Muscle reinnervation in one or two stages?: experimental study in rats with end-to-side nerve graft

Reinervação muscular em um ou dois estágios?: estudo experimental em ratos com enxerto de nervo término-lateral

Abstracts

PURPOSE: To compare muscle reinnervation in one and two surgical stages using end-to-side neurorrhaphy (ESN) without donor nerve injury. METHODS: The experiment was performed on four groups of 20 rats. Group 1 (G1), one stage, received the graft which was sutured to the tibial nerve, with ESN, and its free stump was sutured end-to-end to the distal stump of the sectioned peroneal nerve (PN), all in the same operation. In Group 2 (G2), two stages, the nerve graft was sutured to the tibial nerve, with ESN. Two months later the PN was sectioned and its distal stump connected to the distal stump of the graft as in G1. Normal control group (Gn) received the graft only sutured to the tibial nerve, with ESN. Denervated control group (Gd), as well received the graft and had the PN sectioned and its two stumps buried in adjacent musculature, with the aim of denervating the cranial tibial muscle (CTM), the target of this study. The parameters used to evaluate CTM reinnervation were muscle mass, muscle fiber's minimum diameter and area. RESULTS: The mean CTM mass, the average of the muscular fibers areas and the average of the muscular fiber minimum diameters was higher (all p<0.0001) in G2 than in G1. Comparing the four groups, these parameters had their maximum expression in Gn and the minimum in Gd, as expected. CONCLUSION: The two stages showed better muscle reinnervation than one stage.

Facial Nerve; Tibial Nerve; Muscle Denervation; Nerve Regeneration; Rats


OBJETIVO: Comparar a reinervação muscular com enxerto de nervo em um e dois tempos operatórios, utilizando a neurorrafia término-lateral (NTL) sem lesão do nervo doador. MÉTODOS: Vinte ratos foram distribuídos em quatro grupos. O grupo 1 (G1), um estágio, recebeu o enxerto que foi suturado ao nervo tibial (NT), por meio de NTL, e seu coto livre foi suturado por NTL ao coto distal do nervo peroneal (NP), seccionado a um centímetro do NT, na mesma cirurgia. O grupo 2 (G2), dois estágios, recebeu o enxerto de nervo na primeira cirurgia, como já descrito. Dois meses depois, na segunda cirurgia, o NP foi seccionado e seu coto distal ligado ao coto distal do enxerto como em G1. O grupo controle de normalidade (Gn) recebeu o enxerto da mesma forma, apenas. E o grupo controle de denervação (Gd), além de receber o enxerto, teve o NP seccionado e seus cotos sepultados na musculatura adjacente, com a finalidade de denervar o músculo tibial cranial (MTC), alvo deste estudo. Os parâmetros utilizados para avaliar a reinervação do MTC foram massa muscular, diâmetro mínimo da fibra muscular e área. RESULTADOS: O grupo G2 apresentou superioridade (p<0,0001) em relação ao G1 na massa do MTC, no diâmetro mínimo e na área das fibras musculares. Na comparação entre os quatro grupos, estes mesmos parâmetros tiveram sua expressão máxima em Gn e mínima em Gd, como era esperado. CONCLUSÃO: A reinervação muscular em dois estágios apresenta melhor resultado quando comparada à técnica em um tempo.

Nervo Facial; Nervo Tibial; Denervação Muscular; Regeneração Nervosa; Ratos


3 - ORIGINAL ARTICLE

MODELS, BIOLOGICAL

Muscle reinnervation in one or two stages? Experimental study in rats with end-to-side nerve graft1 1 Research performed at Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu-SP, Brazil.

Reinervação muscular em um ou dois estágios? Estudo experimental em ratos com enxerto de nervo término-lateral

Joseli Assem BersanetiI, Fausto ViterboII, Jacks JorgeIII, Rafael DenadaiIV

IPhD, Assistant Professor, Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, University of Marilia (UNIMAR), Sao Paulo, Brazil. Main author. Conception, design, intellectual and scientific content of the study; interpretation of data; involved in technical procedures; collection of study informations; manuscript writing

IIPhD, Associate Professor, Head of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, FMB, UNESP, Botucatu-SP, Brazil. Supervised all phases of the study, scientific and intellectual content of the study, manuscript writing, critical revision

IIIPhD, Assistant Professor, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba-SP, Brazil. Interpretation of data, manuscript writing, critical revision

IVResident, Department of Surgery, Hospital Municipal Dr. Mário Gatti (HMMG), Campinas-SP, Brazil. Research Fellow, Institute of Plastic and Craniofacial Surgery, Brazilian Society of Research and Assistance to Craniofacial Rehabilitation Hospital (SOBRAPAR), Campinas-SP, Brazil. Interpretation of data, manuscript writing, critical revision

Correspondence

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare muscle reinnervation in one and two surgical stages using end-to-side neurorrhaphy (ESN) without donor nerve injury.

METHODS: The experiment was performed on four groups of 20 rats. Group 1 (G1), one stage, received the graft which was sutured to the tibial nerve, with ESN, and its free stump was sutured end-to-end to the distal stump of the sectioned peroneal nerve (PN), all in the same operation. In Group 2 (G2), two stages, the nerve graft was sutured to the tibial nerve, with ESN. Two months later the PN was sectioned and its distal stump connected to the distal stump of the graft as in G1. Normal control group (Gn) received the graft only sutured to the tibial nerve, with ESN. Denervated control group (Gd), as well received the graft and had the PN sectioned and its two stumps buried in adjacent musculature, with the aim of denervating the cranial tibial muscle (CTM), the target of this study. The parameters used to evaluate CTM reinnervation were muscle mass, muscle fiber's minimum diameter and area.

RESULTS: The mean CTM mass, the average of the muscular fibers areas and the average of the muscular fiber minimum diameters was higher (all p<0.0001) in G2 than in G1. Comparing the four groups, these parameters had their maximum expression in Gn and the minimum in Gd, as expected.

CONCLUSION: The two stages showed better muscle reinnervation than one stage.

Key words: Facial Nerve. Tibial Nerve. Muscle Denervation. Nerve Regeneration. Rats.

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Comparar a reinervação muscular com enxerto de nervo em um e dois tempos operatórios, utilizando a neurorrafia término-lateral (NTL) sem lesão do nervo doador.

MÉTODOS: Vinte ratos foram distribuídos em quatro grupos. O grupo 1 (G1), um estágio, recebeu o enxerto que foi suturado ao nervo tibial (NT), por meio de NTL, e seu coto livre foi suturado por NTL ao coto distal do nervo peroneal (NP), seccionado a um centímetro do NT, na mesma cirurgia. O grupo 2 (G2), dois estágios, recebeu o enxerto de nervo na primeira cirurgia, como já descrito. Dois meses depois, na segunda cirurgia, o NP foi seccionado e seu coto distal ligado ao coto distal do enxerto como em G1. O grupo controle de normalidade (Gn) recebeu o enxerto da mesma forma, apenas. E o grupo controle de denervação (Gd), além de receber o enxerto, teve o NP seccionado e seus cotos sepultados na musculatura adjacente, com a finalidade de denervar o músculo tibial cranial (MTC), alvo deste estudo. Os parâmetros utilizados para avaliar a reinervação do MTC foram massa muscular, diâmetro mínimo da fibra muscular e área.

RESULTADOS: O grupo G2 apresentou superioridade (p<0,0001) em relação ao G1 na massa do MTC, no diâmetro mínimo e na área das fibras musculares. Na comparação entre os quatro grupos, estes mesmos parâmetros tiveram sua expressão máxima em Gn e mínima em Gd, como era esperado.

CONCLUSÃO: A reinervação muscular em dois estágios apresenta melhor resultado quando comparada à técnica em um tempo.

Descritores: Nervo Facial. Nervo Tibial. Denervação Muscular. Regeneração Nervosa. Ratos.

Introduction

Long standing paralysis, such as facial palsies and paralysis caused by brachial plexus avulsion, can be treated by nerve graft associated with muscle transplant. In facial paralysis, this method is known as cross-face nerve graft, in which a nerve graft is used as a bridge between the healthy side and paralyzed side of the face, associated to muscle transplant. One end of the graft is sutured into a sectioned branch of the facial nerve on the healthy side. The other end is sutured to the nerve of the transplanted muscle, generally the gracilis muscle1-4, the pectoralis minor muscle5,6, or the latissimus dorsi muscle7,8, among others9-13.

This surgical procedure can be carried out in one or in two stages2,10,14. When performed in two stages, the first one is the nerve graft. There is a wait for the growth of axons at the distal end of the graft, and then, in a second procedure, the muscle transplant is positioned and reinnervated by the nerve graft previously placed. In a single-stage procedure, the nerve graft and muscle transplant are done in the same surgery. Both methods present advantages and disadvantages. The single-stage method reduces time of hospital stay, provides a shorter recovery time, and presents fewer complications2. However, its disadvantage is that muscle transplant remains denervated for a longer time waiting for axon growth through the nerve graft, which can result in atrophy of muscular fibers, jeopardizing the final result15. In the two-stage procedure, the muscle remains denervated for less time, because when it is transplanted, the axons had already grown to the distal end of the graft2,3,5,6,16.

Only two studies2,15 compared both methods. One clinical study2 analyzed facial symmetry at rest and when smiling, as well as less need for secondary surgical procedures; found 90 percent for the single-stage and 93 percent for the two-stages. A study15 in rabbits, comparing muscular reinnervation through nerve grafts in one and two-stage procedures found better results for the two-stage technique.

End-to-end neurorrhaphy is commonly used in the cross-face technique to connect the graft to the donor nerve, damaging some branches of the facial nerve on the healthy side1-3,5,6,16. The end-to-side neurorrhaphy without donor nerve lesion, introduced in 1992 by Viterbo et al.17, has been increasingly used18-32 and has the advantage of not injuring the donor nerve.

The purpose of this experimental study was to compare aspects of muscle reinnervation in one and two surgical stages using end-to-side neurorrhaphy without donor nerve injury.

Methods

The experimental protocol was approved by the Ethic Committee of the Medical School of Sao Paulo State University (UNESP). The rats were kept according to the guidelines of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (Institute for Laboratory Animal Research, 1996) and according to the ethical principles of the Brazilian College on Animal Experimentation (COBEA).

Animal housing and anesthesia

Eighty male albino Wistar rats, with average initial body weight of 182.6±14.9g were used. The animals were kept in light-dark cycles (12/12h) with free access to food and water. All surgical procedures and samplings were performed under general anesthesia by intraperitoneal administration of 30mg/kg hydrochloride sodium pentobarbital (Nembutal®) and by using a DFV microscope (MC-M3101) with 16 magnifications.

Experimental groups and surgical procedure

All animals underwent right hind limb surgery by the same surgeon. Initially the sciatic nerve and its branches, the tibial nerve (TN), the caudal cutaneous sural nerve (CCSN), and the peroneal nerve (PN) were dissected in an extension of about 2.5 centimeters. A one-centimeter segment of the CCSN was then removed and sutured to the lateral face of the TN by end-to-side neurorrhaphy (ESN) with 3 simple 10-0 monofilament nylon stitches, without removing the TN epineurium.

Following this phase, four groups of 20 rats each were formed randomly. The normal control group (Gn) had only the graft sutured to the side of the donor nerve by ESN (Figure 1).

In the denervated control group (Gd), the distal stump of the nerve graft was inverted about 120° and buried in the abductor muscle with a 7-0 polypropylene stitch. Then the PN, which innervates the cranial tibial muscle (CTM), was sectioned 1 centimeter bellow the trifurcation of the sciatic nerve, with its proximal and distal stumps also inverted, but in opposite directions, and also buried in the abductor muscle; this procedure was carried out in order to avoid spontaneous CTM reinnervation (Figure 2).

Group 1 (G1) underwent the single-stage procedure. After ESN of the TN graft, the PN was sectioned 1 centimeter bellow of the trifurcation of the sciatic nerve, as previously described, and its proximal stump was inverted 120° and buried in the abductor muscle. The distal stump of the graft was sutured to the distal stump of the PN by end-to-end neurorrhaphy (EEN) with three simple 10-0 nylon stitches (Figure 3).

Finally, Group 2 (G2) underwent the two-stage surgical procedure, with the first stage carried out as it was described for Gn (Figure 1). The interval between the first and the second surgeries was two months. In the second surgical stage, 1 millimeter of the free end of the graft was ressected to remove a possible neuroma which could harm the axon growth. This was followed by the sectioning of the PN at 1 centimeter of the trifurcation of the sciatic nerve, continuing the procedure in an identical way as described for G1 (Figure 3).

Collection and analysis of specimen

Six months after the first surgery, all animals were anesthetized for removal of CTM and of nerve segments for the study. The rats were killed by a lethal intraperitoneal anesthetic dose immediately after removal of the tissues.

Removed nerve segments were denominated N1, N2, N3, and N4 (Figure 4). N1 was the extremity of PN proximal stump and it was used to verify whether there was neuroma or occasional reinnervation of the CTM. N2 segment was the joint between the graft and the TN, i.e. the ESN site, while N3 segment contained the distal segment of the PN, after EEN, 10 mm from where it joined the CTM. N4 segment was the distal end of the graft buried in the aductor muscle, present only in Gd.

N1 and N4 segments were fixed with glutaraldehyde; post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide, and set in paraffin. Longitudinal sections were cut at 3 micra thickness, and two slides were made from each segment; one of them stained only with osmium, and the other also stained with toluidine blue. N2 segment was fixed in 10% buffered formalin and set in paraffin. Sections were also longitudinal, with 3 micra thick and two slides from each segment were stained with Masson trichrome, modified by Van de Grieft, and with Bielschowsky silver staining. N3 segment was fixed in glutaraldehyde, post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide and embedded in paraffin. Transverse sections were cut at 3 micra, and the two resulting slides were stained as the ones from segments N1 and N4.

Finally, the muscle was frozen in liquid nitrogen for carrying out histological sections which were made in a LEICA cryostat (CM 1800) with five micra thickness, transversal to the main axis of the muscular fibers in the central part of the muscle, comprising all its thickness. The slides were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. All analyses of all slides were performed by an experienced pathologist who was blinded to the study.

Morphometric analysis

Cranial tibial muscle morphometry included the measurement of the muscular fiber areas in square millimeters and the measurement of their minimum diameters, in millimeters. Fifty muscular fibers were randomly analyzed per animal by using the "SigmaScan Pro Image Analysis", Version 3.00.030, from Jandel Scientific Corporation. The identification of slides was hidden at the moment of image capturing and measuring of attributes. Counts of nerve fibers from N3 segment were performed with the same equipment. A randomized image was taken from each slide; with an area of 0.0192 mm², in which all nerve fibers were counted. For these analyses it was used a 40X COLEMAN microscope (18ST).

Statistical analysis

Comparison between groups regarding initial and final animal mass, CTM mass and number of PN nerve fibers was carried out by variance analysis of one factor complemented by the Bonferroni "t" test for multiple comparisons. The comparison of area and minimum muscle fiber diameter was made by Kruskal-Wallis analysis of variance. All analyses were performed using the software program Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS version 11.0 for Windows, Chicago, IL, USA). Values were considered significant for a confidence interval of 95% (p<0.05).

Results

Due to some losses, at the end of the experiment groups G1, G2, Gn, and Gd contained 16, 17, 19, and 16 rats, respectively.

Mass analysis

The initial and final animal body masses did not show statistical differences among the groups. Mean CTM mass, in grams, was higher (p<0.001) in G2 (0.603±0.033) than in G1 (0.480±0.066). In Gn (0.918±0.112), this parameter was the highest (p<0.001) of all groups, and Gd (0.256±0.013) was the lowest (p<0.001) (Table 1).

CTM=Cranial tibial muscle; N3=Removed nerve segment; Gn=Normal control group; G1=Group 1; G2=Group 2; Gd=Denervated control group; * P=0.648; ** P=0.545; # P<0.001 the comparison between all groups and the comparison between individual groups (Gn>G2 >G1>Gd); ## P<0.0001 the comparison between all groups and the comparison between individual groups (Gn>G1, G2 and Gd, G1>Gd and G2>Gd), except between G1 and G2 (p=0.4724).

Morphometric analysis

The average of the muscular fibers areas, in µm², and the average of the muscular fiber minimum diameters, in µm, was higher (p<0.0001) in G2 (2.613±0.581 and 44.423±0.768, respectively) than in G1 (2.102±0.674 and 38.978±9.114, respectively). Comparing the four groups, these two parameters had their maximum expression in Gn (4.634±0.758 and 66.012±6.347, respectively) and the minimum in Gd (0.433±0.486 and 15.295±8.610, respectively) (Table 1).

The average count of nerve fibers in N3 segment was significantly higher in Gn in relation to the other groups. Gd had the lowest average compared to the other groups (p<0.0001). There was no significant difference (p=0.4724) in this parameter between the G1 and G2 (Table 1).

Histological features

Cranial tibial muscle histology showed that fibers in Gn had large polygonal fibers, with peripheral nuclei and little connective tissue, characteristics of normal muscular tissue (Figure 5 left, above). There was well defined muscular atrophy in Gd, with a predominance of fiber groups with considerably reduced diameter, with few cells presenting normal diameter and an abundance of connective tissue, compatible with denervated muscle (Figure 5 right, above). G1 (Figure 5 left, below) and G2 (Figure 5 right, below) showed few polygonal cells in the midst of muscle fiber groups with considerably reduced areas, contrasting with others with considerably increased areas and rounded shapes. Some muscle fibers presented a centralized nucleus. In some regions there was an increase of connective tissue. This pattern was not constant in all animals and there was variation in the histological aspect within these two groups.

Nerve histology of N1 revealed characteristics of end neuroma, with fibers growing in different directions, mixed with muscle tissue, on all slides. In N2 segment, site of the ESN between the graft and TN, on the slides stained by the Bielschowsky method it was observed numerous nerve fibers within the graft (85% of 68 slides), which demonstrates the lateral sprouting of nerve fibers (Figure 6 above). N2 stained with trichromic Masson showed epineural discontinuity at the ESN site (88% of 68 slides) (Figure 6 below).

Histology of N3 from Gn showed normal nerve characteristics, with myelin sheath, well defined axon and epineural and high density of nerve fibers (Figure 7 left, above). G1 and G2 also showed numerous nerve fibers with a well defined myelin sheath, demonstrating appropriate axonal repopulation, in a similar way (Figures 7 right, above; and left, below).

However, G1 and G2 presented less nerve fibers, smaller diameters, thinner myelin sheaths, and larger amount of connective tissue when compared to Gn.

Gd had very few nerve fibers, with a greatly reduced diameter and a very scarce myelin sheath among substantial fibrosis, what is compatible with nerve degeneration (Figure 7 right, below). Characteristics of end neuroma in N4 segment were observed on all slides, except for one animal in which the graft had almost disappeared.

Discussion

This study used the neuro-muscular tibial-peroneal nerve and the cranial tibial muscle neuromuscular model33.

Sample homogeneity regarding initial and final animal mass is extremely important since the cranial tibial muscle mass is directly correlated with animal mass33.

All groups underwent nerve graft with ESN on TN because occasional neurotrophic factors or other factors still unknown could have affected the results34.

The 2 months chosed time between the first and the second surgeries was enough for axon growth in the grafts35.

Although in the most studies1-3,5,6,14,16 on cross-face nerve graft the EEN is the technique used to connect the graft to the donor nerve, some authors36-38 have shown that the ESN (technique more recently introduced17) can also be used successfully. However, to date there is no consensus on the realization of reanimation of the facial paralysis in one or two surgical stages2,4,9. In this context, the main objective of this experimental research was to compare aspects of muscle reinnervation with nerve graft in one and two surgical stages, using the end-to-side neurorrhaphy, because this technique of neurorrhaphy has the great advantage of not injuring the epineurium of donor nerve17-22 and, consequently, any nerve could potentially be used as a donor22. A comprehensive review of pertinent English literature (Medline and Embase databases) found no studies similar to that presented here. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first experimental research comparing muscle reinnervation by means of nerve grafts in one and two-stage procedures, using end-to-side neurorrhaphy of the graft on the donor nerve.

Segments N1 and N4 were sectioned longitudinally to confirm neuroma formation on the end and the non-fiber growth in the direction of the cranial tibial muscle39, confirming the non occurrence of motor contamination.

N2 segments stained with Masson Trichromic40 allowed observing the disappearance of the epineurium and perineurium in ESN sites in most cases (88%). Probably these structures had been absorbed. Some studies believe this phenomenon is due to the action of neurotrophic factors41; nevertheless, further studies are needed to identify exactly which substances are involved in this process. Bielschowsky technique, which stains nerve fibers in brown showed clearly the lateral sprouting40.

The nerve fibers counting in the distal portion of PN (N3 segment) showed the highest number in Gn and lowest number in Gd, as expected. There was no difference between G1 and G2, which demonstrated that the axon growth was not affected by the difference in time of the muscle target connection.

The study of CTM was important because all aspects involved in nerve repair are aimed at the target organ, muscle or sensation terminals.

Cranial tibial muscle mass showed normality in Gn and denervation in Gd, but it mainly demonstrated better result in G2 than in G1.

Cranial tibial muscle morphometry measured the area and minimum diameter of 50 fibers from each muscle; this number was shown to be statistically appropriate. Minimum diameter was chosen because any inclination of muscle fibers at the time of sectioning don't influences on it. CTM morphometry also showed a better result in G2 compared to G1. Data were highest in Gn and lowest in Gd, as expected.

The histological aspects of CTM showed normality in Gn and denervation in Gd, as expected. Groups G1 and G2 showed signs of muscular reinnervation.

The muscle mass and muscle fiber morphometry confirmed that the two-stage technique used in G2 provides better muscular reinnervation than the single stage operation (G1), probably due to less denervation time of the target muscle.

Rab et al.15 demonstrated better muscular reinnervation in the two-stage group and this result was attributed to prolonged atrophy in the transplanted muscle with the nerve graft in the single-stage operation. They15 also found differences in number of nerve fibers after the second neurorrhaphy of nerve graft, which did not occur in our study.

Kumar et al.2 showed the advantages and disadvantages of the cross-face nerve graft with free-muscle transfer for reanimation of the paralyzed side in one and two-stage operations, and despite the fact that muscle reinnervation showed better results in two-stage procedure, they recommend the single-stage due to its advantages. Clinical studies needs large series and generally are difficult to really expose precise results.

Our study also proved the efficacy of muscle reinnervation using ESN, promoting lateral axonal sprouting and muscle reinnervation.

Conclusion

The muscle reinnervation using nerve graft with end-to-side neurorrhaphy in two-stage procedures offers better result than in a single-stage.

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank Dr. Thaer Hashem for the final revision of the manuscript.

Received: July 19, 2012

Review: September 20, 2012

Accepted: October 22, 2012

Conflict of interest: none

Financial source: none

  • 1. Harii K, Ohmori K, Torii S. Free gracilis muscle transplantation with microneurovascular anastomosis for the treatment of facial paralysis: a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;57(2):133-43.
  • 2. Kumar PAV, Hassan KM. Cross-face nerve graft with free-muscle transfer for reanimation of the paralyzed face: A comparative study of the single-stage and two-stage procedures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(2):451-62.
  • 3. Frey M, Michaelidou M, Tzou CHJ, Pona I, Mittlböck M, Gerber H, Stüssi E. Three-dimensional video analysis of the paralyzed face reanimated by cross-face nerve grafting and free gracilis muscle transplantation: Quantification of the functional outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122(6):1709-22.
  • 4. Ashayeri M, Karimi H. One-stage reversed and rotated gracilis muscle free flap for chronic facial palsy: a new technique. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(5):1298-302.
  • 5. Harrison DH. The pectoralis minor vascularised muscle graft for the treatment of unilateral facial palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;75(2):206-13.
  • 6. Terzis JK. Pectoralis minor: a unique muscle for correction of facial palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;83(5):767-76.
  • 7. Harii K, Asato H, Yoshimura K, Sugawara Y, Nakatsuda T, Ueda K. One-stage transfer of the latissimus dorsi muscle for reanimation of a paralyzed face: a new alternative. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102(4):941-51.
  • 8. Biglioli F, Frigerio A, Rabbiosi D, Brusati R. Single-stage facial reanimation in the surgical treatment of unilateral established facial paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(1):124-33.
  • 9. Koshima I, Tsuda K, Hamanaka T, Moriguchi T. One-stage reconstruction of stablished facial paralysis using a rectus abdominis muscle transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;99(1):234-8.
  • 10. Koshima I, Moriguchi T, Soeda S, Hamanaka T, Tanaka H, Ohta S. Free rectus femoris muscle transfer for one-stage reconstruction of established facial paralysis. Plast Reconst Surg. 1994;94(3):421-30.
  • 11. Hayashi A, Maruyama Y. Neurovascularized free short head of the biceps femoris muscle transfer for one-stage reanimation of facial paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(2):394-405.
  • 12. Sajjadian A, Song AY, Khorsandi CA, Deleyiannis FWB, Van Swearingen JM, Henkelmann TC, Hui K, Manders EK. One-stage reanimation of the paralyzed face using the rectus abdominis neurovascular free flap. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(5):1553-9.
  • 13. Wang W, Qi Z, Lin X, Hu Q, Dong J, Zhou L, Dai C. Neurovascular musculus obliquus internus abdominis flap free transfer for facial reanimation in a single stage. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;110(6):1430-40.
  • 14. Terzis JK, Konofaos P. Experience with 60 adult patients with facial paralysis secondary to tumor extirpation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130(1):51e-66e.
  • 15. Rab M, Koller R, Haslik W, Kamolz LP, Beck H, Meggeneder J, Frey M. The influence of timing on the functional and morphological result after nerve grafting: an experimental study in rabbits. Br J Plast Surg. 2002;55(8):628-34.
  • 16. Terzis JK, Olivares FS. Long-term outcomes of free-muscle transfer for smile restoration in adults. Plast Reconst Surg. 2009;123(3):877-88.
  • 17. Viterbo F, Trindade JC, Hoshino K, Mazzoni Neto A. Latero-terminal neurorrhaphy without removal of the epineural sheath: experimental study in rats. Rev Paul Med. 1992;110(6):267-75.
  • 18. Rovak JM, Cederna PS, Macionis V, Urbanchek MS, Van Der Meulen JH, Kuzon WM Jr. Termino-lateral neurorrhaphy: the functional axonal anatomy. Microsurgery. 2000;20(1):6-14.
  • 19. Matsuda K, Kakibuchi M, Fukuda K, Kubo T, Madura T, Kawai K, Yano K, Hosokawa K. End-to-side nerve grafts: experimental study in rats. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2005;21(8):581-91.
  • 20. Koh KS, Kim J, Kim CJ, Kwun BD, Kim S. Hipoglossal-facial crossover in facial-nerve palsy: pure end-to-side anastomosis technique. Br J Plast Surg. 2002;55(1):25-31.
  • 21. Akeda K, Hirata H, Matsumoto M, Fukuda A, Tsujii M, Nagakura T, Ogawa S, Yoshida T, Uchida A. Regenerating axons emerge far proximal to the coaptation site in end-to-side nerve coaptation without a perineurial window using a T-shaped chamber. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(4):1194-203.
  • 22. Viterbo F, Amr AH, Stipp EJ, Reis FJ. End-to-side neurorrhaphy: past, present, and future. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6 Suppl):e351-8.
  • 23. Viterbo F, Salvio AG, Griva BL, Maciel FO. The embracing end-to-side neurorrhaphy in rats. Acta Cir Bras. 2012;27(3):260-5.
  • 24. Nunes e Silva D, Silva AC, Aydos RD, Viterbo F, Pontes ER, Odashiro DN, Castro RJ, Augusto DG. Nerve growth factor with fibrin glue in end-to-side nerve repair in rats. Acta Cir Bras. 2012;27(4):325-32.
  • 25. Zheng MX, Xu WD, Shen YD, Xu JG, Gu YD. Reconstruction of elbow flexion by end-to-side neurorrhaphy in phrenic nerve transfer. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(3):573e-5.
  • 26. Omori M, Sakakibara S, Hashikawa K, Terashi H, Tahara S, Sugiyama D. Comparison of reinnervation for preservation of denervated muscle volume with motor and sensory nerve: An experimental study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(7):943-9.
  • 27. Haninec P, Kaiser R. The end-to-side neurorrhaphy in axillary nerve reconstruction in patients with brachial plexus palsy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129(5):882e-3.
  • 28. Haninec P, Kaiser R, Bobek V, Dubovy P. Enhancement of musculocutaneous nerve reinnervation after vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) gene therapy. BMC Neurosci. 2012;13(1):57.
  • 29. Jaeger MR, Braga-Silva J, Gehlen D, Pereira-Filho Gde A, Zettler CG, de Souza MA, Veas JR, Sebben A. End-to-end versus end-to-side motor and sensory neurorrhaphy in the repair of the acute muscle denervation. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;67(4):391-6.
  • 30. Wang M, Xu W, Zheng M, Teng F, Xu J, Gu Y. Phrenic nerve end-to-side neurotization in treating brachial plexus avulsion: an experimental study in rats. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66(4):370-6.
  • 31. Lauretti L, D'Ercole M, Di Masi G, Socolovsky M, Fernandez E. Facial--hypoglossal nerve end-to-side neurorrhaphy: anatomical study in rats. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2011;108:221-6.
  • 32. Silva DN, Coelho J, Frazílio Fde O, Odashiro AN, Carvalho Pde T, Pontes ER, Vargas AF, Rosseto M, Silva AB. End-to-side nerve repair using fibrin glue in rats. Acta Cir Bras. 2010;25(2):158-62.
  • 33. Viterbo F, Trindade JC, Hoshino K, Mazzoni Neto A. End-to-side neurorrhaphy with removal of the epineural sheath: An experimental study in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94(7):1038-47.
  • 34. Lundborg G. A 25-year perspective of peripheral nerve surgery: Evolving neuroscientific concepts and clinical significance. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(3):391-414.
  • 35. Al-Qattan MM, Al-Thunyan A. Variables affecting axonal regeneration following end-to-side neurorrhaphy. Br J Plast Surg. 1998;51(3):238-42.
  • 36. Yamamoto Y, Sasaki S, Sekido M, Yokoyama T, Tsutsumida A, Furukawa H, Sawamura Y, Sugihara T. Alternative approach using the combined technique of nerve crossover and cross-nerve grafting for reanimation of facial palsy. Microsurgery. 2003;23(3):251-6.
  • 37. Frey M, Giovanoli P, Michaelidou M. Functional upgrading of partially recovered facial palsy by cross-face nerve grafting with distal end-to-side neurorrhaphy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117(2):597-608.
  • 38. Ueda K, Akiyoshi K, Suzuki Y, Ohkouchi M, Hirose T, Asai E, Tateshita T. Combination of hypoglossal-facial nerve jump graft by end-to-side neurorrhaphy and cross-face nerve graft for the treatment of facial paralysis. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2007;23(4):181-7.
  • 39. Lewin-Kowalik J, Marcol W, Kotulska K, Mandera M, Klimczak A. Prevention and management of painful neuroma. Neurol Med Chir. 2006;46(2):62-7.
  • 40. Bancroft JD, Stevens A. Theory and practice of histological techniques. 4ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1996.
  • 41. Boyd JG, Gordon T. Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor sustain the axonal regereneration of chronically axotomized motoneurons in vivo. Exp Neurol. 2003;183(2):610-9

  • Correspondence:
    Fausto Viterbo
    Rua Domingos Minicucci Filho, 587
    18607-030 Botucatu – SP Brasil
    Tel.: (55 14)3882-5414
  • 1
    Research performed at Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Botucatu Medical School (FMB), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu-SP, Brazil.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    29 Nov 2012
  • Date of issue
    Dec 2012

History

  • Received
    19 July 2012
  • Accepted
    22 Oct 2012
  • Reviewed
    20 Sept 2012
Sociedade Brasileira para o Desenvolvimento da Pesquisa em Cirurgia Al. Rio Claro, 179/141, 01332-010 São Paulo SP Brazil, Tel./Fax: +55 11 3287-8814 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: sgolden@terra.com.br