Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Common environmental descriptors of two benthic amphi-atlantic mollusc assemblages

Abstracts

Two benthic mollusc assemblages of the continental shelf on both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, a tropical one in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, and another, temperate, in Galicia, Spain were investigated, with a view to finding common environmental descriptors which would explain, on a macro-scale, why these assemblages are there. Both of the assemblages concerned show approximately the same species richness, about 150 taxa each. The molluscan fauna of both regions live on sandy sediments. The Galician assemblages are at about 2-12 m depth, while those in Rio de Janeiro are at about 10-40 m depth. Malacological assemblages were defined through Cluster Analysis and Multiple Discriminant Analysis of the environmental data showed that each assemblage has its own environmental space. These assemblages have no species in common, but show the same phenological characters associated with each sedimentological facies. The same set of environmental variables (median sediment grain size, skewness, kurtosis, sorting, fine and medium sand fractions and depth) were selected as controlling these assemblages, suggesting that they play their role as general environmental descriptors.

Benthic ecology; Marine malacological assemblages; Multiple discriminant analysis; Environmental descriptors; Sedimentological parameters; Atlantic Ocean


Duas associações de moluscos bênticos litorais foram estudadas em ambos os lados do oceano Atlântico, uma tropical no Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, e outra temperada na Galicia, Espanha, procurando-se por descritores ambientais comuns, a ambas, que pudessem explicar, em macro escala, o porquê de essas associações estarem onde estão. As duas associações apresentam, aproximadamente, a mesma riqueza de espécies, cerca de 150 táxons cada uma. Ambas as faunas malacológicas habitam sedimentos arenosos em profundidades variando entre 2-12 m, na Galicia, e 10-40 m, no Rio de Janeiro. As associações malacológicas foram definidas através de Análise de Grupamento e caracterizadas ambientalmente com a aplicação da Análise Discriminante Múltipla realizada sobre os dados abióticos. Não existem espécies em comum entre as associações estudadas; contudo estes táxons apresentam caracteres fenológicos similares em função de habitarem as mesmas fácies sedimentológicas. Um mesmo conjunto de variáveis ambientais (tamanho médio do grão do sedimento, assimetria, curtose, grau de selecionamento, frações de areias fina e média e a profundidade) foram identificadas por condicionarem a presença dessas associações, sugerindo que possam ter um papel relevante como descritores ambientais gerais.

ecologia bêntica; associações malacológicas; análise discriminante múltipla; descritores ambientais; parâmetros sedimentológicos; oceano Atlântico


  • Absalão, R. S. 1986. Moluscos da Comissão oceanográfica de Geocosta Río I, RJ, Brasil. Rev. Bras. Biol., 46:27-31.
  • Absalão, R. S. 1989. Ophiuroid assemblages off Lagoa dos Patos outlet, Southern Brazil. Ophelia, 31:133-143.
  • Absalão, R. S. 1991. Environmental discrimination among soft-bottom mollusc association of Lagoa dos Patos, South Brazil. Estuar. coast. Shelf Sci., 32:71-85.
  • Absalão, R. S.; Pimenta, A. D.; Gomes, R. S. & Cecchetti, F. 1999. Associações malacológicas dos substratos inconsolidados na Área de Proteção Ambiental do Arquipélago de Santana, Macaé, Rio de Janeiro. In: Silva, S. H. G. & Lavrado, H. P. eds. Ecologia dos Ambientes Costeiros do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Série Oecologia Brasiliensis, vol. VII. PPGE-UFRJ, p. 272-289.
  • Alves, O. F. S.; Manso, C. L. R.; Absalão, R. S. & Paiva, P. C. 2004. Geoecology of sublittoral benthic communities in Todos os Santos Bay (Bahia, Brazil): Biotic and sedimentological diversity. J. coast. Res., 39 (in press).
  • Bergen, M.; Weisberg, S. B.; Smith, R. W.; Cadien, D. B.; Dalkey, A.; Montagne, D. E.; Stull, J. K.; Velarde, R.G. & Ranasinghe, J. A. 2001. Relationship between depth, sediment, latitude, and the structure of benthic infaunal assemblages on the mainland shelf of southern California. Mar. Biol., 138:637-647.
  • Botto, F. & Iribarne, O. 1999. Effect of the burrowing crab Chasmagnathus granulata (Dana) on the benthic community of a SW Atlantic coastal lagoon. J. expl. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 241:263-284.
  • Driscoll, E. G. & Brandon, D. E. 1973. Mollusc-sediment relationships in Northwestern Buzzards Bay, Massachussetts, USA. Malacologia, 12:13-46.
  • Dittmann, S. 1996. Effects of macrobenthic burrows on infaunal communities in tropical tidal flats. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 134:119-130.
  • Dolédec, S. & Chessel, D. 1994. Co-inertia analysis: an alternative method for studying species-environment relationships. Freshwat. Biol., 31:277-294.
  • Duffy, J. E. & Harvilicz, A. M. 2001. Species-specific impacts of grazing amphipods in an eelgrass-bed community. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 223:201-211.
  • Field, J. G.; Clarke, K. R. & Warwick, R. M. 1982. A practical strategy for analysing multispecies distribution patterns. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 8:37-52.
  • Franz, D. 1976. Benthic molluscan assemblages in relation to sediment gradients in Northeastern Long Island Sound, Connecticut. Malacologia, 15:377-399.
  • Folk, R. L. & Ward, W. C. 1957. Brazos River Bar: a study of the significance of grain size parameters. J. Sediment. Petrol., 27:3-26.
  • Foreman, K.; Valiela, I. & Sardà, R. 1995. Controls of benthic marine food webs. Sci. Mar., 59:119-128.
  • Garlo, E. V. 1980. Abundance and distribution of benthic macroinvertebrates near Little Egg Inlet, New Jersey from 1972 to 1974. Int. Rev. Ges. Hydrobiol., 65:345-356.
  • Glémarec, M. 1973. The benthic communities of the European North Atlantic continental shelf. Oceanog. Mar. Biol. a. Rev., 11:263-289.
  • Graham, A. 1988. Molluscs: Prosobranch and pyramidellid gastropods. Synopses of the British Fauna, 2:1-662.
  • Harry, H. W. 1976. Correlation of benthic Mollusca with substrate composition in Lower Galveston Bay, Texas. Veliger, 19:135-152.
  • Hyland, J.; Baptiste, E.; Campbell, J.; Kennedy, J.; Kropp, R. & Williams, S. 1991. Macroinfaunal communities of the Santa Maria Basin on the California outer continental shelf and slope. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 78:147-161.
  • Jones, N. S. 1950. Marine bottom communities. Biol. Rev., 25:283-313.
  • Jorgensen, L. L.; Pearson, T. H.; Anisimova, N. A.; Gulliksen, B.; Dahle, S.; Denisenko, S. G. & Matishov, G. G. 1999. Environmental influences on benthic fauna associations of the Kara Sea (Arctic Russia). Polar Biol., 22:395-416.
  • Karakassis, I. & Eleftheriou, A. 1997. The continental shelf of Crete: structure of macrobenthic communities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 160:185-196.
  • Kidwell, S. M. 2001. Preservation of species abundance in marine depth assemblages. Science, 294:1091-1094.
  • Klecka, W. R. 1980. Discriminant Analysis. London, Sgae Publications. 72p.
  • Lindroth, A. 1935. Die association der marinen Weichdoden. Zool. Bidrag Uppsala, 15:331-366.
  • McCall, P. L. 1977. Community patterns and adaptative strategies of the infaunal benthos of Long Island Sound. J. mar. Res., 35:221-266.
  • Moreira, J.; Quintas, P. & Troncoso, J. S. 2005. Distribution of the molluscan fauna in the subtidal soft bottoms of the Ensenada de Baiona (NW Spain). Am. Malac. Bull., 20 (1/2):75-86.
  • Moss, D.; Furse, M. T.; Wright, J. T. & Armitage, P. D. 1987. The prediction of macro-invertebrate fauna of unpolluted running-water sites in Great Britain using environmental data. Freshw. Biol., 17:41-52.
  • Oyarzún, C.; Carrasco, F. D. & Gallardo, V. A. 1987. Some characteristics of macrobenthic fauna from the organic-enriched sediments at Talcahuano, Chile. Cah. Biol. Mar., 28:429-446.
  • Pearson, T. H. 2001. Functional group ecology in soft-sediment marine benthos: the role of bioturbation. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol.: Ann. Rev., 39:233-267.
  • Petersen, C. G. 1911. Valuation of the sea. I. Animal life of the sea-bottom, its food and quantity. Rep. Dan.Stat.Biol., 20:1-81.
  • Petersen, C. G. 1913. Valuation of the sea. II. The animal communities of the sea bottom and their importance for marine zoogeography. Rep. Dan. Stat. Biol., 21:1-44.
  • Peterson, B. J. & Heck, K. L. 2001. Positive interactions betwenn suspension-feeding bivalves and seagrass - a facultative mutualism. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 213:143-155.
  • Pielou, E. C. 1977. Mathematical Ecology. New York, John Wiley & Sons. 386p.
  • Posey, M. H.; Alphin, T. D.; Cahoon, L. B.; Lindquist, D. G.; Mallin, M. A. & Nevers, M. B. 2002. Top-down versus bottom-up limitation in benthic infaunal communities: Direct and indirect effects. Estuaries, 25:999-1014.
  • Ragnarsson, S. A. & Raffaelli, D. 1999. Effects of the mussel Mytilus edulis L. on the invertebrate fauna of sediments. J. expl. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 241:3143.
  • Rhoads, D.C. & Young, D.K. 1970. The influence of the deposit feeding organisms on sediment stability and community trophic structure. J. Mar. Res., 28:150-178.
  • Rios, E. C. 1994. Seashells of Brazil. Museu Oceanográfico Professor Eliezer de Carvalho Rios da Universidade de Rio Grande. 368p.,113pls.
  • Robert, G. 1979. Benthic molluscan fauna of the St. Lawrence Estuary and its ecology as assessed by numerical methods. Natur. Canad, 106:211-227.
  • Romesburg, H. C. 1984. Cluster Analysis for Researches. Lifetime Learning Publications, Belmont. 344pp.
  • Rosenberg, R. 2001. Marine benthic faunal successional stages and related sedimentary activity. Sci. Mar., 65 (Suppl. 2):107-119.
  • Shin, P. K. S. 1982. Multiple discriminant analysis of macro-benthic infaunal assemblages. J. expl. Mar. Biol. Ecol., 59:39-50.
  • Suguio, K. 1973. Introdução à sedimentologia. São Paulo, Edgar Blücher. 317p.
  • Tebble, N. 1966. British bivalve Seashells. London, Trustees of the British Museum (Nat. Hist.). 214pp.
  • Thorson, G. 1957. Bottom communities (sublittoral or shallow shelf). Mem. Geol. Soc. Am., 67:461-534.
  • Townsend, C. R. & Hildrew, A. G. 1994. Species traits in relation to a habitat template for river systems. Freshw. Biol., 31:265-275.
  • Troncoso, J. S.; Urgorri, V. & Parapar, J. 1993. Cartografía de los moluscos infralitorales de sustratos blandos de la ría de Ares y Betanzos (Galicia, NO de España). Publ. Esp. Inst. Esp. Oceanogr., 11:131-137.
  • Usseglio-Polatera, P.; Thomas, S.; Beisel, J.-N. & Moreteau, J.-C. 1999. Illustration de la valeur indicatrice des caractéristiques biologiques des macroinvertébrés d'une commonauté benthique à différentes échelles d'observation. Annls. Limnol., 35:71-80.
  • Van der Meer, J. 1999. Keeping things in order : Multivariate direct gradient analysis of a strongly fluctuating benthic community. J. Sea Res., 42:263-273
  • Warwick, R. M. & Clarke, K. R. 1991. A comparison of some methods for analysing changes in benthic community structure. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. U. K., 71:225-244.
  • Zajac, R. N.; Whitlatch, R. B. & Thrush, S. F. 1998. Recolonization and succession in soft-sediment infaunal communities: the spatial scale of controlling factors. Hydrobiologia, 375/376:227-240.

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    24 Oct 2007
  • Date of issue
    Mar 2006

History

  • Accepted
    03 Mar 2005
  • Reviewed
    29 June 2005
  • Received
    10 Apr 2005
Universidade de São Paulo, Instituto Oceanográfico Praça do Oceanográfico, 191 , 05508-120 Cidade Universitária, São Paulo - SP - Brasil, Tel.: (55 11) 3091-6501, Fax: (55 11) 3032-3092 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil
E-mail: io@usp.br