SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 número3Lysine and methionine + cystine for laying hens during the post-molting phaseCrude protein and metabolizable energy levels for layers reared in hot climates índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science

versão impressa ISSN 1516-635X

Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. vol.14 no.3 Campinas jul./set. 2012

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2012000300006 

Glycerine derived from biodiesel production as a feedstuff for broiler diets*

 

 

Silva CLSI; Menten JFMII ; Traldi ABI ; Pereira RI ; Zavarize KCI; Santarosa JI

I Graduate students – Department of Animal Science - ESALQ/USP
II Head Professor of the Department of Animal Science - ESALQ/USP

Mail Adress

 

 


ABSTRACT

The performance, carcass traits, and litter humidity of broilers fed increasing levels of glycerine derived from biodiesel production were evaluated. In this experiment, 1,575 broilers were distributed according to a completely randomized experimental design into five treatments with seven replicates of 45 birds each. Treatments consisted of a control diet and four diets containing 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, or 10% glycerine. The experimental diets contained equal nutritional levels and were based on corn, soybean meal and soybean oil. The glycerine included in the diets contained 83.4% glycerol, 1.18% sodium, and 208 ppm methanol, and a calculated energy value of 3,422 kcal AMEn/kg. Performance parameters (weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, live weight, and livability) were monitored when broilers were 7, 21, and 42 days of age. On day 43, litter humidity was determined in each pen, and 14 birds/treatment were sacrificed for the evaluation of carcass traits. During the period of 1 to 7 days, there was a positive linear effect of the treatments on weight gain, feed intake, and live weight gain. Livability linearly decreased during the period of 1 to 21 days. During the entire experimental period, no significant effects were observed on performance parameters or carcass traits, but there was a linear increase in litter humidity. Therefore, the inclusion of up to 5% glycerine in the diet did not affect broiler performance during the total rearing period.

Keywords: Alternative feedstuffs, broilers, biodiesel, performance, glycerol.


 

 

INTRODUCTION

The denominations glycerine, glycerol, crude glycerine, and purified glycerine are often interchangeably used, but these compounds may be very different. The difference between the glycerine products available in the market is determined by the intensity of their industrial processing. They may be found in the crude (high fatty acid content), semi-purified (low fatty acid content), or in the purified form (pure compound). The by-product derived from biodiesel production has been called glycerol by some authors, while others call it glycerine. However, according to Morrison (1994), the term glycerol should be applied only to the pure compound (1,2,3-propanetriol), whereas the term glycerine refers to the purified commercial compounds.

Glycerine is the main co-product generated in the production of biodiesel. Approximately 10% of the total volume of biodiesel produced corresponds to glycerine (Dasari et al., 2005). According to the Brazilian Oil Agency, Brazil is among the largest global biodiesel producers and consumers, with an annual production in 2010 of 2.4 biodiesel millions liters, generating 240,000 tons of glycerine.

The use of glycerine in poultry and swine feed formulation may be interesting, as it is rich in energy (4,320 kcal gross energy per kg of pure glycerine) and presents high efficiency of utilization by animals. Another aspect that may justify the use of that co-product of the biodiesel industry in feed production is that part of the renewable raw materials used for energy purposes will return to the food chain, generating products with high nutritional value. In addition of being an energy source, glycerol may also have positive effect on amino acid or nitrogen retention, as mentioned by Cerrate et al. (2006).

The energy value of glycerine is a function of its proportion of pure glycerol (Lammers et al., 2007b). Research studies with broilers reported that the coefficient of metabolization of gross energy (GEMC) of glycerine products containing 85-90% glycerine range between 95% (Dozier et al., 2008) and 85% (Gianfelici, 2009; Oliveira et al., 2010), demonstrating that broilers utilize this feedstuff efficiently .

In Brazil, recent studies carried out with poultry (Gianfelici, 2009; Batista, 2010) and pigs (Berenchtein et al., 2010) showed that glycerine may be included in feeds, as it has high energy content and it is efficiently used by animals.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence on performance and carcass traits, as well as possible detrimental effects, of increasing levels of glycerine added as energy feedstuff in broiler diets.

 

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study was carried out at the Department of Animal Science of ESALQ/USP, Piracicaba, SP, Brazil. A total number of 1,575 male Cobb 500 chicks, with 45.5g ± 3.3g average initial weight, were distributed according to a completely randomized experimental design into five treatments with seven replicates of 45 birds each.

The basal diet was formulated to supply the broilers' nutritional requirements, according to the recommendations of Rostagno et al. (2005), and the other four treatments consisted in the dietary inclusion of 2.5, 5.0, 7.5, and 10% glycerine. Glycerine was acquired from the company ADM do Brasil Ltda. and its concentration was analyzed in a commercial laboratory (Table 1). Glycerol concentration was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), with electro-chemical detection, according to the methodology adapted from Silva (2004) and Dionex Corporation (2006). The ingredient composition and the calculated nutritional values are presented in Tables 2, 3, 4, and 5.

 

 

Glycerine gross energy value was determined as 3,602 kcal/kg, using a calorimetric bomb. The determination of metabolizable energy was based on Dozier et al. (2008), who determined that the coefficient of metabolizability of glycerine gross energy is 95%; therefore, the calculated metabolizable energy was 3,422 kcal/kg. The apparent metabolizable energy value (AME) was based on the study of Dozier et al. (2008), because the composition of the glycerine products in both studies was similar. Diets were formulated taking into account glycerine sodium and chlorine levels.

The feeding program applied during the experiment considered the following rearing phases: pre-starter, from 1 to 7 days, starter, from 7 to 21 days; grower, from 21 to 35 days, and finisher, from 35 to 42 days. Birds were offered feed and water ad libitum during the entire experimental period. Performance parameters (live weight, weight gain, feed intake, feed conversion ratio, and livability) were determined for each rearing phase.

On day 43, two birds per experimental unit (14 birds per treatment) were submitted to fasting for eight hours, and then sacrificed to determine carcass yield and parts (breast, drumstick + thighs, wings, and back) yield, and abdominal fat content. Litter material was collected from each pen to determine litter humidity.

Performance, carcass trait, and litter humidity data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA), using the PROC MIXED of SAS (2006). When the effect of glycerine levels was significant (p<0.05), degrees of freedom were decomposed into their individual components (linear and quadratic), using orthogonal polynomials by the PROC REG of SAS (Statistical Analysis System, 2006).

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The inclusion of increasing glycerine levels in the diet of broilers during the period of 1 to 7 days of age linearly increased (p<0.05) their live weight, weight gain, and feed intake. However, there was no effect (p>0.05) on feed conversion ratio or livability (Table 5).

 

 

The inclusion of up to 10% glycerine in the diet during the period of 1 to 7 days of age positively influenced broiler live weight, weight gain, and feed intake. As compared to mammals, bird taste and smell are not well developed, and these deficiencies are compensated by mechanic receptors located in the peak. These receptor cells are stimulated by direct contact with the feed, similarly as the stimulus elicited by smell and taste in mammals (Berkhoudt, 1984). The dietary inclusion of glycerine in mash diets may improve feed texture and palatability, in addition of reducing dust, therefore increasing feed intake. In young broilers (1 to 21 days of age), feed texture has a marked effect on feed intake, and consequently, on weight gain (Bueno, 2006).

Consistent findings were observed with the inclusion of 4% glycerine in broiler diets during the first week of age (Fernandes et al., 2010) and with 6% dietary glycerine inclusion in nursery pigs (Groesbeck et al., 2008). Both authors attributed these results to better feed palatability. Some glycerine characteristics, such as acidity, should be taken into account in research studies, as they may directly interfere in glycerine quality, and possibly affect feed intake.

The performance results obtained for the period of 1 to 21 days of age are presented in Table 7. Livability was linearly reduced (p<0.05), whereas feed conversion ratio was not affected (p>0.05). There was a significant effect of treatments (p<0.05) on feed intake, live weight, and weight gain, but no linear or quadratic trends were identified for glycerine levels. It was clear, however, that up to 21 days of age, the higher dietary glycerine levels did not have a negative influence on the performance parameters and that the 5% inclusion was the most beneficial for performance.

 

 

The feed intake of broilers fed 5 and 7.5% glycerine during the period of 1 to 21 days of age was similar, but the inclusion of 5% glycerine promoted higher weight gain, while feed conversion ratio was similar among treatments. Consequently, the broilers fed 5% glycerine presented 3.3% higher weight gain at the end of the 21-d period compared with the control treatment. However, livability linearly decreased with glycerine inclusion levels.

Other studies reported that the inclusion of 10% purified (Fernandes et al., 2010) or crude (Simon et al., 1997) glycerine did not influence broiler performance until 21 days of age.

During the period of 1 to 42 days of age, treatments did not influence performance parameters (Table 8). Despite the lack of statistical significance, the weight gain of broilers fed 10% glycerine was reduced in 131 g relative to the control birds, which represents a 4.2% difference in weight gain. Cerrate et al. (2006) fed 10% glycerine to broilers and reported a 5.75% (2871 vs. 2706 g) reduction in final body weight.

Out of the total reduction in livability, 65% were attributed to mortality and 35% to culling. The causes of culling during the entire experimental period were possibly derived from hatchery problems (lack of uniformity) and leg problems.

The dietary inclusion of 10% glycerine during the entire rearing period did not affect performance; however, LW tended to decrease. Other authors, working with dietary glycerine inclusions of 8% in broilers (Fernandes et al., 2010) and 10% in pigs (Berenchtein, 2008; Lammers et al., 2008), did not observe any performance impairment.

Litter humidity, determined when broilers were 43 days of age, linearly increased (p<0.05) as dietary glycerine levels increased (Table 9). Consistent results of increased litter moisture due to higher excreta moisture were obtained in Japanese quails (Batista, 2010), layers (Lammers et al., 2008), and broilers (Gianfelici, 2009). However, in all these studies, glycerine sodium levels were not considered in feed formulation and possibly exceeded the sodium nutritional recommendations for those animals.

 

 

When glycerine sodium levels are taken into account, the increase in excreta humidity may be explained by the hygroscopic properties of glycerol. When there is excessive glycerol in the body, water that should be reabsorbed binds to glycerol, and both are filtered in the kidneys and eliminated in the urine (Lin, 1977). This probably increases water consumption by the animals, because the water that should have been reutilized by the body is being eliminated together with glycerol. This assumption is supported by the study of Gianfelici (2009), who reported that broilers were able to metabolize diets containing up to 7.5% glycerol; above this level, there was an increase in free glycerol in the blood and in the excreta, as well as in water consumption.

Table 9 presents the carcass trait results of broilers at 43 days of age. Although breast yield increased 1.73% (4.5% variation), no significant differences (p>0.05) were detected with the dietary inclusion of increasing glycerine levels. Other carcass traits were also not significantly influenced (p>0.05) by the treatments. Consistent findings were obtained when up to 10% pure glycerol was included in the diet of one- to 35-d-old broilers (Gianfelici, 2009).

These results are different from the findings of Cerrate (2006), who detected a significant increase (p<0.05) of 3% in the breast yield of broilers fed 2.5 and 5% glycerine in the diet, suggesting that glycerol may increase breast protein deposition as it reduces gluconeogenesis from amino acids by inhibiting some enzymes, such as phosphoenolpiruvate carboxykinase.

 

CONCLUSIONS

Broiler performance and litter humidity is not affected with up to 5% glycerine is included in the diet during the entire rearing period.

 

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors thank FAPESP for the grant given to the first author and the company ADM do Brasil for the funding provided for the development of this project.

 

REFERENCES

Agência Nacional de Petróleo [cited 2011 Set 20]. Disponível em: http://www.anp.gov.br.         [ Links ]

Batista E. Avaliação nutricional para codornas de corte [dissertação]. Maringá (PR): Universidade Estadual de Maringá; 2010.         [ Links ]

Berkhoudt, H.A. Structure and function of avian teste receptors.In: King AS, Mclelland K, editors. Form and Functions in birds. London:Academic Press; 1984. p. 213-325.         [ Links ]

Bueno FL. Efeito da forma física, granulometria (DGM) e adição de óleo em dietas 317 iniciais de frangos [dissertação]. Curitiba (PR); Universidade Federal do Paraná;         [ Links ] 2006.

Berenchtein B. Utilização de glicerol na dieta de suínos em crescimento e terminação [dissertação]. Piracicaba (SP): Escola Superior de Agricultura "Luiz de Queiroz", Universidade de São Paulo; 2008.         [ Links ]

Cerrate S, Yan F, Wang Z, Coto C, Sacakli P, Waldroup PW. Evaluation of glycerine from biodiesel production as a feed ingredient for broilers. International Journal of Pountry Science 2006; 5:1001-1007.         [ Links ]

Dasari MA, Kiatsimkul PP, Sutterlin WR. Low-pressure hydrogenolysis of glycerol to propylene glycol. Applied Catalysis. A. General 2005; 281:225-231.         [ Links ]

Dionex Corporation. The determination of carbohydrates, alcohols, and glycols in fermentation broths [Application Note 122]. Sunnyvale, CA; 2006.         [ Links ]

Dozier III WA, Kerr BJ, Corzo A, Kidd MT, Weber TE, Bregendahl K. Apparent metabolizable energy of glycerin for broiler chickens. Poultry Science 2008;87:317-322.         [ Links ]

Fernandes EA, Machado CA, Fagundes NS, França AMS, Ramos GC. Inclusão de glicerol purificado em dietas de frangos de corte [cd-rom]. Anais da Conferência Apinco de Ciência e Tecnologia Avícola; 2010; Santos, SP. Brasil. Campinas: FACTA; 2010.         [ Links ]

Gianfelici MF. Uso de glicerol como fonte de energia para frangos de corte [dissertação]. Porto Alegre (RS): Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; 2009.         [ Links ]

Groesbeck CN, Mckinney LJ, Derouchey JM, Tokach MD, Goodband RD, Ditriz SS, Nelssen JL, Duttlinger AW, Fahrenholz AC, Behnke KC. Effect of crude glycerol on pellet mill production and nursery pig growth performance. Journal of Animal Science 2008;86:2228-2236.         [ Links ]

Lammers PJ, Kerr BJ, Honeyman MS, Stalder K, Dozier III WA, Weber TE, Kidd MT, Bregendahl K. Nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy value of crude glycerol for laying hens. Poultry Science 288b;87:104-107.         [ Links ]

Lin EC. Glycerol utilization and its regulation in mammals. Annual Review of Biochemistry 1997;46:765-795.         [ Links ]

MORRISON LR. Glycerol. In: Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology. New York: Wiley; 1994. p. 921-932.         [ Links ]

Rostagno HS, Albino LFT, Donzele JL, Gomes PC, Oliveira RF, Lopes DC, Ferreira AS, Barreto SLT. Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos: composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais. 2 ed. Viçosa: Universidade Federal de Viçosa; 2005.         [ Links ]

SAS INSTITUTE. Statistical Analysis System: user's guide. Version 9.1 ed. Cary; 2006.         [ Links ]

Silva RG. Farmacocinética e determinação de resíduos de enrofloxacina e seu metabólico em tecidos de frangos [doutorado]. Campinas (SP): Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2004        [ Links ]

Simon A, Schwabe M, Bergner H. Glycerol supplementation to broiler rations with low crude protein content. Archive of Animal Nutrition 1997;50:271-282.         [ Links ]

Summers JD, Leeson S, Spratt D. Yield and composition of edible meat from male broilers as influenced by dietary protein level and amino acid supplementation. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 1988;68:241-248.         [ Links ]

 

 

Mail Adress
Camila Leão Silveira da Silva
Departamento de Zootecnia – ESALQ/USP
Avenida Pádua Dias, nº11 – Agronomia – Piracicaba – SP – CEP: 13418-900
E-mail: camilaleaos@yahoo.com.br

Submitted: October/2011
Approved: August/2012

 

 

*Part of the M.Sc. dissertation of the first author. Part of the results of this study were published in the 2010 APINCO Conference proceedings (Nutrition Section), Santos, SP, Brazil.

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons