ABSTRACT
For incompatibilists about free will, the existence of free decisions and actions would be metaphysically impossible in a deterministic world. A few incompatibilist philosophers hold theories that are in conflict with some ideas about nature in a stronger sense: they postulate a concept of freedom that it is nos possible under a naturalistic conception of actions. I describe here an incompatibilist view which fits into naturalism. The key idea is to renounce to an usual assumption shared by most incompatibilists: the thesis that indetermination is relevant to free will because it contributes to the agent’s control and/or authorship over her actions.
Keywords:
compatibilism; naturalismo; determinismo; alternative; possibilities; Kane; Luck Argument