by the CLSI [10] was carried out in parallel for comparative analysis.

Population Analysis Profile (PAP) for Vancomycin and Teicoplanin

Bacterial subpopulations selected from the BHIA plates with 4 mg/mL of vancomycin were identified by classical tests to confirm the Staphylococcus species [22]. Heteroresistance phenotype to glycopeptides in subpopulations was confirmed by the PAP method for vancomycin and teicoplanin as recommended by Kim and coworkers [6], with modifications. Aliquot (100 mL) of a starting cell suspension at 0.5 McFarland turbidity and serial 10-fold dilutions were cultured on BHIA plates containing vancomycin at the concentrations 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 16 mg/mL or teicoplanin at the concentrations 3, 6, 12, 18, 20, 25, 50 and 100 mg/mL. After incubation at 35ºC for 48 h, the number of colonies on plate in each concentration of drug was counted and plotted on a semi logarithmic scale. S. aureus 14a (without growth on BHI agar plates with vancomycin) and Mu50 (VISA) strains were used as controls [11]. The PAP experiment was performed at least twice for each strain to ensure reproducibility.



In Table 1 are shown the 106 strains of Staphylococcus, distributed in species, isolated from bacteremias of 106 patients between October/2001 and November/2002 at the MDNH. Vancomycin and teicoplanin MICs were determined by the agar dilution method (CLSI, 2005), while the results found by the Microscan WalkAway automated method were only reported for vancomycin. In the period of the study, 57 (53.8%) patients presented S. aureus bacteremia, while CNS were isolated from 49 (46.2%) patients, including the species: S. epidermidis (21 strains), S. haemolyticus (14 strains), S. hominis (7 strains), S. capitis (3 strains) and S. lugdunensis (1 strain). Oxacillin resistance rates were 26.3% for S. aureus and 81.6% for CNS. All the isolates presented MICs for vancomycin <1 mg/mL (68 strains) or ranging from 1 to 2 mg/mL (38 strains) by the agar dilution method. Four S. epidermidis, three S. haemolyticus and two S. hominis isolates presented MICs of 8 mg/mL to teicoplanin. One S. haemolyticus isolate was resistant to teicoplanin (MIC of 32 mg/mL). By the automated system one isolate of each S. aureus, S. epidermidis and S. haemolyticus and, two isolates of S. hominis showed vancomycin MIC of 4 mg/mL.

From 213 isolates submitted to the vancomycin agar screening method, 13 (6.1%) CNS isolated from nine patients grew on the BHIA containing 4 mg/mL of vancomycin. Four of them also grew on the BHIA with 6 mg/mL of drug (Table 2). From five patients, the same CNS species were detected in two blood specimens. Isolates that grew on BHIA with 4 mg/mL of vancomycin were selected as subpopulations and were submitted to the tests to confirm the heteroresistance phenotype to glycopeptides. Isolates from the patient 115 presented MICs of 12 mg/mL for vancomycin, while the strains isolated from the patients 19, 31, 53 and 127 presented MICs of 16, 16, 32 and 32 mg/mL for teicoplanin, respectively. Staphylococcus aureus isolates were not detected by the vancomycin agar screening method. All oxacillin-resistant staphylococci isolates presented the mecA gene.

All the CNS isolates that grew on the vancomycin agar screening presented heterogeneous profile for vancomycin and/or teicoplanin by the PAP method (Figure 1). Isolates 4a and 4b presented subpopulations able to grow in 8 mg/mL of vancomycin, while the isolates of the patients 19, 53 and 120 presented subpopulations that grew in 6 mg/mL of the drug (Figure 1A). The remaining presented strains grew in 4 mg/mL of vancomycin. Concerning to the teicoplanin heteroresistance, some CNS species presented subpopulations able to grow in higher concentrations than 20 mg/mL of the drug (isolates of the patients 4, 19, 31, 53, 115 and 127) (Figure 1B). The clinical isolates of S. aureus (14a) that did not grow on the vancomycin agar screening and the Mu50 strain (VISA) were used as susceptible and resistant controls, respectively.



Table 3 summarizes the characteristics associated with the nine patients presenting bacteremias by glycopeptides heteroresistant CNS. Infectious disease as underlying disease was common among these patients and all used previous antibiotics (five used b-lactams and four used quinolones) as therapy.



The isolation of VISA strains has been rare in the last years and only 20 strains have been reported to date [4]. Susceptibility methods as microdilution in broth, agar screening with 6 mg/mL of vancomycin or E-test have shown accuracy in the detection of this type of strain, including S. aureus strains with full vancomycin resistance (MIC > 32 mg/mL) [23,24]. However, isolates of Staphylococcus presenting heteroresistance to vancomycin have not been detected by these methods. Moreover, the best method to detection of vancomycin heteroresistance in Staphylococcus is not consensus [13].

The lack of a standardized method to detect heteroresistance to glycopeptides in staphylococci makes difficult the determination of the clinical significance of this resistance type in the course of the treatment of an infection with vancomycin, where the therapeutic failures associated with the underlying conditions of the patient is relatively common [25]. Studies on prevalence of vancomycin-heteroresistant S. aureus have shown variable rates, probably reflecting different criteria and/or methods used to detection of these strains [4].

Recently, our group evaluated the susceptibility to glycopeptides among 84 clinical strains of Staphylococcus by different methods [14]. A total of 20 (23.8%) strains of CNS grew on BHIA containing 4 and/or 6 mg/mL of vancomycin. Amongst these CNS, three isolates from the species S. haemolyticus, S. epidermidis and S. warneri were selected and analyzed by the PAP method, which confirmed its heteroresistance phenotypes. Respective subpopulations selected in higher concentrations of vancomycin and teicoplanin presented cell wall thickness, main characteristic associated with resistance to glycopeptides [19].

In the present study, 213 staphylococci isolated from 106 patients presenting bacteremia were submitted to the agar screening with 4 and 6 mg/mL of vancomycin. Thirteen (6.1%) CNS strains from nine patients grew on the BHIA plate containing 4 mg/mL of vancomycin and four of them also grew on the BHIA with 6 mg/mL. Hiramatsu [11] suggests that a subpopulation growing on the BHIA plate with 4 mg/mL of vancomycin and presenting MIC > 8 mg/mL for this drug might be considered as a vancomycin-heteroresistant strain. By this criterion, a patient (case 115) would have presented infection by vancomycin-heteroresistant staphylococci since the two strains (115a and 115b) isolated from him presented subpopulations with MICs of 12 mg/mL for vancomycin. Although the other isolates had presented vancomycin MICs < 8 mg/mL, these strains had subpopulations capable to grow in concentrations ranging from 4 to 8 mg/mL as showed by the PAP method in comparison to the control strains (14a and 150a) that presented subpopulations growing up with 2 mg/mL of vancomycin. Probably, the analysis of the bacterial subpopulations carried out after its storage in glycerol had a influence on the low MICs obtained, since the phenotype of resistance tends to revert in the absence of drug. Amongst 13 isolates grown on 4 mg/mL of vancomycin, only four (30.7%) grew on the BHIA with 6 mg/mL, as recommended by CLSI [10]. It is the concern, since the detection of these strains could have been compromised if these isolates were submitted only to selection in 6 mg/mL of vancomycin.

Teicoplanin is used as alternative therapy to vancomycin only in Europe [26,27]. However, some studies have shown an increase in the isolation of CNS with reduced susceptibility to teicoplanin worldwide. Schlegel and coworkers [28] isolated CNS strains presenting reduced susceptibility to teicoplanin from 6.3% of patients from an intensive care unit, while Lallemand and coworkers [29] found this type of strains in 31% of patients with bacteremias. The authors showed that the found rates were not associated with the increased use of teicoplanin in the hospitals analyzed. In addition, for some patients, the isolation of this type of strain was not related to the previous use of glycopeptides, indicating that CNS present large ability to develop glycopeptides resistance. Experiments in vitro about the resistance to glycopeptides in Staphylococcus have shown that the acquisition of teicoplanin resistance would be a previous stage for the development of vancomycin resistance [8,11]. Recently, Bertin and coworkers [30] showed that the incidence of CNS with decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin (32.1%) isolated at a French hospital was significantly associated with the use of vancomycin in medical units. To verify a possible correlation between heteroresistance to vancomycin and heteroresistance to teicoplanin, we determined the PAPs for teicoplanin of 12 isolates that showed heteroresistance to vancomycin (Table 2). All the isolates presented heterogeneous profiles for teicoplanin with subpopulations capable to grow in concentrations ranging from 6 mg/mL to 50 mg/mL. Moreover, the strain of the patient 53 presented full resistance to teicoplanin (MIC of 32 mg/mL) although the MIC 2 mg/mL for vancomycin, while four isolates showed intermediate resistance to teicoplanin. Thus, the determination of the teicoplanin MIC in routine laboratories could help to detect staphylococcal strains presenting heteroresistance to glycopeptides. The detection of this resistance type would be indicating that the strains possess vancomycin-resistant subpopulations, which could be selected during the treatment with this drug.

In this study we found a prevalence of 8.5 % (9/106 patients) for glycopeptides-heteroresistant staphylococci isolated from bacteremias. Wong and coworkers [31] also found a similar rate (7.4%) of CNS strains with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides isolated from bloodstream among 203 patients analyzed. If we considered only bacteremias by CNS the prevalence found in our study would increase for 18.37% (9/49 patients). This result is worrisome because the CNS are the most frequent Gram-positive agents isolated from nosocomial bacteremias [18] and are also prevalent as endogenous microbiota in humans [22]. These facts in association with antibiotic pressure, especially by the use of vancomycin owing to the high prevalence of oxacillin resistance among these organisms, probably would be contributing to the establishment and maintenance of the glycopeptides resistance in hospitals.

Bacterial infection and use of antimicrobial therapy were common characteristics among the nine patients that presented glycopeptides heteroresistant CNS isolates. Marcilio Dias naval hospital is a tertiary hospital with an average of 13,000 admissions per year where patients with severe underlying disease are referred. Thus, our results may also reflect the severity of the patients admitted in this hospital. Wong and coworkers [31] in a case-control study showed that the admission to the intensive care unit, prior use of vancomycin and/or b-lactams and isolation of methicillin-resistant staphylococci were common characteristics among patients with bacteremia due to staphylococci with heteroresistance to vancomycin.

In conclusion, our results showed the emergence of glycopeptides heteroresistance in oxacillin-resistant CNS isolated from bacteremias. Alert about this emergence is important in order to achieve judicious use of antimicrobials. Moreover, the use of methods, as vancomycin agar screening in routine to detect these staphylococci would be crucial to confirm the presence of this pathogen in hospitals.



We thank Dr Keiichi Hiramatsu (Department of Bacteriology, Juntendo University, Japan) that kindly provided the Mu50 strain. This study was supported by grants from: Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq), Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Fundação Universitária José Bonifácio (FUJB), Programa de Núcleos de Excelência (PRONEX) and Fundação de Apoio a Ciência e Tecnologia do Estado do Espírito Santo (FAPES).



1. Endtz H.P., Braak N., Verbrugh H.A., Belkum A. Vancomycin resistance: status quo and quo vadis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 1999; 18: 683-90.         [ Links ]

2. Schwalbe R.S., Stapleton J.T., Gilligan P.H. Emergence of vancomycin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. N Eng J Med 1987;316:927-31.         [ Links ]

3. Biavasco F., Vignaroli C., Varaldo P.C. Glycopeptide resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2000;19:403-17.         [ Links ]

4. Walsh T.R., Howe R.A. The prevalence and mechanisms of vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus. Annu Rev Microbiol 2003;56:657-75.         [ Links ]

5. Oliveira G.A., Dell'Aquila A.M., Masiero R.L., et al. Isolation in Brazil of nosocomial Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2001;22:443-8.         [ Links ]

6. Kim M.N., Pai C.H., Woo J.H., Ryu J.S., Hiramatsu K. Vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in Korea. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:3879-81.         [ Links ]

7. Reverdy M.E., Jarraud S., Bobin-Dubreux S., et al. Incidence of Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to glycopeptides in two French hospitals. Clin Microbiol Infect 2001;7:267-72.         [ Links ]

8. Sieradzki K., Villari P., Tomasz A. Decreased susceptibilities to teicoplanin and vancomycin among coagulase-negative methicillin-resistant clinical isolates of staphylococci. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998;42:100-7.         [ Links ]

9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility test. Approved Standard — Eighth edition. M2-A8. CLSI, Wayne, Pensylvania, USA, 2003.         [ Links ]

10. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute CLSI. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. Approved Standard — Sixth Edition. M7-A6. CLSI, Wayne, Pensylvania, USA, 2003.         [ Links ]

11. Hiramatsu K. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a new model of antibiotic resistance. Lancet Infect Dis 2001;1:147-55.         [ Links ]

12. Sieradzki K., Roberts R.B., Serur D., et al. Heterogeneously vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis strain causing recurrent peritonitis in a dialysis patient during vancomycin therapy. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:39-44.         [ Links ]

13. Srinivasan A., Dick J.D., Perl T.M. Vancomycin resistance in staphylococci. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002;15:430-8.         [ Links ]

14. Nunes A.P.F., Teixeira L.M., Bastos C.C.R., et al. Susceptibility of Brazilian staphylococcal strains to glycopeptides evaluated by different testing methods. Curr Microbiol 2002;44:385-90.         [ Links ]

15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute CLSI. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: fourteenth informational supplement. M100-S14. CLSI, Wayne, Pensylvania, EUA, 2004.         [ Links ]

16. Pfaller M.A., Jones R.N., Doern G.V., et al. Survey of bloodstream infections attributable to Gram-positive cocci: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in 1997 in the United States, Canada, and Latin America from the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program. Diag Microbiol Infect Dis 1999;33:283-97.         [ Links ]

17. Wong S.S., Ng T., Yam W., et al. Bacteremia due to Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2000;36:261-8.         [ Links ]

18. Moore M.R., Perdreau-Remington F., Chambers H.F. Vancomycin treatment failure associated with heterogeneous vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus in a patient with endocarditis and in the rabbit model of endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:1262-6.         [ Links ]

19. Nunes A.P.F., Teixeira L.M., Iorio N.L.P., et al. Heterogeneous resistance to vancomycin in Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus haemolyticus and Staphylococcus warneri clinical strains: characterization of glycopeptides susceptibility profiles and cell wall thickening. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2006;27:307-58.         [ Links ]

20. Garner J.S., Jarvis W.R., Emori T.G., et al. CDC definitions for nosocomial infections. Am J Infect Control Hosp 1988;16:28-40.         [ Links ]

21. Ferreira R.B.R., Iorio N.L.P., Malvar K.L., et al. Coagulase-negative staphylococci: comparison of phenotypic and genotype oxacillin susceptibility tests and evaluation of the agar screening tests by using different concentrations of oxacillin. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:3609-14.         [ Links ]

22. Bannerman T.L. Staphylococcus, Micrococcus, and other catalase-positive cocci that grown aerobically. In: Murray P.R., Barron E.J., Pfaller M.A., et al. [eds]. Manual of Clinical Microbiology, 8th ed, ASM Press. Washington, DC, 2003.         [ Links ]

23. CDC. Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin — United States, 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2002;51:565-7.         [ Links ]

24. CDC. Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin — New York, 2004. MMWR, Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53:322-3.         [ Links ]

25. Goldstein F.W., Kitzis M.D. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: no apocalypse now. Clin Microbiol Infect 2003;9:761-5.         [ Links ]

26. Fanos V., Kacet N., Mosconi G. A review of teicoplanin in the treatment of serious neonatal infections. Eur J Pediat 1997;156:423-7.         [ Links ]

27. Graninger W., Assadian O., Lagler H., Ramharter M. The role of glycopeptides in the treatment of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Microbiol Infect 2002;8:310-5.         [ Links ]

28. Schlegel L., Saliba F., Mangeney N., Mathieu D. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis typing of coagulase-negative staphylococci with decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin isolated from an intensive care unit. J Hosp Infect 2001;49:62-8.         [ Links ]

29. Lallemand S., Thouverez M., Boisson K., et al. Bacteremia caused by coagulase-negative staphylococci exhibiting decreased susceptibility to teicoplanin. J Hosp Infect 2002;51:207-14.         [ Links ]

30. Bertin M., Muller A., Bertrand X., et al. Relationship between glycopeptides susceptibility to teicoplanin in isolates of coagulase-negative staphylococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2004;23:375-9.         [ Links ]

31. Wong S.S.Y., Ho P.L., Woo P.C.Y., Yuen K.Y. Bacteremia caused by staphylococci with inducible vancomycin heteroresistance. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:760-7.         [ Links ]



Address for correspondence:
Dr. Kátia Regina Netto dos Santos
Laboratório de Infecções Hospitalares, sala I2-010
Departamento de Microbiologia Médica. Instituto de Microbiologia Prof. Paulo de Góes
CCS, Bloco I, UFRJ, Cidade Universitária, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
Zip code: 21941-590
Phone: 55-21-22604193. Fax: 55-21-2560-8344

Received on 28 January 2007; revised 11 May 2007.

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License