Comparison of different household food security assessment methods in the rural area of a Brazilian city * * This work was conducted during a scholarship supported by the Foundation for Research of the State of Minas Gerais (Fapemig). Financed by Fundação Arthur Bernardes (Funarbe), the Foundation off Support for the Federal University of Viçosa.

Comparação dos diferentes métodos de avaliação da segurança alimentar e nutricional domiciliar na zona rural de uma cidade brasileira

Comparación de los diferentes métodos de evaluación de la seguridad alimentaria y nutricional domiciliar en el área rural de una ciudad brasileña

Luiza Veloso Dutra Dayane de Castro Morais Ricardo Henrique Silva Santos Sylvia do Carmo Castro Franceschini Silvia Eloiza Priore About the authors


Aim:To evaluate and compare household food security situations in the rural area of a Brazilian city by three different methods: Availability of food energy at home, nutritional status and Perception of food insecurity. Methods: Cross-sectional study of 79 families living in 19 rural communities in a small city in Minas Gerais, Brazil, including a total of 272 residents. Families were selected by drawing lots, respecting the proportionality of families per community. The inclusion criteria included living in rural areas, inhabiting a selected household, and using food products available for consumption, by purchase and production. During family visits, nutritional status was analyzed by anthropometry, the perception of food insecurity by Food Insecurity Scale (EBIA) and availability of food energy at household for 30 days. Results: Of the 79 families of family farmers, 12.7% were considered to be unsafe for availability of food energy at household, 24.0% due to the presence of low weight at the household and 49.5% by EBIA. There was a low correlation among the methods, with differences between them (Kendall W 0.162 p <0.001). Food insecurity was associated to the presence of at least one individual aged less than 18 years old in the household. Food security classified according to EBIA was associated with an increase in the number of people living in the household, the production of vegetables and fruits. Conclusions: No single indicator can cover several dimensions of food security. Food Security involves a broad and multifaceted approach; therefore, its thorough evaluation requires different classification methods.

Key words
Food security; Food availability; Family farming; Anthropometry; Perception of food insecurity

Associação Brasileira de Estudos Populacionais Rua André Cavalcanti, 106, sala 502., CEP 20231-050 Rio de Janeiro - RJ - Brasil, Fone: 55 31 3409 7166 - São Paulo - SP - Brazil