SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.22 issue7Interview: inequality the key concept when discussing health internationallyAnti-bullying interventions in schools: a systematic literature review author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Ciência & Saúde Coletiva

Print version ISSN 1413-8123On-line version ISSN 1678-4561

Ciênc. saúde coletiva vol.22 no.7 Rio de Janeiro July 2017

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232017227.24892015 

REVIEW

Prescription medication by physiotherapists: a Brazilian view of the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia and New Zealand

Prescrição de medicamentos por fisioterapeutas: um olhar brasileiro sobre o Reino Unido, Canadá, Austrália e Nova Zelândia

Valton da Silva Costa1 

1Faculdade Estácio do Rio Grande do Norte. R. Dr. Hernani Hugo Gomes 90, Capim Macio. 59082-270 Natal RN Brasil. valtontj@hotmail.com


Abstract

Many health systems (HS) have adopted novel models of care which have included non-medical prescription (NMP) by physiotherapists. The aim of this study was to verify in the literature the existence of this practice and its possible benefits. A literature review was carried out through search on Science Direct, PubMed, SciELO, Lilacs and Google Scholar, and in the World Confederation for Physical Therapy and Chartered Society of Physiotherapy websites. In recent decades the United Kingdom adopted the NMP for health professionals, followed by Canada. In Australia and New Zealand physiotherapists have acted in the prescription and administration of medications under medical orders, which is the first step into independent prescription. Brazilian physiotherapists cannot prescribe any medication, despite of high demands from patients in the Brazilian HS, shortage of physicians in many regions and bureaucracy in accessing health services. The adoption of NMP by physiotherapists may play an important role in the HS, and it seems to be an inevitable achievement in the next years in Australia and New Zealand. The main benefits include decreasing bureaucracy for assistance, population demands for medication as well as major professional refinement.

Key words: Health systems; Physical therapists; Professional practice; Drug prescriptions

Resumo

Alguns sistemas de saúde (SS) têm adotado modelos inovadores de assistência que incluem a prescrição não médica (PNM) por fisioterapeutas. Este estudo objetivou verificar na literatura a existência dessa prática e seus possíveis benefícios. Foi realizada revisão da literatura, com buscas na Science Direct, PubMed, SciELO, Lilacs e Google Scholar, e nos sites da World Confederation for Physical Therapy e da Charthered Society of Physiotherapy, entre 2014 e 2015. O Reino Unido adotou a PNM por fisioterapeutas em décadas recentes, exemplo seguido pelo Canadá. Na Austrália e Nova Zelândia, fisioterapeutas têm atuado na prescrição e administração de medicamentos, sob ordens médicas, sendo este o primeiro passo para a prescrição independente. Fisioterapeutas brasileiros não podem prescrever medicamentos, apesar das altas demandas de pacientes, carência de médicos em muitas regiões e burocracia no acesso aos serviços de saúde. A prática da PNM por fisioterapeutas pode preencher um importante papel nos SS, e parece ser uma inevitável realização na Austrália e Nova Zelândia nos próximos anos. Os principais benefícios são a diminuição da burocracia no acesso a medicamentos e demandas populacionais, bem como maior refinamento profissional.

Palavras-Chave: Sistemas de saúde; Fisioterapeutas; Prática profissional; Prescrições de medicamentos

Introduction

In most part of the contemporary world physiotherapy plays a paramount role in the health systems of both developed and developing countries. In those countries physiotherapists are able to autonomously assess, diagnose, treat and discharge their own patients as part of their professional practice1. In that context, a variety of therapeutic approaches have been utilized to address a number of problems of functioning and movement. Indeed, in its historic context physiotherapy usually has used drug-free physical therapeutic agents such as photoelectric, thermal and mechanic energies, water, manipulation, physical exercises, and so on. However, health systems have required supplementaries competencies from different healthcare professionals as the incidence of chronic-degenerative diseases and population demands for additional care increase2,3. Thus health systems around the world have adopted novel models of care and required professional competencies which are centred on consume needs4,5.

One of these models has drawn attention on prescription medication by non-medical professionals including physiotherapists. For the purposes of this paper prescription medication is defined as the act of indicating, recommending or advising on the initiation, continuation or cessation of a medication or remedy for therapeutic objectives. In this context, concerns respect to pharmacological education and legal status of practice have been taken into consideration by healthcare managers, consumers and the health professionals themselves4. Nevertheless, increasing evidence has indicated that physiotherapists may play an important role on prescription and administration of some types of drugs2,5.

Therefore, the aim of this paper was to verify on the literature the existence of prescription medication by physiotherapists and the likely benefits of this practice for the health systems, consumers, and the professionals themselves, and to additionally check out possible solutions for the concerns related to this extension of scope of practice in those countries where it already exists or probably will be adopted.

Methods

This study is a literature review with descriptive analysis of the collected data. An electronic search was performed in July 2014, in the following databases: ScienceDirect, PubMed, Google Scholar and the websites of organizations related to the topic of this research, namely, the World Confederation for Physical Therapy and the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. The following English search-terms were used: Physiotherapy, Extended Scope of Practice and Prescription Medication. The resulting data were assembled and analysed so that relevant information could be identified; those data which duplicated, did not meet the topic of the research or represented grey literature (non-academic or non-official sources) were excluded. The results were first presented in a simple brief review in English language as an academic requirement for completion of the preparatory English course for master’s degree of La Trobe University, Australia. In September 2015, the research was updated and amplified in order to include wider information from the Brazilian context. The same search procedures and inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, extending it to Portuguese language and data from the Brazilian version of Google Scholar and the databases Scielo (Scientific Electronic Library Online) and Lilacs (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Ciências da Saúde). A general view of the procedures of the electronic search can be seen in Figure 1. The results were then assembled in one up-to-date literature review and presented in the form of subtopics.

Figure 1 Flow chart of the procedures of the electronic search. 

Results and Discussion

Health systems, legal status of prescription and availability of medications

Health systems can benefit from adopting models of care that allow physiotherapists and other professionals to prescribe and administrate some types of drugs, hence fulfilling a gap in the increasing demand for assistance and delivery of medication5. In Australia, New Zealand and Brazil, only physicians, dentists and pharmacists are expected to legally prescribe and delivery drugs. That legal status is regulated by state-by-state or even by unified federal laws and acts6,7. However, changes in availability and sale of medication have been in recent years a tendency in countries such as Australia and New Zealand, where other health professionals are now able to prescribe under different circumstances, e.g. nurse practitioners, midwives, podiatrists and optometrists4. In these countries many medications are over-the-counter drugs sold freely in pharmacies and markets. As a result, some oral and topical anti-inflammatory and analgesic drugs are sold without needing medical prescription or recommendation from a health professional1. This phenomenon has also been happening in Brazil in recent years, even in a small scale8,9.

Patient demands for responsiveness and advice on medication usage

Physiotherapists are often asked by clients about the use of certain medications. It seems as they seek advice and recommendation because they see the physiotherapy setting as a relaxing space for expressing their concerns on health6. Hence even with no legal allowance many professionals end up advising on or recommending anti-inflammatory, muscle-relaxing and analgesic drugs in response to those demands. Thus, the advices are mainly related to drugs which are already in use by the patient, are being used inadequately, needless or even are potential complements to physiotherapy management10. This situation does seem to indicate there is some shortage in the assistance of patient needs for medications that are of widespread use in some health systems. Therefore, it can be argued that such demand could be suitably met by the adoption of innovative models of care and more advanced practice of multidisciplinary teams as well as by augmenting the number of professionals enabled to prescribe medications4,11,12.

Adoption of novel models of care: the example of the United Kingdom and Canada

The benefits of adopting novel models of non-medical prescription can be observed from the legal changes adopted by the National Health Service, the United Kingdom healthcare system, in recent decades. In the United Kingdom, physiotherapists have been acting in prescription medication under medical approval since 1990 (medications) and 1995 (injections), and increased their scope of practice to supplementary prescribing in 20054,13. As a result, consumers and the health system itself experienced significant improvements in terms of availability and delivery of medications without compromising patient safety as well as introducing a more flexible design of professional team and other professional achievements that came from changes in more extended professional practice4,14. In 20 August 2013, the United Kingdom physiotherapists who worked as advanced extended-scope professionals were first recognized as independent prescribers, decreasing the health system’s bureaucracy and alleviating extra burden on doctors13,15. Thus, the list of medicines that can be prescribed has been expanded to any licensed medicine from the British National Formulary, for any condition within the practitioner’s area of expertise and competence. Under that new legal status they may prescribe even from a restricted list of controlled drugs according to regional regulations, benefiting different groups of patients16.

These positive effects were also seen in some Canadian states where the scope of physiotherapy practice were extended, especially in Quebec, where these professionals have demonstrated good practice on safe prescription of anti-inflammatory and analgesic drugs with high degree of popular acceptance from patients and also medical professionals5. This acceptance and engagement of medical professionals and other prescribers is an important framework to underpin the adoption of that practice. Furthermore, it seems to be a trend in countries where more advanced practice in physiotherapy is being implemented17,18.

Australia and New Zealand: a trend into adoption of non-medical prescription by physiotherapists

In Australia, a number of physiotherapists work in the treatment of neuromusculoskeletal dysfunctions whose management is generally a combination of physical and pharmacological therapy such as steroid and non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs, muscle-relaxing and similar medications19,20. Furthermore, some drugs have been used as adjuncts in more complex physiotherapeutic procedures, such as iontophoresis and phonophoresis (which maximize the power of absorption of some topic drugs), or as massage creams, manipulations and nebulisations, hence enhancing the physical management of a variety of musculoskeletal and rheumatologic conditions20,21. Additionally, pain and inflammation are very common symptoms of chronic and degenerative diseases. Thus, the drugs which are in the centre of discussion are those used as adjunct to physiotherapy practice and that are related to musculoskeletal or respiratory symptoms, such as oral, topic, nebulising or injective drugs6,22. Therefore, prescribing drugs that are aimed to alleviating symptoms relevant to the physiotherapy management could result in a faster and more efficient treatment, with larger gains in mobility and functional recovery, within a suitable time for resolution of the condition, with no need for waiting a medical prescription14,15,23.

Benefits of adopting non-medical prescription for physiotherapists

Extending the physiotherapy scope of practice may lead to a major professional refinement, responsibility and recognition. In Australia, New Zealand, Canada, as well as in Brazil, physiotherapists are first-contact professionals5,6,24, what means that individuals may seek directly a physiotherapist without needing a referral from a doctor. However, if patients need medication – as simple as anti-inflammatory drugs or painkillers, and though some are widely available in pharmacies and markets – physiotherapists cannot recommend them but just refer those patients to a physician or pharmacist in order to provide the medication1. Medications can have a deleterious or a positive impact on physiotherapeutic interventions22. From this point of view, prescribing medication relevant to physiotherapist practice could meet an important gap in the professional autonomy. Indeed, as stressed by the study of Anderson25, Australian physiotherapists can administer some drugs under “permanent orders”, where a physician may approve the administration of certain drugs, especially in the absence of doctors. In Brazil, despite the autonomy and advanced practice of the profession in the subareas of specialization and in different levels of assistance (including the request of complementary exams), the discussion about non-medical prescription has not received enough attention24. Consequently, the benefits of that practice to the Brazilian health system, which is widely known to suffer huge demands of patients, shortage of health professionals in many geographic areas, bureaucracy in assistance and burden of referral and unnecessary work from some professionals, still are to be discussed26-28. Therefore, this paper has the potential to initiate an important discussion about non-medical prescription medication in the Brazilian physiotherapy scenario and also stimulate thinking of alternatives to meet some of the problems the Brazilian health system has faced.

In Australia and New Zealand, permanent orders of drug prescription are common in some areas of specialization, especially in sports medicine, where many sport teams prefer hiring a physiotherapist as their only healthcare provider25, or in regions where there is not enough doctors19. In these circumstances physiotherapists generally carry and administer anti-inflammatory and similar drugs. It is noteworthy that these situations seem to happen, yet to a lesser extent, to Brazilian physiotherapists working in sports medicine29. Additionally to the legal autonomy and first-contact professional status of Australian and New Zealand physiotherapists, relevant prescription medication as an extended scope is likely to result in greater professional development and responsibility, similar to those of the United Kingdom extended-scope physiotherapists.

Concerns and solutions relative to the adoption of non-medical prescription medication by physiotherapists

The main concern of extending the physiotherapy scope of practice to include Suplementary or independent prescription is related to insufficient pharmacological education of these professionals4. Indeed, undergraduate and postgraduate curricula have drawn little attention on pharmacological education6,22. However, it probably happens because of the legal status of these professionals in the majority of countries, where by law they are not allowed to prescribe any type of medication24.

Insufficient knowledge on the effects, indications and contraindication of relevant drugs for physiotherapy could be met through advanced training programs and closer attention on pharmacology in the undergraduate and postgraduate physiotherapy course programs30. This could only occur through legislative changes on country’s law and the professional organizations which could coordinate the implementation of the practice for some professionals and the necessary training, evaluation and fiscalization4,14. Furthermore, there are possible problems that maybe arise from different health professionals prescribing such as disconnected care, drug interactions, drug duplication, and even issues related to financial interests, pharmaceutical promotion and marketing which may introduce a negative perspective to prescribing rather than patient needs. Yet, strangely, these questions do not appear in the available literature. Moreover, any issue related to these questions could be at least partially met by building sound and efficient communication between the healthcare providers and surveillance from the organizations responsible for the profession.

Following the changes in the United Kingdom health system, it could be noticed that any deficiency in pharmacological knowledge could be met by means of educational programs thought to enable some professionals to prescribe certain types of drugs, first as supplementary and later as independent prescribers4,13,20. A research carried out in New Zealand showed that physiotherapists who recommended non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs were also more likely to know a major number of risks and side effects of recommended drugs than those who did not31. Similar results were found by Coelho and co-workers10. Thus, advanced education programs on prescription medication seem to minimize possible risks to patient safety. In fact, of 60.000 drugs accidents between 2005 and 2006 in the United Kingdom no one was related to physiotehrapists4. In the United Kingdom, physiotherapists willing to extend their professional practice to independent prescription should undergo a six-month training program and demonstrate a high-level of professional competency15. Brazilian physiotherapists, other healthcare professionals and managers should consider the possibility of adopting novel models of prescription medication, which might result in benefits for the health system and better patient-centered care. However, deep and long transcultural adaptations, besides advanced education programs and legislative changes, would probably be necessary should that model be implemented toward successful non-medical prescription by Brazilian physiotherapists and other professionals, following the United Kingdom pathway.

Conclusion

Non-medical prescription medication represents a dilemma for physiotherapists and health managers in terms of legal status, patient safety and pharmacological education. Despite that, non-medical prescription seems to be an inevitable achievement in Australia and New Zealand in the next decades, following the successful examples of the United Kingdom and some Canadian states, in response to the increasing demand for resolution from patients what can be partially met by this measure.

Therefore, adopting a new model of care which allows physiotherapists suitably trained to prescribe relevant medications for their practice may result in important benefits. It may diminish the bureaucracy of drugs delivery and the demands of the health system, fulfill safely patient therapeutic needs without any loss of time, and may result in major professional refinement. Implementation of non-medical prescription by physiotherapists in Brazil should follow the steps led by the United Kingdom, from supplementary to independent prescribing, and similarly it could base on advanced educational programmes for safe practice.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to acknowledge the teacher Lisa Pagnon from La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia, for her technical aid during the production of this research and article.

References

1. Kumar S, Grimmer K. Nonsteroidal antiinflamatory drugs (NSAIDs) and physiotherapy management of musculoskeletal conditions: a professional minefield? Ther Clin Risk Manag 2005; 1(1):69-76. [ Links ]

2. Kersten P, McPherson K, Lattimer V, George S, Breton A, Ellis B. Physiotherapy extended scope of practice – who is doing what and why? Physiotherapy 2007; 93(4):235-242. [ Links ]

3. Neuman PB, Scammell AE, Burnett AM, Thompson JA, Briffa NK. Training of women’s health physiotherapists to provide pessary care in the Australian health care setting: results of a novel program. Physiotherapy 2015; 101(Supl. 1):833-1237. [ Links ]

4. Morris JH, Grimmer K. Non-medical prescribing by physiotherapists: issues reported in the current evidence. Man Ther 2014; 19(1):82-86. [ Links ]

5. Desjardins-Charbonneau A, Roy J-S, Thibault J, Ciccone VT, Desmeules F. Acceptability of advanced practice physiotherapists and physiotherapists as primary care practitioners in the treatment of patients with musculoskeletal disorders. In: WCPT Congress 2015. Physiotherapy 2015; 101(Supl. 1):26-426. [ Links ]

6. Lansbury G, Sullivan G. Advising clients about prescription medications. Physiotherapy 2002; 88(1):18-24. [ Links ]

7. Pepe V, Osorio-de-Castro CGS. Prescrição de medicamentos. Formulário terapêutico nacional. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde (MS); 2008. [ Links ]

8. Brasil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução da Diretoria Colegiada – RDC 80, de 11 de maio de 2006. Diário Oficial da União 2006; 11 maio. [ Links ]

9. Vitor RS, Lopes CP, Menezes HS, Kerkhoff CE. Padrão de consumo de medicamentos sem prescrição médica na cidade de Porto Alegre, RS. Cien Saude Colet 2008; 13(Supl. 0):737-743. [ Links ]

10. Coelho A, Cardoso, AS, Parola V, Pedro JM, Rebelo P. Hábitos de aconselhamento de medicamentos por fisioterapeutas. In: Congresso Internacional de Ciências e Tecnologias da Saúde, 2010 abril; Ilha Terceira, Açores; 2010. [ Links ]

11. Oguisso T, Freitas GF. Enfermeiros prescrevendo medicamentos: possibilidades e perspectivas. Rev Bras Enferm 2007; 60(2):141-144. [ Links ]

12. Faria RC, Campos EMS. Demanda espontânea na estratégia de saúde da família: uma análise dos fatores que a influenciam e os desafios na reorientação do modelo assistencial do SUS. Rev APS 2012; 15(2):148-157. [ Links ]

13. Beswetherick N, White P. Achieving independent prescribing by physiotherapists in the UK. Physiotherapy 2015; 101(Supl. 1):26-426. [ Links ]

14. Wagstaff S. Extended Scope Physiotherapy: the way towards consultant physiotherapists? Physiotherapy. 2001; 87(1):2-3. [ Links ]

15. World Confederation for Physical Therapy. UK physiotherapists first in the world to prescribe medicines independently after campaigning by CSP 2012. [acessado 2014 set 15]. Disponível em: HTTP://www.wcpt.org/sites/wcpt.org/files/files/UK_physio_prescribing_press_release_2012.pdfLinks ]

16. Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Independent prescribing, 2014. [acessado 2014 set 15]. Disponível em: http://www.csp.org.uk/professional-union/professionalism/prescribingLinks ]

17. Dawson LJ, Ghazi F. The experience of physiotherapy extended scope practitioners in orthopaedic outpatient clinics. Physiotherapy 2004; 90(4):210-216. [ Links ]

18. Holdsworth LK, Webster VS, McFadyen AK. Physiotherapists’ and general practitioners’ views of self-referral and physiotherapy scope of practice: results from a national trial. Physiotherapy 2008; 94(3):236-243. [ Links ]

19. Lansbury G, Sullivan G. Physiotherapists and drug administration: a survey of practices in New South Wales. Aust J Physiother 1998; 44(4):231-237. [ Links ]

20. Grimmer K, Kumar S, Gilbert A, Milanese S. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs):Physiotherapists’ use, knowledge and attitudes. Aust J Physioth 2002; 48(2):82-92. [ Links ]

21. Brasileiro JS, Alves TC, Escóssia CC. Análise da transmissibilidade ultra-sônica de medicamentos utilizados na prática da fonoforese. Rev Bras Fisioter 2003; 7(2):139-144. [ Links ]

22. Onigbinde AT, Olaogun MOB. An evaluation of the knowledge level of Nigerian physiotherapists on topical pharmacotherapy. Hong Kong Physiother J 2012; 30(1):36-42. [ Links ]

23. Shacklady C, Saunders S, Mallion C. Clinical Effectiveness of Physiotherapist-administered Injection Therapy. Physiotherapy 1997; 83(7):353. [ Links ]

24. Brasil. Resolução COFFITO 8, de 20 de fevereiro de 1978. Diário Oficial da União 1978; 13 nov. [ Links ]

25. Anderson L. Physiotherapists administering medications under instruction. Br J Sports Med 2012; 46(4):222-223. [ Links ]

26. Marques GQ, Lima MADS. Demandas de usuários a um serviço de pronto atendimento e seu acolhimento ao sistema de saúde. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem 2007; 15(1):13-19. [ Links ]

27. Girardi SN, Carvalho SN, Araújo JF, Farah JM, Maas LWD, Campos LAB. Índice de Escassez de Médicos no Brasil: estudo exploratório no âmbito da atenção primária. In: Pierantoni CR, Dal Poz MR, França T, organizadores. O trabalho em Saúde: abordagens quantitativas e qualitativas . Rio de Janeiro: Cepesc/IMS/UERJ, ObservaRH; 2011. p. 171-205. [ Links ]

28. Confederação Nacional Dos Municípios (CNM). Pesquisa da CNM sobre a demanda reprimida em saúde no Estado do Rio Grande do Sul – Brasília, 2011. [acessado 2015 set 5]. Disponível em: http://www.cnm.org.br/Links ]

29. Silva AA, Bittencourt NFN, Mendonça LM, Tirado MG, Sampaio RF, Fonseca ST. Análise do perfil, funções e habilidades do fisioterapeuta com atuação na área esportiva nas modalidades de futebol e voleibol no Brasil. Rev Bras Fisioter 2011; 15(3):219-226. [ Links ]

30. Filho PCPT, Cassiani SHB. Administração de medicamentos: aquisição de conhecimentos e habilidades requeridas por um grupo de enfermeiros. Rev Latino-Am Enfermagem 2004; 12(3):533-540. [ Links ]

31. Braund R, Abbott JH. Recommending NSAIDs and paracetamol: a survey of New Zealand physiotherapists’ knowledge and behaviour. Physiother Res Int 2010; 16(1):43-49. [ Links ]

Received: November 19, 2015; Accepted: January 14, 2016; Revised: January 16, 2016

Creative Commons License  This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.