Acessibilidade / Reportar erro

Associations between tree spacing and features of native grassland grown in silvopastoral systems in Pampa biome

Relações entre o espaçamento arbóreo e características do campo nativo em sistemas silvipastoris no bioma Pampa

ABSTRACT:

The current study assessed the association of eucalyptus-tree spacing with forest growth and yield, as well as with the floristic composition, diversity and yield of natural grassland grown in silvopastoral systems in Pampa biome. Data were collected in six family cattle-ranching area in Bagé County (RS). The effect of two different genetic materials (seminal-origin Eucalyptus dunnii plant and one Eucalyptus grandis clone) on shading features of plants grown in 3 planting-spacing dimensions(625, 312 and 208 trees ha-1) was assessed, as well as their association with herbaceous extract (bare soil; green cover; forage dry matter; floristic composition; species richness; and grass, legumes and winter - and summer-growth species rates) and forestry (litter accumulation, diameter at breast height, total height and volume per hectare) variables. Planting carried out at the highest tree density (625 trees ha-1) has increased forest yield. However, it reduced green cover, herbaceous extract dry-matter yield and species richness, mainly in grasses and legumeswith greater forage potential. Conversely, it is possible combining forestry and animal yield to the preservation of native forage species at low tree densities (204 to 312 trees ha-1).

Key words:
natural grassland; floristic composition; eucalyptus

RESUMO:

O trabalho foi desenvolvido com o objetivo de avaliar as relações entre o espaçamento de árvores de eucalipto com o crescimento, produção florestal e a composição florística, diversidade e produção de pastagens nativas em sistemas silvipastoris no bioma Pampa. Os dados foram coletados em seis unidades de referência tecnológicas instaladas em área de pecuaristas familiares no município de Bagé (RS) e foi avaliado o efeito de dois materiais genéticos (Eucalyptus dunnii de origem seminal e um clone de Eucalyptus grandis) em três densidades arbóreas (625, 312 e 208 árvores ha-1) sobre o sombreamento e suas relações com variáveis do extrato herbáceo (solo descoberto, cobertura verde, massa seca de forragem, composição florística, riqueza de espécies e o percentual de gramíneas, leguminosas e espécies de crescimento hibernal e estival) e florestais (acúmulo de serapilheira, diâmetro a altura do peito, altura total e volume por hectare). Concluiu-se que o plantio em maior densidade arbórea (625 árvores ha-1) promoveu o aumento na produção florestal, mas reduziu a cobertura verde, a produção de matéria seca do extrato herbáceo e a riqueza de espécies, especialmente, as gramíneas e leguminosas de maior potencial forrageiro. Em baixas densidades arbóreas (204 a 312 árvores ha-1) é possível conciliar a produção florestal com a preservação de espécies forrageiras nativas.

Palavras-chave:
campo nativo; composição floristica; eucalipto

INTRODUCTION:

The Pampa biome covers 62.2% of Rio Grande do Sul State’s territory; moreover, it is a great cultural heritage given its remarkable floral and faunal biodiversity (BOLDRINI et al., 2010BOLDRINI, I. I. et al. Bioma Pampa: diversidade florística e fisionômica. Porto Alegre, editora Pallotti, 2010. 64 p.). Extensive livestock farming carried out in native grasslands has been one of the main economic activities in place in this region, since the colonization period. Nowadays, the aforementioned region houses 48%, 66% and 8% of cattle, sheep and dairy cow herds bred in Rio Grande do Sul State, respectively (IBGE, 2020IBGE. Cidades e estados. Available from: <Available from: https://www.ibge.gov.br/cidades-e-estados.html >. Accessed: Sept. 01, 2020.
https://www.ibge.gov.br/cidades-e-estado...
).

However; although, extensive livestock farming carried out in natural grasslands is a traditional practice, it often presents low yield and economic profitability (MALAFAIA et al., 2014MALAFAIA, G. C. et al. Sistema e custo de produção de gado de corte no estado do Rio Grande do Sul - bioma Pampa - 2012. Campo Grande: Embrapa Gado de Corte, 2014. 7 p. ; LAMPERT et al., 2015LAMPERT, V. N. et al. Modelagem produtiva e econômica de diferentes níveis de intensificação na produção de bovinos de corte de ciclo completo para o Rio grande do Sul. X Jornada Nespro e II Simpósio Internacional sobre sistemas de produção de bovinos de corte. Anais.... Porto Alegre: NESPRO, 2015.). This issue has encouraged the de-characterization and replacement of natural grasslandsby other economic activities, such as agricultural and forestry monocultures and exotic pasture cultures, a fact that has reduced the native vegetation cover in the investigated biome (approximately 64%), as well as cattle and sheep herds, by 1.5 million (22%) and 691.8 thousand (25%) heads, respectively, between 2004 and 2019 (OLIVEIRA, 2021OLIVEIRA, J. C. P. Revisão sobre o ambiente e a produção agropecuária no bioma Pampa do Brasil. Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul, 2021. 41p.).

Thus, silvopastoral systems can be used as sustainable and integrated land-use alternative to promote production matrix diversification in rural properties based on forestry activity introduction in them, and to enable environmental services, such as animal welfare, by reducingextreme temperatures or thermal sensations in summer and winter (SCHINATO et al., 2023SCHINATO, F. et al. Microclimate, forage production and carbon storage in a eucalypt-based silvopastoral system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v.344, p.2023. 2023 Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092200439X >. Accessed: Nov. 18, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108290.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...
). It is so, because those are limiting factors for animal yield in the investigated region (LUCAS et al., 2015LUCAS, M. A. K. et al. Sistema silvipastoril na Região da Campanha do Rio Grande do Sul. Embrapa Pecuária Sul: Bagé, 2015, 23p.).

However, from the natural grassland conservation perspective, the afforestation of these pastures should not imply natural grassland`s suppression; they should remain productive to help supporting animal yield and the delivery of ecosystem services, such as the ones mentioned by VOLK & TRINDADE(2020VOLK, L, B. S.; TRINDADE, J. P. Princípios técnicos de manejo de sistemas pecuários para maior disponibilidade de agua no solo. Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul , 2020, 27p.), as well as to help maintaining the biodiversity of forage species and their potential to store water and fix carbon in the soil.

In Silvopastoral systems, trees and ground vegetation compete for both above ground (light) and below ground (soil moisture and nutrients) site resources. These complex interactions among direct and indirect effects of microclimatic conditions, soil properties, herbivore behavior and disturbance regimes can widely change depending on local conditions (BERNARDI et al., 2016BERNARDI, R. E. Trees improve forage quality and abundance in South American subtropical grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v.232, 2016, p.227-231 Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880916303978 >. Accessed: Nov. 20, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.003.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...
).

The presence of trees changes both the availability and quality of light reaching forage species; besides, it can influence their structure, floristic composition and dynamics, growth, yield and nutritional value (PACIULLO et al., 2011PACIULLO, D. S. C. et al. Productive and nutritional traits of pasture in an agrosilvopastoral system, according to the distance from trees. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v.46, n.10, p.1176-1183, 2011. Available from: <Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/pab/a/hCpktSmgfnRqZ36F7xX7Jhj/?lang=pt#:~:text=decumbens%2C%20em%20condi%C3%A7%C3%B5es%20de%20pleno,)%2C%20durante%20o%20segundo%20ano >. Accessed: May, 21, 2018. doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2011001000009.
https://www.scielo.br/j/pab/a/hCpktSmgfn...
; NORDENSTAHL et al., 2011NORDENSTAHL, M. et al. Forage production in natural and afforested grasslandsof the Pampas: ecological complementarity and management opportunities. Agroforest Systems, v.83, p.201-211. 2011 Available from: <Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-011-9383-6 >. Accessed: Nov. 20, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10457-011-9383-6.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.100...
; BERNARDI et al., 2016BERNARDI, R. E. Trees improve forage quality and abundance in South American subtropical grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v.232, 2016, p.227-231 Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880916303978 >. Accessed: Nov. 20, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.003.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...
; FEDRIGO et al., 2019FEDRIGO, J. K. Dynamics of forage mass, air temperature and animal performance in a silvopastoral system of Uruguay. Agroforest Systems, v.93, p.2197:2204, 2019. Available from: <Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-018-0335-2 >. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10457-018-0335-2(0123456789().,-volV()0123456789().,-volV).
https://link.springer.com/article/10.100...
).

The availability of light for forage species and competition can be regulated by the density and arrangement of trees in the pasture area (VARELA et al., 2019VARELA, F. Modelo de simulacion forestal y ganadero-SINFORGAN. In: Instituto Nacional de Investigacion Agropecuária. Producción Ganadera y forestal: análisis de sistema de producción integrados. Montevideo: INIA, p.131-142. 2019.) and some studies have shown that appropriately spaced trees have potential to positively alter botanical composition, growth, and nutricional value, in natural grasslands (CLAVIJO et al., 2005CLAVIJO, M. P. et al. Poplar afforestation effects on grassland structure and composition in the Flooding Pampas. Rangeland ecology & management, v.58, p.474-479, 2005 Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1550742405500757 >. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2023. doi: 10.2111/1551-5028(2005)58[474:PAEOGS]2.0.CO;2.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...
; FEDRIGO et al., 2019FEDRIGO, J. K. Dynamics of forage mass, air temperature and animal performance in a silvopastoral system of Uruguay. Agroforest Systems, v.93, p.2197:2204, 2019. Available from: <Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-018-0335-2 >. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10457-018-0335-2(0123456789().,-volV()0123456789().,-volV).
https://link.springer.com/article/10.100...
). Therefore, defining tree spacing that allow the maintenance of natural grassland throughout the forest component age rotation in the edaphoclimatic conditions of Pampa in the state of Rio Grande do Sul is fundamental for conserving native vegetation.

The current study was to assess the association of eucalyptus tree spacing with forest growth and yield, as well as with the floristic composition, diversity and yield of natural grassland grown in silvopastoral systems in Pampa biome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

The region’s climate, according to the Köppen classification, is subtropical (Cfa) with rainfall regularly distributed throughout the year with annual normals between 1.350 mm and 1.650 mm and monthly normals of 90 to 170 mm (MACHADO, 1950MACHADO, F. P. Contribuição ao estudo do clima no Rio Grande do Sul. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE,1950, 91p.).

The average annual temperature is 17.6 °C, with the average for the hottest month (January) being 24 °C and the coldest month (June) being 12.5 °C. Extreme temperatures vary between -4 °C in the coldest month and 41 °C in the hottest month. Frost formation occurs from April to November, with a greater incidence from June to August (MACEDO, 1984MACEDO, W.Levantamento de reconhecimento dos solos do município de Bagé RS. Bagé, EMBRAPA-UEPAE de Bagé. Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul, 1984. 69 p.).

Based on data obtained at the Bagé climatological station of the National Institute of Meteorology, it was observed that in 2019, it rained slightly above the historical average with 1,703.6 mm, a result of the el niño recorded in 2018/2019 with precipitation in the month driest of 20.7 mm (March) and the wettest of 445.1 mm (January). Regarding temperature, the lowest averages were recorded in June and July (7.3 ºC) and the highest in December (31.3 ºC).

The predominant soils in the region studied, more precisely in the subdistricts of Palmas and Joca Tavares, where most of the plantations evaluated here are located, are of the Chernosol type, shallow, with clayey texture and granite or andesite substrate and of the Neosol type Dystrophic or Eutrophic texture medium, granite or sandstone substrate (MACEDO, 1984MACEDO, W.Levantamento de reconhecimento dos solos do município de Bagé RS. Bagé, EMBRAPA-UEPAE de Bagé. Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul, 1984. 69 p.)

Data were collected between December and February 2020/2021, in 6 Technological Reference Units (TRUs) installed by EmbrapaPecuáriaSul and Emater in a family cattle-ranching area in Bagé County (RS), between 2013 and 2014.

Two different genetic materials (seminal-origin Eucalyptus dunnii and Eucalyptus grandis clone) were assessed in 3 planting-spacing dimensions (8 m x 2 m, 16 m x 2 m and 24 m x 2 m) comprising 625, 312 and 208 trees ha-1 arranged in simple lines, in natural grassland. Each URT was implanted with an area of 3 hectares subdivided into two spacings with 1.5 hectares.E. dunni had been planted for 91 months with 625 and 312 trees ha-1 and E. grandis for 85 months, with 312 and 208 trees ha-1.Further details on the planting and management of these areas can be seen in the study by LUCAS et al.(2015LUCAS, M. A. K. et al. Sistema silvipastoril na Região da Campanha do Rio Grande do Sul. Embrapa Pecuária Sul: Bagé, 2015, 23p.).

One (1) in every 5 rows (20% of the total number of trees) in each TRU and planting arrangement was randomly measured to collect tree-growth data.All trees in the selected row had their diameter at breast height (DBH) measured with diameter tape (cm), whereas their total height (h) was measured with electronic hypsometer (m).

Tree volume was determined through the rigorous cubing of standing trees, based on using Criterium RD 1000 equipment. Sample trees were selected based on diameter class; each population (defined by genetic material and spacing) was divided into10 classes - 2 trees belonging to each class were cubed (100 trees, in total). Tree height and volume estimates for each location (TRU) were obtained after selecting and adjusting the model by Stoffels: lnh = b 0 + b 1 lndand the combined variable model by Spurr: logv = b 0 + b 1 log(d 2 h).Further details can be found in the study by TONINI et al.(2020TONINI, H.et al. Desempenho e potencial econômico para o eucalipto em sistemas silvipastoris em Bagé-RS. Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul , 2020. 43p.).

The surface sampling method used for pastures comprised sample units (SUs) of 0.25 m2 (0.5 m x 0.5 m), which were systematically distributed into 3 transects, based on spacing and location. SUs in each transect were arranged in the tree row (0D), at one quarter (25d) and at half the distance between tree rows (50d).

A full-sun field area (FSFA) free from trees’ influence in a single pasture was selected as reference for dry matter production in this environment. Three (3) samples were collected per place by visually selecting areas of high, medium and low green matter yield.

All TRUs were operating under grazing system, without stocking control; most fields presented “shaved” or excessively used aspect, at assessment time.There were no fences dividing the areas and it enabled the herd to graze in areas with, and without, forest component.

Photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) measurements were taken at clear-sky days, with the aid of Accuparceptometer, model LP 80, (Decagon, Pullman, WA, USA); shading rates were determined at different distances from the row of trees in each TRU.

Exposed soil (ES%), green cover (GC%), litter accumulation (LA) (leaves, branches, bark and fruits) rates were determined in each SU. Species composition was expressed by grass (G%), legume (L%), winter (W%) and summer-growth (S%) species rates.

Total herbaceous dry matter production (TDM) was separated into green (GDM) and dead (DDM) dry matter. In order to do so, fresh matter was cut and weighed in the field; subsequently, it was dried in forced air circulation oven at 65 °C, for 72 hours.

The coverage of all species was estimated and their absolute (Af) and relative frequency (Rf) values were calculated.Floristic similarity between spacing dimensions was compared through Sorensen Index (SI), whereas species richness was calculated based on the number of species (SN) in the investigated native grassland.

Species were gathered into 5 functional groups, based on NABINGER & DALL’AGNOL (2019NABINGER, C.; DALL’AGNOL, M. Guia para reconhecimento de espécies dos campos sulinos. Brasília: Ibama, 2019, 132 p.), namely: 1 - summer-growing cespitose grasses;2 - summer-growing prostrate grasses;3 - winter-growing grasses;4 - winter-growing legumes;5 - non-forage plants. Relative grass and legume contribution, as well as that of their growth habit (winter/summer) to species richness, were calculated.

Since the eucalyptus materials were planted in different places and at different times, it was not possible to make comparisons between them. T-test for unpaired, unilateral and independent samples was performed to investigate the effect of spacing on the assessed variables in the same genetic material. F-test was used to assess whether the recorded means derived from treatments with equal or different variances; it was done to test the equality-of-variances hypothesis (Ho:σ1 22 2), based on BHERING & TEODORO (2021BHERING, L. L.; TEODORO, P. E. Estatística experimental no Rbio.Curitiba: Brasil, 2021. 477p.).

Normality of residuals was assessed through Shapiro-Wilk test; effect size was measured based on Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient (r), which, in its turn, was calculated based on Rosenthal’s conversion and assessed based on Cohen scale, according to FIELD (2009FIELD, A. Descobrindo a estatística usando o SPSS. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2009.680p.).The amount of variation explained by spacing was measured through Coefficient of Determination (R2).

RESULTS:

Tree growth, yield and biomass composition under trees’ canopy

Preliminary data analysis has indicated that all variables showed normality of residuals.Hypothesis Ho: σ1 22 2was rejected for variables shading (S%) and LA in both genetic materials, as well as for variable DDM in E. grandis - t value associated with these data was calculated for groups showing different variances.

Based on the assessment of spacing effect on E. dunnii (Table 1), differences observed in means recorded for BS% (t (3) = -1.1; P = 0.15) and H (t (3) =4.7; P = 0.12) were not significant, whereas the other variables have evidenced strong spacing effect (r > 0.5) capable of explaining from 80% to 97% of the observed variation.

Table 1
Mean values recorded for variables, such as shading (S%), bare soil (BS%) litter accumulation (LA), Green cover (GC%), Green forage dry matter (GDM), Dead forage dry matter (DDM), Total forage dry matter(TDM), diameter at breast height (DBH), height (H) and volume per hectare, based on the genetic material and spacing adopted for silvopastoral systems investigated in Bagé County (RS).

Spacing of 8 m x 2 m recorded the highest mean values for the variables shading (t(5)=9.9; P < 0.001, r=0.97; R2=0.95), litter accumulation in the soil (t(10)=6.3; P < 0.001, r=0.89; R2=0.80) and wood volume per hectare (t(4)=9.7; P < 0.0003, r=0.97; R2=0.96). Conversely ,the lowest values were recorded for green cover (t(10) =-10.9; P < 0.001, r=0.96; R2=0.92), dry matter production (GDM - t(10)=-6.9; P < 0.001, r=0.91; R2=0.83; TDM - t(10)= -6.7; P < 0.001, r=0.91;R2=0.82 ) and DBH (t(3) = -2.8; P=0.03, r=0.85; R2=0.72).

Evaluated spacings to E. grandis recorded significant differences for S% (t(16)= 2.3; P = 0.01; r= 0.49, R2= 0.24), BS% (t(19) = -1.8; P = 0.04, r= 0.38; R2 = 0.14 ) and tree volume per hectare (t(4)= 2.4; P = 0.03, r= 0.77; R2 = 0.59).

Natural grassland composition and biodiversity

The floristic composition comprised 54 species and 3 genera distributed in 14 families.Poaceae, Asteraceae and Ciperaceae were the most representative families. Natural grassland vegetation richness and similarity between spacing dimensions were higher in TRUs planted with E. grandis trees, which presented 16 species (ranging from 8 to 21), on average, and SI = 0.59 (Table 2).

Table 2
Mean values recorded for variables, such as Grass rate (G%), legumes rate (L%), winter-growing species rate (WGS%), summer-growing species rate (SGS%), species richness (SN) and Sorensen Index (SI), based on the genetic material and spacing adopted for silvopastoral systems investigated in Bagé County (RS).

There was statistically significant difference in natural grassland composition only among spacingsevaluated to E. dunnii; the smallest spacing between tree rows has shown reduced species richness and diversity. The use of 625 trees per hectare led to reduced species richness (t(10)= -8.6; P < 0.001, r= 0.93; R2 = 0.88), grass rate (t(10) =-3.6; P < 0.001, r = 0.77; R2 = 0.57), legume rate (t(10) = -3.3 , P = 0.0004, r = 0.75; R2 = 0,57), winter-growing species (t(10) = -4.0;P = 0.001, r = 0.78; R2 = 0.51) and summer-growing species (t(10) = -2.5; P = 0.001, r = 0.61; R2 = 0.38).

Live vegetation cover in this spacing ranged from 0.33% to 8.3%; mean value recorded for this parameter reached 1.3% due to large litter accumulation in the soil - 8,5 tons per hectare (Figure 1A and Table 1).Elephantopusmollis (Rf =18.1%), Hypoxis decumbens( Rf =18.2%) and Sidarhombifolia ( Rf = 17.7%) were the most frequent species.

Figure 1
Detail of samples collected in silvopastoral systems and in full-sun field area (C, F), as well as in silvopastoral system planted with E.dunnii at 8 m x 2 m (A) and 16 m x 2 m (B) and with E. grandis at 16 m x 2 m (D) and 24 m x 2 m (E) spacing dimensions.

Bromus auleticus, commonly reported in natives forest edge areas, Piptochaetium montevidense, commonly found in quite poor grasslands undergoing degradation process, and Piptochaetium stipoides were observed among winter-growing grass species. Conversely, Paspalum urvillei, Axonopus affinis and Desmodium incanum, summer-growing leguminous plant also found in shrubby fields, “capoeiras” and in the edges of natural forests (NABINGER & DALL’AGNOL, 2019NABINGER, C.; DALL’AGNOL, M. Guia para reconhecimento de espécies dos campos sulinos. Brasília: Ibama, 2019, 132 p.) were observed among summer-growing species.

Live vegetation cover increased after tree density was reduced to 312 trees per hectare; it ranged from 36.7% to 59.3%, and mean uncovered soil value reached 3.2%.Desmodium incanum (Rf = 18.2%), Paspalum notatum (Rf = 15.1) and Dichondra macrocalyx (Rf = 12.1) were the species mostly observed at this tree density.

Larger number of forage species was observed in areas planted with summer-growing cespitose grass species, such as Chizachyrium tenerum, Setaria parviflora, Axonopus argentinus; as well as summer-growing prostrate grass species, such as Axonopus affinis, Stipa filiculmes, Piptochaetium stipoides, Paspalum lepton and Melica sarmentosa;summer-growing grass species, such as Piptochaetium montevidense;Chascolytrum subaristatum , Vulpiaaustralis; as well as summer-growing legume species, such as Desmodium incanum, and winter-growing legume species, such as Trifolium polymorphum. Only 5 species were often observed in the investigated phytophysiognomies, on average; 13 species were only found in the widest spacing; consequently, there was lower similarity between vegetation types.

Lower shading was observed in the spacing dimensions adopted for E. grandis (Table 1), and it led to little change in the floristic composition of the field between the two assessed spacing.There was larger number of species common to the investigated phytophysiognomies (15, on average; they ranged from 12 to 19 species) than the number of exclusive species (10, on average; they ranged from 5 to 13 species), and it resulted in greater floristic similarity.

Paspalum notatum (Rf =17.7%) and Mnesithea selloana (Rf = 12.8) were the most frequent forage grass species.Piptochaetium montevidense recorded the highest frequency (Rf =12.8%) in tree-planting rows, a fact that indicated its high tolerance to shading.

DISCUSSION:

Results have shown that eucalyptus tree planting affected herbaceous extract production and biodiversity in natural grasslands; this finding corroborated studies conducted by NORDENSTAHL et al.(2011NORDENSTAHL, M. et al. Forage production in natural and afforested grasslandsof the Pampas: ecological complementarity and management opportunities. Agroforest Systems, v.83, p.201-211. 2011 Available from: <Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-011-9383-6 >. Accessed: Nov. 20, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10457-011-9383-6.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.100...
), FEDRIGO et al. (2019FEDRIGO, J. K. Dynamics of forage mass, air temperature and animal performance in a silvopastoral system of Uruguay. Agroforest Systems, v.93, p.2197:2204, 2019. Available from: <Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-018-0335-2 >. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10457-018-0335-2(0123456789().,-volV()0123456789().,-volV).
https://link.springer.com/article/10.100...
) and SCHINATO et al.(2023)SCHINATO, F. et al. Microclimate, forage production and carbon storage in a eucalypt-based silvopastoral system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v.344, p.2023. 2023 Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092200439X >. Accessed: Nov. 18, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108290.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...
.The bidirectional behavior of interactions mentioned by VARELA et al.(2019VARELA, F. Modelo de simulacion forestal y ganadero-SINFORGAN. In: Instituto Nacional de Investigacion Agropecuária. Producción Ganadera y forestal: análisis de sistema de producción integrados. Montevideo: INIA, p.131-142. 2019.), according to which, favoring one variable can decrease the development of another, was observed. In other words, increased tree density has favored wood production; on the other hand, it has reduced pasture supply for animals.

Green cover and green dry matter production at tree density of 625 trees ha-1 were 97% and 92.9% lower than values recorded for the full-sun area.These indicators improved when tree density dropped to 312 trees ha-1 (48.8% and 50.9%, respectively).

With respect to E. grandis, mean reduction recorded for GC and GDM reached 60.8% and 42.9%, respectively. These values can be considered high in comparison to those recorded by SCHINATO et al.(2023)SCHINATO, F. et al. Microclimate, forage production and carbon storage in a eucalypt-based silvopastoral system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v.344, p.2023. 2023 Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092200439X >. Accessed: Nov. 18, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108290.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...
, who observed reduction by 20% when they compared dry matter produced in a full-sun area to that of a silvopastoral system planted with E. grandis at 18-meter spacing between rows (427 trees ha-1), innatural grassland, in the Uruguayan Pampa.However, unlike the current study, the aforementioned authors only took into consideration pasture dry matter in the central region between tree rows and disregarded the region under the canopy.

Conversely, NORDENSTAHL et al. (2011NORDENSTAHL, M. et al. Forage production in natural and afforested grasslandsof the Pampas: ecological complementarity and management opportunities. Agroforest Systems, v.83, p.201-211. 2011 Available from: <Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-011-9383-6 >. Accessed: Nov. 20, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10457-011-9383-6.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.100...
) observed reduction by 52.6% in TDM, on average,compared 25-year-old Populus deltoids plantations at tree densities of 625 and 1,111 trees ha-1 to full-sun areas of prevalent Argentine Pampanatural grassland. The fact that this species loses all its leaves in winter may explain the smaller reduction in forage supply.

It is worth emphasizing that the herein collected data reflect reductions in dry matter production in summer, which is the season when most forage production takes place. Production losses may be even higher in winter, as pinpointed by SCHINATO et al.(2023)SCHINATO, F. et al. Microclimate, forage production and carbon storage in a eucalypt-based silvopastoral system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v.344, p.2023. 2023 Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092200439X >. Accessed: Nov. 18, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108290.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...
, and it can be critical for the system, since low primary yield during winter often sets the limit for animal-carrying capacity in Pampa grasslands (NORDENSTAHL et al., 2011NORDENSTAHL, M. et al. Forage production in natural and afforested grasslandsof the Pampas: ecological complementarity and management opportunities. Agroforest Systems, v.83, p.201-211. 2011 Available from: <Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-011-9383-6 >. Accessed: Nov. 20, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10457-011-9383-6.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.100...
).

Shading and litter accumulation at tree density of 625 trees ha-1 can be associated with reduced number of species and herbaceous extract dry matter production. Shading, which ranged from 46.4% to 96.1%, can be considered excessive to maintain forage species growth in all spacing evaluated, since shading levels higher than 40% can affect the growth of most tropical grass species(PACIULLO et al., 2007PACIULLO, D. S. C. et al. Morphophysiology and nutritive value of signal grass under natural shading and full sunlight. Pesquisa AgropecuáriaBrasileira, v.42, p.573-579, 2007. Available from: <Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/pab/a/hCpktSmgfnRqZ36F7xX7Jhj/?lang=pt#:~:text=decumbens%2C%20em%20condi%C3%A7%C3%B5es%20de%20pleno,)%2C%20durante%20o%20segundo%20ano >. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2023. doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2007000400016 .
https://www.scielo.br/j/pab/a/hCpktSmgfn...
), whereas maximum shading level at 50% can be applied as parameter for using winter-growing species in silvopastoral systems (VARELA et al., 2008VARELA, A. C. et al. Recomendações para a escolha e manejo de plantas forrageiras em sistemas silvipastoris no Sul do Brasil. Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul , 2008, 26p.).

Litter accumulation was strongly associated with E. dunnii tree density.The accumulation difference between the smallest (625 trees ha-1) and the largest (312 trees ha-1) spacing was 5, 2 tons ha-1.Decrease in litter accumulated on the soil was followed by increase in green cover and dry matter production in the herbaceous stratum.

In total, 99.4% biomass under the ground was composed of litter at the density of 625 trees ha-1; however, this rate dropped to 82.6% when tree density was reduced by 50% (312 trees ha-1), and it increased TDM rate from 0.6% to 17.4% (i.e., increase by 191.5 kg ha-1). This factor explains thelow uncovered soil rate, despite the low soil cover by herbaceous extract species, observed for E. dunni in the smallest spacing.

Litter accumulation on the soil in eucalyptus plantations is often high and takes place due to low decomposition rates resulting from low nutritional quality, mainly with respect to nutrients such as Nitrogen and Phosphorus (PINTO et al., 2016PINTO, H. C. A. Leaf litter decomposition in native forest plantation of Pterogynenitens and Eucalyptus urophylla in southwestern bahia. CiênciaFlorestal, v.26, n.4, p.1141-1153, 2016, Available from: <Available from: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/25105 >. Accessed: Feb. 26, 2023. doi: 10.5902/1980509825105.
https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflores...
). However, non-excessive litter accumulation can contribute to the nutrient cycle, increase organic matter contents in the soil and protect vulnerable areas from water and wind erosion events (BRUN et al., 2013BRUN, E. J. , et al.Litter accumulation and dendrometric variables relations in a hibrid stand of Eucalyptus urophylla x E. globulusmaidenii, in Eldorado do Sul/RS/BRASIL. Revista Ecologia e Nutrição Florestal, v.1, n.1, p.24-31, 2013 Available from: <Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270481212 >. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2023. doi: 10.13086/2316-980x.v01n01a03.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication...
).

Significant changes in natural grassland composition were observed at 625 trees ha-1, namely: smaller number of species, as well as prevalence of shade-tolerant and winter-growing species found in areas bordering the forests, shrubby fields and fields undergoing degradation process.However, no significant increase in the number of winter-growing plants wasobserved, based on spacing and shading levels. On the other hand, CLAVIJO et al.(2005CLAVIJO, M. P. et al. Poplar afforestation effects on grassland structure and composition in the Flooding Pampas. Rangeland ecology & management, v.58, p.474-479, 2005 Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1550742405500757 >. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2023. doi: 10.2111/1551-5028(2005)58[474:PAEOGS]2.0.CO;2.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...
), BERNARDI et al.(2016BERNARDI, R. E. Trees improve forage quality and abundance in South American subtropical grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v.232, 2016, p.227-231 Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880916303978 >. Accessed: Nov. 20, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.003.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...
) and NORDENSTAHL et al.(2011NORDENSTAHL, M. et al. Forage production in natural and afforested grasslandsof the Pampas: ecological complementarity and management opportunities. Agroforest Systems, v.83, p.201-211. 2011 Available from: <Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-011-9383-6 >. Accessed: Nov. 20, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10457-011-9383-6.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.100...
) investigated the effect of afforestation on natural grasslands in the Uruguayan and Argentinean Pampas and reported that shading has favored the growth of C3-metabolism plants.

Although, the grassland produced less dry matter than FSA at tree density ranging from 204 to 312 trees ha-1, it proved to be rich in species and capable of maintaining significant number of grass and legume species of forage value. The non-observation of significant differences in dry matter production and species composition in the herbaceous extract between the two aforementioned spacingsindicate that up to 85 months of planting, for this planting arrangement, at the evaluated age, there was little influence of trees from 16 meters of distance between tree lines.

Increase in spacing dimension had significant effect on forest yield, which is directly linked to the number of trees per hectare; however, trees grown in systems featured by lower tree density are expected to show greater diameter growth and individual volume due to less competition for production factors, such as nutrients, water and light (RIBEIRO et al., 2020RIBEIRO, Y. S. et al. Silvicultural performance on silvopastoral system of Eucalyptus urograndis Clone H13 at different densities after 12 years of planting. Uniciências, v.24, n.1, p.45-50, 2020. Available from: <Available from: https://seer.pgsskroton.com/index.php/uniciencias/article/view/9039 >. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2023. doi: 10.17921/1415-5141.2020v24n1p45-50.
https://seer.pgsskroton.com/index.php/un...
).

The non-significance between mean DBH and H recorded for E. grandis has indicated that, up to the assessed age, competition in the planting row (which has the same spacing between treatments - 2 m) had greater influence on competition between treesthan spacing between rows.The same finding was not observed for the spacing applied to E. dunnii, and it indicated that the 8-m distance has influenced growth and reduced individual growth.

Therefore, if one makes the option for densities close to 208 or 312 trees ha-1, one should take into account that even if there is no significant difference in dry matter production in the herbaceous stratum, in species richness and in forage species incidence, there will be difference in the area occupiedby the forestry component (in this case, 8.3% and 12.5%, respectively); consequently, it will result in lower wood volume production.This reduction in forest yield can be offset by increase in grazing area and stocking rate, depending on producers’ goals.

Results have also indicated that, in order to reconcile forest and animal production to the preservation of natural grassland species throughout the forestry component cycle, it is necessary to continuously monitor the field and to apply silvicultural treatments, such as thinning and pruning, to enable light to enter the system; to adopt natural grassland management and improvement techniques, such as planting winter-growing species, fertilization and forage supply control, as well as low grazing intensities. These findings corroborated some recommendations by LUCAS et al. (2015LUCAS, M. A. K. et al. Sistema silvipastoril na Região da Campanha do Rio Grande do Sul. Embrapa Pecuária Sul: Bagé, 2015, 23p.).

CONCLUSION:

Tree density was highly correlated to forest and forage production, as well as to natural grassland composition and diversity.Higher tree density promoted increase in forest yield; however, it reduced green cover, herbaceous extract dry matter production and species richness, mainly in grass and legume species with higher forage potential. It is possible combining forest and animal production to natural grassland species preservation at low tree densities. Tree densities ranging from 204 to 312 trees ha-1 were the most suitable for this purpose. It is so because;although,the field was less productive than the full-sun pasture, it remained diverse due to the maintenance of a significant number of grass and legume species of forage value.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are grateful to the Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, and the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES), Brasil - Finance code 001 for the financial support provided for the development of the current study.

REFERENCES

  • BERNARDI, R. E. Trees improve forage quality and abundance in South American subtropical grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v.232, 2016, p.227-231 Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880916303978 >. Accessed: Nov. 20, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.003.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.08.003.» https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880916303978
  • BHERING, L. L.; TEODORO, P. E. Estatística experimental no Rbio.Curitiba: Brasil, 2021. 477p.
  • BOLDRINI, I. I. et al. Bioma Pampa: diversidade florística e fisionômica. Porto Alegre, editora Pallotti, 2010. 64 p.
  • BRUN, E. J. , et al.Litter accumulation and dendrometric variables relations in a hibrid stand of Eucalyptus urophylla x E. globulusmaidenii, in Eldorado do Sul/RS/BRASIL. Revista Ecologia e Nutrição Florestal, v.1, n.1, p.24-31, 2013 Available from: <Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270481212 >. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2023. doi: 10.13086/2316-980x.v01n01a03.
    » https://doi.org/10.13086/2316-980x.v01n01a03.» https://www.researchgate.net/publication/270481212
  • CLAVIJO, M. P. et al. Poplar afforestation effects on grassland structure and composition in the Flooding Pampas. Rangeland ecology & management, v.58, p.474-479, 2005 Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1550742405500757 >. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2023. doi: 10.2111/1551-5028(2005)58[474:PAEOGS]2.0.CO;2.
    » https://doi.org/10.2111/1551-5028(2005)58[474:PAEOGS]2.0.CO;2.» https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1550742405500757
  • FEDRIGO, J. K. Dynamics of forage mass, air temperature and animal performance in a silvopastoral system of Uruguay. Agroforest Systems, v.93, p.2197:2204, 2019. Available from: <Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-018-0335-2 >. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10457-018-0335-2(0123456789().,-volV()0123456789().,-volV).
    » https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-018-0335-2(0123456789().,-volV()0123456789().,-volV).» https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-018-0335-2
  • FIELD, A. Descobrindo a estatística usando o SPSS. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2009.680p.
  • IBGE. Cidades e estados. Available from: <Available from: https://www.ibge.gov.br/cidades-e-estados.html >. Accessed: Sept. 01, 2020.
    » https://www.ibge.gov.br/cidades-e-estados.html
  • LAMPERT, V. N. et al. Modelagem produtiva e econômica de diferentes níveis de intensificação na produção de bovinos de corte de ciclo completo para o Rio grande do Sul. X Jornada Nespro e II Simpósio Internacional sobre sistemas de produção de bovinos de corte. Anais.... Porto Alegre: NESPRO, 2015.
  • LUCAS, M. A. K. et al. Sistema silvipastoril na Região da Campanha do Rio Grande do Sul. Embrapa Pecuária Sul: Bagé, 2015, 23p.
  • MACEDO, W.Levantamento de reconhecimento dos solos do município de Bagé RS. Bagé, EMBRAPA-UEPAE de Bagé. Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul, 1984. 69 p.
  • MACHADO, F. P. Contribuição ao estudo do clima no Rio Grande do Sul. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE,1950, 91p.
  • MALAFAIA, G. C. et al. Sistema e custo de produção de gado de corte no estado do Rio Grande do Sul - bioma Pampa - 2012. Campo Grande: Embrapa Gado de Corte, 2014. 7 p.
  • NABINGER, C.; DALL’AGNOL, M. Guia para reconhecimento de espécies dos campos sulinos. Brasília: Ibama, 2019, 132 p.
  • NORDENSTAHL, M. et al. Forage production in natural and afforested grasslandsof the Pampas: ecological complementarity and management opportunities. Agroforest Systems, v.83, p.201-211. 2011 Available from: <Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-011-9383-6 >. Accessed: Nov. 20, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10457-011-9383-6.
    » https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10457-011-9383-6
  • OLIVEIRA, J. C. P. Revisão sobre o ambiente e a produção agropecuária no bioma Pampa do Brasil. Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul, 2021. 41p.
  • PACIULLO, D. S. C. et al. Morphophysiology and nutritive value of signal grass under natural shading and full sunlight. Pesquisa AgropecuáriaBrasileira, v.42, p.573-579, 2007. Available from: <Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/pab/a/hCpktSmgfnRqZ36F7xX7Jhj/?lang=pt#:~:text=decumbens%2C%20em%20condi%C3%A7%C3%B5es%20de%20pleno,)%2C%20durante%20o%20segundo%20ano >. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2023. doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2007000400016 .
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2007000400016 .» https://www.scielo.br/j/pab/a/hCpktSmgfnRqZ36F7xX7Jhj/?lang=pt#:~:text=decumbens%2C%20em%20condi%C3%A7%C3%B5es%20de%20pleno,)%2C%20durante%20o%20segundo%20ano
  • PACIULLO, D. S. C. et al. Productive and nutritional traits of pasture in an agrosilvopastoral system, according to the distance from trees. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, v.46, n.10, p.1176-1183, 2011. Available from: <Available from: https://www.scielo.br/j/pab/a/hCpktSmgfnRqZ36F7xX7Jhj/?lang=pt#:~:text=decumbens%2C%20em%20condi%C3%A7%C3%B5es%20de%20pleno,)%2C%20durante%20o%20segundo%20ano >. Accessed: May, 21, 2018. doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2011001000009.
    » https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2011001000009.» https://www.scielo.br/j/pab/a/hCpktSmgfnRqZ36F7xX7Jhj/?lang=pt#:~:text=decumbens%2C%20em%20condi%C3%A7%C3%B5es%20de%20pleno,)%2C%20durante%20o%20segundo%20ano
  • PINTO, H. C. A. Leaf litter decomposition in native forest plantation of Pterogynenitens and Eucalyptus urophylla in southwestern bahia. CiênciaFlorestal, v.26, n.4, p.1141-1153, 2016, Available from: <Available from: https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/25105 >. Accessed: Feb. 26, 2023. doi: 10.5902/1980509825105.
    » https://doi.org/10.5902/1980509825105.» https://periodicos.ufsm.br/cienciaflorestal/article/view/25105
  • RIBEIRO, Y. S. et al. Silvicultural performance on silvopastoral system of Eucalyptus urograndis Clone H13 at different densities after 12 years of planting. Uniciências, v.24, n.1, p.45-50, 2020. Available from: <Available from: https://seer.pgsskroton.com/index.php/uniciencias/article/view/9039 >. Accessed: Feb. 27, 2023. doi: 10.17921/1415-5141.2020v24n1p45-50.
    » https://doi.org/10.17921/1415-5141.2020v24n1p45-50.» https://seer.pgsskroton.com/index.php/uniciencias/article/view/9039
  • SCHINATO, F. et al. Microclimate, forage production and carbon storage in a eucalypt-based silvopastoral system. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, v.344, p.2023. 2023 Available from: <Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092200439X >. Accessed: Nov. 18, 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108290.
    » https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2022.108290.» https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016788092200439X
  • TONINI, H.et al. Desempenho e potencial econômico para o eucalipto em sistemas silvipastoris em Bagé-RS. Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul , 2020. 43p.
  • VARELA, A. C. et al. Recomendações para a escolha e manejo de plantas forrageiras em sistemas silvipastoris no Sul do Brasil. Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul , 2008, 26p.
  • VARELA, F. Modelo de simulacion forestal y ganadero-SINFORGAN. In: Instituto Nacional de Investigacion Agropecuária. Producción Ganadera y forestal: análisis de sistema de producción integrados. Montevideo: INIA, p.131-142. 2019.
  • VOLK, L, B. S.; TRINDADE, J. P. Princípios técnicos de manejo de sistemas pecuários para maior disponibilidade de agua no solo. Bagé: Embrapa Pecuária Sul , 2020, 27p.
  • CR-2023-0308.R1

Edited by

Editors: Leandro Souza da Silva (0000-0002-1636-6643)
Denise Baptaglin Montagner (0000-0003-2688-8063)

Publication Dates

  • Publication in this collection
    08 Apr 2024
  • Date of issue
    2024

History

  • Received
    06 July 2023
  • Accepted
    05 Nov 2023
  • Reviewed
    02 Jan 2024
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Centro de Ciências Rurais , 97105-900 Santa Maria RS Brazil , Tel.: +55 55 3220-8698 , Fax: +55 55 3220-8695 - Santa Maria - RS - Brazil
E-mail: cienciarural@mail.ufsm.br