The scope of this study was to correlate toothache with social and economic conditions, access to oral health facilities and the lifestyle of adolescents in Sobral in the state of Ceará. It was conducted as a cross-sectional analytical study with a sample composed of 688 adolescents. The prevalence of toothache in the study group was 31.8%. A chi-square test of association was performed to measure the relationship between independent variables and toothache, estimating the prevalence ratio by Poisson regression. The factors that demonstrated the closest relationship with toothache were cavity severity, the reason for dental treatment being related to urgency, frequency of dental appointments and the distribution of toothbrushes at school. It was observed that the high prevalence of dental pain in adolescents is directly linked to the access conditions, as well as the characteristics of the actions developed by the health services. Just as there is a need for the deployment of services related to health promotion, based on equity and integration, it is necessary to introduce emergency services to intervene not just to curtail crippling pain, but also as a mechanism to stimulate the development of procedures for the prevention of oral diseases.
Dental caries; Toothache; Adolescent; Social conditions; Oral health services
O objetivo deste estudo foi relacionar dor de dente com condição socioeconômica, acesso aos serviços de saúde bucal e estilo de vida em adolescentes do município de Sobral, Ceará, desenvolvido com delineamento transversal analítico, com amostra composta por 688 indivíduos. A prevalência de dor de dente no grupo pesquisado foi de 31,8%. Para avaliar a relação entre as variáveis independentes e a dor de dente, realizou-se teste de associação pelo qui-quadrado, estimando-se a razão de prevalências por meio da regressão de Poisson. Os fatores que mais demonstraram relação com a dor de dente foram severidade da cárie, motivo do atendimento odontológico relacionado com urgência, frequência ao dentista e recebimento de escova na escola. Observou-se que a alta prevalência de dor de dente em adolescentes está diretamente relacionada às condições de acesso, assim como às características das ações desenvolvidas pelos serviços de saúde. Assim como há necessidade da implantação de serviços vinculados à promoção de saúde, pautados pela equidade e integralidade, é necessária a implantação de serviços de urgência que não simplesmente intervenham na dor de forma mutiladora, mas a encarem como mecanismo de estímulo ao desenvolvimento de procedimentos de prevenção das doenças bucais.
Cárie dentária; Odontalgia; Adolescente; Condições sociais; Serviços de saúde Bucal
Toothache is still one of the main problems that lead people to seek dental treatment, representing a substantial impact on public health. This is because its magnitude is sufficiently large to cause undesirable situations, such as difficulty sleeping, decrease in work productivity, school absenteeism and rejection of certain foods, negatively impacting the daily life of the individual and the community1-4.
Caries can be considered one of the principal causes of dental pain5,6. Thus, there is a clear association between the "missing" component of the DMFT index and toothache7,8. In response to this demand, some services (public and private) use the most common procedure to solve the problem: traditional mutilation by tooth extraction9.
Corroborating this assertion Narvai et al.10, using data available from the Ministry of Health, observed that in the public sector dental extractions correspond to 14% of the basic procedures offered, and that this proportion varies from 22% in the Northeast to 8% in the Southeast, reaching 100% in some municipalities.
Another important factor related to dental services is the fear of oral surgeons and dental clinic procedures still experienced by a large part of the population. In a recent study11 is reported that after dental treatment that began with toothache, adolescents are less likely to seek further dental service owing to their mistrust of oral surgeons and high anxiety. According to the authors, these elements explain the irregular pattern of dental attendance in adolescents.
Toothache has also been associated with oral health care standards. People with restricted access to dental services tend to report toothache and seek urgent care more frequently6. In addition to interfering with individual quality of the life, pain is influenced by social conditions and access to dental services. According to Ekanayake and Mendis12, pain of dental origin is a significant predictor of the usage of such services.
Despite its magnitude and impact on people's daily activities, there are still few epidemiological studies on oral health that include questionnaires regarding toothache13. In Chinese adolescents was observed a 41% prevalence of toothache at ages 11, 13, 1514, while in the United Kingdom was found 26% prevalence at age 12 and 20% at age 1515.
Irrespective of the age group studied or pain assessment scale, Pau et al.16 concluded that toothache has a significant effect on children, teenagers and adults worldwide.
In Brazil, the first national study to include self-reported toothache in adolescents (SBBrasil 200317) showed that 35.7% of those interviewed between ages 15 and 19 described having experienced toothache in the six months prior to research.
The study aimed to correlate toothache with socioeconomic conditions, access to oral health facilities and lifestyle of adolescents in the municipality of Sobral, Brazil.
This is a cross-sectional analytical study aimed at identifying contributing factors to explain toothache in adolescents in the municipality of Sobral, Brazil.
The present research draws on data obtained from an investigation entitled "Health conditions of children in Sobral, Brazil", conducted from 1999 to 2000 with children aged five to nine years. On that occasion, 3,425 children were evaluated, resulting in a sub-sample of 1,021 who were assessed with respect to indexes of oral health (dental caries, gingival condition and malocclusions). This number was obtained from the estimate of 30% malocclusion prevalence, associated with a margin of relative error of 10%, a 95% confidence level and 15% rate of non-respondents18.
Five years after the execution of the study, an active search was undertaken of the 1,021 children (now teenagers), for the purpose of performing a longitudinal study to determine cavity incidence and associated factors19. The study sample consists of the 688 individuals (67.4%) who were located (Figure 1).
The variable under analysis in this investigation, prevalence of pain from reported dental origin, has an estimated prevalence of 33.6% in northeastern adolescents20. Taking into account this value, the sample of 688 adolescents has sufficient power to estimate prevalence, with a 10.5% margin of error for α = 0.05.
Since active search was used in the second study and taking into account that age is an important variable in determining tooth damage, distribution was analyzed at two different times (Figure 2). Distributions were found to be the same (p < 0.001 on the chi-square test), making age-related selection bias negligible.
Data collection was performed using two research instruments: a) clinical form for oral exams created from the codes and criteria advocated by the WHO13 for epidemiological surveys of oral health, identifying dental caries gingival alterations and malocclusion and b) semi-structured questionnaire applied to adolescents, addressing aspects relative to socioeconomic conditions, access to health services and lifestyle, in addition to toothache incidence in the last six months.
Researchers participated in technical training in order to establish patterns for examination and questionnaire application as well as calibration, using inter-rater consensus. General agreement between 0.92 and 0.97% was observed and Kappa coefficient varying from 0.86 to 0.96 was observed, demonstrating a high degree of reproducibility.
Seven teams composed of dentists (examiners) and dental assistants (recorders) from the Municipal Health Secretariat of Sobral collected field data. Preliminary contact was made by community health agents from the Family Health Strategy in light of their bond with and proximity to the community. Agents then scheduled home visits where oral examinations were performed and the questionnaire was applied.
With the aim of standardizing clinical examinations, a toothbrush was given to every study participant. Results of these types of studies show that brushing prior to examination generally results in greater diagnostic efficiency21. Independent variables present in the study were grouped into three categories: socioeconomic conditions, access to health services and lifestyle (Chart 1) The outcome variable was toothache, identified as "present" or "absent".
The field data collected were entered and processed twice by Epi Info 6.04 software. SPSS 13.0 software was employed for data processing and statistical analysis. Independent variables were dichotomized for bivariate analysis, which was followed by Poisson regression to determine variables with the greatest influence on the toothache observed.
The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee at Vale do Acaraú State University. Participant safety was ensured, in addition to their anonymity and privacy.
Participants were 352 male and 336 female adolescents between ages 11 and 15, residents of the urban zone of Sobral, Brazil. Age distribution was as follows: 126 11 year-olds, 137 12 year-olds, 128 13 year -olds, 131 14 year-olds and 166 15 year olds.
In relation to categorized variables such as "socioeconomic condition", 97.4% of subjects were students and of these, 89.1% studied in public schools. Of this total, 84.9% lived in their own residence. For variables related to "access to health services", 87.1% classified dental services as good or excellent and 92% provided complete vaccination records. Of those who experienced malnutrition in childhood, 16.1% participated in malnourishment programs, while only 6% had access to private health care. With regard to "lifestyle", 82.8% evaluated their mastication as good or excellent, as did 95% in relation to speech. Toothpaste and toothbrushes are used by 99.6% and 98.4% of the adolescents, respectively, in contrast to dental floss, which is used by only 8.1% of the study subjects. Another practically universal measure is the public supply of fluoride-treated water, which reaches 98.7% of this population.
The remaining independent study variables were dichotomized in situations of exposure and non-exposure for bivariate analysis.
The prevalence of toothache in the study population was 31.8% (CI95%= 28.3% - 35.3%).
Following this first analysis, the variables relative to socioeconomic conditions (born in Sobral, sewage, garbage, malnutrition, school lunches, failing grades, maternal and paternal schooling and income, race of adolescent, father and mother), access to services (dental attendance, orientation regarding prevention, no treatment from dental service; location where they were not treated; reason for not receiving treatment; implementation of collective actions; site where public actions were implemented, locality where orientation was received; who provides orientation, basic health unit (BHU) access, receive visits from the community health agent (CHA) enrolment in Family Health Program (FHP) and lifestyle (brushing frequency/day, relationships, use of pacifier, use of baby bottle, thumb-sucking, nursery, preschool and elementary school attendance) showed no statistical significance to explain toothache.
Poisson regression was performed with variables exhibiting p < 0.20 in univariate analysis. Of variables related to socio-economic conditions, only "individuals per room" was included in the model as a control variable. For variables associated with access to service, "frequency of dental visits" (length of time between visits), "reason for treatment" (reason for the visit related to pain), "received a toothbrush" (receiving a toothbrush, especially at school) and total "DMFT" (caries severity) were statistically significant. As to lifestyle, statistically significant variables after Poisson logistical regression were "oral health perception" (related to the adolescent's self-perception of oral health) and "believes in the need for treatment" (need for treatment). Distribution of these variables is displayed in Table 1.
Factors demonstrating the highest correlation with toothache were total DMFT, indicating the importance of caries severity in determining toothache and those related to treatment being associated with emergency care.
Another factor showing substantial correlation with toothache was frequency of dental visits, indicating those that visit the dentist at least once a year had more toothache than those who had not seen a dentist for over one year.
Receiving a toothbrush where collective oral health is practiced, especially at school, was shown to be a significant factor for the non-occurrence of toothache.
Toothache is one of the most traumatic experiences for those requiring treatment, since public sector care is still not universal and access to private services is invariably "open" to a very limited portion of the population, especially when health plans are included. It is therefore necessary to understand its magnitude and seek mechanisms for maximum avoidance of toothache.
In the present study, prevalence of toothache among teenagers studied was 31.8%, similar to observed in Greek adolescents between 11 and 13 years of age (37%)22 and similar to the prevalence of 33.7% in children between 12 and 13 years of age examined in Florianopolis, Brazil23. Bastos et al.6 found a 21.2% prevalence of toothache in young army personnel in Florianopolis, Brazil. Research conducted by Goes et al.20, also in the Brazilian Northeast, involved adolescents between 14 and 15 years of age and showed an incidence of 33.6%, very similar to that recorded in the present study. Finally, our findings corroborate those obtained in a national study (SBBrasil 200317), which indicated a prevalence of 35.7% in 15 to 19 year-old adolescents.
Among the study variables, severity of dental caries was a highly significant independent variable in explaining the occurrence of toothache. Dental caries are the most prevalent illness in oral cavities. Adolescents with total DMF (dmft + DMFT) > 2 presented with greater prevalence of toothache than those with DMFT < 2. These findings are in accordance with those described in a study on children aged 12 and 13 years23, which found a 2.9-fold greater risk in children with DMFT > 1. These data agree with those obtained by Slade4, showing dental caries as a predictor for identifying individuals at higher risk of toothache and emphasizing the significant influence of dental caries in determining suffering and dental mutilation. According to Petersen et al.24 the most pressing concern is the pain experienced by children and adults as a result of acute caries toothaches. These teeth are often untreated, but rather extracted to alleviate pain or discomfort.
The motive for dental treatment as it relates to urgent care was another statistically significant variable for explaining toothache, when compared with those seeking dental treatment or preventive care. This situation reflects access to oral health services. Despite substantial alterations after implementation of the National Health System, which mandates universal treatment and quality for all, services still lack adequate financing to implement all the forecasted measures. It is worth remembering that the historical distortions present in Brazilian public health policies, such as prioritizing remedial dental treatment and a shortage of investment in health promotion and disease prevention (except for schoolchildren), are a great challenge for administrators in terms of providing more adequate oral conditions for the population as a whole. This should be one of the Ministry of Health's primary goals in developing the Family Health Strategy23. This relationship, however, is one of the limitations of the present research considering that studies25,26 report pain itself as the main reason for seeking urgent care services.
Among toothache-related variables, the length of time between dental visits stood out. The need for regular dental appointments aimed at early diagnosis, immediate intervention or limiting the damage, is often pointed out. Our study does not question this need; however, the reality shown indicates that the lack of regular access to oral health services leads adolescents to seek treatment in cases of pain, as demonstrated in other studies5. These findings also corroborate those of Alexandre et al.27, who reported that 2 years or more between check-ups did not increase the likelihood of toothache compared to one year or less between visits. This is in accordance to others authors, who stated that services and studies directed over the population are not being properly applied, especially for those with unfavorable socioeconomic conditions and oral health6. Teenage use of dental services has often been reported as being influenced by their perceived need, based on the impact of oral health in their daily activities28. Flores and Drehmer29 concluded that to the teenagers the tooth pain represents the illness but decay is not seen as such because it is very common.
Although variables classified as socioeconomic conditions, in particular "per capita" family income, demonstrate significance in bivariate analysis, they lose this significance when included in Poisson regression analysis, and are not included in the model explaining toothache. Thus, this type of study is not able to prove this relationship, as established in previous research30-33. It is therefore important to emphasize that income information is not as easily identifiable, especially in a single interview34. Nevertheless, all variables studied were directly affected by socioeconomic conditions, since high caries severity, lack of regular access to health services, seeking care in emergency situations and not receiving a toothbrush at school are directly linked to an individuals' ability to solve their problems through social insertion. This is in agreement with Locker35, who considers the study of social conditions as a cause of oral diseases is still in the initial phase.
So, it is necessary to use some tools in the planning of dental care at a local level36. Baldani et al.37 describe a need for implementing compensatory measures and policies in order to lessen the damaging effects of social inequality. These become more serious if preventative strategies cannot provide equal benefits to low socioeconomic groups. The substantial impact of toothache indicates the urgent need for the public sector to promote caries prevention strategies and acquire appropriate technology to achieve these aims30,38,39. However, it is also essential that the health system supply emergency dental treatment, thereby minimizing the suffering caused by toothache40.
Negative impact of toothache should trigger oral health priorities to guarantee universality and equality principle, like proposed by Brazilian National Health System, permitting care access to those with unfavorable socioeconomic conditions and health.
The high prevalence of adolescent toothache is directly correlated to conditions of access to oral health services. Clearly defined strategies are needed at local level, allowing National Health System guidelines to be achieved in the services, particularly those aimed at health promotion and dental caries, which are the main cause of toothache.
The first draft was written by LRA Noro and AG Roncalli and the developing of the instrument too. The data collection was carried out by FIR Mendes Júnior. The interpretation of findings was developed by LRA Noro, AG Roncalli and KC Lima. All authors contributed to article writing and reviewing.
1Goes PSA, Watt RG, Hardy R, Sheiham A. Impacts of dental pain on daily activities of adolescents aged 14-15 years and their families. Acta Odont Scand 2008; 66(1):7-12.
2Macfarlane TV, Blinkhorn AS, Davies RM, Kincey J, Worthington HV. Oro-facial pain in the community: prevalence and associated impact. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 2002; 30(1):52-60.
3Krisdapong S, Sheiham A, Tsakos G. Oral health-related quality of life of 12- and 15-year-old Thai children: findings from a national survey. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2009; 37(6):509-517.
4Slade GD. Epidemiology of dental pain and dental caries among children and adolescents. Community Dent Health 2001; 18(4):219-227.
5Borges CM, Cascaes AM, Fischer TK, Boing AF, Peres MA, Peres KG. Dental and gingival pain and associated factors among Brazilian adolescents: an analysis of the Brazilian Oral Health Survey 2002-2003. Cad Saude Publica 2008; 24(8):1825-1834.
6Bastos JLD, Nomura L, Peres MA. Dental pain, socioeconomic status and dental caries in young male adults from southern Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 2005; 21(5):1416-1423.
7Pau A, Khan SS, Babar MG, Croucher R. Dental pain and care-seeking in 11-14-yr-old adolescents in a low-income country. Eur J Oral Sci 2008; 116(5): 451-457.
8Lacerda JT, Simionato EM, Peres KG, Peres MA, Traebert J, Marcenes W. Dental pain as the reason for visiting a dentist in a Brazilian adult population. Rev Saude Publica 2004; 38(3):453-458.
9Noro LRA, Oliveira AGRC, Mendes Júnior FIR, Lima KC. Children oral health status from Sobral-Ceará. Stoma 2008; 88:4-8.
10Narvai PC, Frazão P, Roncalli AG, Antunes JL. Dental caries in Brazil: decline, polarization, inequality and social exclusion. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2006; 19(6):385-393.
11Skaret E, Berg E, Kvale G, Raadal M. Psychological characteristics of Norwegian adolescents reporting no likelihood of visiting a dentist in a situation with toothache. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007; 17(6):430-438.
12Ekanayake L, Mendis R. Self-reported use of dental services among employed adults in Sri Lanka. Int Dent J 2002; 52(3):151-155.
13World Health Organization (WHO). Oral health surveys: basic methods. 4th Edition. Geneva: WHO; 1997.
14Jiang H, Petersen PE, Peng B, Tai B, Bian Z. Self-assessed dental health, oral health practices, and general health behaviors in Chinese urban adolescents. Acta Odontol Scand 2005; 63(6):343-352.
15Nuttall NM, Steele JG, Evans D, Chadwick B, Morris AJ, Hill K. The reported impact of oral condition on children in the United Kingdom, 2003. Br Dent J 2006; 200(10):551-555.
16Pau A, Croucher R, Marcenes W, Leung T Development and validation of a dental pain-screening questionnaire. Pain 2005; 119(1-3):75-81.
17Brasil. Ministério da Saúde (MS). Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Projeto SB Brasil 2003: condições de saúde bucal da população brasileira 2002-2003: resultados principais. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2004. (Série C. Projetos, Programas e Relatórios).
18Silva NN. Amostragem probabilística. São Paulo: EDUSP; 1998.
19Noro LRA, Roncalli AG, Mendes Júnior FIR, Lima KC. Dental caries incidence in adolescents in a city Northeast Brazil, 2006. Cad Saude Publica 2009; 25(4):783-790.
20Goes PSA, Sheiham A, Watt RG, Hardy R. The prevelence and severity of dental in Brazilian in 14-15 years old schoolchildren. Comm Dent Health 2007; 24(4):217-224.
21Assaf AV, Meneghim MC, Zanin L, Mialhe FL, Pereira AC, Ambrosano GMB. Assessment of different methods for diagnosing dental caries in epidemiological surveys. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004; 32(6):418-425.
22Pau A, Baxevanos KG, Croucher R. Family structure is associated with oral pain in 12-year-old Greek schoolchildren. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007; 17(5):345-351.
23Nomura LH, Bastos JLD, Peres MA. Dental pain prevalence and association with dental caries and socioeconomic status in schoolchildren, Southern Brazil, 2002. Braz Oral Res 2004; 18(2):134-140.
24Petersen PO, Bourgeois D, Ogawa H, Estupinan-Day S, Ndiaye C. The global burden of oral diseases and risks to oral health. Bull World Health Organ 2005; 83(9):661-669.
25Dourado AT, Caldas AF Jr, Albuquerque DS, Sá Rodrigues VM. Epidemiologic study of urgencies in dentistry. J Bras Clin Odontol Integr 2005; 9(48):60-64.
26Tortamano IP, Leopoldino VD, Borsatti MA, Penha SS, Buscariolo IA, Costa CG, Rocha RG. Epidemiologic and sociodemographic aspects os Urgency Service of São Paulo University Dental School. RPG Rev Pós Grad 2007; 13(4):299-306.
27Alexandre GC, Nadanovsky P, Lopes CS, Faerstein E. Prevalence and factors associated with dental pain that prevents the performance of routine tasks by civil servants in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 2006; 22(5):1073-1078.
28Ekanayake L, Ando Y, Miyazaki H. Patterns and factors affecting dental utilization among adolescents in Sri Lanka. Int Dent J 2001; 51(5):353-358.
29Flores EMTL, Drehmer TM. Knowledge, perceptions, behaviors and representations of oral health of teenagers of public schools of two neighborhoods of Porto Alegre. Cien Saude Colet 2003; 8(3):743-752.
30Bastos JL, Peres MA, Peres KG, Araujo CL, Menezes AM. Toothache prevalence and associated factors: a life course study from birth to age 12 yr. Eur J Oral Sci 2008; 116(5):458-466.
31Pinto RS, Matos DL, Loyola Filho AI. Characteristics associated with the use of dental services by the adult Brazilian population. Cien Saude Colet 2012; 17(2):531-544.
32Peres MA, Latorre MRO, Sheiham A, Peres KG, Barros FC, Hernandez PG, Maas AM, Romano AR, Victora CG. Social and biological early life influences on severity of dental caries in children aged 6 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2005; 33(1):53-63.
33Bastos JL, Gigante DP, Peres KG. Toothache prevalence and associated factors: a population-based study in southern Brazil. Oral Diseases 2008; 14(4):320-326.
34Boing AF, Peres MA, Kovaleski DF, Zange SE, Antunes JLF. Social stratification in epidemiological studies of dental caries and periodontal diseases: a profile of the scientific literature in the 1990s. Cad Saude Publica 2005; 21(3):673-678.
35Locker D. Deprivation and oral health: a review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000; 28(3):161-169.
36Carnut L, Filgueiras LV, Figueiredo N, Goes PSA. Initial validation of the index of oral healtcare needs for oral health teams in the family healthcare strategy. Cien Saude Colet 2011; 16(7):3083-3091.
37Baldani MH, Vasconcelos AGG, Antunes JLF. Association of the DMFT index with socioeconomic and dental services indicators in the state of Paraná, Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 2004; 20(1):143-152.
38Ferreira AAA, Piuvezam G, Werner CWA, Alves MSCF. The toothache and toothloss: social representation of oral care. Cien Saude Colet 2006; 11(1):211-218.
39Bardal PAP, Olympio KPK, Valle AAL, Tomita NE. Dental caries in children as a natural or pathological phenomenon: emphasis in a qualitative approach. Cien Saude Colet 2006; 11(1):161-167.
40Kuhnen M, Peres MA, Masiero AV, Peres KG. Toothache and associated factors in Brazilian adults: a cross-sectional population-based study. BMC Oral Health 2009; 9:7.
Publication in this collection
14 Sept 2012
26 Oct 2012