Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Globalization: the evolution of enterprises in the global network competition

Abstract

The globalization of a company is embedded in the globalization of its task environment. This process can be described as a co-evolutionary process of a social system in its environment. A historical view of the globalization of competition seems to prove that it can be interpreted as an evolutionary process of differentiation and integration that is reinforced by the decreasing rigidity of boundaries. A liquefaction of competition" can be observed, in which an increasing number of autonomous economic actors like decentralized units of Multinational Corporations (MNCs) and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) are competing and cooperating in the global context. As a result, a network competition" is emerging, which can be traced to an increasing expansion and density of economic and other social interactions. The competence of networking on a global scale thus becomes a central demand in the process of globalization. The globalization of competition can be defined as a feedback-loop, in which companies strive for competitive advantages by global differentiation and integration of their activities and products and thereby reinforcing the increasing demand for competences in global competition. This feedback-loop is marked by increasing dynamics, so that the competence to cope with the evolutionary dynamics of globalization becomes the second central demand for management. A management of globalization thus should be based on three elements: the classical competence of internationalization in the sense of building up international business activities, the competence of global networking and the competence of evolutionary dynamics.


ARTIGOS / ARTICLES

Globalization: the evolution of enterprises in the global network competition

Thomas BorghoffI; Prof. Dr. Martin K. WelgeI I

IUniversity of Dortmund, Germany 44221 Dortmund Tel.: 0049-231-755-3460 Fax.: 0049-231-755-5228 E-Mail: t.borghoff@wiso.uni-dortmund.de IIUniversity of Dortmund, Germany 44221 Dortmund Tel.: 0049-231-755-3148 Fax: 0049-231-755-5228 E-Mail: welge@usw.de

ABSTRACT

The globalization of a company is embedded in the globalization of its task environment. This process can be described as a co-evolutionary process of a social system in its environment. A historical view of the globalization of competition seems to prove that it can be interpreted as an evolutionary process of differentiation and integration that is reinforced by the decreasing rigidity of boundaries. A „liquefaction of competition" can be observed, in which an increasing number of autonomous economic actors like decentralized units of Multinational Corporations (MNCs) and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) are competing and cooperating in the global context. As a result, a „network competition" is emerging, which can be traced to an increasing expansion and density of economic and other social interactions. The competence of networking on a global scale thus becomes a central demand in the process of globalization. The globalization of competition can be defined as a feedback-loop, in which companies strive for competitive advantages by global differentiation and integration of their activities and products and thereby reinforcing the increasing demand for competences in global competition. This feedback-loop is marked by increasing dynamics, so that the competence to cope with the evolutionary dynamics of globalization becomes the second central demand for management. A management of globalization thus should be based on three elements: the classical competence of internationalization in the sense of building up international business activities, the competence of global networking and the competence of evolutionary dynamics.

Texto completo disponivel apenas em PDF.

Full text avaliable only in PDF.

REFERENCES

Bamberger, I. & M. Evers 1996. Internationalisierungsverhalten von Klein-und Mittelunternehmen. In: J. Engelhard, H. Rehkugler, editors. Strategien für nationale und internationale Märkte. Wiesbaden: Gabler

Bettman, J.R. & B. Weitz 1983. Attributions in the Board Room: Causal Reasoning in Corporate Annual Reports. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28: 165-183

Bilkey, W.J. & G. Tesar 1977. The Export Behavior of Smaller Wisconsin Manufacturing Firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 9: 93-98

Böttcher, R. 1996. Global Network Management. Wiesbaden: Gabler

Cameron, K.1986. Effectiveness as Paradox. Management Science, 5: 539--552

Cavusgil, S.T. 1980. On the Internationalization of Firms. European Research, 11: 273-281

Colberg, W. 1989. Internationale Präsenzstrategien von Industrieunternehmen. Kiel:Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk

Eisenhardt, K.M.1989. Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High Velocity Environments. Academy of Management Journal, 3: 543-578

Evans, P.H.L. & Y. Doz 1992. Dualities. In: V. Pucik, N.M. Tichy, C.K. Barnett, editors. Globalizing Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons

Fahey, L. & V.K. Narayanan 1989. Linked Changes in Revealed Causal Maps and Environmental Change: An Empirical Study. Journal of Management Studies, 26: 361-378

Gioia, D.A. & K. Chittipeddi 1991. Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change nitiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12: 443-448

Heidelberger, M. 1990. Concepts of Self-Organization in the 19th century. In: W. Krohn, G. Küppers, H. Nowotny, editors. Self-Organization. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers

Johanson, J. & J.-E. Vahlne 1977. „The Internationalization Process of the Firm". Journal of International Business Studies, 2: 23-32

Johanson, J. & F. Wiedersheim-Paul 1975. The Internationalization of the Firm – Four Swedish Cases. Journal of Management Studies, 3: 305-322

Kutschker, M 1994. Dynamische Internationalisierungsstrategie. In: J. Engelhard, H. Rehkugler, editors. Strategien für nationale und internationale Märkte. Wiesbaden: Gabler

Kutschker, M. 1996. Evolution, Episoden und Epochen: Die Führung von Internationalisierungsprozessen. In: J. Engelhard, editor. Strategische Führung internationaler Unternehmen. Wiesbaden: Gabler

Luhmann, N.1984. Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp

Luostarinen, R. 1980. Internationalization of the Firm. Helsinki: Acta Academiae Oeconomicae Helsingiensis

Macharzina, K. & J. Engelhard 1991. Paradigm Shift in International Business Research: From Partist to Eclectic Approaches to the GAINS Paradigm. Management International Review, Special Issue, 31: 23-43

Martinez, J.I. & J.C. Jarillo 1989. The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 3: 489-514

Maturana, H.R. 1980. Man and Society. In: F. Benseler et al., editors. Autopoiesis, Communication, and Society. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp

Maturana, H.R. 1981. Autopoiesis. In: M. Zeleny, editor. Autopoiesis. New York: North Holland

Miller, D. & P. Friesen 1980. Archetypes of Organizational Transition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6: 268-291

Moore, K. & D. Lewis 1998. The First Multinationals: Assyria Circa 2000 B.C.. Management International Review, 38: 95-107

Thomas, J.B. & D. Gioia & D.J. Ketchen, Jr.: Strategic Sense-Making. Advances in Strategic Management, 14: 299-329

Wallner, F. 1991. Selbstorganisation-Zirkularität als Erkärungsprinzip?. In: H.R. Fischer, editor. Autopoiesis. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag

Wiesmann, D. 1993. Komplexität und Differenz. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag

  • Bamberger, I. & M. Evers 1996. Internationalisierungsverhalten von Klein-und Mittelunternehmen. In: J. Engelhard, H. Rehkugler, editors. Strategien für nationale und internationale Märkte. Wiesbaden: Gabler
  • Bilkey, W.J. & G. Tesar 1977. The Export Behavior of Smaller Wisconsin Manufacturing Firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 9: 93-98
  • Böttcher, R. 1996. Global Network Management. Wiesbaden: Gabler
  • Cameron, K.1986. Effectiveness as Paradox. Management Science, 5: 539--552
  • Cavusgil, S.T. 1980. On the Internationalization of Firms. European Research, 11: 273-281
  • Colberg, W 1989. Internationale Präsenzstrategien von Industrieunternehmen. Kiel:Wissenschaftsverlag Vauk
  • Eisenhardt, K.M.1989. Making Fast Strategic Decisions in High Velocity Environments. Academy of Management Journal, 3: 543-578
  • Evans, P.H.L. & Y. Doz 1992. Dualities. In: V. Pucik, N.M. Tichy, C.K. Barnett, editors. Globalizing Management. New York: John Wiley & Sons
  • Fahey, L. & V.K. Narayanan 1989. Linked Changes in Revealed Causal Maps and Environmental Change: An Empirical Study. Journal of Management Studies, 26: 361-378
  • Heidelberger, M 1990. Concepts of Self-Organization in the 19th century. In: W. Krohn, G. Küppers, H. Nowotny, editors. Self-Organization. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers
  • Johanson, J. & J.-E. Vahlne 1977. „The Internationalization Process of the Firm". Journal of International Business Studies, 2: 23-32
  • Johanson, J. & F. Wiedersheim-Paul 1975. The Internationalization of the Firm – Four Swedish Cases. Journal of Management Studies, 3: 305-322
  • Kutschker, M 1994. Dynamische Internationalisierungsstrategie. In: J. Engelhard, H. Rehkugler, editors. Strategien für nationale und internationale Märkte. Wiesbaden: Gabler
  • Kutschker, M. 1996. Evolution, Episoden und Epochen: Die Führung von Internationalisierungsprozessen. In: J. Engelhard, editor. Strategische Führung internationaler Unternehmen. Wiesbaden: Gabler
  • Luhmann, N.1984. Soziale Systeme. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp
  • Luostarinen, R. 1980. Internationalization of the Firm. Helsinki: Acta Academiae Oeconomicae Helsingiensis
  • Macharzina, K. & J. Engelhard 1991. Paradigm Shift in International Business Research: From Partist to Eclectic Approaches to the GAINS Paradigm. Management International Review, Special Issue, 31: 23-43
  • Martinez, J.I. & J.C. Jarillo 1989. The Evolution of Research on Coordination Mechanisms in Multinational Corporations. Journal of International Business Studies, 3: 489-514
  • Maturana, H.R. 1980. Man and Society. In: F. Benseler et al., editors. Autopoiesis, Communication, and Society. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp
  • Maturana, H.R. 1981. Autopoiesis. In: M. Zeleny, editor. Autopoiesis. New York: North Holland
  • Miller, D. & P. Friesen 1980. Archetypes of Organizational Transition. Administrative Science Quarterly, 6: 268-291
  • Moore, K. & D. Lewis 1998. The First Multinationals: Assyria Circa 2000 B.C.. Management International Review, 38: 95-107
  • Thomas, J.B. & D. Gioia & D.J. Ketchen, Jr.: Strategic Sense-Making. Advances in Strategic Management, 14: 299-329
  • Wallner, F. 1991. Selbstorganisation-Zirkularität als Erkärungsprinzip?. In: H.R. Fischer, editor. Autopoiesis. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Systeme Verlag
  • Wiesmann, D. 1993. Komplexität und Differenz. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    06 Feb 2015
  • Date of issue
    Dec 2001
Escola de Administração da Universidade Federal da Bahia Av. Reitor Miguel Calmon, s/n 3o. sala 29, 41110-903 Salvador-BA Brasil, Tel.: (55 71) 3283-7344, Fax.:(55 71) 3283-7667 - Salvador - BA - Brazil
E-mail: revistaoes@ufba.br