versão impressa ISSN 0104-1169
Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem vol.17 no.1 Ribeirão Preto jan./fev. 2009
Renata da Costa BriãoI; Emiliane Nogueira de SouzaII; Raquel Azevedo de CastroIII; Eneida Rejane RabeloIV
ISpecialist in Cardiology Nursing, Nurse at Instituto de Cardiologia da Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Brazil
IIM.Sc. in Health Sciences, Faculty at Instituto de Cardiologia da Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Brazil, Assistant Faculty at Faculdade Fátima, Brasil, e-mail: email@example.com
IIIUndergraduate student in Nursing at Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
IVPh.D. in Biological Sciences: Physiology, Adjunct Professor at Escola de Enfermagem da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, Faculty at Instituto de Cardiologia da Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Brazil, e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate nursing professionals' theoretical knowledge of cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) treatment before specific training, immediately after, and six months later.
METHODS: Cohort study, performed in a cardiology hospital in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul (November/2005 to May/2006), Brazil. Nurses, nursing technicians and assistants were included. A questionnaire was administered in the three periods, and 75% of correct answers was considered a satisfactory result.
RESULTS: Thirty-five nurses participated in the pre-test, and 34 in the immediate and 6-month tests. Among technicians and assistants, 232, 227, and 104 participated in the pre-test, immediate, and 6-months tests, respectively. Among nurses, 62.9% achieved an adequate percentage of correct answers in the pre-test, 94.1% in the immediate, and 64.7% in the 6-months test; for nursing technicians and assistants, these values were 36.2%, 79.3%, and 62.5%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Training in CPA improved the nursing professionals' knowledge immediately after its administration, with a reduction in the rate of correct answers after 6 months.
Descriptors: heart arrest; nursing; education
Cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) care is considered successful if there is early diagnosis of the heart arrest signs, fast activation of emergency care, immediate use of basic support and life assessment, including electric defibrillation, and the early use of pharmacological agents. These stages are all linked and are indispensable to obtain completely successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation. CPA care outcome is directly related to the team's speed, and the chance of recovery depends on the immediate, competent and safe application of resuscitation measures (1).
In this setting, several studies have addressed the performance of patient care teams assisting CPA victims. For instance, a cohort study published in 2000 sought to determine the survival rate of intra-hospital post-CPA patients, related to the identification of CPA and care performance by nurses trained in Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS), and by untrained nurses. That study showed a post-CPA survival rate of 38% for patients who received care from trained nurses, while the rate for patients who received care from nurses without ACLS(2) was 10%.
A recent study, which aimed to evaluate the human factors that could affect the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation care, found that health professionals fail to provide basic life support and defibrillation within an appropriate minimum period of time. In addition, lack of leadership and inadequate task distribution were associated with the team's poor performance(3). Other studies have also evaluated how well the professionals maintain the knowledge and skills learned during CPA training courses. Those studies report that, if the skills are not systematically practiced or reviewed after training, the professionals' performance diminishes proportionally with time(4-5).
The scientific board of the institution addressed in the present study recently established the goal that the whole nursing team would be trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The present study was designed based on that institutional strategy, with a view to following the effectiveness of the training program. The purpose is to evaluate the nursing team's theoretical knowledge regarding patient care during CPA before training, immediately after the course and six months later.
This is a cohort contemporaneous study, performed at a cardiology hospital located in the city of Porto Alegre, in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, from November, 2005 to May, 2006. Subjects were nurses, nursing technicians and assistants who were regular workers at the hospital during the data collection period, had been trained in CPA and were willing to take part in the study. Any employees on probation were excluded, as well as the nurses responsible for the training. Data collection was done using three closed questionnaires: one for nurses (nine questions), and another for nursing technicians and assistants (12 questions). Both questionnaires contained questions that addressed the care delivered to CPA patients, from the first detection measures to defibrillation and administering drugs in cases of CPA, according to the new guidelines(1). These questionnaires were administered at three points in time: before training, immediately after, and six months later. The project was approved by the institution's Research Ethics Committee, and the participants were included in the study after having read and signed the free and informed consent term.
The training course was carried out from November, 2005 to February, 2006. The program was coordinated by nurses certified in ACLS and the groups consisted of one nurse and five nursing technicians or assistants. The training time was two hours, divided into the theoretical portion, based on the knowledge regarding basic and advanced life support, and a practical component, based on adequate cardiopulmonary resuscitation, from monitoring the patient up to and including advanced support. The course was held at a place equipped with a mannequin and CPA simulations. Although the team responsible for the training course did not establish parameters with correctness percentages to evaluate the team's performance after the test, previously published data state that 75% of correctness after training programs is considered to be satisfactory(6).
The analyses were done using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) 12.0. The categorical variables were expressed in percentages or absolute value, as continuous variables, and as means ± standard deviation. To compare continuous variables between groups, Student t and ANOVA tests were used for the parametric values and Kruskall-Wallis for non-parametric values. The Chi-square test was used to understand the categorical values, considering values significant for p<0.05.
Of all the nurses working at the institution (n=52), 35 took part in the pre-test, and 34 in the post-test and in the test six moths later. They answered the questionnaire in the three evaluation periods. These professionals' average age was 32±7.3 years. Of all nursing technicians and assistants (n=362) working at the institution, 232 took part in the pre-test, 227 in the post-test, and 104 in the test held six months after the training course. These professionals' average age was 35.6±8.2 years. There were more women than men. Among the nurses working in clinical and surgical hospitalization units during the training period (n=32), 17 answered the pre-test, 18 the post-test, and 12 answered the test six months after the training course. Of all nurses from the intensive care unit (n=20), 14 participated in the pre-test, 13 in the post-test, and 19 in the test held six months later. In terms of the total number of nursing technicians and assistants working at the institution (n=362), 167 worked in clinical and surgical hospitalization units, 106 of which answered the pre-test, 98 answered the post-test, and 57 answered the test six months later. Of the 195 professionals working in intensive care units, 125 participated in the pre-test, 129 in the post-test, and 47 in the test six months after training.
Nurses' performance on the theoretical test
In the nurse group, the questions that showed different frequencies of correct answers in the theoretical test held before training, after training, and six months later referred to the joules load in the first defibrillation, the compression/ventilation ratio, and the number of compressions per minute. For the other questions, the performance on the theoretical test did not differ between evaluation periods. Other data are shown in Table 1.
Nurses were expected to give 75% of correct answers in the theoretical tests. In the pre-test 22/35 (62.9%) reached that percentage. After the training course, 32/34 (94.1%) reached the performance level of 75%, and 22/34 (64.7%) six months later.
Comparing nursing technicians and assistants in terms of their performance on the theoretical test, it was observed that there was a significant difference in the frequency of correct answers to every question was observed in the pre-test, post-test, and in the test six months later. The team's performance immediately after the training course was better in ten out of twelve questions. Six months later, six questions showed a reduction in the score compared to the post-training period and, in six others, the percentage with 75% was greater. The other data are shown in Table 2.
Considering the expected 75% performance for nursing technicians and assistants in the theoretical test, 84/232 (36.2%) achieved that goal in the pre-test. In the test immediately after training, 180/227 (79.3%) achieved the expected 75% and, in the test six months later, 65/104 (62.5%) reached that index.
Mean correct answers in the test before, after and six months after training
For nurses, the mean score was 6.8±1.6 in the pre-training test, 7.9±0.9 in the post-test, and 6.7±1.6 after six months, from a total of 9 points (p=0.001). This difference was significant between the pre and post periods (p=0.006), and between the post-test and six-month test period (p=0.001). Data are shown in Figure 1.
In terms of the nurses' average score on the test and their work unit (hospitalization or intensive care units), it was observed that professionals working in the intensive care unit had a higher mean score than the mean score among nurses working in the hospitalization unit in the test before (7.6±1.1 vs 6.2±1.8; p=0.013) and after (8.3±0.8 vs 7.7±0.8; p=0.046) training. There was no difference in the test performed six months after training.
As for technicians and assistants, the mean score in the pre-test was 7.6±1.8, against 9.6±1.5 in the post-test, and 9.3±1.8 (p<0.001) after six months, out of a total 12 points. This difference was significant between the pre and post (p<0.001) periods, and between the pre-training and six-months-later periods (p<0.001), as shown in Figure 2.
In terms of the mean score and the work unit of nursing technicians and assistants, there was no difference in the pre and post period. In the period after six months, the professionals working in intensive care units had the highest mean score (10.2±1.4 vs 8.4±1.7; p<0.001).
This study showed that the knowledge of the nursing team as measured by a theoretical test was lower before training. Among the nurses, slightly over 60% achieved a satisfactory percentage. As for the team of technicians and assistants, this percentage was even lower (36.2%). Immediately after training, 94.1% of the nurses and 79.3% of the other professionals achieved the percentage recommended as "satisfactory knowledge". In the theoretical test evaluation, after six months of training, every professional showed a lower score. As to the participation of nurses, assistants and technicians working in the institution when the training occurred, proportionally higher participation by those working in the intensive care unit was observed. This may be related to the fact that the more people realize the possible practical application of the knowledge, techniques, and attitudes learned in a training course, the stronger their participation(7).
As to the performance in the theoretical test, the literature has presented similar results. A study that evaluated the knowledge and practical skills in basic life support of 19 nurses, after three hours of a recycling course, showed an initial improvement, with a significant reduction in knowledge after 10 weeks. The findings were attributed to the fact that, if the skills are not practiced or used regularly, there is a decrease in what was learned(4). Another study, which tested a similar strategy, investigated at what point nursing students acquired and assimilated knowledge in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Tests were performed before a four-hour training course about cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and two and a half months after the course.
The results showed better performance shortly after the training course, but a significant reduction in performance two and a half months later; nevertheless, there were improvements in the results compared to the pre-test, which suggests a positive knowledge assimilation(5).
Although only the theoretical knowledge of the nursing team was evaluated, this study's findings are in agreement with these and other studies that show that the professional's knowledge retention is harmed in a three-month period, significantly decreasing within 6 to 12 months after the training course. Hence, it is stressed that the knowledge and skills acquired during a training program reduce with time(6,8-9). On the other hand, perhaps the team that attended the training course did not seek, on its own, strategies to maintain the skills acquired in the training course.
Authors of a 2004 study evaluated if the frequency of an Immediate Life Support course affected the nurses' performance. In this study, the authors collected data in every instance of CPA care over the preceding twelve months, before and after implementing the course. The study results showed that the nurses felt confident during the CRA care delivered shortly after the course but that, with time, they felt incapable of performing the competencies without supervision(10). These results reinforce the need for systematic and more frequent training since, in fact, the acquired knowledge is reduced and abilities are lost if they are not practiced.
Among the nurses from intensive care units, the mean score in the pre- and post-training period was significantly higher compared to those working in hospitalization units. This difference did not occur after six months of training. Among technicians and assistants, the professionals from intensive care units only had a higher mean score than those working in hospitalization units in the test held six months after the training course (p<0.001). These data suggest that professionals from critical units work with more unstable patients and that, therefore, there is a greater chance of being involved in CPA situations. In this environment, these professionals can practice their abilities and competencies.
Some limitations should be highlighted in the present study. Since the training course was a goal established by the studied institution's scientific nursing commission, there was no interest in identifying the team that answered the questionnaire. This made it less feasible to perform individual analyses during the studied periods.
This study showed that the nurses' performance on the CPA theoretical test was worse than before the training course. After training, 90% of those professionals achieved the recommended score for a satisfactory performance, but the score reduced after six months. The nursing assistants had a similar performance to that of nurses in the tests before training, after training, and six months later.
These results support the data from the literature, showing there is a need to maintain continuous training in cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Institutions should invest in regular training programs, implementing theoretical and practical sessions, with an increased exposure to possible CPA cases. Furthermore, professionals should seek research strategies with a view to improving and maintaining their own performance over time. It is believed that additional studies, comparing different time periods after the training course and evaluating individual performances, if necessary, would provide valuable information.
1. American Heart Association. Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2005; 112(1):IV-1-IV-211. [ Links ]
2. Dane FC, Russell-Lindgren KS, Parish DC, Durham MD, Brown TD. In-hospital resuscitation: association between ACLS training and survival to discharge. Resuscitation 2000; 47:83-7. [ Links ]
3. Marsch SC, Muller C, Marrquardt K, Conrad G, Tschan F, Hunziker PR. Human factors affect the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation in simulated cardiac arrests. Resuscitation 2004; 60(1):51-6. [ Links ]
4. Broomfield R. A quasi-experimental research to investigate the retention of basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation skills and knowledge by qualified nurses following a course in professional development. J Adv Nurs 1996; 23:1016-23. [ Links ]
5. Madden C. Undergraduate nursing students acquisition and retention of CPR knowledge and skills. Nurs Educ Today 2006; 26:218-27. [ Links ]
6. Semeraro F, Signore L, Cerchiari EL. Retention of CPR performance in anaesthetists. Resuscitation 2006; 68:101-8. [ Links ]
7. Flores YP, Castillo MA. Factors influencing nursing staff members' participation in continuing education. Rev Latino-am Enfermagem 2006; 14:309-15. [ Links ]
8. Pottle A, Brant S. Does resuscitation training affect outcome from cardiac arrest? Accid Emerg Nurs 2000; 8:46-51. [ Links ]
9. Hollis S, Gillespie N. An audit of basic life support skills amongst general practitioner principals: is there a need for regular training? Resuscitation 2000; 44:171-5. [ Links ]
10. Murphy M, Fitzsimons D. Does attendance at an immediate life support course influence nurses skill deployment during cardiac arrest? Resuscitation 2004; 62:49-54. [ Links ]
Recebido em: 16.6.2007
Aprovado em: 21.10.2008