Analysis of two questionnaires on quality of life of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease patients^*

Abstracts

Objective:

to evaluate the efficacy of quality of life questionnaires St. George Respiratory Questionnaire and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease based on correlation and agreement analyses, and identify the most effective tool to assess their quality of life.

Method:

cross-sectional cohort study with patients hospitalized in a Spanish hospital for exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health-related quality of life was assessed with both questionnaires. The correlation and the agreement between the questionnaires were analyzed, as well as the internal consistency. Associations were established between the clinical variables and the results of the questionnaire.

Results:

one hundred and fifty-six patients participated in the study. The scales had a correlation and agreement between them and high internal consistency. A higher sensitivity of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test was observed for the presence of cough and expectoration.

Conclusion:

the questionnaires have similar reliability and validity to measure the quality of life in patients with acute chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test is more sensitive to detect cough and expectoration and requires a shorter time to be completed.

Descriptors:
Quality of Life; Pulmonary Disease Chronic Obstructive; Lung Diseases, Obstructive; Hospital Care; Nursing Assessment; Lung Disease

Objetivo:

avaliar a eficácia entre os questionários de qualidade de vida St. George Respiratory Questionnaire e Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test em pacientes com doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica a partir da análise de correlação e concordância, bem como identificar a ferramenta mais eficaz para avaliar sua qualidade de vida.

Método:

estudo analítico de coorte transversal com pacientes internados em um hospital espanhol para exacerbação de doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica. A qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde foi avaliada com os dois questionários. Analisaram-se a correlação e a concordância entre ambos, bem como a consistência interna. As associações foram estabelecidas entre as variáveis clínicas e os resultados do questionário.

Resultados:

participaram 156 pacientes. Ambas as escalas mostram correlação e concordância entre elas e alta consistência interna. Uma maior sensibilidade do Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Assessment Test foi observada para detectar a presença de tosse e expectoração.

Conclusão:

ambos os questionários têm a mesma confiabilidade e validade para medir a qualidade de vida em pacientes com doença pulmonar obstrutiva crônica aguda, sendo que o Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment é mais sensível para detectar a tosse e a expectoração e com um tempo de preenchimento mais curto.

Descritores:
Qualidade de Vida; Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica; Pneumopatias Obstructivas; Assistência Hospitalar; Avaliação em Enfermagem; Pneumopatias

Objetivo:

evaluar la efectividad entre los cuestionarios de la calidad de vida St. George Respiratory Questionnaire y Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Assessment Test en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica a partir del análisis de su correlación y concordancia, e identificar la herramienta más efectiva para evaluar su calidad de vida.

Método:

estudio analítico transversal en pacientes ingresados en un hospital español por exacerbación de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica. Se estudió la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud evaluada con los dos cuestionarios. Se analizó la correlación y concordancia entre ambos, así como su consistencia interna. Se establecieron asociaciones entre las variables clínicas y los resultados del cuestionario.

Resultados:

participaron 156 pacientes. Ambas escalas muestran correlación y concordancia entre ellas y consistencia interna elevada. Se observa una mayor sensibilidad del cuestionario Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Assessment Test para detectar la presencia de tos y expectoración.

Conclusión:

ambos cuestionarios presentan la misma fiabilidad y validez para medir la calidad de vida en pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica agudizada, siendo el Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Assessment Test más sensible para detectar tos y expectoración y con un tiempo de cumplimentación más breve.

Descriptores:
Calidad de Vida; Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica; Enfermedades Pulmonares Obstructivas; Atención Hospitalaria; Evaluación en Enfermería; Enfermedades Pulmonares

Introduction

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common disease and 80 million people suffer from the severe or moderate form of this disease^(1–2). COPD is an avoidable and treatable disease⁽¹⁾. Its diagnosis is established by the presence of persistent respiratory symptoms, such as dyspnea, cough and sputum production. The test to diagnose COPD is spirometry (forced expiratory volume ratio in the first second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) less than 70 after bronchodilation)⁽¹⁾.

Despite being an unknown disease, it is the third leading cause of death worldwide in developed countries after cardiac and oncological diseases^(1–3). Continuous reduction in lung function is a result of the progression of the disease. This situation worsens during periods of exacerbation, which happens once or twice a year. The treatment requires hospitalization to control the symptoms, in a large number of patients⁽⁴⁾, implying a high cost for the management of the pathology⁽⁵⁾. The exacerbations accelerate the continuous reduction of lung function, reducing the Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) of patients.

HRQL is the personal evaluation made by an individual about the suffering caused by the effects of an illness or by the application of a treatment in various areas of life, especially the consequences on their physical, emotional or social well-being⁽⁶⁾.

HRQL in chronic respiratory patients is a good indicator of disease severity, being significantly related to the frequency of exacerbations⁽⁷⁾, and its serial assessment can act as an indicator of the onset of an exacerbation⁽⁸⁾. Moreover, it is a good independent predictor of mortality⁽⁹⁾.

Therefore, HRQL measurement of chronic respiratory patients is part of the routine evaluation of the results of therapeutic interventions⁽⁸⁾ performed by all health professionals, be them physicians, nurses, physiotherapists or psychologists, among others, in order to know the efficacy of the treatment adopted. Thus, HRQL assessment should be multidimensional in order to provide a better understanding and monitoring of the severity of the disease^(10–12) through valid and reliable scales⁽¹³⁾. Nursing is one of the groups that most use these two scales.

In order to measure HRQL, several questionnaires, either generic and specific, have showed to have optimal psychometric properties of reliability and validity to be used in COPD patients, with specific questionnaires being the most sensitive to changes during disease progression⁽⁸⁾.

Among the specific questionnaires, there are several that present reliability, validity, precision, consistency and sensitivity to changes, and are widely used to evaluate HRQL in patients with respiratory diseases. They have been adapted to different languages, but with different extensions, accessibility, ease of calculation of indices and filling time⁽¹⁴⁾. These characteristics may influence the gathering of information, especially if the patient needs to complete the questionnaire.

According to the recommendations of the Spanish Society of Respiratory Diseases (SEPAR) and international research⁽¹⁵⁾, the most used questionnaires are the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test (CAT). The SGRQ⁽¹⁶⁾ validated in Spanish^(17–18) is the most used questionnaire in the population with respiratory diseases^(17,19), and it is also validated for administration via telephone call⁽²⁰⁾. The SGRQ has 50 items distributed into three categories - symptoms, activity, and impact - with 76 weighted responses, and requires 10 minutes for completion⁽¹⁷⁾. Each item has an empirically derived weight, and a score has to be calculated.

The CAT questionnaire, recommended by the SEPAR, is aimed at evaluating HRQL in patients with a diagnosis of COPD. The instrument had initially 21 items⁽²¹⁾ which were later reduced to 8; a total score is obtained from the sum of these items⁽²²⁾.

The SGRQ and the CAT present reliability, validity and sensitivity to changes during acute exacerbations^(23–25). The Cronbach's alpha of the SGRQ is 0.94 (symptoms: 0.72, activity: 0.89, impact: 0.89) and of the CAT is 0.88, and the intraclass correlation coefficient of the SGRQ and CAT is 0.9 and 0.8, respectively⁽²²⁾.

A literature review revealed a significant correlation between the SGRQ and the CAT in a population with a diagnosis of COPD in primary care centers^{(21–22,26–27)}. Likewise, it was observed that there was a correlation between the two scales in the hospital setting in patients with stable COPD⁽²³⁾, where there is also a correlation between the two questionnaires, although CAT is of much faster and easier application.

No studies were found to investigate the best questionnaire to evaluate HRQL in the hospital setting in patients with exacerbated COPD, as confirmed in the Spanish guide to COPD patient care⁽²⁸⁾. This is one of the most important moments to evaluate HRQOL, that is, to verify the effectiveness of the treatment provided, as well as to administer the help and resources necessary to train patients before discharge.

Despite the interest generated by the study of HRQOL, there is only consensus in the literature about the use of the CAT in non-acute stages⁽²⁹⁾ and primary care centers⁽²²⁾, while no consensus exist on the most appropriate choice to evaluate the HRQOL in hospitalized patients with exacerbated condition.

Therefore, the main objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the SGRQ and CAT questionnaires to evaluate quality of life based on the analysis of their correlation and agreement, and to identify which is the simplest tool to evaluate the quality of life of hospitalized patients with severe exacerbation of COPD.

Method

A cross-sectional study with patients admitted to the General University Hospital of Castellón (HGUCS) (Spain) was carried out between February 2014 and May 2016, in which the SGRQ and CAT were applied within the first five days of admission.

The study population was patients with exacerbation of COPD hospitalized in the HGUCS during the period of study. The sample size was 150 patients who had been diagnosed with severe COPD exacerbation during the 27-month study period, based on the annual mean of 229 admitted patients diagnosed with this condition, a 95% confidence, and a reposition rate of 22%, as based on the literature consulted⁽³⁰⁾. Patients diagnosed with COPD exacerbation (ICD 491.2) were included on the basis of a history of smoking (active or previous) of at least 20 packs a year, along with the presence of obstruction of the airway flow defined as FEV1/FVC below 70 after bronchodilation, voluntarily decision to participate in the study after receiving explanations and after understanding the objective of the study. All patients who were unable to communicate due to physical or mental disabilities, terminal patients with life expectancy less than six months according to clinical criteria, and patients who met the criteria but rejected the invitation to share in the study were excluded.

The variable studied was the HRQOL measured by the SGRQ and CAT. Questionnaire St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), composed of 50 items divided into three dimensions: symptoms of respiratory pathology (eight questions); activities that are limited in daily life (16 questions); and impact, which refers to the social and psychological functioning that can change the patient's lifestyle (26 questions). The sum of the three dimensions results in a total score between zero and 100. Higher scores are indicative of poorer quality of life. A calculator is used for calculation⁽³¹⁾.

The CAT⁽¹³⁾ consists of eight questions related to cough, phlegm, chest tightness, breathlessness in activities of daily living, activity limitation at home, confidence leaving home, sleep, and energy. The score interval of each element varies between zero and five, with a maximum score of 40⁽²²⁾. According to the total CAT scores and the revised literature, patients can be classified into the following categories: 1-10 low impact; 11-20 average impact; 21-30 high impact; 31-40 very high impact^(13,27).

The control variables were divided into sociodemographic variables: sex, age, and schooling; clinic variables: dyspnea, through the Medical Research Council (MRC)⁽³²⁾, tcough, expectoration, wheezing, drowsiness, fever, need to sit, and edema (presented as dichotomous variables with yes/no answers), and pain through a visual analogue scale (VAS) with a score ranging from 0 to 10. The psychological variables (anxiety and depression) were studied using the HAD questionnaire (33-34) from the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and, finally, the level of dependence was analyzed using the Barthel index⁽³⁵⁾.

The data collection procedure was developed within the scope of a therapeutic education program called Aprendepoc. This is a randomized controlled trial with masked data analysis, with no blinding in the allocation of participants. With two task groups, the Intervention Group (IG) consisted of four group educational sessions, telephone follow-up, and delivery of informative leaflets; and the Control Group (CG) whose intervention was based on conventional care, taking into account the standard care provided to all patients without being included in the project (without group educational sessions, telephone follow-up, or delivery of additional documents).

The project was evaluated at admission (from the 3rd day of hospitalization) and at three months from the time of inclusion, although for this investigation only the data corresponding to the screening (beginning of the study) were used, because the sample was homogeneous at the time of recruitment. Our results are not affected by the performance of the Aprendepoc program.

To recruit patients, once a week, the main investigator conducted searched for all patients admitted to the hospital who met the inclusion criteria using a software tool called “integration”. This search allowed to locate the number of the room and the number of days of hospital stay. This was the basis to select only patients hospitalized for more than two days, because the patients had limitations to respond to the questionnaires at the day of admission. The questionnaires were applied and control variables were obtained through a structured interview, followed by self-completion of the HAD, Barthel, CAT and SGRQ. For the statistical study of sociodemographic variables, measures of central tendency were used. The results were presented as percentages, mean (x) and standard deviation (SD). To determine the correlation between the questionnaires, a factorial analysis of motifs allowed to establish eight CAT questions in three dimensions: CAT_symptoms, CAT_activity, and CAT_impact. In the factorial analysis, a correlation matrix was used to correlate the three dimensions created in the CAT with the three dimensions of the SGRQ, classifying the CAT questions that had a (bilateral) statistical < 0.01 with some of the SGRQ spheres. In order to test the construct created, the Pearson correlation coefficient was measured between the means of the newly created spheres (CAT_sintomas, CAT_activity, CAT_impact) with existing ones (SGRQ_symptoms, SGRQ_activity, SGRQ_impact). The correlation coefficients were interpreted as follows: r < 0.10 (no correlation); r = 0.10 − 0.29 (weak correlation); r = 0.30 − 0.49 (moderate correlation); and r ≥ 0.50 (strong correlation)⁽³⁶⁾. To estimate the reliability of each of the questionnaires of the sample studied, the internal consistency was analyzed through the Cronbach's Alpha. The agreement between the two questionnaires was measured through the Bland Altman method, which measures the degree of agreement between the final result of two questionnaires to see whether they behave similarly in the same individuals. To perform the calculation, it was considered necessary to multiply the CAT score by 0.25 to make it directly comparable with the total SGRQ score⁽²⁷⁾. In order to observe the differences between the health status of the patient and the total scores of the questionnaires, associations were established between the control variables and the general score of the questionnaire. Tthe Student's t test was applied in the case of comparisons of two groups and Anova in the case of comparisons of three or more groups. All p values were reported for interpretation, considering statistically significant p values < 0.05. The statistical analyses were performed in the SPSS v.23 and the Epitat v4.2 for Windows.

The study was approved by the Bioethics and Research Committee of the HGUCS and by the Deontological Commission of Universitat Jaume I. It was carried out following the rules specified in the Declaration of Helsinki. The treatment of the data was adjusted to the provisions of the Spanish Organic Law on Protection of Personal Data, 15/1999, of December 13, and of Law 41/2002, of November 14, on basic regulations about patient autonomy and rights and information regarding clinical information and documentation. All the study participants signed a consent form to participate in the study.

Results

A total of 466 patients were admitted for exacerbation of COPD in the HUGC, where 310 were excluded due to physical or mental disabilities (n = 66), terminal condition (n = 85), previous inclusion (n = 66), existence of language barrier (n = 9), or patients who had the criteria but rejected the invitation to share in the study (n = 84). Finally, a total of 156 patients met the inclusion criteria, but 153 (98.1%) were selected because of the presence of items left incomplete in the questionnaire. The majority were male, 79.1% (n = 121), with a mean age of 73.7 ± 9.8 SD years and primary education 48.4% (n = 74). In the clinical profile, 43.8% (n = 63) presented grade III level of dyspnea. The more prevalent signs and symptoms were sputum, 75.2% (n = 115), followed by cough, 60.8% (n = 93), and the need to sleep in the sitting position, 58.2% (n = 89). Of the mental health pathologies, the most prevalent was depression, 24.2% (n = 37) of the probable cases. Regarding the basic activities of daily living, 49.0% (n = 75) were severely dependent and 20.9% (n = 32) were moderately dependent. A summary of the characteristics of the sample is presented in Table 1.

Table 1
Characteristics of the sample according to the control variables. Castellón de la Plana, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 2014, 2015, 2016

Sociodemographic
Age		73.7 ± (DP*9.8)
Sex
	Male	121 (79.1%)
	Female	32 (20.9%)
Schooling
	None	26 (17.0%)
	Primary school	74 (48.4%)
	Secondary school	42 (27.5%)
	College	11 (7.2%)
Clinical variables
Dyspnea (MRC†)
	0	2 (1.3%)
	I	6 (3.9%)
	II	30 (19.6%)
	III	67 (43.8%)
	IV	43 (28.1%)
Cough		93 (60.8%)
Sputum		115 (75.2%)
Wheezing		73 (47.7%)
Daytime drowsiness		47 (30.7%)
Fever		24 (15.7%)
Edemas		57 (37.3%)
Need to sleep in sitting position		89 (58.2%)
Pain (EVA‡)		1.4 ± (2.3)
Psychological variables
Anxiety
	No cases	39 (25.5%)
	Doubtful case	85 (55.6%)
	Probable case	29 (19.0%)
Depression
	No cases	37 (24.2%)
	Doubtful case	79 (51.6%)
	Probable case	37 (24.2%)
Daily life activities
Barthel Index
	Total dependence	9 (5.9%)
	Severe dependence	75 (49.0%)
	Moderate dependence	32 (20.9%)
	Mild dependence	8 (5.2%)
	Independence	29 (19.0%)

• ^*
  SD = Standard deviation;
• ^†
  MRC = Medical Research Council;
• ^‡
  EVA = Visual Analog Scale

A factorial analysis was performed to classify the eight questions of the CAT according to the SGRQ spheres, which resulted in three spheres in the CAT. Thus, the sphere of symptoms of CAT presented a greater factorial load in the following items: cough, phlegm and oppression; the sphere of CAT_sintomas refered to a greater factorial load on the following items: climbing stairs and performing household activities; and finally the sphere CAT_impact gathered a greater factorial load on the items: confidence leaving home, no problem to sleep, and energy. Table 2 shows the correlation matrix of the spheres of the two questionnaires.

Table 2
Matrix of correlations of the questions of the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases Assessment Test with the spheres of the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire. Castellón de la Plana, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 2014, 2015, 2016

	SGRQ* Symptoms	SGRQ* Activity	SGRQ* Impact
CAT† cough	0.316‡	0.095	0.201
CAT† phlegm	0.436‡	0.187	0.253
CAT† oppression	0.511‡	0.342	0.380
CAT† climbing stairs	0.458	0.537‡	0.509
CAT† household activities	0.466	0.486‡	0.491
CAT† confidence leaving home	0.474	0.461	0.565‡
CAT† sleep	0.528	0.455	0.539‡
CAT† energy	0.504	0.545	0.562‡

• ^*
  SGRQ = St. George Respiratory Questionnaire;
• ^†
  CAT = Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases Assessment Test;
• ^‡
  Spheres showing correlation p < 0.05

The Pearson correlation coefficient showed a correlation between the new spheres created in the CAT and the existing ones of the SGRQ. A strong correlation was obtained globally and in the spheres of activity and impact, as well as a moderate correlation in the sphere of symptoms, as shown in Table 3. It was also observed that the two questionnaires presented adequate internal consistency in the sample studied, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients of 0.843 for the SGRQ and 0.799 for the CAT (Table 3).

Table 3
Relationship between the spheres created from the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Assessment Test with the spheres of the St George Respiratory Questionnaire. Castellón de la Plana, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 2014, 2015, 2016

	Correlation
CAT* symptoms	0.444‡
SGRQ* symptoms
CAT* activity	0.591‡
SGRQ* activity
CAT* impact	0.637‡
SGRQ* impact
Total CAT*	0.628‡
SGRQ† total
	Cronbach's Alpha
Total CAT*	0.799
SGRQ† total	0.843

• ^*
  CAT = Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases Assessment Test;
• ^†
  SGRQ = St George Respiratory Questionnaire;
• ^‡
  Spheres showing correlation p < 0.01

The Bland and Altman graph (Figure 1) showed that the mean scores of each of the questionnaires were within the limits of agreement, confirming the agreement between the two questionnaires.

Figure 1
Bland and Altman total scores of the St. George Respiratoy Questionnaire and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases Assessment Test. Castellón de la Plana, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 2014, 2015, 2016

When correlating the global scores of the two questionnaires with the clinical variables, all variables were statistically significant in the two questionnaires, with the exception of cough and sputum, which showed statistical significance only in the CAT (p < 0.01), but not in the SGRQ (p = 0.129) and (p = 0.221). Table 4 shows the results obtained from the correlation between the two questionnaires.

Table 4
Bivariate analysis of the p value obtained between the final score of the questionnaire and the control variables. Castellón de la Plana, Comunidad Valenciana, Spain, 2014, 2015, 2016

	CAT*	SGRQ†
Dyspnea	0.000‡	0.000‡
Pain	0.004‡	0.001
Anxiety	0.000‡	0.000‡
Depression	0.000‡	0.000‡
Barthel Index	0.000‡	0.000‡
Cough	0.000‡	0.129
Sputum	0.002‡	0.221
Wheezing	0.000‡	0.000‡
Daytime drowsiness	0.001‡	0.000‡
Fever	0.547	0.232
Edemas	0.047‡	0.001‡
Need to sleep in sitting position	0.017‡	0.003‡

• ^*
  CAT = Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Diseases Assessment Test;
• ^†
  SGRQ = St George Respiratory Questionnaire;
• ^‡
  Items that presented statistical significance.

Discussion

The profile of the study sample was predominantly male, aged 73 years, and with primary schoold. These characteristics are similar to epidemiological studies carried out with COPD patients in the Spanish territory (IBEREPOC)^(37–38) or international studies^(39–40). Thus, patients presented a high number of signs and symptoms, such as dyspnea, sputum or cough, which were related to respiratory infections of exacerbations in COPD⁽⁴¹⁾, and the reason for the invitation to share in the study.

The CAT questionnaire, as well as the SGRQ, presented an internal reliability above 0.7, similar to another review⁽²⁵⁾ on the attributes of the two questionnaires. Thus, the existence of correlation between the results of the two questionnaires has also been valued by several researchers⁽¹³⁾ and even a correlation of the SGRQ spheres with the total CAT result has been reported⁽²⁶⁾, but no study correlated all questions with the SGRQ spheres. There was a correlation in the questions attributed to the sphere of symptoms, activity or impact of the SGRQ with the questions related to these items in the CAT.

Similarly, the results of this study demonstrated that HRQOL in COPD patients is associated with dyspnea^(7,42–46), pain^(7), anxiety and depression^(7,45,47), limitation in the performance of activities⁽⁴⁸⁾, wheezing, daytime drowsiness, edema, and the need to sleep in the sitting position. It is important to highlight the increased sensitivity of the CAT in comparison to the SGRQ to detect cough and sputum, while maintaining the same sensitivity to detect the remaining variables. Thus, the use of the CAT questionnaire is considered better in patients with COPD exacerbation in the hospital setting, particularly in view of the easier and less time-consuming completion⁽²⁶⁾. However, both questionnaires were considered sensitive when evaluating HRQOL in patients with COPD exacerbation in the hospital environment and in patients with stable COPD in the primary care setting, as identified in other studies⁽²²⁾.

Finally, another aspect that favors the application of the CAT over the SGRQ is the filling time. The SGRG is more extensive and presents complex scoring algorithms, making its use in clinical practice to become ordinary and the repeated evaluation to become inadequate; in many cases, it is necessary to help patients complete it correctly⁽⁴⁹⁾. The mean time to complete the CAT is 107 seconds, compared to 578 seconds of completion required by the SGRQ⁽²³⁾. In hospital environments, the use of short questionnaires that facilitate information and improve communication between patients and health personnel is considered necessary^(50–51).

The main limitation of the present study is the nature of the data, because the study was not designed to verify the effectiveness of the SGRQ and the CAT on quality of life in hospitalized patients with severe COPD exacerbation. Therefore, data such as retests are missing despite the fact that if patients have data in three months, this information was rejected because patients do not present the same conditions, acting in the education program as a confounding factor. Another aspect that would be interesting to evaluate is the filling time of each of the questionnaires whose data were not studied.

Conclusions

The CAT scores were correlated with the ones of the SGRQ, in total, according to spheres and questions. Both questionnaires have high internal consistency in patients admitted for exacerbation of COPD in the hospital setting, and the CAT is more sensitive in detecting changes in the HRQOL if the patient has cough and sputum only.

Therefore, the CAT is a reliable and accurate tool to be used in COPD patients with exacerbation of the problem in hospital settings, requiring a shorter time than the SGRQ.

The evaluation of the HRQOL in COPD patients is a good indicator of severity, and the onset of a new exacerbation and mortality. Their routine assessment is necessary for better disease monitoring in order to assess the impact of the disease and the effectiveness of the treatment for the performance of activities of daily living. The use of CAT will facilitate routine evaluation for physicians, nurses, physical therapists, and other health professionals in the hospital setting. Admission is the time of greatest need for follow-up necessary to control the efficacy of the administered treatments, with nursing being one of the groups which most uses the two questionnaires.

• *
  Supported by Sociedad Española de Neumología y Cirugía Torácica (SEPAR), Spain, grant #191/2013.

Referências

• ¹
  Vogelmeier C, Lopez V, Frith P, Bourbeau J, Roche F, Martinez R, et al. Global Strategy for the Diagnosis, Management, and Prevention of Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease 2017 Report. GOLD Executive Summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. [Internet].2017 Mar [cited Dec 11, 2017];195(5):557-82. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201701-0218PP
  » https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201701-0218PP
• ²
  Mathers CD, Fat DM, Inoue M, Rao C, Lopez AD. Counting the dead and what they died from: an assessment of the global status of cause of death data. Bull Wrld Health Organ. [Internet]. 2005 Mar [cited Oct 26, 2016];83(3):171-7. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15798840
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15798840
• ³
  Solanes I, Casan P. Causes of death and prediction of mortality in COPD. Arch Bronconeumol. [Internet]. 2010 Jul [cited Apr 15, 2015];46(7):343-6. Available from: http://www.archbronconeumol.org/es/causas-muerte-prediccion-mortalidad-epoc/articulo/13152478/
  » http://www.archbronconeumol.org/es/causas-muerte-prediccion-mortalidad-epoc/articulo/13152478/
• ⁴
  Godtfredsen NS, Lam TH, Hansel TT, Leon ME, Gray N, Dresler C, et al. COPD-related morbidity and mortality after smoking cessation: status of the evidence. Eur Respir J. [Internet]. 2008 Oct [cited Jan 6, 2015];32(4):844-53. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18827152
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18827152
• ⁵
  Soler J, Sánchez L, Latorre M, Alamar J, Román P, Perpiñá M. The impact of COPD on hospital resources: the specific burden of COPD patients with high rates of hospitalization. Arch Bronconeumol. [Internet]. 2001 Oct [cited Jun 12, 2014];37(9):375-81. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11674937
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11674937
• ⁶
  The WHOQOL Group. The World Health Organization quality of life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. [Internet].1995 Nov [cited Jun 25, 2018];41(10):1403-9. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027795369500112K?via%3Dihub
  » https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/027795369500112K?via%3Dihub
• ⁷
  Villar I, Carrillo R, Regí M, Marzo M, Arcusa N, Segundo M. Factores relacionados con la calidad de vida de los pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica. Atención Primaria. [Internet]. 2014 Abr [Acceso 14 dec 2016];46(4):179-87. Disponible en: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0212656713002734
  » http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0212656713002734
• ⁸
  Sanjuás C. Medición de la calidad de vida: ¿cuestionarios genéricos o específicos? Arch Bronconeumol. [Internet]. 2005 Mar [Acceso 24 jun 2018];41(3):107-9. Disponible en: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0300289605705998
  » http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0300289605705998
• ⁹
  Almagro P, Calbo E, Ochoa de Echaguïen A, Barreiro B, Quintana S, Heredia JL, et al. Mortality After Hospitalization for COPD. Chest. [Internet]. 2002 May [cited Jun 24, 2018];121(5):1441-8. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0012369215348534
  » http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0012369215348534
• ¹⁰
  Wardlaw AJ, Silverman M, Siva R, Pavord ID, Green R. Multi-dimensional phenotyping: towards a new taxonomy for airway disease. Clin Exp Allergy. [Internet]. 2005 Oct [cited Jan 18, 2017];35(10):1254-62. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02344.x
  » http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02344.x
• ¹¹
  Weatherall M, Travers J, Shirtcliffe PM, Marsh SE, Williams MV, Nowitz MR, et al. Distinct clinical phenotypes of airways disease defined by cluster analysis. Eur Resp J. [Internet]. 2009 Oct [cited Jan 18, 2017];34(4):812-8. Available from: http://erj.ersjournals.com/cgi/doi/10.1183/09031936.00174408
  » http://erj.ersjournals.com/cgi/doi/10.1183/09031936.00174408
• ¹²
  Burgel PR, Paillasseur JL, Caillaud D, Tillie-Leblond I, Chanez P, Escamilla R, et al. Clinical COPD phenotypes: a novel approach using principal component and cluster analyses. Eur Resp J. [Internet]. 2010 Sep [cited Jan 18, 2017];36(3):531-9. Available from: http://erj.ersjournals.com/cgi/doi/10.1183/09031936.00175109
  » http://erj.ersjournals.com/cgi/doi/10.1183/09031936.00175109
• ¹³
  Jones PW, Harding G, Berry P, Wiklund I, Chen WH, Kline Leidy N. Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test. Eur Resp J. [Internet]. 2009 Sep [cited Apr 3, 2015];34(3):648-54. Available from: http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/34/3/648
  » http://erj.ersjournals.com/content/34/3/648
• ¹⁴
  Hajiro T, Nishimura K, Tsukino M, Ikeda A, Koyama H, Izumi T. Comparison of discriminative properties among disease-specific questionnaires for measuring health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. [Internet]. 1998 Mar [cited Jan 18, 2017];157(4):785-90. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9517591
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9517591
• ¹⁵
  Tsiligianni IG, Alma HJ, de Jong C, Jelusic D, Wittmann M, Schuler M, et al. Investigating sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve of the Clinical COPD Questionnaire, COPD Assessment Test, and Modified Medical Research Council scale according to GOLD using St George's Respiratory Questionnaire cutoff 25 (and 20) as reference. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. [Internet]. 2016 May [cited Jun 1, 2017];11:1045-52. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274226
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27274226
• ¹⁶
  Jones PW. Quality of life measurement for patients with diseases of the airways. Thorax. 1991 Sep;46(9):676-82. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC463372/
  » https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC463372/
• ¹⁷
  Ferrer M, Alonso J, Prieto L, Plaza V, Monsó E, Marrades R, et al. Validity and reliability of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire after adaptation to a different language and culture: the Spanish example. Eur Respir J. [Internet]. 1996 Jun [cited Oct 6, 2016];9(6):1160-6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8804932
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8804932
• ¹⁸
  Fernanda M. Validación del cuestionario respiratorio St. George para evaluar calidad de vida en pacientes ecuatorianos con EPOC. Rev Cuid. [Internet]. 2015 Nov [cited Jun 25, 2018];6(1):882-91. Available from: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=359538018002
  » http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=359538018002
• ¹⁹
  Jones PW, Quirk FH, Baveystock CM, Littlejohns P. A Self-complete Measure of Health Status for Chronic Airflow Limitation: The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Am Rev Respir Dis. [Internet]. 1992 Jun [cited Oct 26, 2016];145(6):1321-7. Available from: http://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/ajrccm/145.6.1321
  » http://www.atsjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1164/ajrccm/145.6.1321
• ²⁰
  Anie KA, Jones PW, Hilton SR, Anderson HR. A computer-assisted telephone interview technique for assessment of asthma morbidity and drug use in adult asthma. J Clin Epidemiol. [Internet]. 1996 Jun [cited Oct 19, 2017];49(6):653-6. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8656226
  » https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8656226
• ²¹
  Jones P, Harding G, Wiklund I, Berry P, Leidy N. Improving the process and outcome of care in COPD: development of a standardised assessment tool. Prim Care Respir J. [Internet]. 2009 Sep [cited Jun 1, 2016]18(3):208-15. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19690787
  » https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19690787
• ²²
  Jones PW, Brusselle G, Dal Negro RW, Ferrer M, Kardos P, Levy ML, et al. Properties of the COPD assessment test in a cross-sectional European study. Eur Respir J. [Internet]. 2011 Jul [cited Oct 26, 2016];38(1):29-35. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21565915
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21565915
• ²³
  Ringbaek T, Martinez G, Lange P. A Comparison of the Assessment of Quality of Life with CAT, CCQ, and SGRQ in COPD Patients Participating in Pulmonary Rehabilitation. COPD J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. [Internet]. 2012 Ene [cited Jan 18, 2017];9(1):12-5. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/15412555.2011.630248
  » http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/15412555.2011.630248
• ²⁴
  Agustí A, Soler JJ, Molina J, Muñoz MJ, García-Losa M, Roset M, et al. Is The CAT Questionnaire Sensitive To Changes In Health Status In Patients With Severe COPD Exacerbations? COPD J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis. [Internet]. 2012 Sep [cited Jun 25, 2018];9(5):492-8. Available from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/15412555.2012.692409
  » http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.3109/15412555.2012.692409
• ²⁵
  Weldam SWM, Schuurmans MJ, Liu R, Lammers JWJ. Evaluation of Quality of Life instruments for use in COPD care and research: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. [Internet]. 2013 May [cited Set 29, 2016];50(5):688-707. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020748912002568
  » http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0020748912002568
• ²⁶
  Nagata K, Tomii K, Otsuka K, TachikaWAR, Otsuka K, Takeshita J, et al. Evaluation of the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test for measurement of health-related quality of life in patients with interstitial lung disease. Respirology. [Internet]. 2012 Abr [cited Jan 18, 2017];17(3):506-12. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02131.x
  » http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02131.x
• ²⁷
  Jones PW, Tabberer M, Chen WH. Creating scenarios of the impact of COPD and their relationship to COPD Assessment Test (CATTM) scores. BMC Pulm Med. [Internet]. 2011 Agos [cited Oct 27, 2016];11:42. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21835018
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21835018
• ²⁸
  Miravitlles M, Soler-Cataluña JJ, Calle M, Molina J, Almagro P, Quintano JA, et al. Guía española de la enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica (GesEPOC) 2017. Tratamiento farmacológico en fase estable. Arch Bronconeumol. [Internet]. 2017 Jun [Acceso 2 oct 2017];53(6):324-35. Disponible en: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0300289617300844
  » http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0300289617300844
• ²⁹
  GESEPOC Grupo de trabajo. Guía de Práctica Clínica para el Diagnóstico y tratamiento de Pacientes con Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica (EPOC) - Guía Española de la EPOC (GesEPOC). Guía de Práctica Clínica para el Diagnóstico y tratamiento de Pacientes con Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica (EPOC) - Guía Española de la EPOC (GesEPOC). Arch Bronconeumol. [Internet]. Feb 2012 [Acceso 1 dic 2014] 48(Supl 1):2-58. Disponible en: http://apps.elsevier.es/watermark/ctl_servlet?_f=10&pident_articulo=90268739&pident_usuario=0&pcontactid=&pident_revista=6&ty=62&accion=L&origen=bronco&web=www.archbronconeumol.org&lan=es&fichero=6v50nSupl.1a90268739pdf001.pdf
  » http://apps.elsevier.es/watermark/ctl_servlet?_f=10&pident_articulo=90268739&pident_usuario=0&pcontactid=&pident_revista=6&ty=62&accion=L&origen=bronco&web=www.archbronconeumol.org&lan=es&fichero=6v50nSupl.1a90268739pdf001.pdf
• ³⁰
  Folch A, Orts-Cortés MI, Hernández-Carcereny C, Seijas-Babot N, Macia-Soler L. Programas educativos en pacientes con Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica. Revisión integradora. Enferm Global. [Internet]. 2016 Dic [Acceso 17 marzo 2017];16(1):537. Disponible en: http://revistas.um.es/eglobal/article/view/249021
  » http://revistas.um.es/eglobal/article/view/249021
• ³¹
  Jones PW. Interpreting thresholds for a clinically significant change in health status in asthma and COPD. Eur Resp J. [Internet]. 2002 Mar [cited Jan 18, 2017];19(3):398-404. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11936514
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11936514
• ³²
  Casanova C, Garcia M, Torres JP. La disnea en la EPOC. Arch Bronconeumol. [Internet]. 2005 Ene [Acceso 6 julio 2015]; 41 (Supl 3): 24-32. Disponible en: http://apps.elsevier.es/watermark/ctl_servlet?_f=10&pident_articulo=13084296&pident_usuario=0&pcontactid=&pident_revista=6&ty=60&accion=L&origen=bronco&web=www.archbronconeumol.org&lan=es&fichero=6v41nSupl.3a13084296pdf001.pdf
  » http://apps.elsevier.es/watermark/ctl_servlet?_f=10&pident_articulo=13084296&pident_usuario=0&pcontactid=&pident_revista=6&ty=60&accion=L&origen=bronco&web=www.archbronconeumol.org&lan=es&fichero=6v41nSupl.3a13084296pdf001.pdf
• ³³
  Tejero A, Guimerá E, Farré J, Peri J. Uso clínico del HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) en población psiquiátrica: Un estudio de su sensibilidad; fiabilidad y validez. Rev Dep Psiquiatr Fac Med Barcelona.[Internet]. 1986 Feb; [Acceso 5 enero 2016] 13(5):233-8. Disponible en: http://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-psiquiatria-salud-mental-286-articulo-uso-del-cuestionario-hospital-anxiety-S1888989112000043
  » http://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-psiquiatria-salud-mental-286-articulo-uso-del-cuestionario-hospital-anxiety-S1888989112000043
• ³⁴
  Vallejo MA, Rivera J, Esteve-Vives J, Rodríguez-Muñoz MF. Use of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) to evaluate anxiety and depression in fibromyalgia patients. Rev Psiquiatr Salud Mental. [Internet]. 2012 [cited May 5, 2015];5(2):107-14. Disponible en: http://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-psiquiatria-salud-mental-286-articulo-uso-del-cuestionario-ihospital-anxiety-90123496
  » http://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-psiquiatria-salud-mental-286-articulo-uso-del-cuestionario-ihospital-anxiety-90123496
• ³⁵
  Cid-Ruzafa J, Damián-Moreno J. Valoración de la discapacidad física: el indice de Barthel. Rev Esp Salud Publica. [Internet]. 1997 Mar [cited 6 julio 2015];71(2):127-37. Disponible en:http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1135-57271997000200004&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
  » http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1135-57271997000200004&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es
• ³⁶
  Cohen J. Statistical analysis of feeding for behavioral sciences. Nueva Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
• ³⁷
  Soriano JB, Miravitlles M. Datos epidemiológicos de EPOC en España. Arch Bronconeumol. [Internet]. 2007 Jun.43(S1):1-38. Disponible en: http://www.archbronconeumol.org/es-datos-epidemiologicos-epoc-espana-articulo-13100985
  » http://www.archbronconeumol.org/es-datos-epidemiologicos-epoc-espana-articulo-13100985
• ³⁸
  Soler JJ, Martínez-García MA, Román P, Orero R, Terrazas S, Martínez-Pechuán A. [Effectiveness of a specific program for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and frequent exacerbations]. Arch Bronconeumol. [Internet]. 2006 Oct [cited Jun 11, 2014];42(10):501-8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17067516
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17067516
• ³⁹
  Siddique HH, Olson RH, Parenti CM, Rector TS, Caldwell M, Dewan NA, et al. Randomized trial of pragmatic education for low-risk COPD patients: impact on hospitalizations and emergency department visits. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. [Internet]. 2012 [citedJun 11, 2014];7:719-28. Available from: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3484530&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
  » http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=3484530&tool=pmcentrez&rendertype=abstract
• ⁴⁰
  Paulin LM, Diette GB, Blanc PD, Putcha N, Eisner MD, Kanner RE, et al. Occupational Exposures Are Associated with Worse Morbidity in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. [Internet]. 2015 Mar [cited Jun 26, 2018];191(5):557-65. Available from: http://www.atsjournals.org/doi/10.1164/rccm.201408-1407OC
  » http://www.atsjournals.org/doi/10.1164/rccm.201408-1407OC
• ⁴¹
  Otero I, Blanco M, Montero C, Valiño P, Verea H. Características epidemiológicas de las exacerbaciones por EPOC y asma en un hospital general. Arch Bronconeumol. [Internet]. 2002 Jun [Acceso 23 julio 2015];38(06):256-62. Disponible en: http://www.archbronconeumol.org/es/caracteristicas-epidemiologicas-las-exacerbaciones-por/articulo/13032777/
  » http://www.archbronconeumol.org/es/caracteristicas-epidemiologicas-las-exacerbaciones-por/articulo/13032777/
• ⁴²
  Barusso MS, Gianjoppe-Santos J, Basso-Vanelli RP, Regueiro EMG, Panin JC, Di Lorenzo VAP. Limitation of Activities of Daily Living and Quality of Life Based on COPD Combined Classification. Respir Care. [Internet]. 2015 Mar [cited Feb 20, 2017];60(3):388-98. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25492955
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25492955
• ⁴³
  Siebeling L, Musoro JZ, Geskus RB, Zoller M, Muggensturm P, Frei A, et al. Prediction of COPD-specific health-related quality of life in primary care COPD patients: a prospective cohort study. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. [Internet]. 2014 Ago [cited Feb 20, 2017];24:14060. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25164146
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25164146
• ⁴⁴
  Weldam SWM, Lammers J-WJ, Heijmans MJWM, Schuurmans MJ. Perceived quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients: a cross-sectional study in primary care on the role of illness perceptions. BMC Fam Pract. [Internet]. 2014 Ago [cited Feb 20, 2017];15:140. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25087008
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25087008
• ⁴⁵
  Ioanna T, Kocks J, Tzanakis N, Siafakas N, Van der Molen T. Factors that influence disease-specific quality of life or health status in patients with COPD: a systematic review and meta-analysis of Pearson correlations. Prim Care Respir J. [Internet]. 2011 Abr [cited Feb 17, 2017];20(3):257-68. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21472192
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21472192
• ⁴⁶
  Kim SH. Health-related quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients in Korea. Health Qual Life Outcomes. [Internet]. 2014 Abr [cited Feb 20, 2017];12:57. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24758364
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24758364
• ⁴⁷
  Sundh J, Johansson G, Larsson K, Lindén A, Löfdahl CG, Janson C, et al. Comorbidity and health-related quality of life in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease attending Swedish secondary care units. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. [Internet]. Oct 2015 [cited Feb 20, 2017];10:173-83. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25653516
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25653516
• ⁴⁸
  Caulfield B, Kaljo I, Donnelly S. Use of a consumer market activity monitoring and feedback device improves exercise capacity and activity levels in COPD. 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. [Internet]. 2014 Ago [cited Feb 20, 2017]. p.1765-8. Available from: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6943950/
  » http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/6943950/
• ⁴⁹
  Harper R, Brazier JE, Waterhouse JC, Walters SJ, Jones NM, Howard P. Comparison of outcome measures for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in an outpatient setting. Thorax. [Internet].1997 Oct [cited Oct 26, 2016];52(10):879-87. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9404375
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9404375
• ⁵⁰
  Ninot G, Soyez F, Préfaut C. A short questionnaire for the assessment of quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: psychometric properties of VQ11. Health Qual Life Outcomes. [Internet]. 2013 Oct [cited Oct 26, 2016];11:179. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24160852
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24160852
• ⁵¹
  Chaplin E, Gibb M, Sewell L, Singh S. Response of the COPD Assessment Tool in Stable and Postexacerbation Pulmonary Rehabilitation Populations. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. [Internet]. 2015 May/Jun [cited Oct 12, 2016];35(3):214-8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407595
  » http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25407595

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  18 July 2019
• Date of issue
  2019

History

• Received
  28 Feb 2018
• Accepted
  07 Feb 2019