SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.21 issue1An Overview on Marek’s Disease Virus Evolution and Evidence for Increased Virulence in BrazilMorphometric Traits, Serum Chemistry and Antibody Response of Three Chicken Genotypes under Free-Range, Semi-Intensive and Intensive Housing Systems author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

Related links

Share


Brazilian Journal of Poultry Science

Print version ISSN 1516-635XOn-line version ISSN 1806-9061

Braz. J. Poult. Sci. vol.21 no.1 Campinas  2019  Epub May 09, 2019

http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1806-9061-2018-0876 

Original Articles

Highly Pathogenic and Multidrug Resistant Avian Pathogenic Escherichia Coli in Free-Range Chickens from Brazil

IUNESP - São Paulo State University, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil.

IIBiological Institute, Advanced Center for Technological Research of Poultry Agribusiness, São Paulo, Brazil.


ABSTRACT

Avian pathogenic Escherichiacoli (APEC) virulence mechanism has been continuously studied and it is believed to be multifactorial and because of this, this work aimed to characterize potentially APEC strains isolated from free-range hens. Isolates were submitted to PCR for the detection of virulence genes, which were of high prevalence. In vivo inoculation of day-old chicks revealed that 49 of these strains were of high and intermediate pathogenicity. In addition, isolates were submitted to antimicrobials susceptibility test with the majority of the strains presenting multiresistance. Phylogenetic analysis showed a greater presence of potentially APEC isolates in-group B2. In addition, high heterogeneity was detected among the isolates byXbaI enzyme. Fifteen serogroups were identified, being the O8 the most frequent. These results strengthen the fact that a combination of diverse factors are associated with the pathogenicity APEC strains, as well as to highlight its importance to public health and that free-range hens can act as a reservoirs of potentially zoonoticbacteria.

Keywords: APEC; backyard chickens; colibacillosis; pathogenicity; virulence factors

INTRODUCTION

Small producers in the word performmainly free-range hens raising, with precarious installations and minimal management often being its main limiting factors. These practices may contribute to the spread of diseases to both birds and consumers (Thekisoeet al., 2003). In this regard, the avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) is a major agent with increasing interest among avian sanity, being associated with a series of extra-intestinal systemic infections, collectively referred as colibaciloses (Kaper et al., 2004) and it is responsible for economic losses on poultry industry (Dho-moulin & Fairbrother, 1999).

E. coli strains pathogenicity are related to virulence factors that are used to differentiate between pathogenic and non-pathogenic strains (Rodriguez-Siek et al., 2005). In this regard, a large number of potential virulence factors have been detected; however, virulence mechanisms have not yet been fully elucidated and, thus, require further studies. There is still no consensus in the literature as to which genes would be the ideal virulence markers. So far, it has been shown that APEC strains present virulence genes, which can be translated into adhesins, toxins, siderophores, colicin, serum resistance and others (Barbieri et al., 2013).

However, it is known that the zoonotic potential of APEC strains is evidenced when common virulence factors of APEC are found in E. colistrains, thus resulting in extra intestinal diseases in humans. This characterize a positive relationship between the APEC, UPEC and NMEC (Johnson et al., 2008). Hens and humans often share the same environment; there, these birds may present an important source of human infection, as well as acquire human strains. Glimpsing the difficulty to define APEC pathotype, this work aims to evaluate possible genes related to APEC virulence and analyze the phenotype of isolates obtained from free-range hens raising in Brazil.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This experiment was approved by the Committee on Ethics for the Use of Animals of the São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, São Paulo, Brazil, under protocol number 05749/14.

Population analyzed and Collection of samples

Samples were collected from 250 hens of unknown genetic origin and different age from seven small farms within Ribeirao Preto region, Sao Paulo state, Brazil, from January to April 2014. Five hundred samples were obtained, being 250 from the cloaca and 250 from the oropharynges. After collection, samples were placed in tubes containing 5 mL of BHI broth and kept on ice until arrival at the laboratory.

Detection of pathotypes and virulence genes

In order to detect APEC, a PCR screening was performed for the cvaC, iroN, iss, iutA, ompT and hlyF genes. Samples that were positive for at least five of the genes were used to detect E. coli isolates as recommended by Kemmett et al. (2013). DNA template preparation as well as PCR procedures and primers were used according to the EcL protocol available at http://www.apzec.ca/en/APZEC/Protocols/APZEC_PCR_en.aspx. In addition, all isolates were evaluated for 11 additional virulence genes as follow: sitA, tsh, traT, vat, astA, iucC, iucD, papC, irp2, fimH and fyuA; also following the EcL protocol as cited above.

Serological identification and antimicrobial susceptibility test

Serotyping was performed by plate agglutination procedure according to Orskov et al. (1977) at the “E. coli Reference Center “(ECRC) at the Pennsylvania State University - USA. Serology was carried out using serogroups O1-O181 antisera with the exceptions of O31, O47, O72, O93, O94, and O122. Additionally, isolates were submitted, by the disc diffusion method (CLSI, 2010), to antimicrobial susceptibility testing against the following: ampicillin (10µg), cephalothin (30µg), streptomycin (10µg), gentamicin (10µg), ciprofloxacin (5µg), chloramphenicol (30µg), tetracycline (30 µg), nitrofurantoin (300µg), sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim (25µg), ceftiofur (30µg), ceftriaxone (30µg), amoxicillin + clavulanic acid (30µg), norfloxacin (10µg) and fosfomycin (50µg).

Phylogenetic Typing and Pulsatile Field Electrophoresis (PFGE)

Identification of chuA and yjaA genes and TspE4.C2 DNA fragment was performed with the primers proposed by Clermont et al. (2000). Genomic DNA digestion with XbaI and plug preparation was done as described by Ribotet al. (2006) with modifications and Salmonella strain Braenderup H9812 was used as a molecular weight reference. Migration was performed on 1% Pulsifield certified agarose gel with an initial time of 2.2 seconds and final time of 54.2 seconds on a 6 V cm-1 gradient and 120° angle for 23h at a temperature of 14°C. Similarity analysis was performed using Dice coefficients with 1% band position tolerance and 0,5% optimization. In addition, a dendrogram was obtained by UPGMA. These analysis were performed with the BioNumerics software version 7.1 (Applied Maths, Sint -Martens-Latem, Belgium).

Pathogenicity test

A 0.1 ml of bacterial culture were inoculated into the left thoracic air sac of 1 day-old chicks as described by Monroy et al. (2005). For inoculum preparation, a colony of each bacterial strain was seeded in 10 ml of BHI broth, incubated for 18 hours at 37 °C and subsequently diluted to a 1:10 ratio. Inoculum concentration was standardized to 107 CFU/mL. The E. coli (serogroup O1) belonging to the Laboratory of Ornithopathology of USP, was used as a positive control. Negative control birds were inoculated with BHI broth only. For each strain, as well as for the negative and positive control groups, ten male chicks from a commercial lineage were used. The strains were classified due to its mortality as follow: high (≥ 80%), intermediate (> 50% and <80%), low pathogenicity (≤ 50%) and non-pathogenic (zero mortality).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Detection of additional pathotypes and virulence genes

From the 500 samples screened by PCR, 139 (27.8%)samples were positive for at least five of the APEC related genes (cvaC, iroN, iss, iutA, ompT and hlyF), of these, 75 were from the cloaca and 64 from the oropharynx. Of these positive samples, 69 (49.6%)strains (36 cloaca and 33 oropharynx) were isolated. The frequency of the referred genes observed in E. coli isolates and other virulence genes is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Frequency of each gene associated with virulence in the potentially 69 isolates of APEC from free-range hens. 

Function Genes Frequency (%)
Adhesion fimH
papC
tsh
82.6
1.5
30.4
Iron acquisition fyuA
iroN
iucC
iucD
irp2
iutA
sitA
39.1
87.0
58.0
74.0
76,8
88.4
89.8
Haemolysin hlyF 100
Serum resistance iss
traT
100
82.6
Toxins astA
vat
15.9
17.4
Multiple functions cvaC
ompT
66.7
100

High percentages (75.4%) of all six genes were observed, and according to Rodriguez-siek et al. (2005), traT gene associated with the cvaC gene in the APEC strains make part of the serum effects resistance mechanism and are usually associated with septicemia. In accordance with the definition of Ewers et al. (2007) for an isolate to be considered pathogenic the presence of at least one adhesion factor is necessary, one of iron acquisition and one of serum resistance. The present study observed that 64 (92.7%) isolates from free-range chicken harbored at least one adhesion-related virulence factor, one iron acquisition factor and a serum resistance factor. Serum resistance, is mainly encoded by the iss gene (Monroy et al., 2005), and was found in 100.0% of the isolates and according to Tivendale et al. (2004) the iss gene was related to high levels of virulence and some authors report it is of high prevalence. In an interesting manner, the present study detected a frequency of 15.9% of the astA gene, with a similar frequency of the study of Won et al. (2009) of 17.8%. However, it is lower than the 20.0% frequency observed by Ewers et al. (2004). These differences may be, according to this author, due to this gene being present in a pathogenicity island.

Serological identification

In this study, fifteen serogroups were identified: O2 (8.7%), O5 (1.5%), O8 (23.2%), O9 5%), O11 (1.5%), O20 (1.5%), O38 (1.5%), O64 (1.5%), O88 (1.5%), O109 (1.5%), O117 (1.5%), O119 (2.9%), O120 (1.5%), O149 (2.9%), O158 (4.4%) (Table 3). According to Silveira et al. (2002), a diversity of serogroups are involved with colibacillosis, and have a relationship with the geographic and temporal factors, resulting in variations of prevalence of different clonal groups. Of the 69 samples, 30 (43.8%) were not typable for the O antigen, which is expected because the frequency non-typical samples could vary between 14.0% and 39.0% (Menão et al., 2002).

Table 2 Distribution of the 69 potentially APEC isolate in correlation with the phylogenetic group. 

Phylogenetic group (nº - %) VF mean/isolate*
A (17 - 24.6%) 9.9
B1 (13 - 18.8%) 10.8
B2 (37 - 53.6%) 11.5
D (2 - 2.9%) 13.5

*Represents a sum total of the virulence factors of the group and divided by the number of isolates.

Table 3 Serogroup distribution within the 69 potentially APEC isolate. 

Serogroup Number of samples Percentage (%)*
O2 6 8.7
O5 1 1.5
O8 16 23.2
O9 1 1.5
O11 1 1.5
O20 1 1.5
O38 1 1.5
O64 1 1.5
O88 1 1.5
O109 1 1.5
O117 1 1.5
O119 2 2.9
O120 1 1.5
O149 2 2.9
O158 3 4.4
NT** 30 43.5

*Percentage of 69 isolates.

**Nottyphable.

Antimicrobial susceptibility test

All 69 tested isolates demonstrated resistance to at least one antimicrobial agent and most of them showed a multi-drug resistance profile with 59 (85.5%) isolates simultaneous resistant to three or more antimicrobials (Figure 1). It is often common that birds E. coli isolates present resistance to more than one antimicrobial, being the main reasons the indiscriminate and prolonged use of sub-therapeutic concentrations and inadequate use antimicrobial therapies (Mellata et al., 2013). Some studies carried out in Brazil report that APEC strains resist to all classes of drugs, with sulfonamides and tetracyclines having the highest indexes, ranging from 50.0% to 90.0% (Zanatta et al., 2004). Accordingly, the present study verified isolates with high resistance for tetracycline (69.5%) and sulfonamides (58.3%). In addition, among the aminoglycosides tested, streptomycin presented a higher index (63.8%). An explanation for these high levels of resistance resides in the fact that 100% of the strains were iss positive. This gene, in addition to the increased serum resistance, may lead to resistance to various antimicrobials (Abreu et al., 2010) and can be transferred, by conjugation, to other nonvirulent bacteria, including ones of different species thus they become more pathogenic and resistant (Johnson et al., 2006).

Phylogenetic Typing

The analysis revealed that most of the isolates in this study belong to phylogenetic group B2 (37/69), followed by group A (17/69), group B1 (13/69) and group D (2/69), as shown in Table 2. Studies of phylogenetic analyzes have shown that E.coli isolates can be grouped into four main phylogenetic groups: A, B1, B2 and D. Extra-intestinal pathogenic samples with a large variety of virulence factors are concentrated in groups B2 and D. Meanwhile, commensal samples are concentrated in groups A and B1 (Le Gall et al., 2007). Isolates of phylogenetic groups B2 and D were associated with a greater number of virulence factors, presenting a mean of 11.5 and 13.5 virulence factors per isolate, respectively. Phylogenetic groups A and B1 presented 9.9 and 10.8 virulence factors per isolate, respectively. Studies suggest that virulent clonal groups are mainly derived from phylogenetic group B2 and, to a lesser extent, from group D, explaining the predominance of groups B2 and D, among clinical isolates (Johnson & Russo, 2002).Based on these results, it can be inferred that there is no group that comprise exclusively pathogenic or non pathogenic isolates, but rather that groups present combinations of commensal and pathogenic isolates, reinforcing the hypothesis that APEC should be considered a potential zoonotic agent.

Pulsatile Field Electrophoresis (PFGE)

Of the 69 potentially APEC isolates, only one was not typable by the XbaI enzyme with the remaining 68 isolates generating 59 pulse types. All other isolates were grouped into single pulse types, demonstrating that a high degree of heterogeneity is present among the APECs examined with the generated dendrogram by PFGE presenting three large clusters (Figure 2). Six pulse types were shared by more than one isolate, with 100% similarity. The pulse types 1Ca3 and 5Ca1, 21Fa4 and 71Fa1, 37Ca1 and 71Fa5 belonged to the same property. This could be explained by the fact that the birds were in constant contact in almost all the properties visited facilitating the transmission of clones. The pulse types 52Ca1 and 81Ca3, 52Ca5 and 82Fa1, 56Ca4 and 88Ca4from free-range hens from different locations present different genotypic profiles, pathogenicity and phylogenetic typing with only the last pulsetype presenting different serogroups, and the first two being non-typable for the O antigen. Pulsetypes with similarity greater than 95.0% were also found within the same bird. The isolates were from samples collected from the oropharynx, being: 149Fa3 and 149Fb2, 175Fa1 and 175Fb1, and 236Fa1 and 236Fb1, presenting genotype and phenotype similarities, except for pulse 149Fa3 and 149Fb2, which although were from the same bird, presented in the in vivo test, quite distinct results, being of low and high pathogenicity. Differences between the presence and absence of virulence genes between these pulses could be explained by the presence of a capsule that are found in virulent APEC strains (Moulin-schouleur et al., 2006) and to genetic changes either caused by mutation (chromosome alteration) or by genetic transfer (Skyberg et al., 2003).

Pathogenicity

Forty-three (62.3%) strains were highly pathogenic, six (8.7%) strains were intermediate pathogenic, 16 (23.2%) strains were low pathogenic, and four (5.8%) were non-pathogenic. All positive control birds deceased, while negative control birds remained alive. Clinical signs and macroscopic lesions were observed in higher frequency among birds inoculated with the high and intermediate pathogenic strains. Guastalli et al. (2013) in a study with commercial laying hens that showed signs of colibacillosis obtained approximately 50.0% of their isolates with high or intermediate pathogenicity, frequency below our result. This can be explained by the fact that free-range chickens have a higher genetic variability and greater rusticity, which gives them resistance to diseases, adverse climate and food conditions (Albino et al., 2001). Interestingly, in this study, 29.0% of the low or non-pathogenic isolates presented a high number of genes related to APEC virulence. According to Ikuno et al. (2006), the presence of a virulence gene in commensal E. colistrains can be used as an indicator of potential risks, but it is necessary to investigate beyond the presence of the genes and look for their expression. Thus, it can be concluded that, even if healthy, the “backyard chickens” are carriers and can disseminate pathogenic E. coli strains, of which can be transferred to other birds and/or animals, thus representing an important source of infection or reservoir.

Although APEC is not pathogenic to humans, it is of concern that poultry samples presents similarities to those of humans and that most virulence genes are similar to the ones identified in extra-intestinal strains causing diseases in humans, thus representing zoonotic risk (Johnson & Russo, 2002). The results found in the present study showed that hens act as reservoirs of multi-drug resistant and highly pathogenic ExPEC, representing a risk to the consumer, mainly because these birds live in close proximity to humans and other animals. It is important to emphasize that animals with virulence factors are an important source of infection, since the bacteria can be excreted along with feces or expelled by the respiratory tract. This is reinforced by the fact that although the isolates were obtained from samples of apparently healthy hens, and that, in principle, should be non-pathogenic; more than 70.0% were of high or intermediate pathogenicity by the test performed in 1 day-old chicks. Therefore, APEC studies in free-range hens, that can act as reservoirs and disseminators of this pathogen, contribute to improve methods for diagnosis, control, prevention and treatment of the diseases caused by this bacterium.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by the Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP - [grant number 2013/18279-1 and 2014/06313-3]

REFERENCES

Abreu DLC, Franco RM, Nascimento ER, Pereira VLA, Alves FMX, Almeida JF. Perfil de sensibilidade antimicrobiana e detecção do gene iss pela reação em cadeia da polimerase na tipificação de Escherichia coli patogênica em codornas de corte sob inspeção sanitária. Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 2010;30:406-410. [ Links ]

Albino LFT, Júnior JGV, Silva JHV. Criação de frango e galinha caipira. Avicultura alternativa. Viçosa: Aprenda Fácil; 2001. 113p [ Links ]

Barbieri NL, De Oliveira AL, Tejkowski TM, Pavanelo DB, Rocha DA, Matter LB, et al. Genotypes and pathogenicity of cellulitis isolates reveal traits that modulate APEC virulence. PlosOne 2013;8:e72322. [ Links ]

Barros LSS, Silva RM, Silva IM, Baliza MD, Virgílio FF. Escherichia coli from cellulitis lesions in broilers. Journal of Food Measurement and Characterization 2013;7:40-45. [ Links ]

Clermont O, Bonacorsi S, Bingen E. Rapid and simple determination of the Escherichia coli phylogenetic group. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2000;66:4555-4558. [ Links ]

CLSI - Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute [cited 2018 Ago 13]. Global Laboratory Standards for a Healthier World; 2018. Available from: www.clsi.org. [ Links ]

Das P, Joardar SN, Samanta I, Das PK, Sadhukhan TK, Isore DP. Isolation and antibiogram of E. coli from backyard poultry in West Bengal. Applied Biological Research 2012;14:228-230. [ Links ]

Dho-moulin M, Fairbrother JM. Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC). Veterinary Research 1999;30:299-316. [ Links ]

Ewers C, Jansen T, Kiessling S, Philip HC, Wieler LH. Molecular epidemiology of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) isolated from colisepticemia in poultry. Veterinary Microbiology 2004;104:91-101. [ Links ]

Ewers C, Li G, Wilking H, Kiessling S, Alt K, Antao EM, Lanturnus C, et al.. Avian pathogenic, uropathogenic, and newborn meningitis-causing Escherichia coli:how closely related are they? International Journal of Medical Microbiology 2007;297:163-176. [ Links ]

Fricke WF, Mcdermott PF, Mammel MK, Zhao S, Johnson TJ, Rasko DA, et al. Antimicrobial resistance-conferring plasmids with similarity to virulence plasmids from avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strains in Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky isolates from poultry. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 2009;75:5963-5971. [ Links ]

Guastalli EAL, Guastalli BHL, Soares NM, Leite DS, Ikuno AA, Maluta RP, et al. Virulence characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates obtained from commercial one-week-old layer chicks with diarrhea. African Journal of Microbiology Research 2013;7:5306-5313. [ Links ]

Ikuno AA, Guastalli EAL, Buim ML, Gama NMSQ, França SQ, Alonso AC, et al. Genes de virulência associados em Escherichia coli (APEC) isoladas de poedeiras comerciais, do meio ambiente e da água de dessecação de granjas de postura de ovos. Biológico 2006;68:68-72. [ Links ]

Johnson JR, Johnston B, Clabots CR, Kuskowski MA, Roberts E, Debrouy C. Virulence genotypes and phylogenetic background of Escherichia coliserogroup O6 isolates from humans, dogs and cats. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2008;46:417-422. [ Links ]

Johnson JR, Russo TA. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli as agents of diverse non-urinary tract extraintestinal infections. Journal of Infection Diseases 2002;186:859-864. [ Links ]

Johnson TJ, Johnson SJ, Nolan LK. Complete DNA sequence of a ColBM plasmid from avian pathogenic Escherichia coli suggests that it evolved from closely related ColV virulence plasmids. Journal of Bacteriology 2006;188:5975-5983. [ Links ]

Kaper JB, Nataro JP, Mobley HL. Pathogenic Escherichia coli. Nature Reviews Microbiology 2004;2:123-140. [ Links ]

Kemmett K, Humphrey T, Rushton S, Close A, Wigley P, Williams NJ. A longitudinal study simultaneously exploring the carriage of APEC virulence associated genes and the molecular epidemiology of faecal and systemic E. coli in commercial broiler chickens. Plos One 2013;8:e67749. [ Links ]

Kobayashi RKT, Aquino I, Ferreira ALS, Vidotto MC. EcoR phylogenetic analysis and virulence genotyping of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli strains and Escherichia coli isolates from commercial chicken carcasses in southern Brazil. Foodborne Pathogens Disease 2011;8:631-634. [ Links ]

Le GallT, Clermont O, Gouriou S, Picard B, Nassif X, Denamur E, et al. Extraintestinal virulence is a coincidental by-product of commensalism in B2 phylogenetic group Escherichia coli strains. Molecular Biology and Evolution 2007;24:2373-2384. [ Links ]

Mellata M. Human and avian extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli:infections, zoonotic risks, and antibiotic resistance trends. Foodborne Pathogens Diseases 2013;10:916-932. [ Links ]

Menão MC, Ferreira CSA, Castro AGM, Knöbl T, Ferreira AJP. Sorogrupos de Escherichia coli isolados de frangos com doença respiratória crônica. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 2002;69:15-17. [ Links ]

Monroy MAR, Knöbl T, Bottino JA, Ferreira CSA, Ferreira AJ P. Virulence characteristics of Escherichia coli isolates obtained from broiler breeders with salpingitis.Comparative Immunology, Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 2005;28:1-15. [ Links ]

Moulin-Schouleur M, Répérant M, Laurent S, Brée A, Mignon-Grasteau S, Germon P, et al. Extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli strains of avian and human origin:link between phylogenetic relationships and common virulence patterns. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 2007;45:3366-3376. [ Links ]

Nakazato G, Campos TA, Stehling GE, Brocchi M, Silveira WD. Virulence factors of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli(APEC). Pesquisa Veterinária Brasileira 2009;29:479-486. [ Links ]

Obeng AS, Rickard H, Ndi O, Sexton M, Barton M. Antibiotic resistance, phylogenetic grouping and virulence potential of Escherichia coli isolated from the faeces of intensively farmed and free range poultry. Veterinary Microbiology 2012;154:305-315. [ Links ]

Orskov I, Orskov F, Jann B, Jann K. Serology, Chemistry, and Genetics of O and K antigens of Escherichia coli. Bacteriological Reviews 1997;41:667-710. [ Links ]

Ribot EM, Fair MA, Gautom R, Cameron DN, Hunter SB, Swaminathan B, et al. Standardization of Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Protocols for the Subtyping of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella, and Shigella for PulseNet. Food borne Pathogens Diseases 2006;3:59-67. [ Links ]

Rodriguez-Siek KE, Giddings CW, Doetkott C, Johnson TJ, Nolan LK. Characterizinig the APEC pathotype. Veterinary Research 2005;36:241-256. [ Links ]

Silveira WDS, Ferreira A, Brocchi M, Hollanda LM, Castro AFP, Yamada AT, et al. Biological characteristics and pathogenicity of avian Escherichia coli strains. Veterinary Microbiology 2002;85:47-53. [ Links ]

Skyberg JA, Horne SM, Giddings CW, Wooley RE, Gibbs PS, Nolan LK. Characterizing avian Escherichia coli isolates with multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Avian Diseases 2003;47:1441-1447. [ Links ]

Thekisoe MMO, Mbati PA, Bisschop SPR. Diseases of free ranging chickens in the Qwa-Qwa district of the northeastern free state province of South Africa. Journal of the South African Veterinary Association 2003;74:14-16. [ Links ]

Tivendale KA, Allen JL, Ginns CA, Crabb BS, Browning GF. Association of iss and iucA, but not tsh, with plasmid-mediated virulence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. Infection and Immunity 2004;72:6554-6560. [ Links ]

Wiles JT, Kulesus RR, Mulvey AM. Origins and virulence mechanisms of uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Experimental and Molecular Pathology 2008;85:11-19. [ Links ]

Won G, Moon B, Oh I, Matsuda K, Chaudhari AA, Hur J, et al. Profiles of virulence-associated of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli isolates from chickens with colibacillosis.Poultry Science 2009;46:260-266. [ Links ]

Zanatta GF, Kanashiro AMI, Castro AGM, Cardoso ALSP, Tessari ENC, Pulici SCP. Susceptibilidade de amostras de Escherichia coli de origem aviária a antimicrobianos .Arquivos do Instituto Biológico 2004;71:283-286. [ Links ]

Received: August 23, 2018; Accepted: November 17, 2018

Corresponding author e-mail address Mariana Monezi Borzi Department of Veterinary Pathology, São Paulo State University (Unesp), School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences - Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donato Castellane. 14884-900 - Jaboticabal, SP - Brazil. Phone: +55 16 32097100 Email: mmborzi@gmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License