Aplicação exógena de ácido salicílico na mitigação do estresse salino em Capsicum annuum L.

Silva, André Alisson Rodrigues da; Lima, Geovani Soares de; Azevedo, Carlos Alberto Vieira de; Veloso, Luana Lucas de Sá Almeida; Souza, Leandro de Pádua; Fátima, Reynaldo Teodoro de; Silva, Francisco de Assis da; Gheyi, Hans Raj

Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Brasil
SciELO.org - Rede SciELO
Blog SciELO em Perspectiva

Abrir menu

Brasil

Español English

Ciência Rural

Submissão de manuscritos
Sobre o periódico
Corpo Editorial
Instruções aos autores
Contato

sumário « anterior atual seguinte »

Resumo (Inglês)
Resumo (Português)

Texto (Inglês)

Download PDF (Inglês)

Compartilhe

Compartilhe
E-mail
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
LinkedIn
Reddit
StambleUpon
CiteULike
Mendeley

Sumário

Compartilhe
E-mail
Facebook
Twitter
Google+
LinkedIn
Reddit
StambleUpon
CiteULike
Mendeley

Resumo (Inglês)
Resumo (Português)

Texto (Inglês)

Download PDF (Inglês)

Crop production • Cienc. Rural 53 (7) • 2023 • https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20210447 copiar

Aplicação exógena de ácido salicílico na mitigação do estresse salino em Capsicum annuum L.

Autoria SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

RESUMO:

A salinidade tem afetado negativamente o cultivo de hortaliças, sobretudo em regiões semiáridas. Neste sentido, o uso de elicitores que atuem na indução de tolerância ao estresse salino, como ácido salicílico, tem se destacado como uma alternativa promissora. Objetivou-se com esse estudo, avaliar os efeitos da pulverização foliar do ácido salicílico na mitigação do estresse salino na morfofisiologia e produção do pimentão cv. All Big. O estudo foi conduzido em casa de vegetação em Campina Grande - PB, utilizando-se o delineamento inteiramente casualizado, em arranjo fatorial 4 x 4, sendo quatro níveis de condutividade elétrica da água de irrigação (0,8; 1,6; 2,4; e 3,2 dS m^-1) e quatro concentrações de ácido salicílico (0; 1,2; 2,4 e 3,6 mM), com três repetições. A aplicação foliar de ácido salicílico na concentração de 1,6 mM atenuou os efeitos do estresse salino nas trocas gasosas, no crescimento, no peso médio de fruto e na produção total por planta, e diminuiu a porcentagem de extravasamento de eletrólitos intercelulares das plantas de pimentão cv. All Big aos 80 dias após o semeio.

Palavras-chave:
pimentão; águas salinas; tolerância a salinidade; elicitor

Autoria

André Alisson Rodrigues da Silva ^*E-mail: andrealisson_cgpb@hotmail.com. *Corresponding author

Unidade Acadêmica de Engenharia Agrícola, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG), 58429-900, Campina Grande, PB, Brasil. Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG)BrazilCampina Grande, PB, BrazilUnidade Acadêmica de Engenharia Agrícola, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG), 58429-900, Campina Grande, PB, Brasil.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9453-1192

Geovani Soares de Lima

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9960-1858

Carlos Alberto Vieira de Azevedo

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7336-1243

Luana Lucas de Sá Almeida Veloso

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0537-7985

Leandro de Pádua Souza

Unidade Acadêmica de Serra Talhada, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Serra Talhada, PE, Brasil.Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE)BrazilSerra Talhada, PE, BrazilUnidade Acadêmica de Serra Talhada, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (UFRPE), Serra Talhada, PE, Brasil.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7588-2413

Reynaldo Teodoro de Fátima

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0463-4417

Francisco de Assis da Silva

https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4558-1147

Hans Raj Gheyi

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1066-0315

E-mail: andrealisson_cgpb@hotmail.com. ^*Corresponding author

Editors: Leandro Souza da Silva(0000-0002-1636-6643) Maria Jaislanny Medeiros(0000-0003-3912-5073)

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS

All authors conceived and designed experiment. All authors participated in preparation of the draft of the manuscript. All authors critically revised the manuscript and approved the final version.

SCIMAGO INSTITUTIONS RANKINGS

Figuras | Tabelas

Figuras (7)
Tabelas (4)

Thumbnail

Figure 1
Temperature (maximum and minimum) and average relative air humidity observed in the internal area of the greenhouse during the experimental period.

Thumbnail

Figure 2 -
Internal CO₂ concentration - Ci of bell pepper plants cv. All Big as a function of the electrical conductivity of the water - ECw, at 80 days after sowing. ^**Significant at P ≤ 0.01. Vertical bars represent the standard error of mean (n=3).

Thumbnail

Figure 3 -
Response surface for stomatal conductance - gs (A), CO₂ assimilation rate - A (B), carboxylation efficiency - CE (C), and water use efficiency - WUE (D) of bell pepper plants as a function of the interaction between the electrical conductivity of the water - ECw and salicylic acid concentrations, at 80 days after sowing. ^{* and**}Significant at P ≤ 0.05 and P ≤ 0.01, respectively.

Thumbnail

Figure 4 -
Plant height (A) and the number of leaves (E) as a function of the electrical conductivity of the water - ECw and salicylic acid concentrations - SA (B and F); and response surface for stem diameter (C) and leaf area (D) of bell pepper plants as a function of the interaction between ECw and SA concentrations, at 80 days after sowing. ^{* and**}Significant at P ≤ 0.05 and P ≤ 0.01, respectively. Vertical bars represent the standard error of mean (n=3).

Thumbnail

Figure 5 - Response surface for the dry mass of leaf - LDM (A), stem - SDM (B), and root - RDM (C) of bell pepper plants as a function of the interaction between the electrical conductivity of the water - ECw and salicylic acid concentrations, at 105 days after sowing. ^{* and}
^**Significant at P ≤ 0.05 and P ≤ 0.01, respectively.

Thumbnail

Figure 6
- Specific leaf area - SLA (A) and leaf succulence - SUC (C) as a function of the electrical conductivity of the water - ECw and SLA as a function of salicylic acid - SA concentrations (B); and response surface for the percentage of intercellular electrolyte leakage - % IEL (D) as a function of the interaction between ECw and SA concentrations, at 80 days after sowing. ^{* and**}Significant at P ≤ 0.05 and P ≤ 0.01, respectively. Vertical bars represent the standard error of mean (n=3).

Thumbnail

Figure 7 -
Response surface for average fruit weight - AFW (A) and total production per plant - TPP (B) as a function of the interaction between the electrical conductivity of the water - ECw and salicylic acid concentrations. ^**Significant at P ≤ 0.01.

Thumbnail

Table 1
Chemical and physical attributes of the soil used in the experiment before application of the treatments.

Thumbnail

Table 2
Summary of the analysis of variance of the internal CO₂ concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration (E), CO₂ assimilation rate (A), carboxylation efficiency (CE), and water use efficiency (WUE) of bell pepper plants cv. All Big irrigated with saline waters and subjected to foliar application of salicylic acid, at 80 days after sowing.

Thumbnail

Table 3
Summary of the analysis of variance for plant height (PH), stem diameter (SD), leaf area (LA), number of leaves (NL), dry mass of leaf (LDM), stem (SDM), and root (RDM) of bell pepper plants cv. All Big irrigated with saline water and subjected to foliar application of salicylic acid, at 80 days after sowing.

Thumbnail

Table 4
Summary of the analysis of variance for the specific leaf area (SLA), leaf succulence (SUC), percentage of intercellular electrolyte leakage (% IEL), average fruit weight (AFW), and total production per plant (TPP) of bell pepper irrigated with saline waters and subjected to foliar application of salicylic acid.

Figure 1 Temperature (maximum and minimum) and average relative air humidity observed in the internal area of the greenhouse during the experimental period.

Figure 2 - Internal CO₂ concentration - Ci of bell pepper plants cv. All Big as a function of the electrical conductivity of the water - ECw, at 80 days after sowing. ^**Significant at P ≤ 0.01. Vertical bars represent the standard error of mean (n=3).

Figure 3 - Response surface for stomatal conductance - gs (A), CO₂ assimilation rate - A (B), carboxylation efficiency - CE (C), and water use efficiency - WUE (D) of bell pepper plants as a function of the interaction between the electrical conductivity of the water - ECw and salicylic acid concentrations, at 80 days after sowing. ^{* and**}Significant at P ≤ 0.05 and P ≤ 0.01, respectively.

Figure 4 - Plant height (A) and the number of leaves (E) as a function of the electrical conductivity of the water - ECw and salicylic acid concentrations - SA (B and F); and response surface for stem diameter (C) and leaf area (D) of bell pepper plants as a function of the interaction between ECw and SA concentrations, at 80 days after sowing. ^{* and**}Significant at P ≤ 0.05 and P ≤ 0.01, respectively. Vertical bars represent the standard error of mean (n=3).

Figure 5 - Response surface for the dry mass of leaf - LDM (A), stem - SDM (B), and root - RDM (C) of bell pepper plants as a function of the interaction between the electrical conductivity of the water - ECw and salicylic acid concentrations, at 105 days after sowing. ^{* and} ^**Significant at P ≤ 0.05 and P ≤ 0.01, respectively.

Figure 6 - Specific leaf area - SLA (A) and leaf succulence - SUC (C) as a function of the electrical conductivity of the water - ECw and SLA as a function of salicylic acid - SA concentrations (B); and response surface for the percentage of intercellular electrolyte leakage - % IEL (D) as a function of the interaction between ECw and SA concentrations, at 80 days after sowing. ^{* and**}Significant at P ≤ 0.05 and P ≤ 0.01, respectively. Vertical bars represent the standard error of mean (n=3).

Figure 7 - Response surface for average fruit weight - AFW (A) and total production per plant - TPP (B) as a function of the interaction between the electrical conductivity of the water - ECw and salicylic acid concentrations. ^**Significant at P ≤ 0.01.

Table 1 Chemical and physical attributes of the soil used in the experiment before application of the treatments.

--------------------------------------------------------------------Chemical characteristics-------------------------------------------------------------------
pH (H₂O) (1:2.5)	OM dag kg^-1	P (mg kg^-1)	K⁺	Na⁺	Ca²⁺	Mg²⁺	Al³⁺ + H⁺	PST (%)	ECse (dS m^-1)
			----------------------------------(cmol_c kg^-1)----------------------------------
5.90	1.36	6.80	0.22	0.16	2.60	3.66	1.93	1.87	1.0
--------------------------------------------------------------------Physical characteristics--------------------------------------------------------------------
-----------Size fraction (g kg^-1) -----------			Textural class	Water content (kPa)		AW	Total porosity %	BD	PD
Sand	Silt	Clay		33.42^*	1519.5^** dag kg^-1			(kg dm^-3)
732.9	142.1	125.0	SL	11.98	4.32	7.66	47.74	1.39	2,66

OM - Organic matter: Walkley-Black Wet Digestion; Ca²⁺ and Mg²⁺ extracted with 1 M KCl at pH 7.0; Na⁺ and K⁺ extracted with 1 M NH₄OAc at pH 7.0; Al³⁺ and H⁺ extracted with 0.5 M CaOAc at pH 7.0; ESP - Exchangeable sodium percentage; ECse - Electrical conductivity of saturation extract; SL - Sandy loam; AW - Available water; AD - Apparent density; PD - Particle density; ^* - Field capacity; ^** - Wilting point.

Table 2 Summary of the analysis of variance of the internal CO₂ concentration (Ci), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration (E), CO₂ assimilation rate (A), carboxylation efficiency (CE), and water use efficiency (WUE) of bell pepper plants cv. All Big irrigated with saline waters and subjected to foliar application of salicylic acid, at 80 days after sowing.

Source of variation	DF	---------------------------------------------Mean squares---------------------------------------------
		Ci	gs	E	A	CE	WUE
Salinity levels (SL)	3	2640.55^**	0.002^ns	0.13^ns	270.64^**	0.02^**	5.49^**
Linear regression	1	7616.26^**	0.003^ns	0.19^ns	772.21^**	0.05^**	16.05^**
Quadratic regression	1	96.33^ns	0.002^ns	0.08^ns	26.41^ns	0.009^ns	0.29^ns
Salicylic acid (SA)	3	269.55^ns	0.005^ns	0.07^ns	107.08^**	0.002^ns	3.97^**
Linear regression	1	112.06^ns	0.0013^ns	0.12^ns	11.82^ns	0.001^ns	0.81^ns
Quadratic regression	1	341.33^ns	0.0011^ns	0.07^ns	206.51^**	0.005^ns	7.59^**
Interaction (SL × SA)	9	484.08^ns	0.007^*	0.36^ns	32.30^*	0.01^**	2.24^**
Residue	30	163.59	0.093	0.22	11.88	0.002	0.59
CV (%)		7.90	12.41	7.91	9.69	17.26	12.90

^ns, ^*, ^** not significant, significant at P ≤ 0.05 and P ≤ 0.01, respectively. CV: Coefficient of variation.

Table 3 Summary of the analysis of variance for plant height (PH), stem diameter (SD), leaf area (LA), number of leaves (NL), dry mass of leaf (LDM), stem (SDM), and root (RDM) of bell pepper plants cv. All Big irrigated with saline water and subjected to foliar application of salicylic acid, at 80 days after sowing.

Source of variation	DF	-----------------------------------------------Mean squares----------------------------------------------
		PH	SD	LA	NL	LDM	SDM	RDM
Salinity levels (SL)	3	80.55^**	1.28^**	516337.1^**	412.14^**	26.97^**	18.72^**	7.91^**
Linear regression	1	231.08^**	0.03^ns	792858.4^*	1188.01^**	75.25^**	50.79^**	5.30^ns
Quadratic regression	1	4.38^ns	2.18^*	701340.9^**	48.01^ns	2.14^ns	0.43^ns	10.01^**
Salicylic acid (SA)	3	35.13^*	0.24^ns	1059816^**	325.80^**	13.47^**	5.15^**	2.32^*
Linear regression	1	9.01^ns	0.12^ns	202695.8^*	201.66^ns	2.73^ns	4.12^ns	0.61^ns
Quadratic regression	1	76.25^**	0.38^ns	1930325.1^**	705.33^**	23.53^**	11.22^**	3.91^*
Interaction (SL × SA)	9	2.06^ns	0.69^*	134214^**	59.49^ns	2.01^*	3.87^**	1.47^*
Residue	30	9.71	0.31	24338	44.87	0.93	0.63	0.69
CV (%)		6.77	6.57	8.94	13.61	7.71	9.48	14.44

^ns, ^*, ^** not significant, significant at P ≤ 0.05 and P ≤ 0.01, respectively. CV: Coefficient of variation.

Table 4 Summary of the analysis of variance for the specific leaf area (SLA), leaf succulence (SUC), percentage of intercellular electrolyte leakage (% IEL), average fruit weight (AFW), and total production per plant (TPP) of bell pepper irrigated with saline waters and subjected to foliar application of salicylic acid.

Source of variation	DF	--------------------------------------------Mean squares-------------------------------------------
		SLA	SUC	% IEL	AFW	TPP
Salinity levels (SL)	3	2420.36^**	0.0011^**	994.24^**	67.41^**	21870.3^**
Linear regression	1	5741.22^**	6.7x10^-4**	2754.99^**	180.18^**	64402.2^**
Quadratic regression	1	373.12^ns	1.7x10^-5ns	0.15^ns	22.07^ns	75.0^ns
Salicylic acid (SA)	3	2526.26^**	2.3x10^-4ns	95.53^ns	66.06^**	8773.9^**
Linear regression	1	3500.87^*	1.3x10^-3ns	21.80^ns	127.22^*	2130.5^ns
Quadratic regression	1	2913.61^**	1.1x10^-3ns	241.53^ns	70.27^**	18246.6^**
Interaction (SL × SA)	9	382.14^ns	5.7x10^-5ns	168.81^**	108.42^**	4433.2^**
Residue	30	198.61	7.8x10^-5ns	36.49	13.52	729.9
CV (%)		10.11	22.11	19.20	10.67	11.36

^ns, ^*, ^** not significant, significant at P≤0.05 and P≤0.01, respectively. CV: Coefficient of variation.

Como citar

copiar

Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciências Rurais , 97105-900 Santa Maria RS Brazil , Tel.: +55 55 3220-8698 , Fax: +55 55 3220-8695 - Santa Maria - RS - Brazil
E-mail: cienciarural@mail.ufsm.br

Acompanhe os números deste periódico no seu leitor de RSS

Versão para download de PDF

PDF

Inglês

Versões e tradução automática

Versão original do texto

English

Tradução automática

Google Translator
Microsoft Translator

Como citar

RIS

BIBTEX

Outros formatos de citação e exportação:

SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online
Rua Dr. Diogo de Faria, 1087 – 9º andar – Vila Clementino 04037-003 São Paulo/SP - Brasil
E-mail: scielo@scielo.org

Leia a Declaração de Acesso Aberto

Métricas

Aplicação exógena de ácido salicílico na mitigação do estresse salino em Capsicum annuum L.

PlumX

Mensagem

[1] E-mail: andrealisson_cgpb@hotmail.com. ^*Corresponding author