NeuroCOVID-19: a critical review

NeuroCOVID-19: uma revisão crítica

ABSTRACT

Background:

The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged neurologists since its early days. Neurology consultation services were then overloaded by emergency department and intensive-care patients with acute neurological syndromes. These complications are better explained today, but the growing number of patients with reported longstanding neurological symptoms constitute an emerging, complex, and still poorly understood phenomenon.

Objective:

This review summarizes data on relevant neurological manifestations of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and lasting post-infectious disease, also known as Long COVID. The complex history of Long COVID is examined to illustrate the upsides and challenges imposed by the active participation of patient communities in the production of medical knowledge.

Methods:

Narrative review.

Results:

Infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 is associated with encephalopathy/delirium, cerebrovascular disease, headache, and peripheral nervous system involvement. Long COVID is a living concept jointly defined by patient communities, physicians and scientists, including neurologists.

Conclusion:

Co-production of Long COVID knowledge between scientists and patients has initiated an era of patient-led research and evidence-based activism that acts as a two-edged sword - putting patient’s suffering in the spotlight, but with a tradeoff in methodological consistency.

Keyword:
COVID-19; Cognitive Dysfunction; Patient Participation; Social Media

RESUMO

Antecedentes:

A pandemia de COVID-19 trouxe desafios aos neurologistas desde seus primeiros dias. Os serviços de interconsulta neurológica foram inicialmente sobrecarregados pelo volume de atendimentos a síndromes neurológicas agudas em departamentos de emergência e unidades de terapia intensiva. Essas complicações são bem conhecidas hoje, mas o verdadeiro desafio está no número crescente de pacientes com sintomas atribuídos a “Long COVID”/COVID Longa, um problema novo, complexo e ainda pouco compreendido.

Objetivo:

Esta revisão resume literatura sobre manifestações neurológicas da infecção aguda por SARS-CoV-2 e COVID longa. A complexa história de COVID longa é examinada para ilustrar os ganhos e as dificuldades impostos pela participação ativa das comunidades de pacientes na produção de conhecimento médico.

Métodos:

Revisão narrativa.

Resultados:

A infecção pelo SARS-CoV-2 está associada a encefalopatia/delirium, doença cerebrovascular, cefaléia e neuropatias periféricas. COVID Longa é um conceito ainda plástico, definido em conjunto por comunidades de pacientes, médicos e cientistas, incluindo neurologistas.

Conclusão:

A co-produção do conhecimento sobre COVID longa, unindo cientistas, médicos (incluindo neurologistas), e pacientes, iniciou uma nova era de pesquisa conduzida por pacientes e “ativismo baseado em evidências”. Este atua como uma faca de dois gumes, alinhando os rumos da pesquisa às demandas e sofrimentos dos pacientes, ao custo de problemas metodológicos.

Palavras-chave:
COVID-19; Disfunção Cognitiva; Participação do Paciente; Mídias Sociais

INTRODUCTION

Since the emergence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Wuhan, China, the illness caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) soon spread across the globe, creating an unprecedented pandemic. As of late March, 2022, over 6 million people have died from the disease (https://covid19.who.int/). Brazil, the United States and India are among the countries with the largest death tolls. Many survivors have developed chronic systemic and neurological symptoms, which are building up to an extreme global and personal burden of disease1. This review summarizes data on relevant neurological manifestations of acute SARS-CoV-2 infection and lasting post-infectious disease, also known as Long COVID, along with its intricate history.

NEUROLOGICAL COMPLICATIONS ASSOCIATED WITH ACUTE SARS-COV-2 INFECTION

Although COVID-19 was initially described as a primarily respiratory disease, the respiratory symptoms were more-than-often accompanied by systemic compromise, including neurological complications2 ^, 3, and the pandemic defied neurology services worldwide3.

About one third of patients with COVID-19 experienced at least one neurological symptom4.

Encephalopathy

Encephalopathy is a prominent neurological finding in acute COVID-19. An array of agitation, consciousness abnormalities, delirium or disexecutive syndrome occur in 7.5 - 28% of hospitalized patients2 ^, 5, and in as many as 14.8 - 69% of ICU-admitted patients2 ^, 6. It is associated with higher mortality rates5. Encephalopathy has been very demanding for clinicians and intensive care physicians, which is demonstrated by the increased workload of neurology consultation services throughout the course of the pandemic3. Encephalopathy and delirium are common in critically ill patients, and COVID-19 shares many clinical characteristics of other acute viral and respiratory conditions such as H1N1 pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome7. However, COVID-19-associated encephalopathy is novel, unexpectedly severe, and associated with prolonged conscious abnormalities following sedation withdrawal, which has prompted efforts into identifying potential disease-specific mechanisms. Several studies report MRI, EEG and CSF findings in COVID-19 encephalopathy8 ^, 9. Although some case reports have suggested SARS-CoV-2 may cause infectious and encephalitis10 ^, 11, the evidence for classical encephalitis mechanisms is limited. Most studies on laboratory markers of COVID-19-encephalopathy reported that CSF only rarely shows pleocytosis (less than 10% of CSF samples) or CNS-restricted oligoclonal bands (0-2%)8 ^, 12. Likewise, SARS-CoV-2 RNA is rarely detected (0/76 samples in Jarius et al.12; 1/21 in Tuma et al.8). Magnetic resonance images usually show non-specific changes in the cerebral white-matter, although unsuspected strokes were also common8 ^, 13.

Peripheral neuropathy

Disorders of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) are common in hospitalized patients with acute COVID-19, although their study is limited by the difficulties in performing electrodiagnostic studies and neurological examination (clouded by encephalopathy and sedation), two fundamental diagnostic tools, during the acute stage of the disease. Moreover, many studies evaluating neurological symptoms during acute COVID reported the prevalence of unspecific findings such as “motor weakness” or “sensory abnormalities” without clear nosological diagnoses8 ^, 14, and a subset of the patients with these symptoms may have developed neuropathies.

A few distinct phenotypes have been described: Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS); axonal polyneuropathy; and focal neuropathies (single or multiple mononeuropathies, plexopathies). The association between GBS and COVID-19 has been extensively debated15 ^, 16. Many case reports of GBS were published in the early stages of the pandemic, suggesting a potential causal association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and GBS15, as frequently seen with other infections. Caress et al. reviewed 37 published case reports from 2020. Patients developed GBS a mean of 11 days after the onset of COVID-19 symptoms. Electrodiagnostic studies showed a demyelinating pattern in half of cases, and serum anti ganglioside antibodies were absent in 15/17 patients tested15. A later epidemiological study from the United Kingdom found no association between the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak and the incidence of GBS16. GBS is also allegedly related to COVID-19 vaccines, but the true incidence of COVID-19-vaccine-associated GBS may be much lower than expected, and lower than GBS from influenza vaccines17. COVID-19 can also cause diffuse weakness and sensory abnormalities suggesting a myopathy/polyneuropathy overlap18.

Focal neuropathies involving nearly every major peripheral nerve from the lower and upper limbs have been described as COVID-19 complications19 ^- 23. Focal neuropathies are usually compressive, and are strongly associated with the severity of acute disease (Bruno F. Guedes, personal communication). Foot drop from uni- or bilateral peroneal nerve injuries are very common and may persist up to 11 months post-COVID in 5% of hospitalized patients (Bruno F. Guedes, personal communication). Internists and neurologists are well-acquainted with peroneal nerve injuries in critically-ill patients. However, an array of known but rare upper limb neuropathies (especially ulnar nerve at elbow level and brachial plexus injuries) caused by mechanical ventilation re-emerged24 ^, 25. Some reports suggest focal neuropathies in COVID can be immune-mediated, based on clinical rationale and a predominance of axonal neuropathies on electrodiagnostic studies19 ^, 26. However, given the rarity of immune-mediated neuropathies and the strong association of focal neuropathies with mechanical ventilation and prone positioning, those could as well be variations of compressive neuropathies.

Stroke

Acute cerebrovascular diseases are not uncommon in patients with COVID-19, with an incidence of 1.4%. Ischemic strokes outnumber brain hemorrhage in a 4:1 ratio. The incidence of stroke is much higher when only hospitalized patients are considered, and the disease is strongly associated with COVID-severity2 ^, 6. The real incidence of cerebrovascular disease could be much higher, as several factors may contribute to its underestimation, including limited access to neuroimaging imposed by safety protocols (decontamination of tomogrophers, restrictions to patient circulation), resource shortage in crowded hospitals, and limitations to neurological examination in comatose and sedated patients27. This limitation may account for the high proportion of unsuspected strokes presenting as encephalopathy3.

COVID-19 stroke patients were older, and more likely to have hypertension, diabetes mellitus and severe infection. Compared to stroke patients without COVID-19, they were younger, were more likely affected by large vessel occlusion, and had more severe strokes, as evidenced by higher NIHSS scores and much higher in-hospital mortality rates28. Interestingly, COVID-19 stroke cases are more likely to be classified as cryptogenic or to involve multiple vascular territories28 ^, 29, suggesting a potential contribution of prothrombotic state30. Optimal management of COVID-19 cryptogenic stroke is uncertain.

Neuro COVID-19 case reports

Although usually considered low-quality evidence31, case reports are particularly relevant at the dawn of pandemics, and should not be neglected32. The first case report on the influenza of 2009 in Mexico33 was an important whistle-blower that drew attention towards a yet-to-become devastating pandemic34. Some case reports are among the most cited publications from the Middle East Respiratory Syndrome period35.

There is an ever-growing list of diseases allegedly associated with COVID-19, which includes esoteric case reports describing SARS-CoV-2 - varicella-zoster meningitis coinfection36, COVID-19-associated vestibulopathy37, nasopharyngeal swab-associated carotid-artery dissection with retinal ischemia38, normal pressure hydrocephalus39, cerebral vasculitis40, and many other rare neurological syndromes. This list even includes diseases with well-known pathophysiological mechanisms, such as neurodegenerative41, metabolic42, autoimmune43, and infectious44 diseases. Many of these reports make the case for a theoretical COVID-19-specific disease mechanism in the discussion sections, with mechanicist rationales based on laboratory studies or theoretical reasoning, and with very limited support from clinical studies. The average quality of COVID-19 case reports is very low - a systematic review of 196 case reports showed the adherence to CARE guidelines45 was poor, with a mean composite score for completeness of reporting46 of 54.%, much lower than the proposed threshold of 75%47.

Low-quality case reports are not unique to the COVID-19 pandemic47, but the rate of incomplete reports is too high. This is potentially dangerous because the overall completeness of recording does not correlate with article citation or social media exposure, which may lead to harmful biases47. In the author’s opinion, the limits of case reports have been dangerously bent, and most COVID-19 case reports are of very limited value. As we transition from the fear of novelty towards a better understanding of the disease, case reports should be repositioned as low-level evidence, and rarely guide clinical decisions.

THE HISTORY OF LONG COVID

Evidence-based activism

The designation “long COVID” is now an established concept worldwide. However, the disease’s clinical features and even its naming are still being debated. The emergence of Long COVID as a clinical entity has initiated a new era in the production of medical knowledge. Widespread internet use and social media-empowered patients, and medical knowledge production is now increasingly influenced by patient-generated data, which relies largely on subjective evidence. Rabeharisoa and colleagues defined the concept of “evidence-based activism” to describe “modes of activism that focus on knowledge production”48. With evidence-based activism, patient communities seek acknowledgement for their subjective knowledge and collective personal experiences, with the aim of identifying areas of “undone science”. This should then guide government agents and academia towards overlooked but clinically relevant issues. Ultimately, this leads to the “co-production” of knowledge - the role of the scientists as guardians of scientific knowledge is replaced by an ill-defined partnership in which the actions of academia, politics and public opinion are intermingled49.

The COVID pandemic was noticeable for high mortality and a complex acute disease that brought entire healthcare systems to their knees50. In the early stages of the pandemic, political, clinical and scientific efforts were all targeted towards reductions in mortality and acute complications. Papers on neurological complications of COVID focused on hospitalized patients with severe acute disease, and emphasized encephalopathy, stroke, neuromuscular disorders and other complex manifestations such as encephalitis2 ^, 3 ^, 8. Clinicians soon noticed surviving patients were challenged by lasting symptoms and disability, but most scientific efforts towards understanding these difficulties focused on cohort studies of surviving severe COVID patients51. Undiagnosed or “mild” COVID patients were largely unstudied. A large mass of unattended patients with chronic symptoms, allegedly COVID-related, gathered around social media and started pushing for recognition.

The controversial meaning of long COVID

Long COVID is probably the first illness defined by patients on Twitter52 ^, 53. The term “long COVID” was first proposed by Elisa Perego, an archeologist from Lombardy (a hard- and early-hit region of Italy), in a Twitter publication in late May 202054. The hashtag #LongCovid was used as a contraction of the wording “long-term Covid illness”. Perego became an activist for recognition and validation of a large and growing group of patients suffering from persistent and debilitating symptoms following COVID-1955. In June, 2020, #LongCovid’s reach grew as rising patient collectives around the world translated the term to French (#apresJ20), Spanish (#covid persistente), Japanese (#長期微熱組), Finnish (#koronaoire), and several other languages (as seen in patient-organized websites: https://www.apresj20.fr; https://apuakoronaan.fi).

“Long Covid” first hit the organized press in late June, following the report of how an intensive care physician, Dr Jake Suett, joined a patient-created support group on Facebook56. A month later, the British Medical Journal (BMJ) issued a blog post signed by a collective of affected doctors entitled “Patients’ experiences of “longcovid” are missing from the NHS narrative”57, which introduced the term to traditional scientific venues. Until mid-2020, there was a clear disconnect between official health communications and Long COVID sufferers online. Online discussions about lasting symptoms of COVID started as early as January-February 2020, and the #LongCOVID and #Long Hauler hashtags gained traction in May-June 2020. A structured analysis of social media content from COVID long haulers showed that “Before the start of June 2020, Long Haulers were (...) invisible: typical tweets reported Long Haulers either being misdiagnosed/’gaslighted’ by their GPs (...) received very little support, information and treatment”58. The gap between patients and the medical establishment started to close during the second semester of 2020, when scientific journals and governments started to broadcast Long-COVID content58.

The choice of the word “Long” is a novelty. Although “Long COVID” is compliant with WHO naming standards (short, neutral), temporality is hazy. Long COVID proponents felt the usual (and WHO-endorsed) “post-” or “chronic” COVID was inadequate for several reasons. First, it could prevent patients without positive acute-phase COVID tests from being diagnosed. Secondly, “post-” and “chronic” suggest the disease clearly occurs following acute COVID, whereas patient experiences suggested a continuation between acute (or suspected acute) disease and persisting symptoms52.

Physicians as patients

As part of the COVID crisis frontline, doctors were highly exposed, and the number of physicians suffering from lingering symptoms grew. Their physical and mental health was profoundly impacted by the pandemic59. The lack of solid research and science-curated knowledge on the subject prompted the mobilization of affected doctors into filling the knowledge gap with anecdotal reports and personal experience. This is very important because the involvement of doctors as patient-advocates grants technical validity to the claims of advocacy groups. Many patient-physician manifestos were published in important journals60 ^, 61, including that signed by 39 doctors entitled “persistent symptoms of Covid-19 to be treated with a scientific methodology without bias”60. This manifesto is a good illustration of this new (and bias-prone) approach to the role doctors can play in the creation of medical knowledge, by combining reports of personal experience with their inherent technical authority, as seen in the following excerpt: “We write as a group of doctors affected by persisting symptoms [...]. We aim to share our insights from both a personal experience of the illness and our perspective as physicians”60.

Limitations of current definitions of Long COVID

Several different definitions of Long COVID were proposed, with vague clinical criteria and variations mostly in the timing of symptoms (range, 1 month - 24 weeks post-COVID)1. The World Health Organization assigned an emergency use of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10), to classify cases of ‘Post-COVID conditions, unspecified’62. Based on a Delphi consensus, the WHO stated ‘post COVID-19 occurs in individuals with a history of probable or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, usually 3 months from the onset of COVID-19 with symptoms that last for at least 2 months and cannot be explained by an alternative diagnosis. (…) Common symptoms include fatigue, shortness of breath, cognitive dysfunction but also others (...) may be of new onset following initial recovery (...) or persist from the initial illnessinstagram post from computer, may fluctuate or relapse (…)’63.

This definition has several limitations, including difficult-to-define time-windows for asymptomatic patients, lack of clinical data to define clinical thresholds, and very low specificity. This is potentially linked to the way co-production took place in the development of Long-COVID definitions.

Patient-driven evidence-based activism was crucial in drawing attention towards the issue of Long COVID, which was inadvertently neglected by the medical establishment in the early stages of the pandemic (see section The history of “Long COVID above). However, the fear of ‘falling through the cracks’, and the need for validation of many suffering patients dictated the deliberate creation of inclusive criteria, so no patients would be left out, a legitimate priority52 ^, 53 ^, 55. Although the current definitions are encompassing, allowing all suffering patients to receive care, the lack of clear diagnostic hallmarks could make clinical studies difficult to perform. The current consensus is slowly shifting away from some of the prerogatives proposed by patient advocacy groups. The explicit exclusion of acute COVID-19 infection is now considered a must in the diagnosis of Long COVID64, which contrasts with advocates’ proposal of Long COVID as an acute-chronic symptoms continuum52 ^, 53.

“NEURO-LONG-COVID”

Neurological manifestations are high in the list of potential lasting complications of COVID. Almost one third of patients are eventually diagnosed with a neurological or psychiatric illness up to six months post-acute COVID65. Although several neurological symptoms and syndromes related to the peripheral (PNS) or central (CNS) nervous system have been described, many such syndromes are likely to be related to dysfunctions in other organ systems. Nonspecific symptoms such as ‘brain fog’, fatigue and sleep disturbances may be associated with CNS, PNS, respiratory, endocrine, cardiovascular, psychiatric or autoimmune diseases66. There is great variability in prevalence estimates of neurological symptoms across studies (including cohort studies and patient-led research), which highlights the challenges brought by the lack of standardization, selection and reporting biases1. The reported rates for neurological symptoms is high across studies. In a cohort study of 1733 patients with confirmed COVID-19, three quarters reported a history of at least one of the following symptoms: fatigue or muscle weakness (63%), disorders of smell (11%) or taste (7%), headache (2%), mialgias (2%). Anxiety/depression was reported by 23% of patients67. Another study of 2433 patients showed similar results68, with fatigue (30% of patients) as a leading symptom. A large online survey by the Patient-Led Research Collaborative found far higher prevalences of neurological symptoms including cognitive dysfunction (85%), headache(77%), mood disorders (88%), and memory impairment (77%), which may reflect the intrinsic selection bias of online surveys targeted at patient support groups68. A meta-analysis including data from nearly 50,000 patients revealed 80% of patients reported at least one persistent symptom, with headache (44%), fatigue (58%) and attention disorder (27%) as leading complaints69.

Headache and cognitive dysfunction are reviewed in greater detail below.

Headache

Headache is among the most common neurological symptoms in outpatient clinics and emergency departments. It is a very frequent symptom during the acute phase of COVID-19, with 11-34% of hospitalized patients reporting headaches70. COVID-19-associated headache lacks specific diagnostic criteria, but to some extent fits the International Classification of Headache disorders-3 (ICHD-3) criteria for headache attributed to systemic viral infection:

“(…) caused by and occurring in association with other symptoms and/or clinical signs of a systemic viral infection. Evidence of causation demonstrated by at least two of the following: (1) headache has developed in temporal relation to onset of the systemic viral infection, (2) headache has significantly worsened in parallel with worsening of the systemic viral infection, (3) headache has significantly improved or resolved in parallel with improvement in or resolution of the systemic viral infection, and (4) headache has either or both of the following characteristics: (a) diffuse pain and (b) moderate or severe intensity”71. However, this classification does not account for all the particularities of COVID-19 associated headache, and recent research has allowed the definition of COVID-19-headache as a unique headache syndrome. The headache associated with acute COVID-19 is more common in women and younger patients, responds poorly to analgesics, is associated with anosmia/ageusia, and has a mean duration of two weeks72. A quarter of patients experience a migraine-like headache, but the most common presentation is tension-type-headache73. The pathogenesis of headache in acute COVID is still debatable. Some authors have suggested headache could be caused by proinflammatory cytokines, as indirectly implied from the association of headache with fever, but studies reporting the association between fever and headache showed conflicting results, with two studies showing independence between headache and fever72 and another reporting higher odds of having headache in febrile COVID-19 patients74. Headache may also be explained by direct invasion of the CNS, as other coronaviruses are known to penetrate the CNS. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 can infect neurons in vitro, and the association between headache and other neurological symptoms such as anosmia strengthens this hypothesis7 ^, 72. Proposed pathways for neurotropism include trans synaptic transmission through the olfactory bulbs and a hematological route, through the blood-brain barrier7.

Headache is also a leading complaint of patients with Long COVID. Although the typical headache duration is two weeks, 16% of patients had persistent headache at 9 months post-infection75. Proposed mechanisms of disease in persistent headache are similar to those suggested for acute infection. The clinical and nosological relationship between Long COVID headache and the recently described New Persistent Daily Headache cannot be overlooked, and points towards an inflammatory post-infectious mechanism76. Although several immune, infectious and metabolic mechanisms have been proposed early in the pandemic, some key environmental factors were described much later. It is important to acknowledge the unique aspects of the epidemic context in which patients developed headaches. Environmental factors include use of personal protective equipment77, worsening of underlying headache disorders following vaccination78, and the psychological impact of the pandemic on the daily life of headache patients79. Evidence on treatment options remains anecdotal. Although small case series suggest benefits for unorthodox treatments such as indomethacin and sphenopalatine ganglion block80, a symptom-oriented approach is usually useful, with patients benefiting from treatment targeted at their headache phenotype.

Cognitive deficits

Cognitive dysfunction and cognitive complaints are very common in both cohorts of hospitalized patients81 and online surveys68. A systematic review showed attention disorder, anxiety, brain fog and memory issues were each observed in roughly 25% of patients82. Interestingly, subjective symptoms were more common long- (≥6months) than short- (3-6 months post-COVID) term, with a pooled prevalence of 25 vs 40% for brain fog, 20 vs 40% for anxiety, a difference that was not observed with cognitive dysfunction. This suggests a subset of subjective cognitive complaints and psychiatric symptoms may in fact emerge de novo after the convalescent phase, and are likely not a direct consequence of acute COVID-1982. Objective cognitive dysfunction is associated with delirium/encephalopathy at the acute stage of disease, and with markers of disease severity such as ICU admission, even after propensity score matching65. Patients with cognitive dysfunction post-COVID should be evaluated for other causes of cognitive decline and dementia and treated accordingly, as impaired cognition is more common in older patients with pre-existing symptoms. There is currently no specific treatment for Long-COVID cognitive impairment, but patients may benefit from cognitive training83.

Psychiatric syndromes showed a much less robust association with acute disease severity. A study by the HCFMUSP COVID-19 Study Group showed a composite of ‘mental and cognitive impairment’ was very common in hospitalized patients after six months, but was not related to baseline disease severity81. The partial dissociation between acute disease and neuropsychiatric symptoms suggests contextual psychological stressors play a major role. These include social isolation, confinement, post-traumatic stress, and regional characteristics, including a response to the striking neglect of the pandemic promoted by the Brazilian government84. This contrasts with fierce claims of universal organicity from journalists85 and patients online, as clearly demonstrated in an enlightening episode: in January 2021, Paul Garner, a professor of infectious diseases at the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, reported his own experience in overcoming Long COVID. He emphasized the similarity between Long COVID and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS), the role of self-help groups, refraining from seeking disease information on the internet, and “by retraining the bodily reactions with my conscious thoughts, feelings, and behaviour”86. The blog post and an accompanying tweet were met with intense discussion and overwhelmingly negative reactions from Long-COVID patients. One user wrote: “It’s a great shame that Prof Garner, who was a beacon in the early days of covid last Spring, when no-one of any note was validating the experience of ‘long covid’ sufferers, has chosen now to suggest it can all be cured by positive thinking”86. Several comments criticized Gardner’s comparison of Long-COVID and ME/CFS, frowning upon a possible suggestion of Long-COVID sharing the status of non-organic disease that many attribute to ME/CFS55. This explains why some skeptical doctors fear vilification as “medical gaslighters”87.

In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic brought major challenges to clinicians and neurologists. It illustrates how the production of medical knowledge is affected: by resource limitation; by the fear and excitement towards novelty (as shown by the surge of “neuro-COVID” case reports); and by the mobilization of subjective evidence and co-production of knowledge by patients and doctors. Social media and patient-led research introduced much welcomed and fast-paced patient-generated data, the downsides being an increase in selection bias and political pressure against clinicians and scientists. In the aftermath of the pandemic, we must be ready to provide care for a large mass of Long-COVID patients in all their physical, cognitive and psychological complexity.

References

• 1. Stefanou MI, Palaiodimou L, Bakola E, Smyrnis N, Papadopoulou M, Paraskevas GP, et al. Neurological manifestations of long-COVID syndrome: a narrative review. Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2022 Feb 17;13:20406223221076890. https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223221076890
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/20406223221076890
• 2. Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, Hu Y, Chen S, He Q, et al. Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol. 2020 Jun 1;77(6):683-90. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1127
  » https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1127
• 3. Studart-Neto A, Guedes BF, Tuma RLE, Camelo Filho AE, Kubota GT, Iepsen BD, et al. Neurological consultations and diagnoses in a large, dedicated COVID-19 university hospital. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2020 Aug 3;78(8):494-500. https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282x20200089
  » https://doi.org/10.1590/0004-282x20200089
• 4. Misra S, Kolappa K, Prasad M, Radhakrishnan D, Thakur KT, Solomon T, et al. Frequency of neurologic manifestations in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2021 Dec 7;97(23):e2269-81. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012930
  » https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000012930
• 5. Callea A, Conti G, Fossati B, Carassale L, Zagaria M, Caporotundo S, et al. Delirium in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia: a prospective, cross-sectional, cohort study. Intern Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 27;1-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-02934-w
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-022-02934-w
• 6. Helms J, Kremer S, Merdji H, Clere-Jehl R, Schenck M, Kummerlen C, et al. Neurologic features in severe SARS-CoV-2 infection. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 4;382(23):2268-70. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2008597
  » https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2008597
• 7. Damiano RF, Guedes BF, de Rocca CC, de Pádua Serafim A, Castro LHM, Munhoz CD, et al. Cognitive decline following acute viral infections: literature review and projections for post-COVID-19. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2022 Feb;272(1):139-54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01286-4
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-021-01286-4
• 8. Tuma RL, Guedes BF, Carra R, Iepsen B, Rodrigues J, Camelo-Filho AE, et al. Clinical, cerebrospinal fluid, and neuroimaging findings in COVID-19 encephalopathy: a case series. Neurol Sci. 2021 Feb;42(2):479-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04946-w
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-020-04946-w
• 9. Siahaan YMT, Puspitasari V, Pangestu A. COVID-19-associated encephalopathy: systematic review of case reports. J Clin Neurol. 2022 Feb 14;18(2):194-206. https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2022.18.2.194
  » https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2022.18.2.194
• 10. Bernard-Valnet R, Pizzarotti B, Anichini A, Demars Y, Russo E, Schmidhauser M, et al. Two patients with acute meningo-encephalitis concomitant to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eur J Neurol. 2020 Sep;27(9):e43-4. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14298
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14298
• 11. Dogan L, Kaya D, Sarikaya T, Zengin R, Dincer A, Akinci IO, et al. Plasmapheresis treatment in COVID-19-related autoimmune meningoencephalitis: case series. Brain Behav Immun. 2020 Jul;87:155-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.022
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.022
• 12. Jarius S, Pache F, Körtvelyessy P, Jelčić I, Stettner M, Franciotta D, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid findings in COVID-19: a multicenter study of 150 lumbar punctures in 127 patients. J Neuroinflammation. 2022 Jan 20;19(1):19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-021-02339-0
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12974-021-02339-0
• 13. Kremer S, Lersy F, Anheim M, Merdji H, Schenck M, Oesterlé H, et al. Neurologic and neuroimaging findings in patients with COVID-19: a retrospective multicenter study. Neurology. 2020 Sep 29;95(13):e1868-82. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010112
  » https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000010112
• 14. Flores-Silva FD, García-Grimshaw M, Valdés-Ferrer SI, Vigueras-Hernández AP, Domínguez-Moreno R, Tristán-Samaniego DP, et al. Neurologic manifestations in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in Mexico City. PLoS One. 2021 Apr 8;16(4):e0247433. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247433
  » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247433
• 15. Caress JB, Castoro RJ, Simmons Z, Scelsa SN, Lewis RA, Ahlawat A, et al. COVID-19-associated Guillain-Barré syndrome: the early pandemic experience. Muscle Nerve. 2020 Oct;62(4):485-91. https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.27024
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.27024
• 16. Keddie S, Pakpoor J, Mousele C, Pipis M, Machado PM, Foster M, et al. Epidemiological and cohort study finds no association between COVID-19 and Guillain-Barré syndrome. Brain. 2021 Mar 3;144(2):682-93. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa433
  » https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa433
• 17. Fernandez PEL, Pereira JM, Risso IF, Silva PBR, Barboza ICF, Silveira CGV, et al. Guillain-Barre syndrome following COVID-19 vaccines: a scoping review. Acta Neurol Scand. 2022 Apr;145(4):393-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13575
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/ane.13575
• 18. Frithiof R, Rostami E, Kumlien E, Virhammar J, Fällmar D, Hultström M, et al. Critical illness polyneuropathy, myopathy and neuronal biomarkers in COVID-19 patients: a prospective study. Clin Neurophysiol. 2021 Jul;132(7):1733-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.03.016
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2021.03.016
• 19. Needham E, Newcombe V, Michell A, Thornton R, Grainger A, Anwar F, et al. Mononeuritis multiplex: an unexpectedly frequent feature of severe COVID-19. J Neurol. 2021 Aug;268(8):2685-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10321-8
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-020-10321-8
• 20. Miller C, O’Sullivan J, Jeffrey J, Power D. Brachial plexus neuropathies during the COVID-19 pandemic: a retrospective case series of 15 patients in critical care. Phys Ther. 2021 Jan 4;101(1):pzaa191. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaa191
  » https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzaa191
• 21. Pardal-Fernández JM, Garcia-Garcia J, Gutiérrez-Rubio JM, Segura T. Plexus-neuropathy due to ilio-psoas hematoma in 4 COVID patients. Med Clin (Barc). 2021 Apr 23;156(8):410-1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2020.11.012
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2020.11.012
• 22. Christie F, Quasim T, Cowan R, King K, McPeake J. Meralgia paraesthetica in intensive care unit survivors of COVID-19. Anaesthesia. 2021 May;76(5):712-3. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15355
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15355
• 23. Acharya S, Thibault M, Lee J, Taha O, Morpurgo AJ, Kshetree BK, et al. COVID-19-induced left sciatic neuropathy requiring prolonged physical medicine and rehabilitation. Cureus. 2021 Jun 21;13(6):e15803. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15803
  » https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.15803
• 24. Brugliera L, Filippi M, Del Carro U, Butera C, Bianchi F, Castellazzi P, et al. Nerve compression injuries after prolonged prone position ventilation in patients with SARS-CoV-2: a case series. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2021 Mar;102(3):359-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.10.131
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2020.10.131
• 25. Sayegh MJ, Larsen CG, Pinpin C, Intravia JM, Nellans KW. Ulnar neuropathy after intermittent prone positioning for COVID-19 infection: a preliminary report of 3 cases. JBJS Case Connect. 2021 Mar 19;11(1):e2000729. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.CC.20.00729
  » https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.CC.20.00729
• 26. Carberry N, Badu H, Ulane CM, Beckley A, Rosenberg SJ, Brenner K, et al. Mononeuropathy multiplex after COVID-19. J Clin Neuromuscul Dis. 2021 Sep 1;23(1):24-30. https://doi.org/10.1097/CND.0000000000000367
  » https://doi.org/10.1097/CND.0000000000000367
• 27. Siegler JE, Cardona P, Arenillas JF, Talavera B, Guillen AN, Chavarría-Miranda A, et al. Cerebrovascular events and outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19: the SVIN COVID-19 multinational registry. Int J Stroke. 2021 Jun;16(4):437-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493020959216
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493020959216
• 28. Nannoni S, de Groot R, Bell S, Markus HS. Stroke in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. 2021 Feb 1;16(2):137-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493020972922
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493020972922
• 29. Dhamoon MS, Thaler A, Gururangan K, Kohli A, Sisniega D, Wheelwright D, et al. Acute cerebrovascular events with COVID-19 infection. Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(1):48-56. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031668
  » https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031668
• 30. Castro RA, Frishman WH. Thrombotic complications of COVID-19 infection: a review. Cardiol Rev. 2021 Jan-Feb;29(1):43-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000347
  » https://doi.org/10.1097/CRD.0000000000000347
• 31. Nissen T, Wynn R. The recent history of the clinical case report: a narrative review. JRSM Short Rep. 2012 Dec 1;3(12):87. https://doi.org/10.1258/shorts.2012.012046
  » https://doi.org/10.1258/shorts.2012.012046
• 32. Wiwanitkit V. The usefulness of case reports in managing emerging infectious disease. J Med Case Rep. 2011 May 20;5:194. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-5-194
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-1947-5-194
• 33. Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus Investigation Team; Dawood FS, Jain S, Finelli L, Shaw MW, Lindstrom S, Garten RJ, et al. Emergence of a novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 18;360(25):2605-15. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0903810
  » https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0903810
• 34. Falagas ME, Koletsi PK, Baskouta E, Rafailidis PI, Dimopoulos G, Karageorgopoulos DE. Pandemic A(H1N1) 2009 influenza: review of the Southern Hemisphere experience. Epidemiol Infect. 2011 Jan;139(1):27-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268810002037
  » https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268810002037
• 35. Zyoud SH. Global research trends of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 7;16:255. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1600-5
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-016-1600-5
• 36. Yun SH, Kim J, Shin H-R. A case report of varicella zoster meningitis as co-infection with breakthrough COVID-19 in an immunocompetent patient. J Korean Med Sci. 2022 Feb 28;37(8):e61. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e61
  » https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e61
• 37. Lee S-U, Kim T, Lee E-S. Acute Bilateral Vestibulopathy Associated With COVID-19. J Clin Neurol. 2022 Mar;18(2):247-9. https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2022.18.2.247
  » https://doi.org/10.3988/jcn.2022.18.2.247
• 38. Matheu A, Saint-Gerons M, Rubio MA, Medrano S, Armentia J. Central retinal artery occlusion and internal carotid artery dissection after COVID-19 nasopharyngeal swab testing. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2022 Apr;45(4):e183-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2022.01.001
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfo.2022.01.001
• 39. Vasconcelos TMF, Nóbrega PR, Ferreira GM, de Souza MLP, Vanderlei AS, de Castro JDV, et al. Normal pressure hydrocephalus associated with COVID-19 infection: a case report. BMC Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 3;22(1):216. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07184-x
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-022-07184-x
• 40. Ivanovic J, Stojanovic M, Ristic A, Sokic D, Vojvodic N. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome presented as a cerebral and systemic vasculitis: a case report. Acta Neurol Belg. 2022 Mar 13;1-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-022-01923-2
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-022-01923-2
• 41. Pimentel GA, Guimarães TG, Silva GD, Scaff M. Case report: neurodegenerative diseases after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, a report of three cases: Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, rapidly progressive Alzheimer’s disease, and frontotemporal dementia. Front Neurol. 2022 Feb 7;13:731369. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.731369
  » https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.731369
• 42. Shepherd E, Smyth D, Sterenstein A, Dorsch A, Mizen T. Post-COVID Wernicke’s presenting as bilateral vision loss. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep. 2022 Mar;25:101271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101271
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajoc.2022.101271
• 43. Monti G, Giovannini G, Marudi A, Bedin R, Melegari A, Simone AM, et al. Anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis presenting as new onset refractory status epilepticus in COVID-19. Seizure. 2020 Oct 1;81:P18-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2020.07.006
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2020.07.006
• 44. Gupta S, Dutta A, Chakraborty U, Kumar R, Das D, Ray BK. Post COVID-19 HSV encephalitis: a review. QJM. 2022 Apr 20;115(4):222-7. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcac060
  » https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcac060
• 45. Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DG, Moher D, Sox H, Riley D, et al. The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. BMJ Case Rep. 2013 Oct 23;2013:bcr2013201554. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-201554
  » https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-201554
• 46. Calvache JA, Vera-Montoya M, Ordoñez D, Hernandez AV, Altman D, Moher D. Completeness of reporting of case reports in high-impact medical journals. Eur J Clin Invest. 2020 Apr;50(4):e13215. https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13215
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13215
• 47. Scaffidi MA, Gimpaya N, Li J, Bansal R, Verma Y, Elsolh K, et al. Completeness of reporting for COVID-19 case reports, January to April 2020: a meta-epidemiologic study. CMAJ Open. 2021 Mar 30;9(1):E295-301. https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200140
  » https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20200140
• 48. Rabeharisoa V, Moreira T, Akrich M. Evidence-based activism: Patients’, users’ and activists’ groups in knowledge society. BioSocieties. 2014 Jun 1;9(2):111-28. https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2014.2
  » https://doi.org/10.1057/biosoc.2014.2
• 49. Jasanoff S, editor. States of knowledge: the co-production of science and the social order. Routledge; 2004. 332 p.
• 50. Lehmann E ¿InternetÁLessons from Northern Italy: Why even great Health Systems collapse under COVID-19 case load. Harvard Global Health Institute; 2020 Mar 10 ¿cited 2022 Mar 31Á. Available from: Available from: https://globalhealth.harvard.edu/lessons-from-northern-italy-why-even-great-health-systems-collapse-under-covid-19-case-load/
  » https://globalhealth.harvard.edu/lessons-from-northern-italy-why-even-great-health-systems-collapse-under-covid-19-case-load/
• 51. Busatto GF, de Araújo AL, Duarte AJS, Levin AS, Guedes BF, Kallas EG, et al. Post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC): a protocol for a multidisciplinary prospective observational evaluation of a cohort of patients surviving hospitalisation in São Paulo, Brazil. BMJ Open. 2021 Jun 30;11(6):e051706. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051706
  » https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051706
• 52. Callard F, Perego E. How and why patients made Long Covid. Soc Sci Med. 2021 Jan;268:113426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113426
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113426
• 53. Perego E, Callard F. Patient-made Long Covid changed COVID-19 (and the production of science, too). SocArXiv. 2021 Feb 9;1-25. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/n8yp6
  » https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/n8yp6
• 54. Dr Elisa Perego. The #LongCovid #COVID19 is starting to be addressed on major newspapers in Italy too: ~20% of tested patients remain covid + for at least 40 days. Prof from Tor Vergata University of Rome notes: there is a lot we don’t know about this virus ¿InternetÁ. @elisaperego78. 2020 May 20 ¿cited 2022 Mar 28Á. Available from: Available from: https://twitter.com/elisaperego78/status/1263172084055838721
  » https://twitter.com/elisaperego78/status/1263172084055838721
• 55. Roth PH, Gadebusch-Bondio M. The contested meaning of “long COVID” - Patients, doctors, and the politics of subjective evidence. Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114619
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114619
• 56. Keay L ¿InternetÁ. Long-term COVID warning: ICU doctor reports having coronavirus symptoms for three months. Sky News; 2020 Jun 25 ¿cited 2022 Mar 28Á. Available from: Available from: https://news.sky.com/story/long-term-covid-warning-icu-doctor-reports-having-coronavirus-symptoms-for-three-months-12014361
  » https://news.sky.com/story/long-term-covid-warning-icu-doctor-reports-having-coronavirus-symptoms-for-three-months-12014361
• 57. Lokurage AU, Taylor S, Rayner C ¿InternetÁ. Patients’ experiences of “longcovid” are missing from the NHS narrative ¿InternetÁ. The BMJ opinion; 2020 Jul 10 ¿cited 2022 Mar 28Á. Available from: Available from: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/07/10/patients-experiences-of-longcovid-are-missing-from-the-nhs-narrative/
  » https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/07/10/patients-experiences-of-longcovid-are-missing-from-the-nhs-narrative/
• 58. Miyake E, Martin S. Long Covid: Online patient narratives, public health communication and vaccine hesitancy. Digit Health. 2021 Nov 29;7:20552076211059649. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076211059649
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076211059649
• 59. Camacho KG, Gomes Junior SCDS, Reis AT, Junqueira-Marinho MF, França LCM, Abramov DM, et al. Repercussions of the COVID-19 pandemic on health professionals in the state of Rio de Janeiro / Brazil. PLoS One. 2022 Jan 21;17(1):e0261814. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261814
  » https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0261814
• 60. Alwan NA, Attree E, Blair JM, Bogaert D, Bowen M-A, Boyle J, et al. From doctors as patients: a manifesto for tackling persisting symptoms of covid-19. BMJ. 2020 Sep 15;370:m3565. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3565
  » https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m3565
• 61. Gorna R, MacDermott N, Rayner C, O’Hara M, Evans S, Agyen L, et al. Long COVID guidelines need to reflect lived experience. Lancet. 2021 Feb 6;397(10273):455-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32705-7
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32705-7
• 62. World Health Organization ¿InternetÁ. Emergency use ICD codes for COVID-19 disease outbreak. 2020 ¿cited 2022 Mar 31Á. Available from: Available from: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases/emergency-use-icd-codes-for-covid-19-disease-outbreak
  » https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases/emergency-use-icd-codes-for-covid-19-disease-outbreak
• 63. World Health Organization ¿InternetÁ. A clinical case definition of post COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus, 6 October 2021. 2021 Oct 6 ¿cited 2022 Mar 31Á. Available from: Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-2019-nCoV-Post_COVID-19_condition-Clinical_case_definition-2021.1
  » https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/WHO-2019-nCoV-Post_COVID-19_condition-Clinical_case_definition-2021.1
• 64. Nalbandian A, Sehgal K, Gupta A, Madhavan MV, McGroder C, Stevens JS, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med. 2021 Apr;27(4):601-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z
• 65. Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, Luciano S, Harrison PJ. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021 May 1;8(5):P416-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00084-5
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S2215-0366(21)00084-5
• 66. Crook H, Raza S, Nowell J, Young M, Edison P. Long covid-mechanisms, risk factors, and management. BMJ. 2021 Jul 26;374:n1648. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1648
  » https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1648
• 67. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, Li X, Ren L, Gu X, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet. 2021 Jan 16;397(10270):220-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32656-8
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32656-8
• 68. Davis HE, Assaf GS, McCorkell L, Wei H, Low RJ, Re’em Y, et al. Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Aug 1;38:101019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101019
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101019
• 69. Lopez-Leon S, Wegman-Ostrosky T, Perelman C, Sepulveda R, Rebolledo PA, Cuapio A, et al. More than 50 long-term effects of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 9;11(1):16144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95565-8
  » https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-95565-8
• 70. Bolay H, Gül A, Baykan B. COVID-19 is a real headache! Headache. 2020 Jul-Aug;60(7):1415-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13856
  » https://doi.org/10.1111/head.13856
• 71. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018 Jan 25;38(1):1-211. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417738202
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102417738202
• 72. Uygun Ö, Ertaş M, Ekizoğlu E, Bolay H, Özge A, Orhan EK, et al. Headache characteristics in COVID-19 pandemic-a survey study. J Headache Pain. 2020 Oct 13;21(1):121. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01188-1
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01188-1
• 73. Caronna E, Ballvé A, Llauradó A, Gallardo VJ, Ariton DM, Lallana S, et al. Headache: a striking prodromal and persistent symptom, predictive of COVID-19 clinical evolution. Cephalalgia Int J Headache. 2020 Nov 4;40(13):1410-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102420965157
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102420965157
• 74. Trigo J, García-Azorín D, Planchuelo-Gómez Á, Martínez-Pías E, Talavera B, Hernández-Pérez I, et al. Factors associated with the presence of headache in hospitalized COVID-19 patients and impact on prognosis: a retrospective cohort study. J Headache Pain. 2020 Jul 29;21(1):94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01165-8
  » https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01165-8
• 75. Garcia-Azorin D, Layos-Romero A, Porta-Etessam J, Membrilla JA, Caronna E, Gonzalez-Martinez A, et al. Post-COVID-19 persistent headache: a multicentric 9-months follow-up study of 905 patients. Cephalalgia. 2022 Jul 1;42(8):804-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211068074
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211068074
• 76. Martelletti P, Bentivegna E, Spuntarelli V, Luciani M. Long-COVID headache. SN Compr Clin Med. 2021 Aug;3(8):1704-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-021-00964-7
  » https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-021-00964-7
• 77. Jafari E, Togha M, Kazemizadeh H, Haghighi S, Nasergivehchi S, Saatchi M, et al. Evaluation of headache associated with personal protective equipment during COVID-19. Brain Behav. 2021 Dec;11(12):e2435. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2435
  » https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2435
• 78. Silvestro M, Tessitore A, Orologio I, Sozio P, Napolitano G, Siciliano M, et al. Headache worsening after COVID-19 vaccination: an online questionnaire-based study on 841 patients with migraine. J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 16;10(24):5914. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245914
  » https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10245914
• 79. Cerami C, Crespi C, Bottiroli S, Santi GC, Sances G, Allena M, et al. High perceived isolation and reduced social support affect headache impact levels in migraine after the Covid-19 outbreak: a cross sectional survey on chronic and episodic patients. Cephalalgia. 2021 Dec 1;41(14):1437-46. https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211027568
  » https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024211027568
• 80. Machado FC, Carone Neto G, Carone RSD. Sphenopalatine ganglion block for refractory COVID-19 headache: a descriptive case series. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021 Nov-Dec;71(6):667-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.024
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2021.04.024
• 81. Damiano RF, Caruso MJG, Cincoto AV, Rocca CCA, Serafim AP, Bacchi P, et al. Post-COVID-19 psychiatric and cognitive morbidity: preliminary findings from a Brazilian cohort study. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2022 Mar-Apr;75:38-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.01.002
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.01.002
• 82. Premraj L, Kannapadi NV, Briggs J, Seal SM, Battaglini D, Fanning J, et al. Mid and long-term neurological and neuropsychiatric manifestations of post-COVID-19 syndrome: a meta-analysis. J Neurol Sci. 2022 Mar 15;434:120162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2022.120162
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jns.2022.120162
• 83. Wen D, Xu J, Wu Z, Liu Y, Zhou Y, Li J, et al. The effective cognitive assessment and training methods for COVID-19 patients with cognitive impairment. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jan 11;13:827273. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.827273
  » https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2021.827273
• 84. Lee Y, Lui LMW, Chen-Li D, Liao Y, Mansur RB, Brietzke E, et al. Government response moderates the mental health impact of COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis of depression outcomes across countries. J Affect Disord. 2021 Jul 1;290:364-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.050
  » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.04.050
• 85. Yong E ¿InternetÁ. Long-Haulers Are Redefining COVID-19 ¿InternetÁ. The Atlantic; 2020 Aug 19 ¿cited 2022 Apr 3Á. Available from: Available from: https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/08/long-haulers-covid-19-recognition-support-groups-symptoms/615382/
  » https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2020/08/long-haulers-covid-19-recognition-support-groups-symptoms/615382/
• 86. Garner P ¿InternetÁ. Paul Garner: Covid-19 and fatigue-a game of snakes and ladders. The BMJ opinion; 2020 May 19 ¿cited 2022 Apr 3Á. Available fromAvailable from: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/05/19/paul-garner-covid-19-and-fatigue-a-game-of-snakes-and-ladders/
  » https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2020/05/19/paul-garner-covid-19-and-fatigue-a-game-of-snakes-and-ladders/
• 87. Manddrola JM ¿InternetÁ. Why long COVID worries me. Medscape; 2021 Apr 5 ¿cited 2022 Apr 3Á. Available from: Available from: http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/948674
  » http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/948674

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  12 Aug 2022
• Date of issue
  May 2022

History

• Received
  04 Apr 2022
• Accepted
  29 Apr 2022