RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia
Brief Background
|
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia (ISSN 1981-8637 - online) was first published in 1953 by a group of friends and is one of the oldest journals in the dental field. From 2006 to 2012, its issues were published in print and online, but in 2013, it was published exclusively online. In 2014, all its content was published in English. Since 2019, the journal has been publishing continuously, with a focus on articles that contribute to the study and scientific development of dentistry, speeding up the process. The journal has been published uninterruptedly since its creation and since it began publishing its articles online in open access in 2006. Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic publishes it. |
Open Science Compliance
|
This journal follows the Gold Open Access model. RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia adopts a series of practices, such as the open access policy, the code of good practice for editors and the use of social networks to disseminate published work. In line with the alignment of open science, it supports the four dimensions of the movement such as harmonizing the adoption of open access, including the preprint modality and continuous publication in the flow of scientific communication, sharing data, codes, methods and other materials used and resulting from research and transparency in the peer review process of manuscripts, publishing the name(s) of the editor(s) responsible for the review process in the final version. Journals should also offer referees and authors the option of opening up their identities in order to encourage interaction in the manuscript evaluation process. When submitting the manuscript, we ask that you fill in the Open Science Compliance Form, in which the authors share with the journal information about the manuscript in accordance with Open Science communication practices. |
Ethics in Publication
|
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia is committed to ethics and scientific quality in publishing. The journal complies with the standards of ethical behavior expected of all parties involved: authors, who must explicitly declare, individually, any potential financial, direct and/or indirect, and non-financial conflict of interest, etc., as well as any conflict of interest with ad hoc reviewers, reviewers who, if a conflict of interest is identified, will notify the journal and the Editorial Committee will forward the manuscript to another ad hoc reviewer and editors. Articles resulting from research related to human beings and animals are only accepted for submission with a letter of approval from a Research and/or Animal Ethics Committee. Articles with clinical research results must have an identification number in one of the Clinical Trials Registries validated by the criteria of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), whose addresses are available on the ICMJE website. The identification number must be entered at the end of the abstract. The journal also follows the COPE guidelines. |
Focus and Scope
|
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia, founded in 1953, is a specialized journal published by Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic. Since 2019, the journal has been published continuously, with a focus on articles aimed at the scientific development of Dentistry and related areas. |
Digital Preservation
|
This journal follows the standards defined in the SciELO Program's Digital Preservation Policy. |
Indexing Sources
Bibliographic Journal Information
|
Websites and Social Media
|
EDITORIAL POLICY
Preprints
|
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia encourages and supports the publication of articles on preprint servers, such as SciELO Preprints, and accepts manuscripts previously deposited on a reliable preprint server. Preprints share with journals the novelty of the publication of articles and inhibit the use of the double-blind procedure in the evaluation of manuscripts. The use of preprints is an option and choice of the authors and it is up to the journals to adapt their policies to accept the submission of manuscripts previously deposited in a preprint server recognized by the journal. |
Peer Review Process
|
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia's editorial policy defines the following criteria for the evaluation process: adequacy to the scope of the journal and the journal's technical and formal standards, relevance, content, textual coherence, theoretical and methodological consistency. Manuscripts that fail to comply with any of the rules published here regarding the form of presentation will be summarily returned before they are even submitted for evaluation as to the merit of the work and the suitability of its publication. Pre-analysis: the evaluation is carried out by the editors based on the originality, relevance, and academic quality, scope of the journal and relevance of the manuscript to the field of Dentistry. The article that complies with the rules will be submitted for evaluation of merit and scientific method by at least three rapporteurs of recognized competence in the subject matter, but from institutions other than those of the author(s). In the event of disagreement, the manuscript will be sent for a fourth evaluation. Manuscripts, which, at the discretion of the Editorial Board or the reviewers, are not considered suitable for publication in RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia will be returned to the authors definitively. In line with open science practices, the journal offers authors and reviewers the option of opening up the peer review process, with or without identifying their names. Authorization to disclose their names can be given by the authors when submitting the article and by the reviewers when filling in the Open Science Compliance Form. In the event of publication of the evaluations on which the decision to publish the article was based, they may be edited by the journal's editorial board. Approved manuscripts are published with the names of the editors responsible for the evaluation. The reviewers, by means of an opinion written on a ScholarOne form, will recommend one of the following options: approved; request for few changes; request for many revisions; rejected. In any of these cases, the authors will be notified. The final decision on whether or not to publish the manuscript rests with the editors, who reserve the right to make any adjustments they deem necessary. If writing problems are detected, the manuscript will be returned to the authors so that the necessary changes can be made. The reworked manuscript must be returned within the specified deadline. Accepted manuscripts: Accepted manuscripts may be returned to the authors for approval of any changes in the editing and standardization process, in accordance with the journal's style. PDF proofs will be sent to the authors to correct the artwork of the manuscript. The proofs must be returned to the journal by the stipulated date (48 hours). Other changes to the original manuscript will not be accepted at this stage. Only corrections to spelling, the exchange of one word or another and numerical data in tables and graphs are allowed. The inclusion and/or exclusion of sentences, paragraphs, images and references will not be accepted. |
Open Data
|
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia is committed to the Research Data Citation Guide and encourages authors to share all data in the manuscript. Authors should make the underlying content available in one data repository or more than one in the case of different types of files and content. Authors can choose to keep these files closed until the article is approved and published. They can also request to keep them closed after publication for reasons that the journal may or may not accept. For deposit check out the list of repositories for depositing research data. To ensure total transparency of the data obtained, RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia requires authors to declare that, for data not available in public repositories, it must be made available on request.
List of repositories for depositing research data: |
Fees
|
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia does not charge any fees for submitting, reviewing, publishing, distributing or downloading articles, keeping publication completely free and open access. |
Ethics and Misconduct, Correction and Retraction Policy
|
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia describes in the flow of manuscripts submitted to the journal steps for authors to attest to their responsibility for the content submitted to the journal and subsequently published, recording each author's contribution at the end of the manuscript. The originality/integrity of the texts is ensured by the journal using plagium software, which checks the percentage of similarity with previous publications. In cases of similarity, the journal contacts the corresponding author for clarification and, if necessary, all the authors and, if similarity of more than 30% or duplication of content is proven, the authors' affiliation or funding institutions involved in the development of the research are contacted. If the editors and/or referees have any doubts about the citations contained in the article and their references, checks and confirmations are requested with the corresponding author and, if necessary, with all the authors. Editors and referees must analyze manuscripts impartially and with scientific and ethical rigor in order to preserve the confidentiality of their evaluation, making notes to improve the article and respecting the deadlines set by the journal. Falsifying data (full plagiarism; partial plagiarism; mosaic plagiarism; concept plagiarism; buzzword plagiarism) is considered serious misconduct.
f misconduct is found, the authors' affiliation or funding institutions involved in the development of the research will be informed and clarification will be requested from the authors and those involved. Suspicions of possible cases of misconduct can be forwarded to the journal's e-mail address. RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia undertakes to publish corrections, clarifications, retractions, as well as notes of concern, if necessary. It is important to note that the processing of the manuscript will be halted and all parties involved will be informed of what happened. If the misconduct is proven, the manuscript will be withdrawn from the evaluation process; the journal will not receive submissions from the group of authors; the reviewer will be excluded from the reviewers' database and the editor may be removed from his duties at the journal. |
Policy on Conflict of Interest
|
Authors must explicitly declare, individually, any potential direct and/or indirect financial and non-financial conflict of interest, etc., as well as any conflict of interest with reviewers. If a conflict of interest on the part of the reviewers is identified, the Editorial Committee will forward the manuscript to another reviewer. Authors should optionally indicate three possible reviewers for the manuscript with their e-mail addresses and the institutions to which they are linked. Optionally, they can indicate three reviewers to whom they would not like their work to be sent. |
Adoption of similarity checking software
|
The Journal considers the practice of plagiarism to be unacceptable. The journal uses the plagium software to check the originality of the article before sending it to the reviewers. Similarity will be considered when the report generated by the program shows long texts (more than 30%) that demonstrate plagiarism. When plagiarism is detected, the authors are informed by presenting the report generated by the plagiarism detection software. If there are any doubts or questions, the editor-in-chief contacts the corresponding author and, if necessary, all the authors. If duplication is proven, the authors' affiliation or funding institutions involved in the development of the research are contacted and the article is rejected for publication. The journal considers plagiarism unacceptable. It uses the plagium program to verify the authenticity of manuscripts at the time of submission. Plagiarism will be considered when the software report indicates that more than 30% of the text is similar to other sources. Authors are notified when plagiarism is identified, providing the plagium report as evidence. In case of doubt, the editor-in-chief will contact the main author and, if necessary, all the authors. |
Adoption of software using Artificial Intelligence resources
|
Artificial intelligence does not meet the requirements of RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia for authorship of a scientific article, due to the need for accountability. AI tools and language models cannot be included as authors in any scientific paper published by RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia. The use of Artificial Intelligence can be made by authors in cases that do not involve ethical issues, such as responsibility for the article, conflict of interest and license and copyright agreements. AI-generated texts may contain biases, distortions, irrelevancies, plagiarism and misrepresentations, many of which are influenced by the algorithms used in their generation and depend on the content of the materials used to formulate the questions. Texts translated by artificial intelligence will not be accepted. Activities considered acceptable for the use of artificial intelligence include assistance with the language of the article, literature searches, non-innovative texts, writing manuscripts, producing images or graphic elements, compiling and analyzing data. Authors must guarantee the accuracy, integrity and originality of their articles, even when using AI. The use of AI must not infringe the plagiarism policy of RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia, and it is essential to correctly cite ideas, data and materials from third parties. |
Gender and Sex Issues
|
The editorial team of RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia, as well as the authors who publish in the journal, should always observe the Sex and Gender Equity in Research – SAGER guidelines. The SAGER guidelines comprise a set of guidelines that guide the reporting of sex and gender information in study design, data analysis, results and interpretation of findings. In addition, RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia observes the gender equity policy in the formation of its editorial board. |
Ethics Committee
|
RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia pays strict attention to ethical standards when conducting research on human beings and animals. When the manuscript involves procedures with human beings and/or animals, a letter of approval from the ethics committee of the institution responsible for approving the research must be attached. |
Copyright
|
The authors hold the copyright of the articles published in RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia, and the content of the articles is the sole responsibility of the authors. The journal uses Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) for published articles. This license allows published articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, as long as the original work is properly cited. Authors grant RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia the right of first publication. |
Intellectual Property and Terms of Use
|
Website responsibility RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia reserves the right to make changes to the originals in order to maintain the cultured standard of the language, while respecting the authors' style. The original files will be returned to the authors. Author's responsibility All the content of the journal and the articles published by RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia, except where otherwise specified, are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license. The data, opinions and concepts expressed in the articles, as well as the accuracy of the bibliographical references, are the sole responsibility of the author(s). Authors of articles published by RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia retain the copyright of their work, licensing it under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, as long as the original work is correctly cited. RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia encourages Authors to self-archive their accepted manuscripts, publishing them on personal blogs, institutional repositories and academic social media, as well as posting them on their personal social media, as long as the full citation to the journal's website version is included. |
Sponsors and Promotion Agencies
|
Editor-in-Chief
|
Deputy Editor(s)
|
Associate Editor
|
Managing Editor
|
Associate Editor
|
Editorial Production
|
|
All papers approved for final publication in RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia will receive a Digital Object Identifier (DOI). |
Submission
|
All articles must be submitted electronically via http://mc04.manuscriptcentral.com/rgo-scielo. The editors will not consider any other form of submission. At the time of submission, the following must be attached:
(1) The article (complete file in Word format, including title page, abstract, text, references and illustrations); The editors of RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia, may reject manuscripts without detailed comments after initial analysis if the articles are considered inappropriate to the scope of the journal or of insufficient scientific priority for publication in the journal. ORCID: It is mandatory to include the ORCID (Open Researcher and Contributor ID) of all authors. |
Types of Documents Accepted
|
Original: contributions aimed at disseminating empirical, experimental or conceptual results of unpublished research, taking into account the relevance of the topic, the scope and the knowledge generated for the research area; Review: a critical synthesis of available knowledge on a given topic, through analysis and interpretation of relevant bibliography, so as to contain a critical and comparative analysis of work in the area, which discusses the methodological limits and scope, making it possible to indicate perspectives for continuing studies in that line of research. Up to two papers will be published per issue; Article that critically summarizes scientific knowledge on a given topic. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: by synthesizing the results of primary studies, whether qualitative and/or quantitative, this type of manuscript must answer a specific question, be limited to 30,000 characters, including spaces, and follow the PRISMA sequence - Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, and The PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med 2009; & amp; nbsp; 6: e1000097. Doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2535.). The manuscript should provide detailed information on the process of searching for and retrieving the original studies, the criteria used to select the studies included in the review and provide a summary of the results obtained in the studies reviewed (with or without a meta-analysis approach). There is no limit to the number of references and figures. Tables and figures, if included, should present the characteristics of the studies reviewed, the interventions that were compared and their results, as well as the studies excluded from the review. Other tables and figures pertinent to the review should be presented as described above. The abstract should contain a maximum of 250 words. Communication: reporting information on relevant topics, based on recent research, supporting the work of professionals working in the field, serving as a presentation or update on the topic; Clinical Case: articles that represent descriptive data from one or more cases, exploring a method or problem through examples. It presents the characteristics of the human or animal being studied, with an indication of their characteristics, such as gender, socioeconomic level, age and others. Preprints |
Manuscript Preparation
|
Cover page
Abstract
All articles submitted must have an abstract in the original language and in English, with a minimum of 150 words and a maximum of 250 words. For original articles, the abstracts should be structured highlighting the objectives, basic methods adopted, information on the location, population and sample of the research, the most relevant results and conclusions, considering the objectives of the work, and indicating ways of continuing the study. For the other categories, the format of the abstracts should be narrative, but with the same information. Introduction It should be concise, defining the problem studied, summarizing its importance and highlighting the gaps in knowledge that will be addressed in the article. It should contain an up-to-date literature review that is pertinent to the topic, appropriate to the presentation of the problem and which highlights its relevance. It should not be extensive, except in manuscripts submitted as a Review Article. Methods They must be presented in sufficient detail to allow the observations to be confirmed, including the procedures adopted, universe and sample; measurement instruments and, if applicable, validation method; statistical treatment. With regard to statistical analysis, the authors must demonstrate that the procedures used were not only appropriate for testing the study's hypotheses, but also correctly interpreted. The levels of statistical significance (e.g. p<0.05; p<0.01; p<0.001) should be mentioned. Accurately identify all drugs and chemical substances used, including generic names, doses and routes of administration. Scientific terms should be spelled out in full, rather than their corresponding abbreviated symbols. This includes the names of compounds and chemical elements and binomials from microbiological, zoological and botanical nomenclature. The generic names of products should be preferred to their respective trademarks, always followed in parentheses by the name of the manufacturer, the city and the country in which it was manufactured, separated by a comma.
Inform that an Ethics Committee accredited by the National Health Council approved the research and provide the approval number. Results They should be presented with as little discussion or personal interpretation as possible, accompanied by tables and/or appropriate illustrative material when necessary. Do not repeat in the text all the data already presented in illustrations and tables. Statistical data should be subjected to appropriate analysis. Discussion It should adequately and objectively explore the results, discussed in the light of other observations already recorded in the literature. Conclusion Present the relevant conclusions, considering the objectives of the work, and indicate ways of continuing the study. Bibliographical citations will not be accepted in this section. Acknowledgements Acknowledgments can be made, in a paragraph no longer than three lines, to institutions or individuals who have effectively contributed to the work. Annexes They should only be included if they are essential to understanding the text. It will be up to the editors to judge the need for their publication. Abbreviations and acronyms They should be used in a standardized way, restricting themselves only to those conventionally used or sanctioned by usage, accompanied by the meaning, in full, when first quoted in the text. They should not be used in the title or abstract. |
Article Submission Format
|
Articles should not exceed 4,000 words, excluding ethical approval, conflicts of interest, acknowledgments, references, tables, figures and figure legends. The total number of illustrations should not exceed 6. References are limited to 30. Exceptions to this number will be analyzed by the editorial board. |
Digital Assets
|
Illustrations include all types of tables, figures, graphs, drawings, schematics, flowcharts, photographs, maps, organizational charts, diagrams, graphs, charts, portraits, etc. that serve to illustrate the research data. For empirical articles, the place and year of the study must be indicated. Figures may not present the same data as tables or data already described in the text. The total number of figures accepted per article is 6 (six), including all the types mentioned above. Illustrations must be inserted after the References section and sent separately in their original program through the platform at the time of submission. Illustrations must be editable and the following editing programs are accepted: Excel, GraphPrism, SPSS 22, Corel Draw Suite X7, and Word. If you choose to use another program, you must use the standard Frutiger font, size 7, as adopted by the journal in the issue. Images must have a resolution of 600 dpi or higher. Graphs and drawings must be created in vector design programs (Microsoft Excel, CorelDraw, Adobe Illustrator, etc.) with their quantitative parameters in tabular form and with the names of all variables. Graphs presented with grid lines will not be accepted, and elements (bars, circles) must not have volume (3-D). |
Citations and References
|
References
Bibliographical citations in the text
|
Supplementary Documents
|
At the time of submission, the authors must necessarily include the manuscript:
All persons listed as authors must sign these documents. On the ScholarOne platform, they must be entered in step 6 of the submission process. Photographs of signatures will not be accepted. Only scanned or electronic signatures are allowed to avoid any kind of fraud. It is preferred that the documents be scanned and submitted in PDF format. |
Financing Statement
|
Inform sources of support for the work, including names of sponsors, contract number (if any), along with explanations of the role of these sources. |
Contact
|
Faculdade São Leopoldo Mandic |