Interpersonal Violence/Bullying Situations at the University: Academic Daily Life Clippings among Students from Undergraduate Health Programs

RESUMO

Bullying compreende todas as formas de atitudes agressivas, intencionais e repetidas (de maneira insistente e perturbadora) que ocorrem sem motivação evidente e de forma velada, sendo adotadas por um ou mais estudantes contra outro(s) numa relação desigual de poder, e são consideradas uma forma de violência interpessoal. Este fenômeno se manifesta sutilmente, sob a forma de brincadeiras, apelidos, trotes, gozações e agressões físicas. É possível identificar extensa literatura sobre as consequências do bullying para o desempenho escolar e participação em contextos de vida para crianças e adolescentes, mas ainda são poucos os estudos sobre o fenômeno na universidade. Este estudo buscou a percepção de estudantes e professores de uma universidade pública sobre a presença de violência interpessoal/ bullying no cotidiano acadêmico e suas manifestações. Participaram 137 estudantes e 32 professores, abordados por meio do questionário eletrônico Google Docs. Para 86 estudantes (63%) e 20 professores (63%), a violência interpessoal/ bullying está presente na graduação. A análise de conteúdo permitiu identificar sete categorias empíricas entre estudantes e três entre professores, sendo as mais frequentes violência interpessoal/ bullying na relação veterano-calouro; violência interpessoal/ bullying devido a características pessoais; violência interpessoal/ bullying devido à orientação sexual/gênero e violência na relação professor-aluno. Estudantes e professores são capazes de identificar tal fenômeno como presente no cotidiano da graduação e em diversas esferas, sendo mais recorrente entre os pares. Situações que emergem dos recortes discursivos preocupam pela intolerância presente no cotidiano, fazendo refletir sobre o papel da educação universitária na formação para a cidadania. É imprescindível tomar atitudes em relação à prática do bullying na universidade, a fim de garantir ao estudante sua estabilidade emocional e psicológica e seu bem-estar.

Bullying; Violência Interpessoal; Ensino Superior

RESUMO

Bullying compreende todas as formas de atitudes agressivas, intencionais e repetidas (de maneira insistente e perturbadora) que ocorrem sem motivação evidente e de forma velada, sendo adotadas por um ou mais estudantes contra outro(s) numa relação desigual de poder, e são consideradas uma forma de violência interpessoal. Este fenômeno se manifesta sutilmente, sob a forma de brincadeiras, apelidos, trotes, gozações e agressões físicas. É possível identificar extensa literatura sobre as consequências do bullying para o desempenho escolar e participação em contextos de vida para crianças e adolescentes, mas ainda são poucos os estudos sobre o fenômeno na universidade. Este estudo buscou a percepção de estudantes e professores de uma universidade pública sobre a presença de violência interpessoal/ bullying no cotidiano acadêmico e suas manifestações. Participaram 137 estudantes e 32 professores, abordados por meio do questionário eletrônico Google Docs. Para 86 estudantes (63%) e 20 professores (63%), a violência interpessoal/ bullying está presente na graduação. A análise de conteúdo permitiu identificar sete categorias empíricas entre estudantes e três entre professores, sendo as mais frequentes violência interpessoal/ bullying na relação veterano-calouro; violência interpessoal/ bullying devido a características pessoais; violência interpessoal/ bullying devido à orientação sexual/gênero e violência na relação professor-aluno. Estudantes e professores são capazes de identificar tal fenômeno como presente no cotidiano da graduação e em diversas esferas, sendo mais recorrente entre os pares. Situações que emergem dos recortes discursivos preocupam pela intolerância presente no cotidiano, fazendo refletir sobre o papel da educação universitária na formação para a cidadania. É imprescindível tomar atitudes em relação à prática do bullying na universidade, a fim de garantir ao estudante sua estabilidade emocional e psicológica e seu bem-estar.

Bullying; Violência Interpessoal; Ensino Superior

INTRODUCTION

The word “bullying” comes from the English term bully, which means: tough guy, bossy, goon ¹ . This is a subject that has occupied a large space in the media and generated concern in the educational context. It is possible to identify several initiatives of society to understand it and reduce its negative impact on the school institution, including the University. Due to the characteristics of the phenomenon, it is important to approach it from the point of view of violence.

Violence has been seen as a major and growing public health problem worldwide, with serious individual and social consequences, particularly for young individuals, who appear in statistics as the ones who most often die and most often kill² . More than considering violence as multicausal, it is necessary to look at it from the perspective of complexity, considering the subject = context interpenetration. Thus, if on the one hand poverty and exclusion of rights can lead to the exhaustion of strategies to deal with adversity, leading to violence, on the other hand, it is a serious mistake to think that violence is only present among the poor. Every day we have lessons from reality that show us situations in which interpersonal violence occurs at different levels of the social pyramid³ . Examples can be found in road traffic relationships, in the construction of the teacher-student relationship, and in the student-student relationship, such as in the University admission period, with the so-called hazing.

In the context of interpersonal violence, bullying emerges as an important phenomenon. Bullying comprises all forms of aggressive, intentional and repeated attitudes, in an insistent and disturbing manner, which occur without obvious motivation and covertly, being adopted by one or more students against another or others, within an unequal power relationship. This phenomenon subtly manifests itself as jokes, nicknames, teasing, mockery and physical aggression² - ⁴ .

The literature about bullying in the context of elementary and high school education shows that its targets generally lack the resources, status, or ability to stop the harmful acts. They are usually unsociable, insecure, and have trouble adjusting to coexistence and group participation. They have a different physical aspect from the standards imposed by their peers, and their low self-esteem is aggravated by the adults’ critical interventions or indifference regarding their suffering. They have few friends, are passive, quiet and do not effectively respond to the acts of aggression they suffer² - ⁴ - ⁵ .

The practice of bullying is related to psychological and / or behavioral disorders that can often cause significant damage to the victims’ quality of life and daily activities. Situations such as school phobia, social phobia, generalized anxiety disorder, depression, anorexia and bulimia have been reported, and there are even reports of suicide and homicide among children and adolescents⁶ .

Perpetrators and witnesses may also suffer the consequences: those who practice bullying are very likely to maintain aggressive practices throughout their lives, may adopt antisocial behaviors and those who witness it, in turn, are troubled by the climate created in the environment and the fear of being the next target, which also leads to a decline in their educational and social development. Constant exposure to bullying, either directly or indirectly, implies the assimilation of this fact, by those involved, as something normal ² - ⁴ - ⁷ .

In the context of university education, such situations of peer violence are also a matter of concern, not only because of the climate of insecurity they create and the possible situations of academic inadaptation and failure, but also the health costs for those involved ⁸ .

In fact, the University has been called to rethink its responsibility for the integral education of its students and the commitment to disseminate values aimed at improving the human condition ⁹ . More than that, the University has been challenged with providing technical education of excellence, while an ethical and political education that expresses its commitment to equity is also expected ¹⁰ .

The concern about the university environment and the student, in this perspective of integrality, has increased the interest in understanding their daily life and the aspects related to their adaptation to the university, academic success / failure; stress and mental health factors, among others¹¹ - ¹² - ¹³ - ¹⁴ - ¹⁵ - ¹⁶ .

It is possible that interpersonal violence in the context of university education is one of the aspects associated with academic failure, school dropout and adjustment difficulties and, thus, its understanding is important, aiming at this view for the integral formation, human values and equity.

Considering that IPV can extend beyond the university admission period and interfere with students’ adjustment and performance, increasing the understanding of students’ and faculty perceptions of IPV / bullying can provide elements for coping with difficulties that college students have to face during their undergraduate journey.

This article presents the results of an exploratory study conducted over two years in a Higher Education Institution (HEI) that has 07 undergraduate courses in the health area. The study aimed at identifying the perception of teachers and students about the presence of interpersonal violence (bullying) in the context of undergraduate school and its most frequent forms.

METHOD

This is a descriptive and exploratory study, with a predominantly qualitative approach with some quantitative procedures, which conducted a general survey on the recognition of the presence of IPV / bullying among undergraduate students in the Unit. The exploratory character led to the construction of a semi-structured questionnaire, also consisting of open-ended questions. The study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Hospital das Clínicas and Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (Process HCRP 8663-2014).

This research was carried out in an HEI with 07 courses in the health area - Biomedical Sciences, Physical Therapy, Speech Therapy, Biomedical Informatics, Medicine, Nutrition and Metabolism, Occupational Therapy, and the study population comprised the students and teachers. At the time of data collection, the Unit had 319 teachers and approximately 1,400 students.

Data were obtained through a semi-structured electronic questionnaire, sent together with the Free and Informed Consent (FIC) form through e-mail to all teachers and students of the Unit, using Google docs technology. This tool consists in the creation of a site containing the research documents, which are sent by electronic mail through a link that can be accessed by the subject, adequately completed and subsequently accessed by the researcher on the same site. The form and questionnaire were sent three times, every thirty days, at two moments (1^st Semester of 2015; 1^st Semester of 2016) emphasizing that each subject could only participate once in the research.

In qualitative terms, content analysis was used as a strategy to identify empirical categories for open-ended questions of the questionnaire ¹⁷ . The thematic content analysis allows the identification of categories through the manifest content in a deductive approach. The manifest content is identified through the use of keywords for the reading /search, which may start with categories predetermined by the research objective or by the hypotheses and may allow the inclusion of new perspectives from the analyzed material ¹⁸ - ¹⁹ . This qualitative research strategy allowed the identification of the types / categories of interpersonal violence, as reported by students and teachers. In quantitative terms, the frequency of occurrence of these categories was obtained, as well as the answers to the closed questions (yes / no), which were quantified by the frequency of their occurrence.

RESULTS

The study included 137 students and 32 teachers. Among the students, 78 were females (56%), 25 males (17%) and 38 (27%) did not answer this question. The participants’ age ranged from 17 to 35 years, with 89 students aged 17 to 25 (65%), 34 students aged 26 to 30 (25%) and 14 students aged 31 to 35 (10%). As for the undergraduate course, 25 were from Speech Therapy (18%), 24 from Physical Therapy (17%), 23 from Occupational Therapy (16%), 17 from Medicine (13%), 16 from Nutrition and Metabolism (12%), 09 from Biomedical Sciences (7%), 09 from Biomedical Informatics (7%) and 14 students did not answer this question (10%).

TABLE 1
Characteristics of students

VARIABLE	Number of students	Relative Frequency (%)
GENDER
Female	78	56
Male	25	17
Did not answer	38	27
Age
17-25	89	65
26-30	34	25
31-35	14	10
UNDERGRADUATE COURSE
Speech Therapy	25	18
Physical Therapy	24	17
Occupational Therapy	23	16
Medicine	17	13
Nutrition and Metabolism	16	12
Biomedical Sciences	9	7
Did not answer	14	10
TOTAL	137	100

For 86 students (63%) IVP / bullying is present in the undergraduate course. About the witnessed situations, seven categories emerged from the answers, which are shown in Chart 1 , together with their frequencies and some discursive clippings that compose them. They are: interpersonal violence / bullying in the senior-freshman relationship, interpersonal violence / bullying due to personal characteristics, interpersonal violence / bullying due to sexual orientation / gender, violence in teacher-student relationship, interpersonal violence / bullying due to academic performance, interpersonal violence / bullying due to social class and interpersonal / bullying violence due to ethnicity.

CHART 1
Categories related to situations of violence reported by students

Category		Frequency
Interpersonal violence / bullying in senior-freshman relationship		20
“... seniors intimidating freshmen through verbal threats ...” “… Freshmen being bullied by seniors’ words or attitudes…” “… Freshman coercion by seniors: forcing them to wear a cap… coercing them to drink, physical aggression: slapping, remain in the kneeling position and / or in an uncomfortable position…” “The nicknames given to students at the beginning of the course often represent bullying to a (usually physical) characteristic of the newcomer.” “A senior from another course telling a freshman that he would “slap her around” for not giving her drink to him.” “... I witnessed cursing and aggression when the freshman forgot the course prop ...”
Interpersonal Violence / Bullying Due to Personal Characteristics Jokes, discrimination and derogatory nicknames		20
“... a classmate mocks someone else’s way of speaking ...” “... girls being criticized and mocked for being ugly, fat ...” “... a classmate receiving a derogatory nickname for being clumsy, poorly groomed ...” “... classmate suffers a lot because of her older age” “... a group of boys said that a girl looked like a man, because she had a ‘beard’ ...” “People laughing and joking when a shy person went to present a seminar” “...a classmate who was rejected by most of the class ... a lot of humiliation. She left the course. ”
Interpersonal violence / bullying due to sexual orientation / gender Jokes, discrimination and derogatory nicknames		13
“Discrimination against homosexuals” “Bad jokes about gender” “I’ve seen freshmen being called derogatory names by seniors…” “…A homosexual friend was assaulted by another boy ...”
Violence in teacher-student relationship		09
“Teachers mistreating, humiliating students” “Teacher humiliating students for personal characteristics” “Teachers, who take advantage of their position of power to terrorize students, put psychological pressure on them ... and make fun of students who have difficulty.” “I have seen a teacher telling the student during class to quit the discipline because he would not be able to pass it”
Interpersonal Violence / Bullying Due to Academic Performance Jokes, discrimination		08
“… People with difficulty understanding the subject… people who ask a lot of questions…” “... students being mocked in the classroom while presenting seminars ...” “Giggles when someone asks the teacher a question.” “During seminar presentations or other events, the person forgot something or got it in the wrong way and many people laughed and then their classmates were mocking them”
Interpersonal Violence / Bullying Due to Social Class	07
“… Difference regarding financial and school situation… because I only studied in public schools” “During a class, when asked if someone uses SUS, only a colleague and I raised our hands, and the looks were prejudiced ...” “Classmates when they exclude someone because of their socioeconomic status” “I’ve witnessed bullying with low-income people, they were mocked for not dressing well”
Interpersonal Violence / Bullying Due to Ethnicity	05
“... and racism ...” “... comments regarding skin color / race / ethnicity ...” “... jokes about skin color (racism) ...”

Among the teachers, 20 were females (63%) and 12 males (37%), aged between 39 and 64 years old; 20 (63%) identified the presence of IPV / bullying, and three categories related to the reported situations of violence emerged, being common to three of the seven categories that emerged among students. The categories, their frequency of occurrence and some of the discursive clippings that constitute the categories can be seen in Table 2. They are: interpersonal violence / bullying due to personal characteristics, violence in the teacher-student relationship and interpersonal violence / bullying in the senior-freshman relationship.

DISCUSSION

Interpersonal violence / bullying is a complex social phenomenon of which definition needs a consensus. Despite this lack of consensus in terms of definition, there are certain common elements that allow us to list characteristics that define peer violence at school: (1) it consists of a type of violent behavior; (2) it involves a broad spectrum of negative actions of a physical, psychological or social nature, developed over a prolonged period of time and which are harmful to the person to whom they are directed; (3) it is intentional in nature, that is, the perpetrator is aware of the harm caused to the victim; (4) it is generally accepted that the victims are not responsible for (causing) the actions directed against them and (5) the abuse may be perpetrated by an individual or group and the target of violence may be one or more individuals, but overall, the victim is one single person ²⁰ . To some extent, these elements are present in the situations reported by the discursive clippings that constitute the categories described in this study.

One of the most important characteristics of bullying is the “systematic abuse of power” ²¹ . This condition of bullying characterization is present in the categories that emerged among both students and teachers. In situations involving violence in the student-teacher relationship and violence in the senior-freshman relationship, power is clearly positioned, either by a real (teacher-student) or imagined (senior-freshman) hierarchy.

The other two most frequent categories, derived from situations reported by students and teachers (IPV / bullying due to personal characteristics) or only by students (IPV / bullying due to sexual orientation / gender, IPV / bullying due to academic performance; IPV / bullying due to social class and IPV / bullying due to ethnicity) also refer to abuse of power. The abuse of power originates from the asymmetry between the victim and the perpetrator, which may be due to the fact that the victim belongs to a minority, i.e., physically or psychologically weaker ²² . These are similar situations to those traditionally reported in the context of elementary and high school: students who do not correspond to the physical, intellectual, communication standard (too tall, too thin, too shy) suffer some kind of violence / discrimination (nicknames, jokes, mocking comments) that can be considered bullying, as they are repeated over time ²³ .

Using the descriptor “university violence” there is a large number of publications in English, studies that refer to sexual violence, especially against women ²⁴ - ²⁵ - ²⁶ . Likewise, there are studies on dating violence among university students, still focusing on the topic of violence against women ²⁷ - ²⁸ - ²⁹ . There is also an extensive literature that deals with violence in the senior-freshman relationship, in situations involving the so-called university “hazing” practices ( praxe in Portugal; trote in Brazil)³⁰ - ³¹ - ³² - ³³ - ³⁴ - ³⁵ . There are some studies in Brazil related to violence against women in the university environment ³⁶ - ³⁸ - ³⁹ - ⁴⁰ and a growing number of publications in recent years about violence in the senior-freshman relationship³⁹ - ⁴⁰ - ⁴¹ - ⁴² - ⁴³ .

Sexual violence against women in the university context is a frequent object of scientific research and affirmative policies in many US, European and Latin American universities ⁴⁴ . However, within the IPV/bullying category due to sexual orientation/gender, there were no discursive references to sexual violence. Discursive clippings refer to ‘chauvinistic’, sexist jokes and intolerance towards the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transvestite, Transsexual and Transgender (LGBT) population.

Regarding violence in the senior-freshman relationship, it is possible to see a growing concern to identify, understand and avoid these violent situations in recent studies ²³ - ³⁰ - ³¹ - ³² - ³³ - ³⁴ - ³⁹ . Although this is not a study on “hazing”, studies about violence in the senior-freshman relationship may provide insights into the understanding of peer violence in academic daily life, since the type of violence that begins in the reception period for new students can continue to occur throughout the academic journey, extrapolating the freshman arrival period, and intersecting with the issues of gender, ethnicity and social class, topics of the other categories that emerged during this investigation. It is possible to think that if, as freshmen, the students accepted the “jokes” to become part of the group²³ , they should continue to accept it for the same reason throughout their undergraduate journey. It is also worth considering that many students entering university bring with them a history of emotional vulnerabilities, and being bullied can cause significant suffering, often requiring psychological support to deal with this reality.

Hazing, as a rite of passage to university life, is not always classified as violent and oppressive. However, situations that have gained visibility in recent years point to the embarrassment and violence that may be present in university hazing ⁴⁵ - ⁴⁶ . This makes it a problem for managers and the university community to face.

Hazing, ( trote , praxe ) refers to situations that occur in a group where the exercise of power and control of older members over newcomers prevails during the initiation period, when the freshmen are asked to perform certain tasks, which may vary from jokes without major consequences, to situations in which the exercise of the seniors’ power and authority over freshmen leads to activities that cause embarrassment and discomfort, involving violence, humiliation, coercion for alcohol consumption and use of other drugs, which can endanger the freshman’s physical and mental integrity ²¹ - ³¹ - ³² .

The tradition present in the hazing activities, and the naturalization of violence as a joke, make students who “survived” it repeat it in the following year as a sophomore/junior/senior, arguing that receiving the hazing was good for their integration into the new environment²³ - ⁴⁵ . This creates an institutional culture that reinforces a tradition that is neither healthy nor constructive.

Studies on the freshman reception period indicate that more than half of higher education students went through some kind of hazing practice ²³ - ³³ - ³⁹ - ⁴¹ . The freshmen’s adherence to hazing places it as a natural event in the context of university education. However, abuses frequently occur, often leading to extreme situations of physical and emotional damage to freshmen, negatively affecting their adjustment and adaptation to this new phase of life.

When students are approached directly to express their perception of hazing, close values are obtained for positive (joy, integration, acceptance) and negative (indignation, humiliation, fear) perceptions ³⁵ - ³⁷ . Some studies show a significant association between negative hazing assessment and gender – women rate hazing negatively more often than men, and between negative assessment and age / course period – older / more advanced students rate it more positively than younger students / those coursing early cycles ⁴⁵ - ⁴⁶ .

In studies published in Brazil about IPV between seniors and freshmen, mostly involving medical schools, the word “hazing” is presented with a negative connotation of abuse, a hierarchical relationship that, rather than intended to welcome, aims to humiliate, coerce, embarrass²³ - ⁴³ The official HEI agenda does not use the word “hazing” for any of its activities during the freshman reception period.

Situations of violence that occurred in the universities of the state of São Paulo have gained visibility in the media and gave origin to the Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry (CPI) on “Violations of Human Rights in the São Paulo state Colleges/Universities”. The CPI’s final report describes violence of all kinds, practiced in the university context involving hazing, parties and academic daily life ⁴⁷ .

The situations reported in the context of the CPI of the São Paulo state Universities give rise to an interface between the three main categories identified in this study: violence against women (sexual harassment, sexual violence, gender-based discrimination) is present in situations involving freshman reception and hazing, but it is also present in academic daily life in general. That is similar to the violence motivated by personal characteristics, which can be very evident at the time of admission to the University and continue throughout the undergraduate years.

The acts of discrimination motivated by personal appearance, social class, ethnicity, or academic performance point to the fact that victims, such as the findings of studies about bullying in elementary and high school ¹ - ⁵ - ⁶ - ⁷ , are people who do not fit the dominant pattern ²¹ . That is, prejudice against “people who are different” would be the main motivator of the phenomenon ⁸ - ⁴⁸ .

Reports of hazing involving abuse and violence that often hit the means of communication during the start of a new school year led to the prohibition of hazing according to specific laws in some Brazilian states. Since 2015 hazing is prohibited in all public schools in the state of São Paulo, at any level of education ⁴⁹ .

In the University of São Paulo, hazing has been prohibited since 1999 by Ordinance GR3154/99 ⁵⁰ . This same ordinance states that violent practices are prohibited not only within the geographic boundaries of campuses, but wherever people are gathered on behalf of the University, broadening the concept of “university environment”, as well as the responsibility of the university community regarding events that occur in frat-houses, on the streets at the so-called “tolls”(where freshmen collect money for the seniors) and in other spaces where students circulate.

Despite the legislation that prohibits hazing, its extinction does not seem possible, as it involves traditions of HEIs of great symbolic value and seen as undisputed. Universities are highly hierarchical environments that generate different forms of IPV: violence is present in the relationships between teachers and students, preceptors and students, teachers and preceptors⁴¹ , offering students a model of interpersonal relationship based on violence. In a study about abuses suffered by students in medical schools, teachers and preceptors were identified as aggressors: verbal abuse, humiliation, insults, facilitating elements of hierarchization, competition and fragility of interpersonal relationships ²³ . This hierarchy, so strongly defined at the University, leads to the promotion of symbols and rituals that favor the reproduction of violence ³⁵ between seniors and freshmen, teachers and students, students and students, in any level of education.

It is important to point out that the discussion of the results found in this study used the terms “interpersonal violence” and “bullying” as synonyms. The use of the word bullying has been established in studies on the occurrence of peer violence in the context of elementary and high school, among children and adolescents. It is possible to assume here that peer violence at any level of education can be termed “bullying” and, in fact, studies of IPV at the University use the term, ¹ - ³ - ⁸ - ¹² - ²³ - ⁴⁰ - ⁴² mainly because it is based on an imagined power relationship between equals. This would not apply to the teacher-student relationship, since the hierarchy in this case is as real as in the relationships of interpersonal violence in the workplace.

Therefore, it is essential that attitudes be taken to take care of interpersonal relationships in the context of university education, aiming at guaranteeing the students their emotional stability, their adaptation and adjustment to the undergraduate years, as well as their ethical and political formation, to act in society with responsibility for the guarantee of human rights.

An excerpt from a student’s speech illustrates and synthesizes the feelings of those who are affected by different forms of violence throughout academic life: “ I thought the university environment was a tolerant, pluralistic one, and it is the opposite of that ”.

Finally, it is necessary to consider the number of participants in relation to the study population. Approximately 1,400 students from the seven undergraduate courses offered by the Unit were invited to answer the form that was sent via Google Docs to the classes’ institutional email. A total of 137 students answered the invitation, accepting to participate in the study (9.8% of the population). Similarly, 320 teachers were invited to participate through the same method, and 32 participated (10%). Poor adherence can be attributed to several reasons: the habit of not using the institutional email, little interest in the IPV / bullying topic or subjects related to undergraduate teaching. However, as this is an exploratory approach, although it can be argued that the sample size does not allow generalizations, the repetition of the topics that constituted the categories indicates the types of situations present in the context of undergraduate school, according to the perspective of students and teachers who agreed to participate. The topics that point to the types of violence can be taken as a starting point for further investigations.

FINAL CONSIDERATIONS

The results of this exploratory study allow us to conclude that the students and teachers who participated in this study recognize the presence of IPV / bullying in the daily life of undergraduate school, and peer violence in the senior-freshman relationship is the one most commonly identified. The violence in the teacher-student relationship also emerged as a category for students and teachers, albeit with a more discrete frequency.

Asymmetrical power relations may extend beyond the period of freshman reception, and violence, naturalized as a “joke”, becomes invisible: when the abuse of the other becomes funny, the need for reflection on the education being offered at the University becomes evident. Which values should characterize university education?

The results of this study become a matter of concern by showing that intolerance and disrespect for differences are present, with such concrete examples, in the daily life of a HEI.

Therefore, it is essential that attitudes be taken to take care of interpersonal relationships in the context of university education, in order to guarantee the students their adaptation and adjustment to undergraduate school, their ethical and political training to act in society to guarantee human rights and equity.

CHART 2
Categories related to situations of violence reported by teachers

Category	Frequency
Interpersonal Violence / Bullying Due to Personal Characteristics Jokes, discrimination and derogatory nicknames	21
“... excessive scorn, with a pejorative sense, between friends / students ...” “... subliminal situations involving subtle joking or explicit exclusion ...” “... an excellent student was teased due to her above-average participation in that class ...” “Annotations in the roll call of pejorative nicknames by two or three student names” “Student (s) verbalizing characteristics of others - e.g. height, weight, clothing ,using a derogatory tone ” “Isolation of a student who has a physical disability”
Violence in teacher-student relationship	09
“… I learned about aggressive and degrading forms of mockery made by medical teachers through the students’ narratives…” “… I witnessed students “crying”, “distressed”, “ inattentive” and referring to the attitudes of some teachers in the classroom, that got to the point of affecting their confidence and self-esteem…” “… A teacher… humiliates internship students for not knowing the answers…” “jokes” ... bullying between teachers and students, especially due to situations of excess power / pseudo-power.”
Interpersonal violence / bullying in senior-freshman relationship	04
“... requirement to wear “Totems” (cap, bandana, splint) without flexibility while maintaining the tradition ... verbal threats of social penalties. “... incidents during freshman reception week ...” “When I followed the registration of new students, I witnessed some situations such as shouting and offense (softly characterized as “jokes”).” “I feel that humiliating situations (such as “get me a beer”) keep happening at the parties involving freshman students” “Freshman who are forced to wear the yellow cap even outside the Campus premises.”

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Gabriel Morais Xavier dos Santos and Lais Bernardes Garcia for their support in data collection.

REFERENCES

• ¹
  Gomes MM. O bullying e a responsabilidade civil do estabelecimento de ensino privado. Trabalho de conclusão de curso. Rio de Janeiro: Escola de Ciências Jurídicas do Centro Universitário da Cidade. 2010.
• ²
  Lopes Neto AA. Bullying – comportamento agressivo entre estudantes. J. Pediatr. (Rio J.) [online]. 2005, vol.81, n.5, suppl., pp.s164-s172.
• ³
  Panúncio-Pinto, MP. O sentido do silêncio dos professores diante da violência doméstica sofrida por seus alunos: uma análise do discurso. Tese de doutorado. São Paulo: IP/USP. 2006.
• ⁴
  Botelho RG, Souza JMC. Bullying e Educação Física na escola: características, casos, conseqüências e estratégias de intervenção. Rev de Educ Fís. 2007, n.139, p. 58-70.
• ⁵
  Fante C, Pedra JA. Bullying Escolar: perguntas e respostas. Porto Alegre: Artmed. 2008.
• ⁶
  Silva ABB. Mentes perigosas nas escolas: Bullying. Rio de Janeiro: Fontanar. 2009.
• ⁷
  Santos MM, Perkoski IR, Kienen N. Bullying: atitudes, consequências e medidas preventivas na percepção de professores e alunos do ensino fundamental. Temas psicol. 2015, vol.23 no.4 Ribeirão Preto.
• ⁸
  Matos APSM, Jesus SN, Simões HMR, Nave FJGM. Escala para avaliação das situações de bullying nas praxes do ensino superior. Psyc@w@re. 2010. Edição no. 3. Recuperado em 28/11/2015 de http://www1.ci.uc.pt/ipc/2007- 010/revista/e9e077ea8608f4ac6ee227aa9229ee46.pdf.
  » http://www1.ci.uc.pt/ipc/2007- 010/revista/e9e077ea8608f4ac6ee227aa9229ee46.pdf
• ⁹
  Santos L, Almeida LS. Vivências acadêmicas e rendimento escolar: estudo com alunos universitários do 1º ano. Análise Psicológica. 2011, 2 (XIX): 205-217.
• ¹⁰
  Panúncio-Pinto MP, Colares MFA. O estudante universitário: os desafios de uma educação integral. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto). 2015; 48(3):273-81.
• ¹¹
  Padovani RC, Neufeld CB, Maltoni J, Barbosa LNF, Souza WF, Cavalcanti HAF, et al. Vulnerabilidade e bem-estar psicológicos do estudante universitário Rev. bras.ter. cogn. 2015, vol.10 no.1, 02-10.
• ¹²
  Santos AS, Oliveira CT, Dias, ACG. (2015) Características das relações dos universitários e seus pares :implicações na adaptação acadêmica Revista Psicologia: Teoria e Prática, 17(1), 150-163.
• ¹³
  Torquato JÁ, Goulart AG, Vicentin P, Correa U. (2010) Avaliação do estresse em estudantes universitários. International Scientific Journal, 3 (14), 140-154.
• ¹⁴
  Corengia A, Pita M, Mesurado B, Centeno A. (2013) Predicting academic performance and attrition in undergraduate students. Liber: Lima (Perú) 19(1): 101-112.
• ¹⁵
  Bellodi PL. Retaguarda emocional para o aluno de medicina da Santa Casa de São Paulo: realizações e reflexões. Rev Bras de Educ Méd , 2007, 31(1) 5-14.
• ¹⁶
  Cerchiari EAN, Caetano D, Faccenda O. Prevalência de transtornos mentais menores em estudantes universitários. Estud.psicol. 2005, V. 10 no.3.
• ¹⁷
  Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo: edição revista e ampliada. São Paulo: Edições 70 Brasil, 2016.
• ¹⁸
  Berg B. Content Analysis. IN: BERG B. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston, Mass: Allyn & Bacon; 1998: 233-252.
• ¹⁹
  Shepherd SK, Achterberg CL. Qualitative research methodology: data collection, analysis, interpretation, and verification. In: Monsen ER, ed. Research: Successful Approaches. Chicago, Ill:American Dietetic Association. 1992:82-88.
• ²⁰
  Carrera MV, Depalma R, Lameiras M. Toward a More Comprehensive Understanding of Bullying in School Settings. Educ Psychol Rev. 2011, 23:479–499.
• ²¹
  Levandoski G, Cardoso FL. Imagem corporal e status social de estudantes brasileiros envolvidos em bullying. Rev.latinoam.psicol. 2013, vol. 45 no.1 Bogotá.
• ²²
  Smith PK, Sharp S. The problem of school bullying. In P. K. Smith & S. Sharp (Eds.), School bullying: Insights and perspectives (pp. 1–19). London: Routledge. 2006.
• ²³
  Villaça FM, Palácios M. Concepções sobre Assédio moral: bullying e trote em uma escola médica. Rev Bras Educ Méd. 2010, 34(4):506-514.
• ²⁴
  Canan SN, Jozkowski KN, Crawford BL. Sexual Assault Supportive Attitudes: Rape Myth Acceptance and Token Resistance in Greek and Non-Greek College Students From Two University Samples in the United States. J Interpers Violence. 2016, Vol 19, Issue 1.
• ²⁵
  Fedina L, Holmes JL, Backes BL. Campus Sexual Assault: A Systematic Review of Prevalence Research From 2000 to 2015. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2016, Vol 19, pp. 76-93.
• ²⁶
  Hayes RM, Abbott RL, Cook S. It’s Her Fault: Student Acceptance of Rape Myths On Two College Campuses. Violence Against Women. 2016, Vol 22(13): 1540-1555
• ²⁷
  López-Cepero, J, Fabelo HE, Rodríguez-Franco L, Rodríguez-Dias FL. (2016) The Dating Violence Questionnaire: Validation of the Cuestionario de Violencia de Novios Using a College Sample From the United States. Violence Vict. 31(3):438-56.
• ²⁸
  Iconis R. Dating Violence Among College Students Contemporary Issues in Education Research , 2013, v6 n1 p111-114.
• ²⁹
  Gover AR, Kaukinen C, Fox KA. The relationship between violence in the family of origin and dating violence among college students. J Interpers Violence. 2008, 23(12):1667-93.
• ³⁰
  Bauer RBY, Nunes CS, Martins MJ, Mendes M, Pinho BS, Silva O. About hazing in higher education. Euro Scient Journ. Special edition, 2015, 1857 – 7881 (Print).
• ³¹
  Mikell TC. Getting away with murder: hazing, hegemonic masculinity and victimization. (Master’s thesis). 2014.
• ³²
  Nirh JLF. Explanations of College Students for Engaging in Hazing Activities. Dissertation to the Graduate College – University Of Arizona. 2014.
• ³³
  Pimentel MH, Mata MAP, Pereira FA. Práticas iniciáticas de integração no ensino superior: um ritual institucionalizado ou um processo de (des)integração. Atas do V Encontro do CIED – Escola e Comunidade. Lisboa: Escola Superior de Educação. 2011.
• ³⁴
  Klerk V. Initiation, Hazing or Orientation? A case study at a South African University. International Research in Education. 2013, Vol. 1, No.
• ³⁵
  Botelho SP, Mendes M, Caldeira SN, Silba O, Martins MJ, Carvalho CB. Praxe no ensino superior: um estudo comparativo entre instituições. R Est Inv Psico Y Educ, Extra 2015 (2):1.
• ³⁶
  Almeida TMC. Violência contra mulheres nos espaços universitários. Mulheres e violências: interseccionalidades. Brasilia: Technopolitik, 2017.
• ³⁷
  Pimentel S, Campilongo C. Diretrizes sobre assédio moral, sexual, discriminação e desigualdade na Faculdade de Direito da PUC/SP. São Paulo: PUCSP, 2015. Recuperado em 05/01/2018 de http://www.pucsp.br/sites/default/files/download/aci/14-3-2016_diretrizes_artigosilviapimentel-celsocampilongo.pdf
  » http://www.pucsp.br/sites/default/files/download/aci/14-3-2016_diretrizes_artigosilviapimentel-celsocampilongo.pdf
• ³⁸
  Scavone M, Alvarez L. Violência contra mulher no ambiente universitário. São Paulo: DATA POPULAR/Instituto AVON. 2015. Recuperado em 08/12/2017 de http://www.ouvidoria.ufscar.br/arquivos/PesquisaInstitutoAvon_V9_FINAL_Bx20151.pdf
  » http://www.ouvidoria.ufscar.br/arquivos/PesquisaInstitutoAvon_V9_FINAL_Bx20151.pdf
• ³⁹
  Akerman M, Conchão S, Hotmsky B, Boaeretto R. Violência e Intimidação na recepção aos calouros nas faculdades de medicina: ato que persiste ao longo do ano. Rev Bras Educ Méd. 2010, 34(4):627-628.
• ⁴⁰
  Silva ACB, Morgado MA. Bullying no Ensino Superior: Existe? Revista de Iniciação Científica da FFC. São Paulo. 2011, 11(3). Recuperado em 10/01/2018 de http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/ric/article/view/1147/1357
  » http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/ric/article/view/1147/1357
• ⁴¹
  Lima MCP. Sobre trote, vampiros e relacionamento humano nas escolas médicas. Rev. bras. educ. med, 2012, vol.36 no.3.
• ⁴²
  Gourlart G. Bullying como fator de evasão universitária: percepção dos alunos de uma universidade federal da região centro-oeste. Revista Gestão Universitária, 2013.
• ⁴³
  Lima MCP, Ramos-Cerqueira ATA, Dantas CL, Lamardo JR, Reis LEC, Torres AR. O Trote e a Saúde Mental de Estudantes de Medicina. Rev Bras Educ Méd. 2017, 41 (2): 210 – 220.
• ⁴⁴
  Maito DC. Parâmetros teóricos e normativos para o enfrentamento à violência contra mulheres na Universidade de São Paulo. Dissertação de mestrado não publicada. Faculdade de Direito de Ribeirão Preto – Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto,SP. 2017.
• ⁴⁵
  Costa MS, Veloso-Dias O, Dias ACA, Souza TR, Canela JR. Trote universitário: diversão ou constrangimento entre acadêmicos da saúde? Rev Bioét. 2013, vol. 21, núm. 2, pp. 350-358.recuperado em 18/01/2018 de http://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/index.php/revista_bioetica/article/view/826/914
  » http://revistabioetica.cfm.org.br/index.php/revista_bioetica/article/view/826/914
• ⁴⁶
  Mascarenhas S, Matos F, Jesus S, Galdino Z. Diagnóstico e avaliação das praxes ou trotes – Um estudo transcultural com universitários de Portugal e do Brasil. Universidade do Algarve. 2013. Recuperado em 10/01/2018 de https://abpsa.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/congresso2011/Comunica%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20Oral/CO75%20-%20CONFERIDO/CO75%20-%20TEXTO%20INTEGRAL%20-%20Diagn%C3%B3stico%20E%20Avalia%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20Das%20Praxes%20Ou%20Trotes%20%E2%80%93%20Um%20Estudo%20Transcultural.pdf
  » https://abpsa.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/congresso2011/Comunica%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20Oral/CO75%20-%20CONFERIDO/CO75%20-%20TEXTO%20INTEGRAL%20-%20Diagn%C3%B3stico%20E%20Avalia%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20Das%20Praxes%20Ou%20Trotes%20%E2%80%93%20Um%20Estudo%20Transcultural.pdf
• ⁴⁷
  SÃO PAULO A. Relatório Final da CPI das Universidades Paulistas. São Paulo: ALESP. Recuperado em 06/01/2018 de http://www.al.sp.gov.br/repositorio/arquivoWeb/com/com3092.pdf
  » http://www.al.sp.gov.br/repositorio/arquivoWeb/com/com3092.pdf
• ⁴⁸
  Lima JS, Lucena FC. O bullying e as suas implicações no processo de ensino aprendizagem: procedimentos para o descomprometimento do cidadão com o social. Revista Ágora, Salgueiro – PE. 2009, v. 4, n.1.
• ⁴⁹
  São Paulo. Lei no. 15892 – Proibe o trote nas escolas da rede pública em qualquer nível de ensino. São Paulo: ALESP. 2015. Recuperado em 06/01/2018 de http://www.al.sp.gov.br/repositorio/legislacao/lei/2015/lei-15892-15.09.2015.html
  » http://www.al.sp.gov.br/repositorio/legislacao/lei/2015/lei-15892-15.09.2015.html
• ⁵⁰
  USP. Universidade de São Paulo. Portaria 3154/99 Dispõe sobre a proibição do trote na USP. São Paulo: Conselho Universitário/USP, abril 1999.

• INSTITUTIONAL AND FINANCIAL SUPPORT

  Unified Grant Program of the Universidade de São Paulo (PUB-USP 2014-2016)

Publication Dates

• Publication in this collection
  13 Jan 2020
• Date of issue
  2019

History

• Received
  5 June 2019
• Accepted
  17 July 2019