SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

vol.23Translation and cultural adaptation into Brazilian Portuguese of the Finnish Diabetes Risk Score (FINDRISC) and reliability assessmentCharacteristics of the schools’ surrounding environment, distance from home and active commuting in adolescents from Curitiba, Brazil author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand




Related links


Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia

Print version ISSN 1415-790XOn-line version ISSN 1980-5497

Rev. bras. epidemiol. vol.23  Rio de Janeiro  2020  Epub June 19, 2020 


Nationwide use of psychotropic drugs for treatment of self-reported depression in the Brazilian urban adult population

Uso nacional de drogas psicotrópicas no tratamento da depressão autorreferida na população adulta urbana brasileira

Luiz Roberto RamosI

Jair de Jesus MariII

Andréia Turmina FontanellaIII

Tatiane da Silva Dal PizzolIV

Andréa Dâmaso BertoldiV

Sotero Serrate MengueIII

PNAUM Research Group* 

IDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

IIDepartment of Psychiatry, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo - São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

IIIGraduate Program in Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.

IVDepartment of Drug Manufacturing and Control, School of Pharmacy, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.

VDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Pelotas - Pelotas (RS), Brazil.



Antidepressant use is increasing worldwide, but national data on psychotropic drug use by depressed patients in Brazil is lacking.


Between 2013 and 2014, a representative sample of urban adult individuals were asked if they had a diagnosis of chronic disease, had a medical indication for drug treatment, and were taking chronic medications at the time for each reported diagnosis. We analyzed the frequencies of reported depression and the medications related to this disease.


Overall, 6.1% of respondents reported depression. The prevalence increased with age - 9.5% among the elders - was higher among women (8.9%) and in the south of the country (8.9%). As a single disease, the prevalence of depression was higher among young people (17.6%). Among those with multimorbidity, the prevalence of depression rose to 25.7%. Of those who reported depression, 81.3% had medical indication for treatment and 90.3% were under treatment - this proportion was lower among young people (84.5%) and those living in the poorest region (78.6%). Antidepressants accounted for 47.2% of psychotropic drugs taken by respondents with depression, with regional differences - only 30% used antidepressants in the North. Polypharmacy was reported by 22% of those with depression and other chronic diseases.


Depression in Brazil, is common among young adults as a single chronic disease and highly prevalent among people with chronic multimorbidity, especially the young. The treatment gap was larger among young people and in the less developed regions of the country.

Keywords: Population Studies in Public Health; Prevalence; Chronic diseases; Psychotropic drugs; Depressive Disorder



O uso de antidepressivos está aumentando em todo o mundo, mas faltam dados nacionais sobre o uso de drogas psicotrópicas por pacientes deprimidos no Brasil.


Entre 2013 e 2014, uma amostra representativa de indivíduos adultos urbanos foi questionada sobre a presença diagnóstica de doença crônica, a indicação médica para tratamento medicamentoso e o uso de medicamentos crônicos à época de cada diagnóstico relatado. Foram analisadas as frequências de depressão relatada e os medicamentos relacionados a essa doença.


No geral, 6,1% dos entrevistados relataram depressão. A prevalência aumentou com a idade (9,5% entre os idosos) foi maior entre as mulheres (8,9%) e no sul do país (8,9%). Como doença única, a prevalência de depressão foi maior entre os jovens (17,6%). Entre aqueles com multimorbidade, a prevalência de depressão subiu para 25,7%. Dos que relataram depressão, 81,3% tinham indicação médica para tratamento e 90,3% estavam em tratamento - essa proporção foi menor entre os jovens (84,5%) e os que moram na região mais pobre (78,6%). Os antidepressivos representaram 47,2% dos medicamentos psicotrópicos tomados pelos entrevistados com depressão, com diferenças regionais - apenas 30% usavam antidepressivos no Norte. Polifarmácia foi relatada por 22% das pessoas com depressão e outras doenças crônicas.


A depressão no Brasil é comum entre adultos jovens como doença crônica única e altamente prevalente entre as pessoas com multimorbidade crônica, principalmente os jovens. A lacuna de tratamento foi maior entre os jovens e nas regiões menos desenvolvidas do país.

Palavras-chave: Estudos Populacionais em Saúde Pública; Prevalência; Doença crônica; Psicotrópicos; Depressão


Depression is a systemic disease that can alter patients’ biorhythms (appetite and sleep), jeopardize emotional processing (feelings of hopelessness and guilt, suicidal ideation), impair cognition (memory and concentration), and cause psychomotor changes (psychomotor agitation or retardation)1. It is a relatively rare disease in childhood, with prevalence increasing from adolescence onward. On average, about 4.5% of the global population is affected, with a higher prevalence (5.2%) among women2. With population aging, the prevalence of depression tends to increase significantly3. Although depressive symptoms are associated with increased mortality, the major burden of depression is related to the impairment of functional capacity4. In addition to increasing the incidence of other chronic conditions, such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes, depression decreases independence and ­autonomy in daily life5,6. According to the World Health Organization, depression is one of the leading causes of years lived with disability7.

Depression is commonly underdiagnosed - especially among the elderly, due to the misconception that negative moods are part of normal aging - and undertreated, due to the challenges posed by the adverse effects of antidepressants and the stigma associated with mental illness8,9. Even so, there is a worldwide trend toward a significant increase in the prevalence of antidepressant use by the general population10.

Although the psychopharmacotherapy of depression can be simple, with use of only one antidepressant controlling symptoms in the majority of cases, greater use of medicines by patients in pursuit of symptom relief is not uncommon. Medicines that are not always appropriate (e.g., benzodiazepine-type anxiolytics) may lead to worsening of the condition and new symptoms, especially in older adults11.

Until recently, national health surveys conducted in Brazil have not evaluated the use of medicines in depth, as the level of detail required by this topic would in itself take up much of the scope of any such research. The National Health Survey (PNS) in 2013 did evaluate the use of medications for several chronic diseases, including depression, but did not investigate which medications were being used12. Few studies have assessed the use of psychotropic drugs in Brazil and, to date, none at the national scale13.

The present study aims to provide nationwide data on the use of psychotropic drugs and other chronic medications by the Brazilian urban adult population, associating with the presence of self-reported depression and some sociodemographic characteristics.


The data used in the present analysis were obtained by the National Survey on Access, Use, and Promotion of the Rational Use of Medicines in Brazil (PNAUM), conducted between September 2013 and February 2014, an initiative of the Brazilian Ministry of Health14. This was a population-based cross-sectional study with a probabilistic sample in three stages, where the first stage corresponds to the municipalities, the second stage are census tracts, and the third stage represents the households. The study population was ­residents in permanent private households in the urban area of the Brazilian territory. A total of 245 municipalities were included, and 41,433 people were interviewed in the 5 Brazilian geographic regions. The sample size was defined according to the estimates of access and use of drugs obtained from previous studies. Face-to-face interviews were conducted by 165 trained interviewers, and data were collected using tablets with a 3G and GPS connection. For the present study, only data from individuals aged 20 years or older (N = 32,348) were analyzed. Additional methodological details of PNAUM are described elsewhere15.

Chronic use of medicines was investigated based on the reported reason for use, among eight directly investigated chronic non-communicable diseases (CNCDs): hypertension, diabetes, heart disease, hypercholesterolemia, stroke, pulmonary disease, arthritis/rheumatic disease, and depression. Respondents were asked whether they were on any chronic medications for each diagnosis they endorsed. The data collection instruments were developed by researchers from seven Brazilian universities, having been tested and standardized prior to implementation. Full questionnaires can be accessed on the PNAUM website (

Point prevalence of self-reported depression and use of medications to treat depression were obtained from the following questions: “Has a doctor ever told you that you have depression?”; “Has a doctor ever told you that you should take any medication for depression?”; “Are you taking any such medication?”. Then, respondents were asked which medications they were taking for the treatment of depression and whether they had access to all of the medications they should be taking. As depression is commonly associated with other CNCDs, it was often impossible to learn from the respondent which medications were used specifically for depression, and the drug use statistics included all medications mentioned by the respondent, in a variable that allowed identification of cases of polypharmacy (concurrent use of 5 or more medications)16.

Medications described as being used by the self-reported depressed respondents were classified primarily as psychotropic and non-psychotropic drugs. Non-psychotropic drugs included all chronic medications reported by respondents with a diagnosis of depression, but which were being used to treat comorbidities often associated with depression. Psychotropic drugs were classified into six groups:

  • those considered specific for the treatment of depression, i.e., antidepressants in general;

  • benzodiazepines;

  • hypnotics;

  • antipsychotics;

  • mood stabilizers;

  • medicines used to treat dementia and parkinsonian syndromes (neurotropic drugs).

This classification is consistent with current guidelines for the treatment of depression and with the methodology of a previous epidemiological survey on the use of psychotropic drugs conducted in São Paulo, Brazil13,17. To obtain supplementary data, we checked whether the psychotropic drugs endorsed by the respondents were present in the National Formulary of Essential Medicines (Rename) in force at the time of data collection18.

The sociodemographic characteristics of interest were: sex, age group (20 to 39, young adults; 40-59, adults; 60 or over, older adults), socioeconomic level according to the Brazilian Economic Classification Criterion, stratified into classes (A/B, C, or D/E) by the Brazilian Association of Research Companies (ABEP)19, and regions of Brazil, which also reflect the socioeconomic differences of the population (North and Northeast - poorer, less-developed regions; South and Southeast - richer, more developed regions).

Data on the multi-morbidity associated with depression, computed on the basis of reports of other chronic diseases, were also used for a supplemental analysis. Depression was classified as a single disease (when it was the only chronic disease present) or comorbid with one or more chronic diseases.

To calculate prevalence values with 95% confidence intervals, the total number of people aged 20 or older in the sample was used as the denominator. For the analyzes, we used post-stratum weights and statistical resources for complex samples (PASW Statistics 18, Release Version 18.0.0 (SPSS), Inc., 2009, Chicago, IL, Pearson’s χ2 test was used for bivariate comparison of proportions.

This project was approved by the Brazilian National Research Ethics Committee (398.131 in 9/16/2013). All interviews were carried out after the prospective respondents or their legal guardians (when respondents could not complete the questionnaire themselves) had read and signed an informed consent form.


The prevalence of self-reported depression in the study population aged 20 years or older was 6.1% (95%CI 5.6 - 6.6). This prevalence increased significantly with age, from 3.5% in the under-40 age group to 9.5% in the 60-or-older group. It was highest among women (8.9%) and in the Southern region of the country (8.9%). There was no significant variation in prevalence across socioeconomic classes (Table 1).

Table 1. Prevalence of self-reported depression, medical indications for pharmacotherapy of depression, and use of medications for depression in the Brazilian population aged 20 years or older, stratified by sociodemographic characteristics. National Survey on Access, Use, and Promotion of the Rational Use of Medicines in Brazil (PNAUM), Brazil, 2014. 

Variable Prevalence of self-reported depression Self-reported depression and medical indications for pharmacotherapy Self-reported depression, medical indications for pharmacotherapy, and current pharmacotherapy
%a 95%CI p %a 95%CI p %a 95%CI p
Sex Male 2.8 2.4 - 3.4 < 0.001 79.9 69.7 - 87.3 0.686 88.5 81.1 - 93.2 0.441
Female 8.9 8.2 - 9.6 81.7 77.9 - 85.0 90.7 88.1 - 92.9
Age range 20 to 39 years 3.5 2.9 - 4.0 < 0.001 72.9 64.2 - 80.1 0.001 84.5 76.6 - 90.1 0.013
40 to 59 years 7.6 6.9 - 8.4 84.9 81.1 - 88.0 90.5 87.2 - 93.0
60 years and older 9.5 8.6 - 10.6 83.2 78.3 - 87.2 94.4 89.8 - 97.0
Region of Brazil North 2.7 2.1 - 3.4 < 0.001 59.1 49.3 - 68.2 0.003 78.6 65.3 - 86.7 0.002
Northeast 5.1 4.2 - 6.2 78.3 71.7 - 83.8 83.2 76.8 - 88.2
Southeast 6.2 5.4 - 7.0 82.6 75.0 - 88.2 92.1 87.3 - 95.2
South 8.9 7.9 - 10.1 87.9 83.0 - 91.5 93.5 90.7 - 95.5
Center-West 6.1 5.4 - 7.0 71.3 63.0 - 78.4 89.1 81.7 - 93.7
ABEP socioeconomic classb A/B 6.2 5.2 - 7.3 0.277 82.6 71.3 - 90.1 0.603 91.2 86.4 - 94.4 0.849
C 5.8 5.3 - 6.4 79.7 75.5 - 83.3 89.8 85.5 - 92.7
D/E 6.7 5.8 - 7.8 83.5 77.1 - 88.3 90.2 85.5 - 93.5
Total 6.1 5.6 - 6.6 81.3 77.5 - 84.7 90.3 87.6 - 92.4

aPercentages adjusted for sample weights and post-stratification by age and sex; baccording to the Brazilian Association of Research Companies (ABEP)18; 95%CI: confidence interval of 95%.

The proportion of respondents with a medical indication for treatment of depression was 81.3% (95%CI 77.5 - 84.7), significantly higher (84.9%) in adults and lower (72.9%) in young adults. Among those who reported having a medical indication for treatment, most were receiving such treatment (90.3%, 95%CI 87.6 - 92.4). However, this proportion was significantly lower among young adults (84.5%) and residents of the North and Northeast regions (78.6 and 83.2%, respectively) (Table 1).

Among respondents who endorsed having only one CNCD, the prevalence of depression as a single disease was much higher than the general average (10.4%), and it was the third highest-prevalent disease in this population with a single disease, after hypertension and dyslipidemia. Among young adults, the prevalence was even higher (17.6%), whereas in older adults, the prevalence of depression as a single chronic disease was low (4.0%). Among those who reported more than one CNCD, the prevalence of depression as a comorbidity rose to 25,7%, reaching 45% among young adults with chronic comorbidities (see Supplementary Material 1).

Self-reported depression was commonly associated with other CNDCs and, consequently, with the chronic use of medicines for reasons other than pharmacotherapy of depression. Among respondents with at least one CNCD, 16.2% were not on any chronic medications, versus only 10.7% among those who specifically mentioned depression. Corroborating this finding, the prevalence of polypharmacy (five or more medications) was significantly higher among those who reported one or more CNCDs including depression (21,9%) than among those who did not report depression (12.1%) (Table 2).

Table 2. Number of chronic medications reported and the number of chronic diseases reported from a list of 8 diseases, controlling for depression. National Survey on Access, Use, and Promotion of the Rational Use of Medicines in Brazil (PNAUM), Brazil, 2014. 

Chronic Medications 1 + CD 1 + CD and DEP Total
None 16,2% 10,7% 71,6%
1 to 4 med 71,7% 67,4% 24,3%
5 or more med 12,1% 21,9% 4,1%

CD: chronic disease; DEP: depression; Med: medications.

Table 3 shows the groups of medications endorsed by patients with self-reported depression. More than two-thirds (69%) were non-psychotropic drugs, which is consistent with the high prevalence of comorbidities in cases of depression. It also lists all psychotropic drugs reported by the respondents, stratified into the six categories defined in the Methods section. Table 4 shows the proportion of use of each category of psychotropic drugs in relation to total intake of psychotropic drugs, for the sample as a whole and stratified by region. Nearly half of all psychotropic drugs mentioned by respondents were antidepressants, i.e., drugs specific for the treatment of depression (47.2%), followed by benzodiazepines (29.8%) and antipsychotics (12.1%). Use of antidepressants in cases of depression varied significantly across regions. In the South region, for instance, it was above the national average (55.4%), whereas in the North region, this rate was lower (29.7%), and use of antipsychotics was more prevalent than in any other region.

Table 3. Drug groups reported for the treatment of depression and its comorbidities. National Survey on Access, Use, and Promotion of the Rational Use of Medicines in Brazil (PNAUM), Brazil, 2014. 

Drugs reported for the treatment of depression Prevalence (%)a 95%CI
Non-psychotropic drugs 69.0 [67.1 - 71.0]
Antidepressants 14.6 [13.6 - 15.7]
Benzodiazepines 9.2 [8.4 - 10.1]
Antipsychotics 3.8 [3.0 - 4.7]
Mood stabilizers 2.1 [1.7 - 2.6]
Hypnotics 0.7 [0.5 - 1.0]
Neurotropics 0.6 [0.4 - 1.0]

aPercentages adjusted for sample weights and post-stratification by age and sex; IC95%: interval of confidence of 95%.

Table 4. Psychotropic drugs reported for the treatment of depression and its comorbidities, stratified by region of Brazil. National Survey on Access, Use, and Promotion of the Rational Use of Medicines in Brazil (PNAUM), 2014. 

Psychotropic drugs used by respondents for depression Region of Brazil
North Northeast Southeast South Center-West Total
%a 95%CI %a 95%CI %a 95%CI %a 95%CI %a 95%CI %a 95%CI
Antidepressants 29.7 22.2 - 38.4 37.4 31.2 - 43.9 47.8 43.4 - 52.3 55.4 51.8 - 59.0 42.4 37.6 - 47.5 47.2 44.4 - 50.0
Benzodiazepines 31.7 24.6 - 39.7 35.2 29.0 - 41.9 31.1 27.9 - 34.5 23.9 21.6 - 26.4 26.5 22.4 - 31.1 29.8 27.7 - 32.0
Antipsychotics 24.7 15.3 - 37.4 16.4 11.6 - 22.7 11.4 7.7 - 16.6 9.9 7.7 - 12.7 11.6 8.3 - 16.0 12.1 9.9 - 14.9
Mood stabilizers 6.7b 2.9 - 14.7 6.5 3.6 - 11.4 6.1 4.4 - 8.5 6.2 4.8 - 8.1 12.7 9.4 - 16.8 6.7 5.5 - 8.1
Hypnotics 6.0b 2.4 - 14.2 2.7b 0.8 - 8.6 1.4b 0.6 - 3.2 3.0 2.0 - 4.5 3.6b 1.6 - 7.9 2.2 1.5 - 3.3
Neurotropics 1.2b 0.4 - 4.1 1.8b 0.8 - 3.7 2.1b 1.0 - 4.5 1.5b 0.7 - 2.8 3.2b 1.6 - 6.4 2.0 1.3 - 3.1

aPercentages adjusted for sample weights and post-stratification by age and sex; bcoefficient of variation greater than 0.3. Cautious interpretation is suggested; 95%IC: interval of confidence of 95%.

A total of 17 antidepressant drugs were reported, the most commonly reported was fluoxetine (30.1%), followed by amitriptyline (22.8%), sertraline (11.9%), and citalopram (8.2%). All others had a prevalence of use below 5% - paroxetine (4,8%), venlafaxine (4,5%), nortriptyline (3,7%), escitalopram and imipramine (2,9%).


In this population sample representative of the Brazilian urban adult population, we found a prevalence of self-reported depression of 6.1% among respondents aged 20 years or older. This prevalence is slightly higher than the overall prevalence estimated by WHO2, but slightly lower than the 7.6% prevalence found in the 2013 National Health Survey, which used a similar methodology of self-report but applied to a broader age range (Brazilian population aged 18 and over)12,20.

The prevalence of depression in the North region was almost one third of that in the South region. This might be due to differences in the exposure to sun light, much greater in the North, but also due to differences in availability of proper diagnosis, but these differences deserve to be further studied.

We observed a significant increase in the prevalence of depression with age, reaching 9.5% among older adults. Considering those individuals who reported only one of the eight CNCDs investigated directly by the PNAUM, the prevalence of depression as a single disease in the population aged 20 years or older rose to 10.8%, ranking third behind hypertension and dyslipidemias as isolated diseases. As such, the prevalence of depression was higher among young adults than among older adults with only one CNCD. Among those who reported at least one CNCD, the prevalence of depression was for times that found in the total population and more than twice the prevalence as a single disease. The most impressive finding was the extremely high prevalence of depression among young adults with chronic comorbidities, showing that self-reported depression is ubiquitous among young people with chronic multi-morbidity. We did not find in the literature other studies that have analyzed the prevalence of depression along with other comorbidities.

Considering that, according to WHO, depression is a leading cause of years lived with disability7, the high prevalence of self-reported depression in the present sample, not only among the population with comorbidity, but also in young adults with depression as a single disease, is a matter of concern.

The vast majority of those who reported depression had a medical indication for treatment (81%); of those, most were indeed being treated. In general, 90% of those reporting depression were actually receiving some medication for depression. This proportion was significantly lower among the population living in the North (79%) and Northeast (83%) regions. This is probably a reflection of the lower accessibility in these poorer regions of the country, with less services and trained personnel. Also, the young population had a significantly lower rate of treatment of those reporting depression (85%). This might be due to the fear of side effects affecting libido or denial of the disease among the young, but this issue deserves further investigation and the attention from health workers treating depression in a young person. The high prevalence of older adults under treatment for depression (94%) is probably a reflection of the good access to prescribed medications for the other comorbidities that most of the interviewees reported having21,22.

The higher prevalence of polypharmacy among respondents with self-reported depression is explained by the fact that depression is often accompanied by comorbidities that are treated with accessible drugs23. Only 11% of those who reported depression with comorbidities were not on any chronic medication, and the prevalence of polypharmacy among those who reported depression was quite high (22%).

Although the majority of depressed patients who had indications for treatment were being treated, it is noteworthy that pharmacotherapy of depression is a chronic treatment based on psychotropic drugs, which are often expensive and are commonly absent from the National Formulary of Essential Medicines in Brazil; thus, treatment can be discontinued or neglected. This means that a significant proportion of depressed patients may not have continuously adequate and effective treatment over the years24.

On the other hand, treatment of depression has become increasingly popular in recent years, in part due to a decrease in the stigma surrounding the disease and in part due to greater availability of effective medications with fewer side effects. There is a worldwide trend towards increased use of antidepressants. A U.S. study showed that, between 2000 and 2010, the number of people aged 18-44 who were on at least one antidepressant increased by almost 50%, from 6.6 to 9.8 million people - i.e., from 6.1 to 8.5% of the population10.

We may consider it a positive fact that among the psychotropic drugs in use by those with self-reported depression, almost half were antidepressants, supposedly the drug of choice to treat depression, as a single drug or associated to others. A total of 17 antidepressants were reported, with three agents accounting for 65% of reports - fluoxetine (30%), amitriptyline (23%), and sertraline (12%). It is worth noting that the two most commonly mentioned antidepressants were included in the National Formulary of Essential Medicines, as were nortriptyline and bupropion, both with a low reported frequency of use (3.7 and 1.8%, respectively).

Despite their lack of antidepressant effect, benzodiazepines were the most-represented group of psychotropic drugs in the sample after antidepressants, with use reported by almost one-third of depressed respondents. This is probably explained by the fact that depression is often comorbid with anxiety (which can lead to sleep disorders) and panic attacks25. A population-based study conducted in São Paulo to evaluate the use of psychotropic drugs found that, as in the present study, anxiolytics and hypnotics are commonly prescribed as adjuncts to antidepressant pharmacotherapy in cases of depression, although these drugs can lead to dependence and are potentially inappropriate for older adults due to their negative effects on memory and balance13. However, depressed patients in this sample may also have had other chronic diseases that were not considered in the analysis and are primarily treated with benzodiazepines. The same population-based study showed that, in some severe cases of depression with mood swings, a mood stabilizer - or even, in some cases, a second-generation antipsychotic - may be required. These classes were both included in the analysis, but were rarely reported by respondents13. We observed significant differences in the prevalence of antidepressant and antipsychotic use across the different regions of Brazil, which probably reflects different prescribing patterns among physicians.

It bears stressing that most previous population-based studies on the prevalence of depression used DSM-IV criteria and/or validated screening instruments, which limits their comparability to the present study26,27. But yet, self-reported diagnosis of depression has been previously validated28,29 and used in large surveys like the PNS12 in Brazil. On the other hand, self-report of depression increased the reliability of respondents’ reports of which medications they use. In most epidemiological drug surveys, these reports lack any linkage to the respondents’ reported health conditions. Another limitation of this study was that we did not have data on the timing or duration of diagnoses.

Depression is a growing public health challenge in the current paradigm of chronic diseases. Given its high prevalence in the population of chronic multimorbidity - especially among young adults - and high potential for inducing disability, its diagnosis and treatment should be a priority in primary care30. This study shows original national data on the type of drugs that the urban adult population was using to treat depression in Brazil. Proper control of diagnosed depression through the rational use of antidepressant and anti-anxiety agents is essential to preserving the functional capacity of those affected, as well as to prevent polypharmacy, which is particularly common among patients with depression.

In summary, the present study shows that the treatment of self-reported depression involves mainly antidepressants but several other classes of psychotropic drugs are being used. A nationwide treatment protocol would be desirable, given the significant regional differences in prescription patterns of medicines for depression in Brazil. The high prevalence of self-reported depression as an isolated chronic non-communicable disease and the extremely high prevalence as a comorbidity among young adults, along with the low proportion of cases being treated in this population group, warrant special attention.


To the Departments of Science and Technology and Pharmaceutical Care of the Secretariat of Science, Technology and Strategic Inputs of the Brazilian Ministry of Health for the funding and technical support for the National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines; to the PNAUM survey team that collected the data for the present study; to Professor Sergio Blay for important suggestions regarding the content of this manuscript.


1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. [ Links ]

2. World Health Organization. Depression and other common mental disorders: Global health estimates [Internet]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 [accessed on Apr. 6, 2018]. Available from: Available from: ]

3. Butler RN, Lewis MI. Late-life depression: when and how to intervene. Geriatrics 1995; 50(8): 44-6, 49-52, 5; quiz 56. [ Links ]

4. Lima MTR, de Souza e Silva R, Ramos LR. Depressive symptomatology and its associated factors in an urban cohort of elderly. J Bras Psiquiatr 2009; 58(1): 1-7. [ Links ]

5. Everson-Rose SA, Lewis TT. Psychosocial factors and cardiovascular diseases. Annu Rev Public Health 2005; 26: 469-500. [ Links ]

6. Ramos LR. Determinant factors for healthy aging among senior citizens in a large city: the Epidoso Project in São Paulo. Cad Saúde Pública 2003; 19(3): 793-7. [ Links ]

7. Global Burden of Disease Study Collaborators. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 301 acute and chronic diseases and injuries in 188 countries, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015; 386(9995): 743-800. [ Links ]

8. Veras RP, Coutinho E. [Prevalence of organic brain syndrome in an elderly population in an metropolitan area of the southeastern region of Brazil]. Rev Saúde Pública 1994; 28(1): 26-37. [ Links ]

9. Gazalle FK, Hallal PC, Lima MS. [Depression in the elderly: are doctors investigating it?]. Rev Bras Psiquiatr 2004; 26(3): 145-9. [ Links ]

10. Stagnitti MN. Trends in antidepressant utilization and expenditures in the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized population by age, 2000 and 2010. Statistical Brief Rockville (MD); 2001. [ Links ]

11. Rozenfeld S. [Prevalence, associated factors, and misuse of medication in the elderly: a review]. Cad Saúde Pública 2003; 19(3): 717-24. [ Links ]

12. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013 - Percepção do estado de saúde, estilos de vida e doenças crônicas. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística; 2014. [ Links ]

13. Quintana MI, Andreoli SB, Peluffo MP, Ribeiro WS, Feijo MM, Bressan RA, et al. Psychotropic Drug Use in Sao Paulo, Brazil--An Epidemiological Survey. PloS One 2015; 10(8): e0135059. [ Links ]

14. Gadelha CAG, Costa KS, Nascimento Junior JM, Soeiro OM, Mengue SS, Da Motta ML, et al. PNAUM: integrated approach to Pharmaceutical Services, Science, Technology and Innovation. Rev Saúde Pública 2016; 50(Suppl. 2). [ Links ]

15. Mengue SS, Bertoldi AD, Boing AC, Tavares NUL, Pizzol TS, Oliveira MA, et al. National Survey on Access, Use and Promotion of Rational Use of Medicines (PNAUM): household survey component methods. Rev Saúde Pública 2016; 50(Suppl. 2): 4s. [ Links ]

16. Ramos LR, Tavares NUL, Bertoldi AD, Farias MR, Oliveira MA, Luiza VL, et al. Polifarmácia e polimorbidade em idosos no Brasil: um desafio em saúde pública. Rev Saúde Pública 2016; 50(2): 9s. [ Links ]

17. Shaywitz J, Marder S. Medication treatment for anxiety, depression, schizophrenia, and bipolar disorder in the community setting. In: Thornicroft G, Szmukler G, Mueser KT, Drake RE, editors. Oxford textbook of community mental health. New York: Oxford University Press; 2011. p. 195-204. [ Links ]

18. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Relação nacional de medicamentos essenciais: RENAME 2013 [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2013 [accessed on Apr. 6, 2018]. Available from: Available from: ]

19. Brazilian Association of Research Companies. Códigos e guias [Internet]. Brazilian Association of Research Companies; 2013 [accessed on Apr. 6, 2018]. Available from: Available from: ]

20. Stopa SR, Malta DC, de Oliveira MM, Lopes CS, Menezes PR, Kinoshita RT. Prevalence of self-reported depression in Brazil: 2013 National Health Survey results. Rev Bras Epidemiol 2015; 18(Suppl. 2): 170-80. [ Links ]

21. Oliveira MA, Luiza VL, Tavares NU, Mengue SS, Arrais PS, Farias MR, et al. Access to medicines for chronic diseases in Brazil: a multidimensional approach. Rev Saúde Pública 2016; 50(Suppl. 2): 6s. [ Links ]

22. Tavares NUL, Luiza VL, Oliveira MA, Costa KS, Mengue SS, Arrais PSD, et al. Free access to medicines for the treatment of chronic diseases in Brazil. Rev Saúde Pública 2016; 50(Suppl. 2). [ Links ]

23. Askari MS, Andrade LH, Filho AC, Silveira CM, Siu E, Wang YP, et al. Dual burden of chronic physical diseases and anxiety/mood disorders among Sao Paulo Megacity Mental Health Survey Sample, Brazil. J Affect Disord 2017; 220: 1-7. [ Links ]

24. Thornicroft G, Chatterji S, Evans-Lacko S, Gruber M, Sampson N, Aguilar-Gaxiola S, et al. Undertreatment of people with major depressive disorder in 21 countries. Brit J Psychiat 2017; 210(2): 119-24. [ Links ]

25. Goldberg DP. Anxious forms of depression. Depress Anxiety 2014; 31(4): 344-51. [ Links ]

26. Beekman AT, Copeland JR, Prince MJ. Review of community prevalence of depression in later life. Brit J Psychiat 1999; 174: 307-11. [ Links ]

27. Andrade LH, Wang YP, Andreoni S, Silveira CM, Alexandrino-Silva C, Siu ER, et al. Mental disorders in megacities: findings from the Sao Paulo megacity mental health survey, Brazil. PloS One 2012; 7(2): e31879. [ Links ]

28. Zimmerman M, Coryell W. The Validity of a Self-Report Questionnaire for Diagnosing Major Depressive Disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 45(8): 738-40. [ Links ]

29. Sanchez-Villegas A, Schlatter J, Ortuno F, Lahortiga F, Pla J, Benito S, et al. Validity of a self-reported diagnosis of depression among participants in a cohort study using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID-I). BMC Psychiatry 2008; 8: 43. [ Links ]

30. Paykel ES. Depression: major problem for public health. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc 2006; 15(1): 4-10. [ Links ]

Financial support: Secretariat of Science, Technology and Strategic Inputs (SCTIE) of the Brazilian Ministry of Health (MS).

Received: July 04, 2019; Revised: December 19, 2019; Accepted: January 07, 2020

Corresponding author: Luiz Roberto Ramos. Rua Botucatu, 740, 4º andar, Vila Clementino, CEP: 04026-001, São Paulo, SP, Brazil. E-mail:


PNAUM Research Group: Luiz Roberto Ramos, Tatiane da Silva Dal Pizzol, Andréa Dâmaso Bertoldi, Sotero Serrate Mengue, Sérgio Dourado Arrais, Noemia Urruth Leão Tavares, Maria Auxiliadora Oliveira, Vera Lucia Luiza, Mareni Rocha Farias

Conflict of interests: nothing to declare

Authors’ contributions: Conception and design: LRR, SSM. Analysis and interpretation: LRR, JJM, ATF, TSDP, ADB, SSM. Data collection: PNAUM research team. Writing the article: LRR, SSM, JJM. Critical revision of the article: LRR, JJM, ATF, TSDP, ADB, SSM. Statistical analysis: SSM, ATF. Overall responsibility: LRR. Final approval of the article: All authors have read and approved the final version of the article.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License