SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 issue3Potential use of molecular-typing methods for the identification and characterization of salmonella enterica serotypes isolated in the poultry production chainLysine and methionine + cystine for laying hens during the post-molting phase author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science

Print version ISSN 1516-635X

Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. vol.14 no.3 Campinas July/Sept. 2012

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2012000300004 

Effect of ph and temperature on the activity of phytase products used in broiler nutrition

 

 

Naves L de PI; Corrêa ADII; Bertechini AGIII; Gomide EMIV; Santos CD dosII

IGraduate student in Monogastric Nutrition of the Animal Science Department − Federal University of Lavras (UFLA)
IIProfessor of the Chemistry Department/UFLA
IIIProfessor of the Animal Science Department/UFLA
IVPh. D. student in Monogastric Nutrition of the Animal Science Department/UFLA

Correponding author

 

 


ABSTRACT

The activity of three commercial microbial phytase (Aspergillus oryzae, A. niger, and Saccharomyces cerevisae) products used in broiler nutrition was determined at different pH (2.0 to 9.0) and temperature (20 to 90°C) values. Enzymatic activity was determined according to the reaction of the phytase with its substrate (sodium phytate), in four replicates, and was expressed in units of phytase activity (FTU). A. oryzae phytase exhibited optimal activity at pH 4.0 and 40°C, but its absolute activity was the lowest of the three phytases evaluated. A. niger phytase exhibited maximal activity close to pH 5.0 and 45ºC, whereas S. cerevisae phytase presented its highest activity at pH close to 4.5 and temperatures ranging between 50 and 60°C. It was concluded that A. niger and S. cerevisae phytase products exhibited the highest absolute activities in vitro at pH and temperature values (pH lower than 5.0 and 41ºC) corresponding to the ideal physiological conditions of broilers, which would theoretically allow high hydrolysis rate of the phytate contained in the feed.

Keywords: Enzymatic activity, enzyme, phytate, phytic acid.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

Poultry production is an important economic activity in Brazil and one of the most developed agricultural industries. However, in addition to the increasing number of broilers produced per year, modern commercial broiler strains present rapid growth, and consequently, diet formulation needs to follow up the changes in their nutritional requirements (Brandão et al., 2007). Phosphorus is nutritionally essential, as evidenced by the different roles it plays in metabolism, and it is particularly important for broiler growth (Assuena et al., 2009).

Phytate (or phytic acid) is the main form of phosphorus (P) storage in seeds and grains commonly included in broiler diets; however, phytate P is poorly available to monogastrics because these animals present low phytase activity in their digestive tract. Furthermore, phytic acid can act as an anti-nutritional factor as it reduces the bioavailability of other nutrients, particularly divalent minerals (Lei & Porres, 2003). In addition, the excretion of non-absorbed phytate P in the environment causes environmental pollution, specifically eutrophication of rivers, lakes and water basins (Maenz, 2001).

One economical solution is to supplement broiler diets with the enzyme phytase, releasing P from phytate. Phytase (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate phosphohydrolase) catalyzes the hydrolysis of phytic acid in a stepwise manner, releasing lower inositol phosphates and inorganic phosphate, which can be absorbed in the intestine (Vats & Banerjee, 2004). Consequently, there is less P excretion in the environment and less dicalcium phosphate needs to be added to the feed, reducing production costs (Gomide et al., 2007).

Several studies have been conducted to evaluate the performance and other parameters of broilers fed diets supplemented with phytase (Singh, 2008; Assuena et al., 2009; Nagata et al., 2009). However, few scientific studies evaluating the effect of pH and temperature on the activity of different phytases were published (Wyss et al., 1999; Igbasan et al., 2000). 

The objective of the present study was to determine the effect of pH and temperature on the activity of three commercial phytases used in broiler feeds to select which products present stronger activity at pH and temperature values corresponding to the physiological conditions of broilers.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Location and phytase products

The present study was conducted at the Biochemistry Laboratory of the Chemistry Department of the Federal University of Lavras, Brazil. Three commercial phytase products, in powder, sold for use in broiler nutrition were used: a) 6-phytase EC 3.1.3.26 (synthesized by Aspergillus oryzae, genetically modified by the addition of a gene from Peniophora lycii); b) 3-phytase EC 3.1.3.8 (produced by A. niger, genetically modified by a phytase-encoding gene from A. ficuum); and c) 6-phytase EC 3.1.3.26 (synthesized by Saccharomyces cerevisae, genetically modified by the addition of genes from Citrobacter brakii and Escherichia coli).

Phytase extraction and determination of enzyme activity

Phytase was extracted in 0.25 mol L-1 acetate buffer, containing 0.05% Triton X-100 (w/v) and 0.05% bovine serum albumin (w/v), at pH 5.0 under horizontal shaking for 30 minutes in the presence of ice. After extraction, the sample was centrifuged (2,000 x g for 10 minutes at 4°C) and the supernatant was collected to determine enzyme activity.

Enzyme activity was determined in the supernatant based on the reaction of phytase with the substrate 7.5 mmol L-1 sodium phytate (C6H6O24P6Na12 − Sigma-Aldrich) in buffered medium and at controlled temperature for four different incubation times. The reaction was ended by adding a mixture of three solutions (21.67% nitric acid; 0.081 mol L-1 ammonium molybdate; and 0.02 mol L-1 ammonium vanadate) at 2:1:1 ratio, respectively. The developed color was measured at 415 nm. The standard phosphorus curve (0.156 to 2.500 μmol) was used as reference (Engelen et al., 1994). The activity was calculated using the slope of the straight line resulting from the assay with the sample (absorbance/minute) and the slope of the straight line arising from the standard curve (absorbance/μmol of P). One unit of phytase activity (FTU) was defined as the amount of enzyme that released one μmol of inorganic phosphate in one minute of reaction.

Effect of pH on phytase activity

Phytase was incubated with 7.5 mmol L-1 sodium phytate at 37°C and pH 2.0 to 9.0 for four different incubation times to determine its pH curve. Initially, the following buffers were used: HCl-KCl (pH 2.0); glycine-HCl (pH 2.0 and 3.0); citrate (pH 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, and 6.0); maleate (pH 6.0 and 7.0); and Tris-HCl (pH 7.0, 8.0, and 9.0). However, no enzyme activity of the three evaluated phytases was detected withcitrate buffers (pH 3.0 to 6.0). Citrate buffers may possibly have chelated some co-factor and further studies are required to determine which molecule performs this function. Thus, the citrate buffers were replaced by acetate buffers (pH 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, and 6.0) while the other buffers were maintained. For pH assays, all buffers were prepared at the concentration of 0.1 mol L-1. Four replicates were performed for each pH value.

Effect of temperature on phytase activity

Temperature assays were conducted at the optimal pH pre-established for each phytase product using a fixed substrate concentration (7.5 mmol L-1) and incubated for four different times at the following temperatures: 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, and 90°C. Four replicates were performed for each temperature value.

Statistical analysis

This experiment was conducted according to a completely randomized design, with eight treatments (pH and temperature values) and four replicates per phytase product. The obtained data were submitted to ANOVA using the SISVAR software (Ferreira, 2008), and regression models (P<0.05) were employed.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Effect of pH on phytase activity

As expected, changes in pH values resulted in changes (p<0.01) in phytase activity of the evaluated products (Figure 1).

 

 

A. oryzae phytase showed activity in acetate (pH 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0) and maleate (pH 6.0) buffers; A. niger phytase was active in glycine (pH 3.0), acetate (pH 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0), and maleate (pH 6.0) buffers; and S. cerevisae phytase showed activity in glycine (pH 2.0 and 3.0) and acetate (pH 3.0, 4.0, and 5.0) buffers. As suggested by Gomori (1955), when the activity was determined in two different buffers (with the same pH value), the average activity value was used.

A. oryzae phytase showed maximum activity at pH 4.0, whereas both A. niger and S. cerevisae phytases displayed maximum activity at pH ranging between 4.5 and 5.0. These results agree with studies indicating that the optimal pH for most phytases ranges between 4.0 and 6.0 (Lei & Porres, 2003; Vats & Banerjee, 2004).

The optimal pH observed in our study for A. niger phytase (close to 5.0) is consistent with the results of several research studies (Maenz, 2001; Mullaney & Ullah, 2003). On the other hand, the optimal pH determined in the present study for A. oryzae phytase (pH 4.0) was lower than that of 5.5 reported in literature (Shimizu, 1993; Dvoráková, 1998). However, this difference is probably due to genetic changes (site-directed mutation, random mutagenesis) in the enzyme-producing microorganism and/or in the gene-donor microorganism, which may change phytase pH profile. The optimal pH for the phytase from S. cerevisae determined in this study (near 4.5) was similar to that reported for Citrobacter braakii phytase (pH 4.0) (Kim et al., 2003) and for E. coli phytase (between 4.0 and 4.5) (Wyss et al., 1999; Igbasan et al., 2000). Accordingly, it should be recalled that genes from these two microorganisms were used to genetically modify S. cerevisae yeast used to produce the commercial phytase product.

According to Liebert et al. (1993), phytase is mostly active in the crop and proventriculus of broilers. In the crop, pH ranges between 4.0 and 5.0, and between 2.5 and 3.5 in the proventriculus. Furthermore, phytic acid phosphate groups are protonated at low pH, allowing their hydrolysis by phytases (Maenz, 2001). Therefore, higher in-vitro phytase activity at low pH (lower than 5.0) indicates higher phytase activity at those segments of the digestive tract of broilers. In the present experiment, phytases produced by S. cerevisae and A. niger showed higher absolute activity at pH values ranging between 2.0 and 5.0, whereas A. oryzae phytase presented the lowest absolute activity.

Effect of temperature on phytase activity

Temperature changes resulted in differences (p<0.01) in phytase activity. A. oryzae phytase showed increasing activity up to 40°C, and then became inactive at 50°C (Figure 2B). On the other hand, A. niger phytase showed increasing activity until almost 45°C, and then became inactive at 60°C (Figure 2A). S. cerevisae phytase showed highest activity between 50 and 60°C, and then became inactive at 70°C (Figure 2A). According to Vats & Banerjee (2004), phytases usually present high activity at temperatures ranging between 45 and 60°C.

Regression equations:

A. niger
(y = -1.2996x3 + 130.6x2 – 3785.2x + 37720; R2 = 0.9959);
S. cerevisae
(y = -0.5537x3 + 60.587x2 – 1789.9x + 18309; R2 = 0.9938).

Wyss et al. (1998) evaluated the influence of temperature on the activity of fungal phytases and reported that A. fumigatus and A. niger T213 phytases completely lost their catalytic activity after 65°C. However, in the present study, Aspergillus phytases lost their activity at a lower temperature.

According Kim et al. (2003), a phytase isolated from C. braakii showed higher activity at 50°C, and others researchers reported that the activity of E. coli phytase was highest between 55 and 60°C (Greiner et al., 1993; Wyss et al., 1999; Igbasan et al., 2000). These temperatures are close to that determined for the S. cerevisae phytase in the present study (between 50 and 60°C). Again, it must be noted that specific genes of C. braakii and E. coli were transferred to the S. cerevisae that synthesized phytase in the present study.

The activity of the evaluated phytases also varied according temperature range. S. cerevisae phytase was active at the widest range of temperature, between 20°C and close to 70°C. On the other hand, A. oryzae phytase exhibited activity at the narrowest range of temperature, between 20°C and close to 50°C; whereas A. niger phytase showed an intermediate temperature range, between 20°C and close to 60°C.

According to Welker et al. (2008), body temperature of mature broilers ranges between 41 and 42°C. Considering the highest activity determined as 100%, A. oryzae phytase exhibited 96.44% of its maximum activity at 41°C. Accordingly, A. niger and S. cerevisae phytases presented 92.87 and 76.79% of their maximum activity at 41°C, respectively. However, the absolute activity of A. oryzae phytase was the lowest of the three evaluated enzymes and therefore, A. niger and S. cerevisae phytases were considered the most appropriate.

 

CONCLUSION

It was concluded that phytases produced by Aspergillus niger and Saccharomyces cerevisae exhibited the highest in-vitro absoluteactivities at pH and temperature values (pH lower than 5.0 and 41°C) that correspond to optimal physiological conditions of broilers, which would theoretically allow a higher rate of hydrolyses of the phytate contained in feed.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors thank FAPEMIG and CAPES for their financial support.

 

REFERENCES

Assuena V, Junqueira OM, Duarte KF, Laurentiz AC, Filardi RS, Sgavioli S. Effect of dietary phytase suplementation on the performance, bone densitometry, and phosphorus and nitrogen excretion of broilers. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Avícola 2009; 11(1):25-30.         [ Links ]

Brandão PA, Costa FGP, Brandão JS, Silva JHV da. Efeito da adição de fitase em rações de frangos de corte, durante as fases de crescimento e final. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 2007;31(2):492-498.         [ Links ]

Dvoráková J. Phytase: sources, preparation and exploitation. Folia Microbiologica 1998;43(4):323-338.         [ Links ]

Engelen AJ, Van der Heeft FC, Randsdorp PHG, Smit ELC. Simple and rapid determination of phytase activity. Journal of AOAC International 1994;77(3):760-764.         [ Links ]

Ferreira DF. Estatística multivariada. Lavras: UFLA; 2008. 672p.         [ Links ]

Gomide EM, Rodrigues PB, Freitas RTF de, Fialho ET. Planos nutricionais com a utilização de aminoácidos e fitase para frangos de corte mantendo o conceito de proteína ideal nas dietas. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 2007;36(6):1769-1774.         [ Links ]

Gomori G. Preparation of buffers for use in enzyme studies. Methods in Enzymology 1955;1:138-146.         [ Links ]

Greiner R, Konietzny U, Jany KLD. Purification and characterization of two phytases from Escherichia coli. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics 1993;303(1):107-113.         [ Links ]

Igbasan FA, Männer K, Miksch G, Borriss R, Farouk A, Simon O. Comparative studies on the in vitroproperties of phytases from various microbial origins. Archives of Animal Nutrition 2000; 53(4):353-373.         [ Links ]

Kim HW, Kim YO, Lee JH, Kim KK, Kim YJ. Isolation and characterization of a phytase with improved properties from Citrobacter braakii. Biotechnology Letters 2003; 25(15):1231-1234.         [ Links ]

Lei XG, Porres JM. Phytase enzymology, applications, and biotechnology.  Biotechnology Letters 2003; 25(21):1787-1794.         [ Links ]

Liebert F, Wecke C, Schoner FJ. Phytase activities in different gut contents of chickens are dependent on level of phosphorus and phytase supplementations. In: Wenk C, Boessinger M, editor. Proceedings of 1st European Symposium Enzymes in Animal Nutrition; 1993; Karthause Ittingen, Switzerland; 1993. p.202-205.         [ Links ]

Maenz DD. Enzymatic characteristics of phytases as they relate to their use in animal feeds. In: Bedford MR, Partridge GG. Enzymes in Farm Animal Nutrition. Wallingford: CABI; 2001. p.61-84.         [ Links ]

Mullaney EJ, Ullah AHJ. The term phytase comprises several different classes of enzymes. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 2003;312(1):179-184.         [ Links ]

Nagata AK, Rodrigues PB, Rodrigues KF, Frietas RTF de, Albino LFT, Fialho ET. Uso do conceito de proteina ideal em rações com diferentes níveis energéticos, suplementadas, com fitase para frangos de corte de 1 a 21 dias de idade. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 2009;33(2):599-605.         [ Links ]

Shimizu M. Purification and characterization of phytase and acid phosphatase produced by Aspergillus oryzae k1. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 1993; 57(8): 1364-1365.         [ Links ]

Singh PK. Significance of phytic acid and supplemental phytase in chicken nutrition: a review. World's Poultry Science Journal 2008;64(4):553-571.         [ Links ]

Vats P, Banerjee UC. Production studies and catalytic properties of phytases (myo-inositolhexakisphosphate phosphohydrolases): an overview. Enzyme and Microbial Technology 2004;35(1):3-14.         [ Links ]

Welker JS, Rosa AP, Moura DJ de, Machado LP, Catelan F, Uttpatel R. Temperatura corporal de frangos de corte em diferentes sistemas de climatização. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 2008; 37(8):1463-1467.         [ Links ]

Wyss M, Brugger R, Kronenberger A, Rémy R, Fimbel R, Oesterhelt G, Lehmann M, Van Loon APGM. Biochemical characterization of fungal phytases (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate phosphohydrolases): catalytic properties. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1999; 65(2):367-373.         [ Links ]

Wyss M, Pasamontes L, Rémy R, Kohler J, Kusznir E, Gadient M, Müller F, Van Loon APGM. Comparison of the thermostability properties of three acid phosphatases from molds: Aspergillus fumigatus phytase, A. niger phytase, and A. niger pH 2,5 acid phosphatase. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 1998; 64(11):4446-4451.         [ Links ]

 

 

Correponding author
Departamento de Zootecnia da Universidade Federal de Lavras
Campus Universitário – Caixa Postal 3037
37200-000 − Lavras, MG, Brasil
E-mail: luciana.naves@hotmail.com

Submitted: February/2011
Approved: September/2012

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License